Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Tell it like it is!
47 views
Skip to first unread message
J. Hugh Sullivan
May 15, 2013, 10:43:32 AM5/15/13
to
>Mychal Massie is a respected writer and talk show host in Los Angeles.
>The other evening on my twitter, a person asked me why I didn't like the Obama's? Specifically I was asked: "I have to ask, why do you hate the Obama's? It seems personal, not policy related. You even dissed (disrespect) their Christmas family picture."
>The truth is I do not like the Obamas, what they represent, their ideology, and I certainly do not like his policies and legislation. I've made no secret of my contempt for the Obamas. As I responded to the person who asked me the aforementioned question, I don't like them because they are committed to the fundamental change of my/our country into what can only be regarded as a Communist state.
>I don't hate them per definition, but I condemn them because they are the worst kind of racialists, they are elitist Leninists with contempt for traditional America . They display disrespect for the sanctity of the office he holds, and for those who are willing to admit same, Michelle Obama's raw contempt for white America is transpicuous.
>I don't like them because they comport themselves as emperor and empress. I expect, no I demand respect, for the Office of President and a love of our country and her citizenry from the leader entrusted with the governance of same. President and Mrs. Reagan displayed an unparalleled love for the country and her people. The Reagan's made Americans feel good about themselves and about what we could accomplish. His arrogance by appointing 32 leftist czars and constantly bypassing congress is impeachable. Eric Holder is probably the MOST incompetent and arrogant DOJ head to ever hold the job. Could you envision President Reagan instructing his Justice Department to act like jack-booted thugs?
>Presidents are politicians and all politicians are known and pretty much expected to manipulate the truth, if not outright lie, but even using that low standard, the Obama's have taken lies, dishonesty, deceit, mendacity, subterfuge and obfuscation to new depths. They are verbally abusive to the citizenry, and they display an animus for civility.
>I do not like them, because they both display bigotry overtly, as in the case of Harvard Professor Louis Gates, when he accused the Cambridge Police of acting stupidly, and her code speak pursuant to now being able to be proud of America. I view that statement and that mindset as an insult to those who died to provide a country where a Kenyan, his illegal alien relatives, and his alleged progeny, could come and not only live freely, but rise to the highest, most powerful, position in the world. Michelle Obama is free to hate and disparage whites because Americans of every description paid with their blood to ensure her right to do same.
>I have a saying, that "the only reason a person hides things, is because they have something to hide." No president in history has spent over a million dollars to keep his records and his past sealed.
>And what the two of them have shared has been proved to be lies. He lied about when and how they met, he lied about his mother's death and problems with insurance, Michelle lied to a crowd pursuant to nearly $500,000 bank stocks they inherited from his family. He has lied about his father's military service, about the civil rights movement, ad nausea. He lied to the world about the Supreme Court in a State of the Union address. He berated and publicly insulted a sitting Congressman. He has surrounded himself with the most rabidly, radical, socialist academicians today. He opposed rulings that protected women and children that even Planned Parenthood did not seek to support. He is openly hostile to business and aggressively hostile to Israel . His wife treats being the First Lady as her personal American Express Black Card (arguably the most prestigious credit card in the world). I condemn them because, as people are suffering, losing their homes, their jobs, their retirements, he
and his family are arrogantly showing off their life of entitlement - as he goes about creating and fomenting class warfare.
>I don't like them, and I neither apologize nor retreat from my public condemnation of them and of his policies. We should condemn them for the disrespect they show our people, for his willful and unconstitutional actions pursuant to obeying the Constitutional parameters he is bound by, and his willful disregard for Congressional authority.
>Dislike for them has nothing to do with the color of their skin; it has everything to do with their behavior, attitudes, and policies. And I have open scorn for their constantly playing the race card.
>I could go on, but let me conclude with this. I condemn in the strongest possible terms the media for refusing to investigate them, as they did President Bush and President Clinton, and for refusing to label them for what they truly are. There is no scenario known to man, whereby a white president and his wife could ignore laws, flaunt their position, and lord over the people, as these two are permitted out of fear for their color.
>As I wrote in a syndicated column titled, "Nero In The White House" - "Never in my life, inside or outside of politics, have I witnessed such dishonesty in a political leader. He is the most mendacious political figure I have ever witnessed. Even by the low standards of his presidential predecessors, his narcissistic, contumacious arrogance is unequalled. Using Obama as the bar, Nero would have to be elevated to sainthood... Many in America wanted to be proud when the first person of color was elected president, but instead, they have been witness to a congenital liar, a woman who has been ashamed of America her entire life, failed policies, intimidation, and a commonality hitherto not witnessed in political leaders. He and his wife view their life at our expense as an entitlement - while America 's people go homeless, hungry and unemployed.�
Posted by Hugh
>The other evening on my twitter, a person asked me why I didn't like the Obama's? Specifically I was asked: "I have to ask, why do you hate the Obama's? It seems personal, not policy related. You even dissed (disrespect) their Christmas family picture."
>The truth is I do not like the Obamas, what they represent, their ideology, and I certainly do not like his policies and legislation. I've made no secret of my contempt for the Obamas. As I responded to the person who asked me the aforementioned question, I don't like them because they are committed to the fundamental change of my/our country into what can only be regarded as a Communist state.
>I don't hate them per definition, but I condemn them because they are the worst kind of racialists, they are elitist Leninists with contempt for traditional America . They display disrespect for the sanctity of the office he holds, and for those who are willing to admit same, Michelle Obama's raw contempt for white America is transpicuous.
>I don't like them because they comport themselves as emperor and empress. I expect, no I demand respect, for the Office of President and a love of our country and her citizenry from the leader entrusted with the governance of same. President and Mrs. Reagan displayed an unparalleled love for the country and her people. The Reagan's made Americans feel good about themselves and about what we could accomplish. His arrogance by appointing 32 leftist czars and constantly bypassing congress is impeachable. Eric Holder is probably the MOST incompetent and arrogant DOJ head to ever hold the job. Could you envision President Reagan instructing his Justice Department to act like jack-booted thugs?
