No dirty play, says Pelini
Sean S
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=3627153
Sean
--
There is an old saying that if a million monkeys
typed on a million keyboards for a million years,
eventually all the works of Shakespeare would be produced.
Now, thanks to Usenet, we know this is not true.
Dan Bretta
> maybe they shoulda tried some.
> http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=3627153
>
game....interesting considering the teams come out of tunnels on
opposite ends of the field and never come close to each other during
pregame workouts...if a Nebraska player spat on him it would have been
witnessed by at least 30-40,000 fans who show up early enough to watch
workouts...I'm certain there were cameras trained on Heisman candidate
Daniel at every freaking second he was on that field.
Beating us by a bajillion points isn't enough for him so he's got to
make up crap like this?? Bo Pelini has called Gary Pinkel to ask
which player it was...If Chase Daniel is not willing to name names
then he's a pathetic liar.
Dan
Ike
It's not like he swung a helmet at him or something-
--
Yrs.,
Ike
********************************************************
"Someday they’ll name a town after him and call it Joe, Pa."
********************************************************
J.C. Watts Enslin
YSB. AYB?
Jon
Dan Bretta
Dan
Chris Bellomy
He's a softie from Southlake who wouldn't stay on the field
if the system weren't built to compensate for his lack of
talent. I'm surprised he didn't end up at Tech.
cb
Dan Bretta
Dan (schadenfreude: It's what's for breakfast)
Glen Heiman
"Dan Bretta" <nud...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ca685225-6ad5-4d6c...@v15g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
-------------------------------------------
What a piece of shit. IMHO, his status just took a huge drop. Why is he so
pissed off at the Huskers? Maybe they didn't pamper his ass and recruit him
properly, or at all.
I wonder how Warren Buffett feels about this?
Heiman
Dan
Glen Heiman
"Sean S" <seans_efn_dotorg> wrote in message
news:Xns9B2E86C2AB...@216.196.97.131...
Ethics in sport's jounalism is a problem here. ESPN seems to be anxious to
jump all over this story, and yet, it seems all they have is one person's
word.
Heiman
J.C. Watts Enslin
> "Sean S" <seans_efn_dotorg> wrote in message
>
> news:Xns9B2E86C2AB...@216.196.97.131...
>
> > maybe they shoulda tried some.
> > http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=3627153
>
> Ethics in sport's jounalism is a problem here. ESPN seems to be anxious to
> jump all over this story, and yet, it seems all they have is one person's
> word.
ESPN didn't say someone spat on Daniel. ESPN is quoting Daniel saying
someone spat on him. There is a difference.
Jon
The Cheesehusker, Trade Warrior
I think this is about the assraping Mizzou put down on the 'skerz and
Daniels annoyance that we didn't douche first?
J.C. Watts Enslin
Yeah that's pretty much how I see it. Herbie's been using his big ole
cob on the non-Sooner Big 8 schools for years. He's not used to being
on the receiving end.
Jon
Glen Heiman
"J.C. Watts Enslin" <jen...@charter.net> wrote in message
news:d4d90483-00fb-4b73...@26g2000hsk.googlegroups.com...
-----------------------------------------
Thanks, but I didn't need you to repeat my post.
There is a difference.
--------------------
No kidding. Why would you infer otherwise? Thank you Rich Hammett!
Heiman
Jon
J.C. Watts Enslin
> "J.C. Watts Enslin" <jens...@charter.net> wrote in messagenews:d4d90483-00fb-4b73...@26g2000hsk.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 6, 12:24 am, "Glen Heiman" <dak...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> > "Sean S" <seans_efn_dotorg> wrote in message
>
> >news:Xns9B2E86C2AB...@216.196.97.131...
>
> > > maybe they shoulda tried some.
> > >http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=3627153
>
> > Ethics in sport's jounalism is a problem here. ESPN seems to be anxious to
> > jump all over this story, and yet, it seems all they have is one person's
> > word.
>
> ESPN didn't say someone spat on Daniel. ESPN is quoting Daniel saying
> someone spat on him.
> -----------------------------------------
> Thanks, but I didn't need you to repeat my post.
>
> There is a difference.
> --------------------
> No kidding. Why would you infer otherwise?
I am sorry. I didn't think I needed to connect the dots because you
supposedly have progressed beyond the 3rd grade.
They are not making up or embellishing a story. They are simply
reporting what was said. Therefore, there is no problem with "ethics
in sports journalism."
Jon
Dan Bretta
picking his nose and then....well doing the unthinkable.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEW8_KVhDFE
Dan
stephenj
> maybe they shoulda tried some.
> http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=3627153
>
> Sean
i can see why BP would rather discuss 'dirty plays' than the abysmal
play of his huskers team saturday night.
--
"if federal judges have the final word over its meaning,
the Constitution would be a mere thing of wax in the hands
of the judiciary, which they may twist and shape into any form
they please".
- Thomas Jefferson
Dan Bretta
> Sean S wrote:
> > maybe they shoulda tried some.
> > http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=3627153
>
> > Sean
>
> i can see why BP would rather discuss 'dirty plays' than the abysmal
> play of his huskers team saturday night.
>
Dan
Glen Heiman
On Oct 6, 8:18 am, "Glen Heiman" <dak...@cox.net> wrote:
> "J.C. Watts Enslin" <jens...@charter.net> wrote in
> messagenews:d4d90483-00fb-4b73...@26g2000hsk.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 6, 12:24 am, "Glen Heiman" <dak...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> > "Sean S" <seans_efn_dotorg> wrote in message
>
> >news:Xns9B2E86C2AB...@216.196.97.131...
>
> > > maybe they shoulda tried some.
> > >http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=3627153
>
> > Ethics in sport's jounalism is a problem here. ESPN seems to be anxious
> > to
> > jump all over this story, and yet, it seems all they have is one
> > person's
> > word.
>
> ESPN didn't say someone spat on Daniel. ESPN is quoting Daniel saying
> someone spat on him.
> -----------------------------------------
> Thanks, but I didn't need you to repeat my post.
>
> There is a difference.
> --------------------
> No kidding. Why would you infer otherwise?
I am sorry. I didn't think I needed to connect the dots because you
supposedly have progressed beyond the 3rd grade.
---------------------------------
They are not making up or embellishing a story. They are simply
reporting what was said. Therefore, there is no problem with "ethics
in sports journalism."
---------------------------------------------------------
Like I said, there is no ethics. No collaboration, no verification and no
reason to spread a rumor. That is not journalism IMHO!
Thanks to ESPN, the Huskers are guilty/smeared until proven innocent which
is next to impossible as no suspect has been named. Daniel has exposed
himself as a piece of shit.
Heiman
Jon
J.C. Watts Enslin
> "J.C. Watts Enslin" <jens...@charter.net> wrote in messagenews:e7ef4f85-fad6-46c3...@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
HE QUOTED HIM!!!!
What...you are not allowed to *quote* someone unless you can verify
what he said is true???
You really are a moron.
Jon
jimbr...@yahoo.com
This is one of the major problems I have with our current political
system. One side says something outrageous, the news repeats the
comment to the other side and asks them to respond like it was already
fact. Instead they could find out if what was said first had a basis
in fact, before giving it credence by asking for a response.
jimbr...@yahoo.com
Well what else was he going to do with it.
J.C. Watts Enslin
But that isn't quite what happened here. He was quoted at a press
conference. What was the press supposed to do? Thoroughly review the
game tapes before they published the quote?
This is just silly.
Jon