Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Obama's Cocaine Use

22 views
Skip to first unread message

freddy...@yahoo.com

unread,
May 11, 2012, 10:38:39 AM5/11/12
to
<chirp...chirp...chirp>

-Tom Enright

Damon Hynes, Cyclone Ranger

unread,
May 11, 2012, 10:42:03 AM5/11/12
to
On May 11, 9:38 am, freddy_ha...@yahoo.com wrote:
> <chirp...chirp...chirp>
>
> -Tom Enright

In 2000, before GWB got traction, I thought he should use Buckcherry's
"Lit Up" as a campaign song.

xyzzy

unread,
May 11, 2012, 10:44:03 AM5/11/12
to
On May 11, 10:38 am, freddy_ha...@yahoo.com wrote:
> <chirp...chirp...chirp>
>
> -Tom Enright

Got anything new? So far these "yabut he's as big a douche as Romney"
attacks on Obama are all based on what he's written in his book, which
was published before he got elected in 2008.

freddy...@yahoo.com

unread,
May 11, 2012, 10:45:29 AM5/11/12
to
The WaPo seems to be able to dig-up HS classmates of Romney, you'd think it would be easier to find college classmates of Obama. But hey, Romney the
"bully gay-basher" while Obama and Biden approve of gay marriage? That's
solid yellow gold journalism right there.

-Tom Enright

xyzzy

unread,
May 11, 2012, 10:50:06 AM5/11/12
to
They don't need to, they can read his book. Are you saying that no
one on the McCain campaign read his book? Why didn't we hear about
this then? Oh wait, we did.

freddy...@yahoo.com

unread,
May 11, 2012, 10:51:40 AM5/11/12
to
Nothing new at all. Just that the MSM didn't care then, don't care now.
Just a comment on their dishonesty and partisanship and more proof that
anything the print, especially if unflattering to someone on the right,
should be viewed with much skepticism.

-Tom Enright

J.C. Watts

unread,
May 11, 2012, 11:37:31 AM5/11/12
to
On May 11, 9:51 am, freddy_ha...@yahoo.com wrote:
> On Friday, May 11, 2012 10:44:03 AM UTC-4, xyzzy wrote:
> > On May 11, 10:38 am, freddy_ha...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > > <chirp...chirp...chirp>
>
> > > -Tom Enright
> > Got anything new?  So far these "yabut he's as big a douche as Romney"
> > attacks on Obama are all based on what he's written in his book, which
> > was published before he got elected in 2008.
>
> Nothing new at all.  Just that the MSM didn't care then,


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/02/AR2007010201359.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/09/us/politics/09obama.html?pagewanted=all

http://realclearpolitics.blogs.time.com/2007/01/04/obamas-drug-use/

I found others as well.

The reason it wasn't that big of a deal is because he came out and
admitted it.

timv

unread,
May 11, 2012, 11:53:51 AM5/11/12
to
Don't talk reason to the Enright. It wastes your time and only makes the Enright mad.

T

freddy...@yahoo.com

unread,
May 11, 2012, 12:26:54 PM5/11/12
to
Story #1 from the WaPo puts a positive spin on Obama's
cocaine use:

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tim-graham/2012/05/10/did-washpost-report-5000-word-expose-obamas-cocaine-use-last-cycle-cours

Story #2: "Old Friends Say Drugs Played Bit Part in Obama’s Young Life"

This one plays-down the drug usage: NBD.

Story #3: Puts a positive spin on his cocaine use.

Actually, "logic" made me very happy, it proved my point very
well. Thanks Logic!!!!!

-Tom Enright

> T

timv

unread,
May 11, 2012, 1:31:35 PM5/11/12
to
They said it was nice to see candor in a Presidential candidate. That is actually a good thing. How many times have me made fun of Clinton for that stupid "didn't inhale" nonsense? Everyone liked the candor with Bush admitting his problems with alcohol and if he would have just admitted his blow usage, we'd all be understanding too.

We're long past the stage in this country in which we think that if you did a few drugs in your youth that somehow you are defective. That shipped sailed a long time ago. And this Romney thing hasn't taken off outside of the liberal echo chamber since the stereotype of the rich dirtbag teenager is so ingrained in our culture that we'd have been surprised if he had actually been a nice guy.

But carry on with the persecution complex. The last thing the right would want to be seen as is tough and resilient.