>Presidents are politicians and all politicians are known and pretty much expected to manipulate the truth, if not outright lie, but even using that low standard, the Obama's have taken lies, dishonesty, deceit, mendacity, subterfuge and obfuscation to new depths. They are verbally abusive to the citizenry, and they display an animus for civility.
>I do not like them, because they both display bigotry overtly, as in the case of Harvard Professor Louis Gates, when he accused the Cambridge Police of acting stupidly, and her code speak pursuant to now being able to be proud of America. I view that statement and that mindset as an insult to those who died to provide a country where a Kenyan, his illegal alien relatives, and his alleged progeny, could come and not only live freely, but rise to the highest, most powerful, position in the world. Michelle Obama is free to hate and disparage whites because Americans of every description paid with their blood to ensure her right to do same.
>I have a saying, that "the only reason a person hides things, is because they have something to hide." No president in history has spent over a million dollars to keep his records and his past sealed.
>And what the two of them have shared has been proved to be lies. He lied about when and how they met, he lied about his mother's death and problems with insurance, Michelle lied to a crowd pursuant to nearly $500,000 bank stocks they inherited from his family. He has lied about his father's military service, about the civil rights movement, ad nausea. He lied to the world about the Supreme Court in a State of the Union address. He berated and publicly insulted a sitting Congressman. He has surrounded himself with the most rabidly, radical, socialist academicians today. He opposed rulings that protected women and children that even Planned Parenthood did not seek to support. He is openly hostile to business and aggressively hostile to Israel . His wife treats being the First Lady as her personal American Express Black Card (arguably the most prestigious credit card in the world). I condemn them because, as people are suffering, losing their homes, their jobs, their retirements, he
and his family are arrogantly showing off their life of entitlement - as he goes about creating and fomenting class warfare.
>I don't like them, and I neither apologize nor retreat from my public condemnation of them and of his policies. We should condemn them for the disrespect they show our people, for his willful and unconstitutional actions pursuant to obeying the Constitutional parameters he is bound by, and his willful disregard for Congressional authority.
>Dislike for them has nothing to do with the color of their skin; it has everything to do with their behavior, attitudes, and policies. And I have open scorn for their constantly playing the race card.
>I could go on, but let me conclude with this. I condemn in the strongest possible terms the media for refusing to investigate them, as they did President Bush and President Clinton, and for refusing to label them for what they truly are. There is no scenario known to man, whereby a white president and his wife could ignore laws, flaunt their position, and lord over the people, as these two are permitted out of fear for their color.
>As I wrote in a syndicated column titled, "Nero In The White House" - "Never in my life, inside or outside of politics, have I witnessed such dishonesty in a political leader. He is the most mendacious political figure I have ever witnessed. Even by the low standards of his presidential predecessors, his narcissistic, contumacious arrogance is unequalled. Using Obama as the bar, Nero would have to be elevated to sainthood... Many in America wanted to be proud when the first person of color was elected president, but instead, they have been witness to a congenital liar, a woman who has been ashamed of America her entire life, failed policies, intimidation, and a commonality hitherto not witnessed in political leaders. He and his wife view their life at our expense as an entitlement - while America 's people go homeless, hungry and unemployed.�
Posted by Hugh
Mr. N.A.Cho
May 15, 2013, 11:25:57 AM5/15/13
to
>
> Posted by Hugh
that's a bunch of clap-trap.
Futbol Phan
May 15, 2013, 11:28:18 AM5/15/13
to
i_like_sockeye
May 15, 2013, 12:33:11 PM5/15/13
to
On Wednesday, May 15, 2013 9:43:32 AM UTC-5, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
> >Mychal Massie is a respected writer
>
>
> >The other evening on my twitter, a person asked me why I didn't like the Obama's? Specifically I was asked: "I have to ask, why do you hate the Obama's? It seems personal, not policy related. You even dissed (disrespect) their Christmas family picture."
If you think this clown is a respected writer, then you're not a respected reader.
J. Hugh Sullivan
May 15, 2013, 1:05:55 PM5/15/13
to
His ability with the language might be suspect but not what he was
saying.
Hugh
Mr. N.A.Cho
May 15, 2013, 1:09:44 PM5/15/13
to
On May 15, 1:05 pm, Ea...@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan) wrote:
> On Wed, 15 May 2013 09:33:11 -0700 (PDT), i_like_sockeye
>
> On Wed, 15 May 2013 09:33:11 -0700 (PDT), i_like_sockeye
>
falsehoods and try to step away from the steaming mess, yet claim that
you can cherry-pick what is true out of the same material.
Futbol Phan
May 15, 2013, 5:58:29 PM5/15/13
to
i_like_sockeye
May 15, 2013, 6:02:40 PM5/15/13
to
On Wednesday, May 15, 2013 12:05:55 PM UTC-5, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
>
> I did not write any portion other than the "Posted by..."
>
I should hope not. If you're really a white boy from Mississippi, then you should have more respect for
>
> I did not write any portion other than the "Posted by..."
>
quality writing. I suppose you've been in Alabama too long.
J. Hugh Sullivan
May 15, 2013, 6:02:42 PM5/15/13
to
On Wed, 15 May 2013 10:09:44 -0700 (PDT), "Mr. N.A.Cho"
<ThisSpac...@mail.com> wrote:
>On May 15, 1:05=A0pm, Ea...@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan) wrote:
>> On Wed, 15 May 2013 09:33:11 -0700 (PDT), i_like_sockeye
>>
>> <i_like_sock...@mailandnews.com> wrote:
>> >On Wednesday, May 15, 2013 9:43:32 AM UTC-5, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
>> >> >Mychal Massie is a respected writer
>>
>> >> >The other evening on my twitter, a person asked me why I didn't like =
>the Obama's? Specifically I was asked: "I have to ask, why do you hate the =
>Obama's? It seems personal, not policy related. You even dissed (disrespect=
Hugh
<ThisSpac...@mail.com> wrote:
>On May 15, 1:05=A0pm, Ea...@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan) wrote:
>> On Wed, 15 May 2013 09:33:11 -0700 (PDT), i_like_sockeye
>>
>> <i_like_sock...@mailandnews.com> wrote:
>> >On Wednesday, May 15, 2013 9:43:32 AM UTC-5, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
>> >> >Mychal Massie is a respected writer
>>
>the Obama's? Specifically I was asked: "I have to ask, why do you hate the =
>Obama's? It seems personal, not policy related. You even dissed (disrespect=
>) their Christmas family picture."
