*
Ed
*
Adam Xavier
news:MPG.25b07d3c6...@news.knology.net...
>
>
> *
Oh, STFU with the *.
Bama won, fair and square. Maybe they won ugly, but there was nothing cheap,
dirty or illegal about how they did it.
Ron
wrote:
The bottom line is, they didn't beat a team with their best player,
playing.
Considering how well Texas' defence played, there is no doubt in my
mind that Bama would have lost the game.
Adam Xavier
"Ron" <BigEL...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:e95ce065-fdbc-4eb8...@m25g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
> On Jan 8, 12:34 am, "Adam Xavier" <ad...@dontbothernobodyshome.com>
> wrote:
>> "Ed" <G...@Away.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:MPG.25b07d3c6...@news.knology.net...
>>
>>
>>
>> > *
>>
>> Oh, STFU with the *.
>>
>> Bama won, fair and square. Maybe they won ugly, but there was nothing
>> cheap,
>> dirty or illegal about how they did it.
>
> The bottom line is, they didn't beat a team with their best player,
> playing.
Fine, but you can't * the win. Hitting the other QB is part of the game.
> Considering how well Texas' defence played, there is no doubt in my
> mind that Bama would have lost the game.
Maybe. It seems that way. But it's not worthy of an *. Now if it comes out
that 'Bama was involved in a scandal or cheated in some way, fine.
Tom Brady was injured in SB XXXXII, do we * the Giants because Brady wasn't
100%? Carson Palmer was injured vs. the Steelers in 2006 and the Steelers
went on to win the SB. Do we * them? Or the best example for what we're
discussing...Willis McGahee gets injured in the 2003 title game. Do we *
tOSU's title because Miami's best player wasn't in the game during the
double OT? No. We suck it up and move on. Could've, should've is a nice
fantasy, but it has no place in history.
Ron
wrote:
> "Ron" <BigELil...@msn.com> wrote in message
Did I say they should have an asterisk next to their win?
No, I didn't.
Carry on............
Ron
BTW, fuck Brady.....the Pats got their ass kicked, period.