Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Coaches aren't the only ones moving

12 views
Skip to first unread message

JGibson

unread,
May 18, 2013, 10:37:11 AM5/18/13
to

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-usc-ucla-recruit-20130518,0,725550.story

(a story about neuroscience professors switching from UCLA to U$C).

michael anderson

unread,
May 18, 2013, 12:11:58 PM5/18/13
to
On Saturday, May 18, 2013 9:37:11 AM UTC-5, JGibson wrote:
> http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-usc-ucla-recruit-20130518,0,725550.story
>
>
>
> (a story about neuroscience professors switching from UCLA to U$C).

"No one would say whether raises were involved; according to a UC website, Toga earned $1.06 million".....

nice

Futbol Phan

unread,
May 18, 2013, 4:46:08 PM5/18/13
to
On May 18, 11:11 am, michael anderson <mianderso...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Saturday, May 18, 2013 9:37:11 AM UTC-5, JGibson wrote:
> >http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-usc-ucla-recruit-20130518,0,7...
>
> > (a story about neuroscience professors switching from UCLA to U$C).
>
> "No one would say whether raises were involved; according to a UC website, Toga earned $1.06 million".....
>
> nice

And these world-class scientists still make less than an SEC line
coach.

Michael Press

unread,
May 18, 2013, 5:40:24 PM5/18/13
to
In article <700130d8-c81b-421a...@googlegroups.com>,
JGibson <james.m...@gmail.com> wrote:

> http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-usc-ucla-recruit-20130518,0,725550.story
>
> (a story about neuroscience professors switching from UCLA to U$C).

Who did UCLA get in the trade?

---

"In a secretive, hastily arranged meeting last week..."

"Secret" is better here. "Secretive" implies not frank or open.
Those kinds of meetings are necessarily secret,
but people are open about acknowledging that. Also "secretive"
has always been used to describe a person's disposition.

--
Michael Press

michael anderson

unread,
May 18, 2013, 6:31:04 PM5/18/13
to
what I meant was that this proves that as a phd scientist you *can* make good money in academia. Now I have a specific example for the guy who thinks he is brilliant and a great success and yet only makes 110 because "nobody makes money in academia"...
0 new messages