>>
>> >If you think this clown is a respected writer, then you're not a respect=
>>
>ed reader.
>>
>> I did not write any portion other than the "Posted by..."
>>
>> His ability with the language might be suspect but not what he was
>> saying.
>>
>> Hugh
>
>You post someone else's material that contains obvious lies and
>falsehoods and try to step away from the steaming mess, yet claim that
>you can cherry-pick what is true out of the same material.
What were the lies and falsehoods?
>>
>> I did not write any portion other than the "Posted by..."
>>
>> His ability with the language might be suspect but not what he was
>> saying.
>>
>> Hugh
>
>You post someone else's material that contains obvious lies and
>falsehoods and try to step away from the steaming mess, yet claim that
>you can cherry-pick what is true out of the same material.
Hugh
Mr. N.A.Cho
May 15, 2013, 6:54:36 PM5/15/13
to
>
> - Show quoted text -
"Mychal Massie is a respected writer dot dot dot dot"
J. Hugh Sullivan
May 16, 2013, 9:39:57 AM5/16/13
to
On Wed, 15 May 2013 15:54:36 -0700 (PDT), "Mr. N.A.Cho"
<ThisSpac...@mail.com> wrote:
>On May 15, 6:02=A0pm, Ea...@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan) wrote:
>> On Wed, 15 May 2013 10:09:44 -0700 (PDT), "Mr. N.A.Cho"
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <ThisSpaceForR...@mail.com> wrote:
>ke =3D
>> >the Obama's? Specifically I was asked: "I have to ask, why do you hate t=
>he =3D
>> >Obama's? It seems personal, not policy related. You even dissed (disresp=
>ect=3D
>ect=3D
But It's interesting that you find no lies in what he said about Obie.
The truth deserves some respect.
Hugh
<ThisSpac...@mail.com> wrote:
>On May 15, 6:02=A0pm, Ea...@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan) wrote:
>> On Wed, 15 May 2013 10:09:44 -0700 (PDT), "Mr. N.A.Cho"
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <ThisSpaceForR...@mail.com> wrote:
>> >On May 15, 1:05=3DA0pm, Ea...@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan) wrote:
>> >> On Wed, 15 May 2013 09:33:11 -0700 (PDT), i_like_sockeye
>>
>> >> <i_like_sock...@mailandnews.com> wrote:
>> >> >On Wednesday, May 15, 2013 9:43:32 AM UTC-5, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
>> >> >> >Mychal Massie is a respected writer
>>
>> >> >> >The other evening on my twitter, a person asked me why I didn't li=
>> >> On Wed, 15 May 2013 09:33:11 -0700 (PDT), i_like_sockeye
>>
>> >> <i_like_sock...@mailandnews.com> wrote:
>> >> >On Wednesday, May 15, 2013 9:43:32 AM UTC-5, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
>> >> >> >Mychal Massie is a respected writer
>>
>ke =3D
>> >the Obama's? Specifically I was asked: "I have to ask, why do you hate t=
>he =3D
>> >Obama's? It seems personal, not policy related. You even dissed (disresp=
>ect=3D
>> >) their Christmas family picture."
>>
>> >> >If you think this clown is a respected writer, then you're not a resp=
>>
>ect=3D
>> >ed reader.
>>
>> >> I did not write any portion other than the "Posted by..."
>>
>> >> His ability with the language might be suspect but not what he was
>> >> saying.
>>
>> >> Hugh
>>
>> >You post someone else's material that contains obvious lies and
>> >falsehoods and try to step away from the steaming mess, yet claim that
>> >you can cherry-pick what is true out of the same material.
>>
>> What were the lies and falsehoods?
>>
>> Hugh- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>"Mychal Massie is a respected writer dot dot dot dot"
I never heard of him so I have no thoughts.
>>
>> >> I did not write any portion other than the "Posted by..."
>>
>> >> His ability with the language might be suspect but not what he was
>> >> saying.
>>
>> >> Hugh
>>
>> >You post someone else's material that contains obvious lies and
>> >falsehoods and try to step away from the steaming mess, yet claim that
>> >you can cherry-pick what is true out of the same material.
>>
>> What were the lies and falsehoods?
>>
>> Hugh- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>"Mychal Massie is a respected writer dot dot dot dot"
But It's interesting that you find no lies in what he said about Obie.
The truth deserves some respect.
Hugh
J. Hugh Sullivan
May 16, 2013, 9:46:36 AM5/16/13
to
On Wed, 15 May 2013 14:58:29 -0700 (PDT), Futbol Phan
<sgz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>So I guess this would make him a disrespected writer.
I'm sure the Obieites disrespect him for telling the truth about their
<sgz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>So I guess this would make him a disrespected writer.
Messiah.
I am unable to form an opinion on Obieites because their IQ does not
register on any known scale.
Hugh
J. Hugh Sullivan
May 16, 2013, 9:54:00 AM5/16/13
to
more than a month in any year.
