Why won't those damb hypocritical feminists...
xyzzy
Oh wait, what's this?
http://www.now.org/issues/media/hall-of-shame/index.php/television/letterman-palin-daughter
funny how none of the 'wingers who huffed and puffed over this
supposed hypocrisy seem to have noticed this.
CheeseHusker dos
> ... denounce degrading jokes about Sarah Palin's daughters?
>
> Oh wait, what's this?
>
>
> funny how none of the 'wingers who huffed and puffed over this
> supposed hypocrisy seem to have noticed this.
Shit - meant to mention that and give them kudos. Yes.
lein
> ... denounce degrading jokes about Sarah Palin's daughters?
>
> Oh wait, what's this?
>
>
> funny how none of the 'wingers who huffed and puffed over this
> supposed hypocrisy seem to have noticed this.
Hell, even during the campaign, Obama said the children of
politicians, specifically Palin's are off limits, before he continued
to stand by and do nothing about his operatives and supporters attack
Palin's children.
So when will NOW demand Letterman's ouster as they did with Don Imus?
rastafar...@yahoo.com
> On Jun 12, 2:54 pm, xyzzy <xyzzy.d...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > ... denounce degrading jokes about Sarah Palin's daughters?
>
> > Oh wait, what's this?
>
> >http://www.now.org/issues/media/hall-of-shame/index.php/television/le...
>
> > funny how none of the 'wingers who huffed and puffed over this
> > supposed hypocrisy seem to have noticed this.
>
> Hell, even during the campaign, Obama said the children of
> politicians, specifically Palin's are off limits, before he continued
> to stand by and do nothing about his operatives and supporters attack
> Palin's children.
She's the one that decided to use her children as props (or at least
didn't stand up to McCain's people if it was their idea).
Glen Heiman
"xyzzy" <xyzzy...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4d12a321-455f-46b7...@x5g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
Not much of a scathing comdemnation. But they use the opportunity to
condemn a Rush Limbaugh joke about Chelsea. Apparently they don't
understand what a sexist joke is.
WTF was NOW when Letterman was doing his Paline joke a day or more every
night?
They only said something because of the public backlash.
What a fucking bunch of hypocrits the NAGS are.
Heiman
John Rogers
animal.
I noticed it.
I also noticed that they could not stay on topic.
John M. Rogers
AU Class of 1985
The Al Del Greco of Atlanta
"War is an ugly thing but not the ugliest of things; the decayed and degraded
state of moral and patriotic feelings which thinks that nothing is worth war
is much worse. A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight,
nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable
creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the
exertions of better men than himself." (John Stuart Mill)
John Rogers
Standing on stage with your parents is being "used as a prop"?
So you are saying that Obama's daughters are dirty whores too?
Mrs Mookie
> Hey, rastafarians2...@yahoo.com... keep the change, you filthy animal.
>
>
>
> >On Jun 12, 4:57 pm, lein <boomer_the_...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> >> On Jun 12, 2:54 pm, xyzzy <xyzzy.d...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > ... denounce degrading jokes about Sarah Palin's daughters?
>
> >> > Oh wait, what's this?
>
> >> >http://www.now.org/issues/media/hall-of-shame/index.php/television/le...
>
> >> > funny how none of the 'wingers who huffed and puffed over this
> >> > supposed hypocrisy seem to have noticed this.
>
> >> Hell, even during the campaign, Obama said the children of
> >> politicians, specifically Palin's are off limits, before he continued
> >> to stand by and do nothing about his operatives and supporters attack
> >> Palin's children.
>
> >She's the one that decided to use her children as props (or at least
> >didn't stand up to McCain's people if it was their idea).
>
> Standing on stage with your parents is being "used as a prop"?
>
> So you are saying that Obama's daughters are dirty whores too?
>
> John M. Rogers
Really?
You're gonna use the same term to describe two girls (ages 7 and 10)
who have never seen a dick AND a 17 yr old unwed mother who has been
by several accounts riding the pink pony since she was 14?
Really?
Mookie
....no real dog in this fight, just trying to keep it clean...
J. Hugh Sullivan
<deb.r...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Jun 12, 10:02=A0pm, John Rogers <tiger7...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Hey, rastafarians2...@yahoo.com... keep the change, you filthy animal.
>>
>>
>>
>> >On Jun 12, 4:57=A0pm, lein <boomer_the_...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>> >> On Jun 12, 2:54=A0pm, xyzzy <xyzzy.d...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> > ... denounce degrading jokes about Sarah Palin's daughters?