Hugh
Mr. N.A.Cho
May 16, 2013, 10:16:52 AM5/16/13
to
On Thursday, May 16, 2013 9:39:57 AM UTC-4, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
> On Wed, 15 May 2013 15:54:36 -0700 (PDT), "Mr. N.A.Cho" <ThisSpac...@mail.com> wrote: >On May 15, 6:02=A0pm, Ea...@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan) wrote: >> On Wed, 15 May 2013 10:09:44 -0700 (PDT), "Mr. N.A.Cho" >> >> >> >> >> >> <ThisSpaceForR...@mail.com> wrote: >> >On May 15, 1:05=3DA0pm, Ea...@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan) wrote: >> >> On Wed, 15 May 2013 09:33:11 -0700 (PDT), i_like_sockeye >> >> >> <i_like_sock...@mailandnews.com> wrote: >> >> >On Wednesday, May 15, 2013 9:43:32 AM UTC-5, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote: >> >> >> >Mychal Massie is a respected writer >> >> >> >> >The other evening on my twitter, a person asked me why I didn't li= >ke =3D >> >the Obama's? Specifically I was asked: "I have to ask, why do you hate t= >he =3D >> >Obama's? It seems personal, not policy related. You even dissed (disresp= >ect=3D >> >) their Christmas family picture." >> >> >> >If you think this clown is a respected writer, then you're not a resp= >ect=3D >> >ed reader. >> >> >> I did not write any portion other than the "Posted by..." >> >> >> His ability with the language might be suspect but not what he was >> >> saying. >> >> >> Hugh >> >> >You post someone else's material that contains obvious lies and >> >falsehoods and try to step away from the steaming mess, yet claim that >> >you can cherry-pick what is true out of the same material. >> >> What were the lies and falsehoods? >> >> Hugh- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > >"Mychal Massie is a respected writer dot dot dot dot" I never heard of him so I have no thoughts. But It's interesting that you find no lies in what he said about Obie. The truth deserves some respect. Hugh
It's hinky that you'd post another writer's work, claim it's 100% truthful, but then back away from the author. Very fishy stuff.
> On Wed, 15 May 2013 15:54:36 -0700 (PDT), "Mr. N.A.Cho" <ThisSpac...@mail.com> wrote: >On May 15, 6:02=A0pm, Ea...@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan) wrote: >> On Wed, 15 May 2013 10:09:44 -0700 (PDT), "Mr. N.A.Cho" >> >> >> >> >> >> <ThisSpaceForR...@mail.com> wrote: >> >On May 15, 1:05=3DA0pm, Ea...@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan) wrote: >> >> On Wed, 15 May 2013 09:33:11 -0700 (PDT), i_like_sockeye >> >> >> <i_like_sock...@mailandnews.com> wrote: >> >> >On Wednesday, May 15, 2013 9:43:32 AM UTC-5, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote: >> >> >> >Mychal Massie is a respected writer >> >> >> >> >The other evening on my twitter, a person asked me why I didn't li= >ke =3D >> >the Obama's? Specifically I was asked: "I have to ask, why do you hate t= >he =3D >> >Obama's? It seems personal, not policy related. You even dissed (disresp= >ect=3D >> >) their Christmas family picture." >> >> >> >If you think this clown is a respected writer, then you're not a resp= >ect=3D >> >ed reader. >> >> >> I did not write any portion other than the "Posted by..." >> >> >> His ability with the language might be suspect but not what he was >> >> saying. >> >> >> Hugh >> >> >You post someone else's material that contains obvious lies and >> >falsehoods and try to step away from the steaming mess, yet claim that >> >you can cherry-pick what is true out of the same material. >> >> What were the lies and falsehoods? >> >> Hugh- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > >"Mychal Massie is a respected writer dot dot dot dot" I never heard of him so I have no thoughts. But It's interesting that you find no lies in what he said about Obie. The truth deserves some respect. Hugh
Mr. Cho
Zaphod Beeblebrox
May 16, 2013, 11:01:11 AM5/16/13
to
On 5/16/2013 9:54 AM, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
> On Wed, 15 May 2013 15:02:40 -0700 (PDT), i_like_sockeye
> <i_like_...@mailandnews.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, May 15, 2013 12:05:55 PM UTC-5, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
>>>
>>> I did not write any portion other than the "Posted by..."
>>>
>>
>> I should hope not. If you're really a white boy from Mississippi, then you should have more respect for
>> quality writing. I suppose you've been in Alabama too long.
>
> I'm really a white boy from MS.
Not something to brag about in public.
> On Wed, 15 May 2013 15:02:40 -0700 (PDT), i_like_sockeye
> <i_like_...@mailandnews.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, May 15, 2013 12:05:55 PM UTC-5, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
>>>
>>> I did not write any portion other than the "Posted by..."
>>>
>>
>> I should hope not. If you're really a white boy from Mississippi, then you should have more respect for
>> quality writing. I suppose you've been in Alabama too long.
>
> I'm really a white boy from MS.
Mr. N.A.Cho
May 16, 2013, 11:20:42 AM5/16/13
to
On May 16, 11:01 am, Zaphod Beeblebrox <victor.kin...@gmail.com>
wrote:
I know, Jesus. And he roots for Alabama/Duke/Yankees. No support
for Mississipi, he's like a carpet-bagger in reverse.
wrote:
for Mississipi, he's like a carpet-bagger in reverse.
michael anderson
May 16, 2013, 11:31:16 AM5/16/13
to
On May 16, 10:01 am, Zaphod Beeblebrox <victor.kin...@gmail.com>
wrote:
one's race and/or where they were born isn't something to 'brag about'
period.
wrote:
period.
Mr. N.A.Cho
May 16, 2013, 11:37:25 AM5/16/13
to
if its for a place that held an entire race in economic and social
shackles right up until 50 years ago.
J. Hugh Sullivan
May 16, 2013, 1:02:27 PM5/16/13
to
On Thu, 16 May 2013 07:16:52 -0700 (PDT), "Mr. N.A.Cho"
<ThisSpac...@mail.com> wrote:
>It's hinky that you'd post another writer's work, claim it's 100% truthful,=
become a liar when you can't back it up.
Where are the lies in his statement little Jap boy?
Hugh
<ThisSpac...@mail.com> wrote:
>It's hinky that you'd post another writer's work, claim it's 100% truthful,=
> but then back away from the author. Very fishy stuff.
>
>Mr. Cho
No, what is interesting is that you called what he said lies. And you
>
>Mr. Cho
become a liar when you can't back it up.
Where are the lies in his statement little Jap boy?
Hugh
Mr. N.A.Cho
May 16, 2013, 1:05:50 PM5/16/13
to
On May 16, 1:02 pm, Ea...@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan) wrote:
> On Thu, 16 May 2013 07:16:52 -0700 (PDT), "Mr. N.A.Cho"
>
> On Thu, 16 May 2013 07:16:52 -0700 (PDT), "Mr. N.A.Cho"
>
> <ThisSpaceForR...@mail.com> wrote:
> >It's hinky that you'd post another writer's work, claim it's 100% truthful,=
> > but then back away from the author. Very fishy stuff.
>
> >Mr. Cho
>
> No, what is interesting is that you called what he said lies. And you
> become a liar when you can't back it up.
>
> Where are the lies in his statement little Jap boy?
>
> Hugh
I see no proof in any of them. All of his statments amount to
> >It's hinky that you'd post another writer's work, claim it's 100% truthful,=
> > but then back away from the author. Very fishy stuff.
>
> >Mr. Cho
>
> No, what is interesting is that you called what he said lies. And you
> become a liar when you can't back it up.
>
> Where are the lies in his statement little Jap boy?
>
> Hugh
this:
I feel Hugh-Hugh is a war-dodging racist queer boy.
Do you support that type of "fact"? I suspect you'll have issue
with it - your entire email is filled with opinions masquarading as
fact. A rude word for it is bullshit. You posted a bunch of that.
Mr. Cho
J. Hugh Sullivan
May 16, 2013, 1:08:28 PM5/16/13
to
Well, not really.
Hugh
Mr. N.A.Cho
May 16, 2013, 1:10:42 PM5/16/13
to
> Hugh- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
He took you to the woodshed and whalloped your behind, yet you
>
> - Show quoted text -
apologize. That's interesting to me.
Mr. Cho
J. Hugh Sullivan
May 16, 2013, 1:11:47 PM5/16/13
to
On Thu, 16 May 2013 08:20:42 -0700 (PDT), "Mr. N.A.Cho"
<ThisSpac...@mail.com> wrote:
>I know, Jesus. And he roots for Alabama/Duke/Yankees. No support
>for Mississipi, he's like a carpet-bagger in reverse.
I'm not really a Duke fan. If had any interest in b'ball I might be.
<ThisSpac...@mail.com> wrote:
>I know, Jesus. And he roots for Alabama/Duke/Yankees. No support
>for Mississipi, he's like a carpet-bagger in reverse.
I don't like losers and you Jap boys lying on rsfc are high on the
list.
Hugh
Mr. N.A.Cho
May 16, 2013, 1:15:14 PM5/16/13
to
On May 16, 1:11 pm, Ea...@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan) wrote:
> On Thu, 16 May 2013 08:20:42 -0700 (PDT), "Mr. N.A.Cho"
>
> On Thu, 16 May 2013 08:20:42 -0700 (PDT), "Mr. N.A.Cho"
>
> <ThisSpaceForR...@mail.com> wrote:
> >I know, Jesus. And he roots for Alabama/Duke/Yankees. No support
> >for Mississipi, he's like a carpet-bagger in reverse.
>
> I'm not really a Duke fan. If had any interest in b'ball I might be.
>
> I don't like losers and you Jap boys lying on rsfc are high on the
> list.
>
> Hugh
Mr. Hugh Hugh posts other peoples lies, yet calls me the liar. Very
> >I know, Jesus. And he roots for Alabama/Duke/Yankees. No support
> >for Mississipi, he's like a carpet-bagger in reverse.
>
> I'm not really a Duke fan. If had any interest in b'ball I might be.
>
> I don't like losers and you Jap boys lying on rsfc are high on the
> list.
>
> Hugh
interesting. I am an American - citizen of the United States, not a
"jap" as you term it in such a small-minded and generally retarded
manner.
Mr. Cho
J. Hugh Sullivan
May 16, 2013, 1:30:20 PM5/16/13
to
On Thu, 16 May 2013 08:37:25 -0700 (PDT), "Mr. N.A.Cho"
<ThisSpac...@mail.com> wrote:
>On May 16, 11:31=A0am, michael anderson <mianderso...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On May 16, 10:01=A0am, Zaphod Beeblebrox <victor.kin...@gmail.com>
That's as shamful as it gets.
Hugh
<ThisSpac...@mail.com> wrote:
>On May 16, 11:31=A0am, michael anderson <mianderso...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On May 16, 10:01=A0am, Zaphod Beeblebrox <victor.kin...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > On 5/16/2013 9:54 AM, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
>>
>> > > On Wed, 15 May 2013 15:02:40 -0700 (PDT), i_like_sockeye
>> > > <i_like_sock...@mailandnews.com> wrote:
>>
>> > >> On Wednesday, May 15, 2013 12:05:55 PM UTC-5, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote=
>>
>> > On 5/16/2013 9:54 AM, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
>>
>> > > On Wed, 15 May 2013 15:02:40 -0700 (PDT), i_like_sockeye
>> > > <i_like_sock...@mailandnews.com> wrote:
>>
>:
>>
>> > >>> I did not write any portion other than the "Posted by..."
>>
>> > >> I should hope not. =A0If you're really a white boy from Mississippi,=
>>
>> > >>> I did not write any portion other than the "Posted by..."
>>
> then you should have more respect for
>> > >> quality writing. =A0I suppose you've been in Alabama too long.
>>
>> > > I'm really a white boy from MS.
>>
>> > Not something to brag about in public.
>>
>> one's race and/or where they were born isn't something to 'brag about'
>> period.
>
>There's nothing wrong about having pride of place and being. Except
>if its for a place that held an entire race in economic and social
>shackles right up until 50 years ago.
Or for one whose cowardly ancestors treacherously bombed Pearl Harbor.
>> > > I'm really a white boy from MS.
>>
>> > Not something to brag about in public.
>>
>> one's race and/or where they were born isn't something to 'brag about'
>> period.
>
>There's nothing wrong about having pride of place and being. Except
>if its for a place that held an entire race in economic and social
>shackles right up until 50 years ago.
That's as shamful as it gets.