>>
>> >> > Oh wait, what's this?
>>
>> >> >http://www.now.org/issues/media/hall-of-shame/index.php/television/le=
>...
>>
>> >> > funny how none of the 'wingers who huffed and puffed over this
>> >> > supposed hypocrisy seem to have noticed this.
>>
>> >> Hell, even during the campaign, Obama said the children of
>> >> politicians, specifically Palin's are off limits, before he continued
>> >> to stand by and do nothing about his operatives and supporters attack
>> >> Palin's children.
>>
>> >She's the one that decided to use her children as props (or at least
>> >didn't stand up to McCain's people if it was their idea).
>>
>> Standing on stage with your parents is being "used as a prop"?
>>
>> So you are saying that Obama's daughters are dirty whores too?
>>
>> John M. Rogers
>
>Really?
>
>You're gonna use the same term to describe two girls (ages 7 and 10)
>who have never seen a dick AND a 17 yr old unwed mother who has been
>by several accounts riding the pink pony since she was 14?
>
>Really?
>
>Mookie
>....no real dog in this fight, just trying to keep it clean...
When I read your posts I realize I don't even speak English. You have
some fascinating expressions. "Riding the pink pony", indeed. 8-)
Hugh
John Rogers
animal.
>On Jun 12, 10:02�pm, John Rogers <tiger7...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Hey, rastafarians2...@yahoo.com... keep the change, you filthy animal.
>>
>>
>>
>> >On Jun 12, 4:57�pm, lein <boomer_the_...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>> >> On Jun 12, 2:54�pm, xyzzy <xyzzy.d...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> > ... denounce degrading jokes about Sarah Palin's daughters?
>>
>> >> > Oh wait, what's this?
>>
>> >> >http://www.now.org/issues/media/hall-of-shame/index.php/television/le...
>>
>> >> > funny how none of the 'wingers who huffed and puffed over this
>> >> > supposed hypocrisy seem to have noticed this.
>>
>> >> Hell, even during the campaign, Obama said the children of
>> >> politicians, specifically Palin's are off limits, before he continued
>> >> to stand by and do nothing about his operatives and supporters attack
>> >> Palin's children.
>>
>> >She's the one that decided to use her children as props (or at least
>> >didn't stand up to McCain's people if it was their idea).
>>
>> Standing on stage with your parents is being "used as a prop"?
>>
>> So you are saying that Obama's daughters are dirty whores too?
>>
>> John M. Rogers
>
>Really?
>
>You're gonna use the same term to describe two girls (ages 7 and 10)
>who have never seen a dick AND a 17 yr old unwed mother who has been
>by several accounts riding the pink pony since she was 14?
>
>Really?
In case you didn't notice, my second question was intended to be
facetious. (The proper answer to my facetious question is: OF COURSE
NOT.)
And, with regard to the teenage girl in question who is KNOWN to have
"seen a dick", she and her family were at least not hypocritical in
their actions when she got herself all knocked up. Her mother, of
course, encourage teenage abstinence (IMO, not a bad thing to
encourage). But her mother also supported "total" sex education (i.e.
encouraging abstinence but also full education as to birth control
methods available) in Alaska schools. Her mother's church/faith also
is not opposed to birth control. No hyprocrisy in the least by the
Palin's in their actions. Just a stupid teenage mistake by the
daughter.
So, considering my response above was in disagreement to the premise
that "dumb teenage girl gets knocked up and dares to stand on stage
with her politician mother, ergo she is a dirty whore" and you seem to
disagree with me, then you think that this dumb teenage girl that made
a mistake who dared to stand on stage with her politician mother
deserves the label "dirty whore"?
Anthony Summers
> So, considering my response above was in disagreement to the premise
> that "dumb teenage girl gets knocked up and dares to stand on stage
> with her politician mother, ergo she is a dirty whore" and you seem to
> disagree with me, then you think that this dumb teenage girl that made
> a mistake who dared to stand on stage with her politician mother
> deserves the label "dirty whore"?
Are you creating something about which to be 'outraged' yet again?
(In case you can't figure that out, where have you seen the Palin girl
labeled as a "dirty whore"?)
--
A. Summers || summerstorm0007-->at<--yahoo.com
John Rogers
you filthy animal.
>On Sat, 13 Jun 2009 12:08:38 -0400, John Rogers wrote...
You mean outside the fact that Letterman tells us that she is ready to
jump into the sack with A-Rod and is for hire by Eliot Spitzer?