Hugh
Mr. N.A.Cho
May 16, 2013, 1:37:28 PM5/16/13
to
> Hugh- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
you honestly believe a single military attack is worse than well over
>
> - Show quoted text -
a century of the worst type of economic and social bondage of a free
people?
Mr. Cho
Futbol Phan
May 16, 2013, 3:37:04 PM5/16/13
to
xyzzy
May 16, 2013, 4:26:54 PM5/16/13
to
J. Hugh Sullivan
May 16, 2013, 5:15:56 PM5/16/13
to
On Thu, 16 May 2013 10:05:50 -0700 (PDT), "Mr. N.A.Cho"
<ThisSpac...@mail.com> wrote:
>I see no proof in any of them. All of his statments amount to
>this:
>
>I feel Hugh-Hugh is a war-dodging racist queer boy.
I believe your mother was a whore in Tokyo in 1945 that I might still
<ThisSpac...@mail.com> wrote:
>I see no proof in any of them. All of his statments amount to
>this:
>
>I feel Hugh-Hugh is a war-dodging racist queer boy.
owe a quarter for her service. Where should I send the money?
>Do you support that type of "fact"? I suspect you'll have issue
>with it -
You called them lies and like the stupid son of a bitch you are, you
try to weasel out by changing the subject.
Hugh
J. Hugh Sullivan
May 16, 2013, 5:20:06 PM5/16/13
to
On Thu, 16 May 2013 12:37:04 -0700 (PDT), Futbol Phan
have supported black writers several times - an editor in NJ in the
50s and Bill Cosby come immediately to mind.
I didn't know the writer was black - if it had made any difference I
would have checked. I absolutely agree with his opinions even if he is
a black queer atheist.
Did I clear that up for you?
Hugh
<sgz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Thursday, May 16, 2013 8:46:36 AM UTC-5, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
>> On Wed, 15 May 2013 14:58:29 -0700 (PDT), Futbol Phan
>>
>> <sgz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> >So I guess this would make him a disrespected writer.
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm sure the Obieites disrespect him for telling the truth about their
>>
>> Messiah.
>>
>>
>>
>> I am unable to form an opinion on Obieites because their IQ does not
>>
>> register on any known scale.
>>
>>
>>
>> Hugh
>
>At least we are getting somewhere with Hugh. He is now quoting and staunchly defending Negro writers, and even referring to them as 'respected'. A breath of fresh air from down in Mizzippi.
If you check back over the past score of years you will find that I
>On Thursday, May 16, 2013 8:46:36 AM UTC-5, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
>> On Wed, 15 May 2013 14:58:29 -0700 (PDT), Futbol Phan
>>
>> <sgz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> >So I guess this would make him a disrespected writer.
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm sure the Obieites disrespect him for telling the truth about their
>>
>> Messiah.
>>
>>
>>
>> I am unable to form an opinion on Obieites because their IQ does not
>>
>> register on any known scale.
>>
>>
>>
>> Hugh
>
>At least we are getting somewhere with Hugh. He is now quoting and staunchly defending Negro writers, and even referring to them as 'respected'. A breath of fresh air from down in Mizzippi.
have supported black writers several times - an editor in NJ in the
50s and Bill Cosby come immediately to mind.
I didn't know the writer was black - if it had made any difference I
would have checked. I absolutely agree with his opinions even if he is
a black queer atheist.
Did I clear that up for you?
Hugh
J. Hugh Sullivan
May 16, 2013, 5:25:36 PM5/16/13
to
On Thu, 16 May 2013 10:15:14 -0700 (PDT), "Mr. N.A.Cho"
<ThisSpac...@mail.com> wrote:
>On May 16, 1:11=A0pm, Ea...@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan) wrote:
>> On Thu, 16 May 2013 08:20:42 -0700 (PDT), "Mr. N.A.Cho"
>>
>> <ThisSpaceForR...@mail.com> wrote:
>> >I know, Jesus. =A0And he roots for Alabama/Duke/Yankees. =A0 No support
asked you where - you can't respond - you are the liar.
>Very
>interesting. I am an American - citizen of the United States, not a
>"jap" as you term it in such a small-minded and generally retarded
>manner.
Your ancestors were Japs - you are a Jap. You are a liar. You are as
stupid as it gets and one sorry sack of shit.
Hugh
<ThisSpac...@mail.com> wrote:
>On May 16, 1:11=A0pm, Ea...@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan) wrote:
>> On Thu, 16 May 2013 08:20:42 -0700 (PDT), "Mr. N.A.Cho"
>>
>> <ThisSpaceForR...@mail.com> wrote:
>> >for Mississipi, he's like a carpet-bagger in reverse.
>>
>> I'm not really a Duke fan. If had any interest in b'ball I might be.
>>
>> I don't like losers and you Jap boys lying on rsfc are high on the
>> list.
>>
>> Hugh
>
>Mr. Hugh Hugh posts other peoples lies, yet calls me the liar.
You are so stupid you can't see the difference. You said he lied - I
>>
>> I'm not really a Duke fan. If had any interest in b'ball I might be.
>>
>> I don't like losers and you Jap boys lying on rsfc are high on the
>> list.
>>
>> Hugh
>
>Mr. Hugh Hugh posts other peoples lies, yet calls me the liar.
asked you where - you can't respond - you are the liar.
>Very
>interesting. I am an American - citizen of the United States, not a
>"jap" as you term it in such a small-minded and generally retarded
>manner.
stupid as it gets and one sorry sack of shit.
Hugh
J. Hugh Sullivan
May 16, 2013, 5:35:34 PM5/16/13
to
On Thu, 16 May 2013 10:37:28 -0700 (PDT), "Mr. N.A.Cho"
<ThisSpac...@mail.com> wrote:
>you honestly believe a single military attack is worse than well over
>a century of the worst type of economic and social bondage of a free
>people?
>
>Mr. Cho
The "single military act" was cowardice in the worst possible
<ThisSpac...@mail.com> wrote:
>you honestly believe a single military attack is worse than well over
>a century of the worst type of economic and social bondage of a free
>people?