Anthony Summers
> >> So, considering my response above was in disagreement to the premise
> >> that "dumb teenage girl gets knocked up and dares to stand on stage
> >> with her politician mother, ergo she is a dirty whore" and you seem to
> >> disagree with me, then you think that this dumb teenage girl that made
> >> a mistake who dared to stand on stage with her politician mother
> >> deserves the label "dirty whore"?
> >
> >Are you creating something about which to be 'outraged' yet again?
> >
> >(In case you can't figure that out, where have you seen the Palin girl
> >labeled as a "dirty whore"?)
>
> You mean outside the fact that Letterman tells us that she is ready to
> jump into the sack with A-Rod and is for hire by Eliot Spitzer?
Are you aware of David Letterman's occupation, Rogers?
rastafar...@yahoo.com
> Hey, rastafarians2...@yahoo.com... keep the change, you filthy animal.
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Jun 12, 4:57 pm, lein <boomer_the_...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> >> On Jun 12, 2:54 pm, xyzzy <xyzzy.d...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > ... denounce degrading jokes about Sarah Palin's daughters?
>
> >> > Oh wait, what's this?
>
> >> >http://www.now.org/issues/media/hall-of-shame/index.php/television/le...
>
> >> > funny how none of the 'wingers who huffed and puffed over this
> >> > supposed hypocrisy seem to have noticed this.
>
> >> Hell, even during the campaign, Obama said the children of
> >> politicians, specifically Palin's are off limits, before he continued
> >> to stand by and do nothing about his operatives and supporters attack
> >> Palin's children.
>
> >She's the one that decided to use her children as props (or at least
> >didn't stand up to McCain's people if it was their idea).
>
> Standing on stage with your parents is being "used as a prop"?
A few month old baby doesn't belong on a stage at 11pm around bright
lights and loud crowds. And he especially doesn't deserve being
passed around like a loaf of bread, ending up in the 7-year old's
(Piper?) hands, with his head hanging down towards the floor because
it is not being supported properly. (This was after the VP debate.)
That is using your baby as a prop.
FYI -- Neither Sarah nor Todd noticed this, but I did, because I would
never let my months old baby out of my sight.
Mrs Mookie
> Hey, Mrs Mookie <deb.rube...@gmail.com>... keep the change, you filthy
No, Im just saying there's no need to paint Palin's girl and the
Obama's girls with the same brush..
Mookie
Steve Cutchen
<d6224856-4e0f-4fa1...@37g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>, Mrs
Mookie <deb.r...@gmail.com> wrote:
He's the one that decided to use his children as props (or at least
didn't stand up to his people if it was their idea).
Anthony Summers
> > No, Im just saying there's no need to paint Palin's girl and the
> > Obama's girls with the same brush..
> >
> > Mookie
>
> He's the one that decided to use his children as props (or at least
> didn't stand up to his people if it was their idea).
Even if that's true (pay attention now)... is going after his children
an appropriate response? Think carefully before you answer.
John Rogers
animal.
I am confused by your statement.
You think the standard of treatment for Obama's girls and Palin's girl
should be different?
Kyle T. Jones
Standard of treatment? No. Actual treatment? Yes. Reason - one set
is young and hasn't gotten into any trouble - one member of the other
set is older, and got herself knocked up.
And if you're now going to pretend that, had the situations been
reversed (Obama the one with older daughters, it comes out that the
oldest is pregnant) you/Rush/Hannity/etc wouldn't have gone absolutely
apeshit about it - well, hear that? Yep, you can hear me laughing all
the way over there in Atlanta.
In fact, if we're projecting woulda coulda beens, I'd wager it woulda
been an even *bigger* dust up, had the situation been revered - "See!",
the righteous Right-Winger exclaims, pointing, "See the values these
*Libruls* hand down to their children!"
So stuff your faux indignation in a sack, mister!
Cheers.
TOE
> John Rogers wrote:
> > Hey, Mrs Mookie <deb.rube...@gmail.com>... keep the change, you filthy
> >> No, Im just saying there's no need to paint Palin's girl and the
> >> Obama's girls with the same brush..
>
> > I am confused by your statement.
> >
> > You think the standard of treatment for Obama's girls and Palin's girl
> > should be different?
> Standard of treatment? No. Actual treatment? Yes. Reason - one set
> is young and hasn't gotten into any trouble - one member of the other
> set is older, and got herself knocked up.