>
>Mr. Cho
definition. And did you forget the Rape of Nanking, the Bataan Death
March and other despicable acts by your ancestors?
Now, please tell me what laws black and white, male and female slave
owners in the north, South, east and west (the entire USA) broke - or
what cowardice or what treachery.
Hugh
Futbol Phan
May 16, 2013, 6:21:37 PM5/16/13
to
supported a NJ editor over a half century ago and perhaps the whitest
black man ever known. I have been so wrong about you, and I feel just
terrible about it...
Michael Press
May 16, 2013, 7:34:11 PM5/16/13
to
In article
<4e7c8249-2327-48f2...@y5g2000yqy.googlegroups.com>,
Though not sarcasm it is humorous. You did not take into account
that ZB knew it is not something to brag about when he wrote what he did.
Your usual mistake in these parts is not crediting people with
wit or intelligents.
--
Michael Press
<4e7c8249-2327-48f2...@y5g2000yqy.googlegroups.com>,
that ZB knew it is not something to brag about when he wrote what he did.
Your usual mistake in these parts is not crediting people with
wit or intelligents.
--
Michael Press
J. Hugh Sullivan
May 17, 2013, 9:19:45 AM5/17/13
to
best to improve himself, and succeeds when the deck is pretty much
stacked against him, is known as "the whitest black man".
Has that replaced "Uncle Tom" as the disgusting label for successful
blacks by those blacks who consider failure the highest level of
success?
Hugh
michael anderson
May 17, 2013, 1:26:43 PM5/17/13
to
On May 16, 6:34 pm, Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> In article
> <4e7c8249-2327-48f2-b6bc-ef992a88a...@y5g2000yqy.googlegroups.com>,
lmfao....I like rsfc, but wit or intelligence is not the norm here.
>
> --
> Michael Press- Hide quoted text -
> In article
> <4e7c8249-2327-48f2-b6bc-ef992a88a...@y5g2000yqy.googlegroups.com>,
>
> --
> Michael Press- Hide quoted text -
Cornelius Cornelius
May 17, 2013, 1:39:29 PM5/17/13
to
On May 16, 10:15 pm, Ea...@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan) wrote:
> On Thu, 16 May 2013 10:05:50 -0700 (PDT), "Mr. N.A.Cho"
>
> On Thu, 16 May 2013 10:05:50 -0700 (PDT), "Mr. N.A.Cho"
>
> <ThisSpaceForR...@mail.com> wrote:
> >I see no proof in any of them. All of his statments amount to
> >this:
>
> >I feel Hugh-Hugh is a war-dodging racist queer boy.
>
> I believe your mother was a whore in Tokyo in 1945 that I might still
> owe a quarter for her service. Where should I send the money?
So you admit to fucking whores? Nice.
> >I see no proof in any of them. All of his statments amount to
> >this:
>
> >I feel Hugh-Hugh is a war-dodging racist queer boy.
>
> I believe your mother was a whore in Tokyo in 1945 that I might still
> owe a quarter for her service. Where should I send the money?
Michael Press
May 17, 2013, 4:09:40 PM5/17/13
to
In article
<bfce1521-0bef-470d...@a8g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>,
I already know you think that. You can tell by reading what I wrote.
--
Michael Press
<bfce1521-0bef-470d...@a8g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>,
--
Michael Press
xyzzy
May 17, 2013, 4:14:27 PM5/17/13
to
On May 17, 1:39 pm, Cornelius Cornelius
Tenuous segue and I normally wouldn't post this kind of stuff that I
get from relatives to rsfc, but I got this email today and this post
completely reminded me of it. Names are changed to insult the
guilty.
A woman went to a pet shop and
immediately spotted a large, beautiful parrot.
There was a sign on the cage that said $50.00.
"Why so little?" she asked the pet store owner.
The owner looked at her and said,
"Look, I should tell you first that this bird used to live
in a house of prostitution, and sometimes it says some
pretty vulgar stuff."
The woman thought about this, but decided she had to
have the bird anyway. She took it home and hung the bird's
cage up in her living room and waited for it to say something.
The bird looked around the room, then at her, and said,
"New house, new madam."
The woman was a bit shocked at the implication,
but then thought "that's really not so bad."
When her two teenage daughters returned from school,
the bird saw them and said, "New house, new madam, new girls."
The girls and the woman were a bit offended but then
began to laugh about the situation considering how and
where the parrot had been raised.
Moments later, the woman's husband Hugh came home from work.
The bird looked at him and said,
"Hi Hugh."
get from relatives to rsfc, but I got this email today and this post
completely reminded me of it. Names are changed to insult the
guilty.
A woman went to a pet shop and
immediately spotted a large, beautiful parrot.
There was a sign on the cage that said $50.00.
"Why so little?" she asked the pet store owner.
The owner looked at her and said,
"Look, I should tell you first that this bird used to live
in a house of prostitution, and sometimes it says some
pretty vulgar stuff."
The woman thought about this, but decided she had to
have the bird anyway. She took it home and hung the bird's
cage up in her living room and waited for it to say something.
The bird looked around the room, then at her, and said,
"New house, new madam."
The woman was a bit shocked at the implication,
but then thought "that's really not so bad."
When her two teenage daughters returned from school,
the bird saw them and said, "New house, new madam, new girls."
The girls and the woman were a bit offended but then
began to laugh about the situation considering how and
where the parrot had been raised.
Moments later, the woman's husband Hugh came home from work.
The bird looked at him and said,
"Hi Hugh."
The Undead Edward M. Kennedy
May 17, 2013, 4:59:40 PM5/17/13
to
"Cornelius Cornelius" <corneliusc...@gmail.com> wrote
> >I see no proof in any of them. All of his statments amount to
> >this:
>
> >I feel Hugh-Hugh is a war-dodging racist queer boy.
>
> I believe your mother was a whore in Tokyo in 1945 that I might still
> owe a quarter for her service. Where should I send the money?
<
>So you admit to fucking whores? Nice.
A *Japanese* whore. Apparently Hugh isn't a boob man.
--Tedward
> >I see no proof in any of them. All of his statments amount to
> >this:
>
> >I feel Hugh-Hugh is a war-dodging racist queer boy.
>
> I believe your mother was a whore in Tokyo in 1945 that I might still
> owe a quarter for her service. Where should I send the money?
<
>So you admit to fucking whores? Nice.
--Tedward
J. Hugh Sullivan
May 17, 2013, 6:45:37 PM5/17/13
to
On Fri, 17 May 2013 13:14:27 -0700 (PDT), xyzzy <xyzzy...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>On May 17, 1:39=A0pm, Cornelius Cornelius
><corneliuscorneliu...@gmail.com> wrote:
I've heard the joke several times in 65 years. I heard that the parrot
your wife bought calls you Shorty.
Hugh
wrote:
>On May 17, 1:39=A0pm, Cornelius Cornelius
><corneliuscorneliu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On May 16, 10:15=A0pm, Ea...@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan) wrote:
>>
>> > On Thu, 16 May 2013 10:05:50 -0700 (PDT), "Mr. N.A.Cho"
>>
>> > <ThisSpaceForR...@mail.com> wrote:
>> > >I see no proof in any of them. =A0 =A0 All of his statments amount to
>>
>> > On Thu, 16 May 2013 10:05:50 -0700 (PDT), "Mr. N.A.Cho"
>>
>> > <ThisSpaceForR...@mail.com> wrote:
>> > >this:
>>
>> > >I feel Hugh-Hugh is a war-dodging racist queer boy.
>>
>> > I believe your mother was a whore in Tokyo in 1945 that I might still
>> > owe a quarter for her service. Where should I send the money?
>>
>> So you admit to fucking whores? =A0Nice.
>>
>> > >I feel Hugh-Hugh is a war-dodging racist queer boy.
>>
>> > I believe your mother was a whore in Tokyo in 1945 that I might still
>> > owe a quarter for her service. Where should I send the money?
>>
your wife bought calls you Shorty.
Hugh
J. Hugh Sullivan
May 17, 2013, 6:48:11 PM5/17/13
to
On Fri, 17 May 2013 10:39:29 -0700 (PDT), Cornelius Cornelius
<corneliusc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On May 16, 10:15=A0pm, Ea...@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan) wrote:
>> On Thu, 16 May 2013 10:05:50 -0700 (PDT), "Mr. N.A.Cho"
>>
>> <ThisSpaceForR...@mail.com> wrote:
>> >I see no proof in any of them. =A0 =A0 All of his statments amount to
Hugh
<corneliusc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On May 16, 10:15=A0pm, Ea...@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan) wrote:
>> On Thu, 16 May 2013 10:05:50 -0700 (PDT), "Mr. N.A.Cho"
>>
>> <ThisSpaceForR...@mail.com> wrote:
>> >this:
>>
>> >I feel Hugh-Hugh is a war-dodging racist queer boy.
>>
>> I believe your mother was a whore in Tokyo in 1945 that I might still
>> owe a quarter for her service. Where should I send the money?
>
>So you admit to fucking whores? Nice.
You must not have been in Tokyo in 1945.
>>
>> >I feel Hugh-Hugh is a war-dodging racist queer boy.
>>
>> I believe your mother was a whore in Tokyo in 1945 that I might still
>> owe a quarter for her service. Where should I send the money?
>
>So you admit to fucking whores? Nice.
Hugh
Hoover
May 18, 2013, 2:26:00 PM5/18/13
to
Glad he's a black dude too
Cornelius Cornelius
May 21, 2013, 10:54:18 AM5/21/13
to
On May 18, 12:48 am, Ea...@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan) wrote:
> On Fri, 17 May 2013 10:39:29 -0700 (PDT), Cornelius Cornelius
>
> On Fri, 17 May 2013 10:39:29 -0700 (PDT), Cornelius Cornelius
>
> <corneliuscorneliu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On May 16, 10:15=A0pm, Ea...@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan) wrote:
> >> On Thu, 16 May 2013 10:05:50 -0700 (PDT), "Mr. N.A.Cho"
>
> >> <ThisSpaceForR...@mail.com> wrote:
> >> >I see no proof in any of them. =A0 =A0 All of his statments amount to
> >> >this:
>
> >> >I feel Hugh-Hugh is a war-dodging racist queer boy.
>
> >> I believe your mother was a whore in Tokyo in 1945 that I might still
> >> owe a quarter for her service. Where should I send the money?
>
> >So you admit to fucking whores? Nice.
>
> You must not have been in Tokyo in 1945.
>
> Hugh
You'd be correct there. I do however regularly spend time in
> >On May 16, 10:15=A0pm, Ea...@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan) wrote:
> >> On Thu, 16 May 2013 10:05:50 -0700 (PDT), "Mr. N.A.Cho"
>
> >> <ThisSpaceForR...@mail.com> wrote:
> >> >I see no proof in any of them. =A0 =A0 All of his statments amount to
> >> >this:
>
> >> >I feel Hugh-Hugh is a war-dodging racist queer boy.
>
> >> I believe your mother was a whore in Tokyo in 1945 that I might still
> >> owe a quarter for her service. Where should I send the money?
>
> >So you admit to fucking whores? Nice.
>
> You must not have been in Tokyo in 1945.
>
> Hugh
Amsterdam, where it is legal, open, and more than readily available
and have managed not to fuck any whores.
J. Hugh Sullivan
May 21, 2013, 1:46:26 PM5/21/13
to
On Tue, 21 May 2013 07:54:18 -0700 (PDT), Cornelius Cornelius
<corneliusc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>You'd be correct there. I do however regularly spend time in
>Amsterdam, where it is legal, open, and more than readily available
>and have managed not to fuck any whores.
And you are probably not 17 years old and 8,000 miles from home at the
<corneliusc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>You'd be correct there. I do however regularly spend time in
>Amsterdam, where it is legal, open, and more than readily available
>and have managed not to fuck any whores.
time not knowing when you might return.
Hugh
0 new messages