Willow Palin is PREGNANT? Really? She's only 14, not THAT much older
than Obama's daughters. WTF are you talking about?
> And if you're now going to pretend that, had the situations been
> reversed (Obama the one with older daughters, it comes out that the
> oldest is pregnant) you/Rush/Hannity/etc wouldn't have gone absolutely
> apeshit about it - well, hear that? Yep, you can hear me laughing all
> the way over there in Atlanta.
You can play that game, but Biden's law-breaking daughter and crooked
son made barely a blip on the radar, in fact the majority of people
reading this are going to have to Google this to know what I am
refering to. How about Edward's love child? Oh yeah the MSM sat on
that one. But you are being dishonest. Nobody went apeshit when
Olbermann/Madow etc. was all over the Palin pregnancy story because
like Hannity/Limbaugh it's part of their job.
> In fact, if we're projecting woulda coulda beens, I'd wager it woulda
> been an even *bigger* dust up, had the situation been revered - "See!",
> the righteous Right-Winger exclaims, pointing, "See the values these
> *Libruls* hand down to their children!"
>
> So stuff your faux indignation in a sack, mister!
Now I'm confused by your statement. "Families are off-limits" That's
WAS the policy, how has that changed?
> Cheers.
-Tom Enright
rastafar...@yahoo.com
> On Jun 15, 11:18 am, "Kyle T. Jones" <KBf...@realdomain.net> wrote:
>
> > John Rogers wrote:
> > > Hey, Mrs Mookie <deb.rube...@gmail.com>... keep the change, you filthy
> > >> No, Im just saying there's no need to paint Palin's girl and the
> > >> Obama's girls with the same brush..
>
> > > I am confused by your statement.
>
> > > You think the standard of treatment for Obama's girls and Palin's girl
> > > should be different?
> > Standard of treatment? No. Actual treatment? Yes. Reason - one set
> > is young and hasn't gotten into any trouble - one member of the other
> > set is older, and got herself knocked up.
>
> Willow Palin is PREGNANT? Really? She's only 14, not THAT much older
> than Obama's daughters. WTF are you talking about?
This is just silly now. There's only 1 Palin girl, and it's Willow?
rastafar...@yahoo.com
Cue Crickets -- the righties have no retorts to this, do they?
TOE
There was only 1 Palin girl at the baseball game Letterman referenced.
...chirp....chirp...chirp...
-Tom Enright
rastafar...@yahoo.com
Oh, that's what you mean. Letterman already apolgized for that.
Who's keeping the story alive?
Kyle T. Jones
WTF is with the chirp/chirp nonsense, TOE? Why would I respond to your
ridiculous "Willow Palin is PREGNANT?" retort? It's pretty @!#%ing far
from the context of my reply to John, which was discussing the "standard
of treatment for Obama's girls and Palin's girls" (his words) in a much
more general sense.
Cheers.
John Rogers
filthy animal.
>WTF is with the chirp/chirp nonsense, TOE? Why would I respond to your
>ridiculous "Willow Palin is PREGNANT?" retort? It's pretty @!#%ing far
>from the context of my reply to John, which was discussing the "standard
>of treatment for Obama's girls and Palin's girls" (his words) in a much
>more general sense.
The "standard of treatment" in this case was SPECIFICALLY with regard
to the Letterman issue, you dishonest asshat.
Kyle T. Jones
> Hey, "Kyle T. Jones" <KBf...@realdomain.net>... keep the change, you
> filthy animal.
>
>> WTF is with the chirp/chirp nonsense, TOE? Why would I respond to your
>> ridiculous "Willow Palin is PREGNANT?" retort? It's pretty @!#%ing far
>>from the context of my reply to John, which was discussing the "standard
>> of treatment for Obama's girls and Palin's girls" (his words) in a much
>> more general sense.
>
> The "standard of treatment" in this case was SPECIFICALLY with regard
> to the Letterman issue, you dishonest asshat.
>
Oh, bullshit - you asked Mrs. Mookie a general question:
She said:
_______
No, Im just saying there's no need to paint Palin's girl and the Obama's
girls with the same brush..
_______
You replied:
_______
I am confused by your statement.
You think the standard of treatment for Obama's girls and Palin's girl
should be different?
_______
Now you're claiming this is all in the context "SPECIFICALLY with regard
to the Letterman issue"? That makes zero sense.
Look at that, John - with just a quick Ctrl-C, Ctrl-V, I proved what
everyone's always telling me - that you're full of shit.
Cheers.