xyzzy

unread,
May 11, 2012, 1:44:02 PM5/11/12
to
On May 11, 1:31 pm, timv <timvr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday, May 11, 2012 11:26:54 AM UTC-5, freddy...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > On Friday, May 11, 2012 11:53:51 AM UTC-4, timv wrote:
> > > On Friday, May 11, 2012 10:37:31 AM UTC-5, J.C. Watts wrote:
> > > > On May 11, 9:51 am, freddy_ha...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > > > > On Friday, May 11, 2012 10:44:03 AM UTC-4, xyzzy wrote:
> > > > > > On May 11, 10:38 am, freddy_ha...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > > > > > > <chirp...chirp...chirp>
>
> > > > > > > -Tom Enright
> > > > > > Got anything new?  So far these "yabut he's as big a douche as Romney"
> > > > > > attacks on Obama are all based on what he's written in his book, which
> > > > > > was published before he got elected in 2008.
>
> > > > > Nothing new at all.  Just that the MSM didn't care then,
>
> > > >http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/02/AR200...
>
> > > >http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/09/us/politics/09obama.html?pagewanted...
>
> > > >http://realclearpolitics.blogs.time.com/2007/01/04/obamas-drug-use/
>
> > > > I found others as well.
>
> > > > The reason it wasn't that big of a deal is because he came out and
> > > > admitted it.
>
> > > Don't talk reason to the Enright. It wastes your time and
> > > only makes the Enright mad.
>
> > Story #1 from the WaPo puts a positive spin on Obama's
> > cocaine use:
>
> >http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tim-graham/2012/05/10/did-washpost-repor...
>
> > Story #2: "Old Friends Say Drugs Played Bit Part in Obama’s Young Life"
>
> > This one plays-down the drug usage: NBD.
>
> > Story #3:  Puts a positive spin on his cocaine use.
>
> > Actually, "logic" made me very happy, it proved my point very
> > well.  Thanks Logic!!!!!
>
> > -Tom Enright
>
> They said it was nice to see candor in a Presidential candidate. That is actually a good thing. How many times have me made fun of Clinton for that stupid "didn't inhale" nonsense? Everyone liked the candor with Bush admitting his problems with alcohol and if he would have just admitted his blow usage, we'd all be understanding too.
>
> We're long past the stage in this country in which we think that if you did a few drugs in your youth that somehow you are defective. That shipped sailed a long time ago. And this Romney thing hasn't taken off outside of the liberal echo chamber since the stereotype of the rich dirtbag teenager is so ingrained in our culture that we'd have been surprised if he had actually been a nice guy.
>
> But carry on with the persecution complex. The last thing the right would want to be seen as is tough and resilient.

Well said in every way.

Like I keep saying, if Romney had started off with his Thursday
statement, instead of trying to lie about it first, realizing that
wasn't going to work, then owning it, we'd all be all good.

freddy...@yahoo.com

unread,
May 11, 2012, 1:51:10 PM5/11/12
to
I generally agree with you, apart from people liking Bush's
candor.

> But carry on with the persecution complex. The last thing the
> right would want to be seen as is tough and resilient.

You should reread your own, darn good, post. People went after Clinton for his lack of “candor” on inhaling. It’s not the actual pot smoking that is the issue, it’s the fact that he couldn’t be honest about it. What bugs me about these stories is not that the MSM puts their thumb on the scale (5600 words for Romney’s “bully” story? FFS.) when reporting on candidates, it’s left’s lack of candor. They can’t be honest about what is happening in front of their own eyes.

-Tom Enright

Huck Kennedy

unread,
May 11, 2012, 2:56:35 PM5/11/12
to
On May 11, 8:37 am, "J.C. Watts" <jonens...@charter.net> wrote:
> On May 11, 9:51 am, freddy_ha...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> > On Friday, May 11, 2012 10:44:03 AM UTC-4, xyzzy wrote:
> > > On May 11, 10:38 am, freddy_ha...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > > > <chirp...chirp...chirp>
>
> > > > -Tom Enright
> > > Got anything new?  So far these "yabut he's as big a douche as Romney"
> > > attacks on Obama are all based on what he's written in his book, which
> > > was published before he got elected in 2008.
>
> > Nothing new at all.  Just that the MSM didn't care then,
>
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/02/AR200...
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/09/us/politics/09obama.html?pagewanted...
>
> http://realclearpolitics.blogs.time.com/2007/01/04/obamas-drug-use/
>
> I found others as well.
>
> The reason it wasn't that big of a deal is because he came out and
> admitted it.

Never try to teach the Enright facts; it wastes your time and
annoys the Enright.

Huck

Futbol Phan

unread,
May 11, 2012, 3:03:00 PM5/11/12
to
On May 11, 10:37 am, "J.C. Watts" <jonens...@charter.net> wrote:
> On May 11, 9:51 am, freddy_ha...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> > On Friday, May 11, 2012 10:44:03 AM UTC-4, xyzzy wrote:
> > > On May 11, 10:38 am, freddy_ha...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > > > <chirp...chirp...chirp>
>
> > > > -Tom Enright
> > > Got anything new?  So far these "yabut he's as big a douche as Romney"
> > > attacks on Obama are all based on what he's written in his book, which
> > > was published before he got elected in 2008.
>
> > Nothing new at all.  Just that the MSM didn't care then,
>
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/02/AR200...
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/09/us/politics/09obama.html?pagewanted...
>
> http://realclearpolitics.blogs.time.com/2007/01/04/obamas-drug-use/
>
> I found others as well.
>
> The reason it wasn't that big of a deal is because he came out and
> admitted it.

And because most people are OK with it.

And prolly most people are OK with Mitt being a spoiled, pricky bully
at Cranbrook too.

Futbol Phan

unread,
May 11, 2012, 3:05:08 PM5/11/12
to
On May 11, 12:51 pm, freddy_ha...@yahoo.com wrote:
> On Friday, May 11, 2012 1:31:35 PM UTC-4, timv wrote:
> > On Friday, May 11, 2012 11:26:54 AM UTC-5, freddy...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > > On Friday, May 11, 2012 11:53:51 AM UTC-4, timv wrote:
> > > > On Friday, May 11, 2012 10:37:31 AM UTC-5, J.C. Watts wrote:
> > > > > On May 11, 9:51 am, freddy_ha...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > > > > > On Friday, May 11, 2012 10:44:03 AM UTC-4, xyzzy wrote:
> > > > > > > On May 11, 10:38 am, freddy_ha...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > > > > > > > <chirp...chirp...chirp>
>
> > > > > > > > -Tom Enright
> > > > > > > Got anything new?  So far these "yabut he's as big a douche as Romney"
> > > > > > > attacks on Obama are all based on what he's written in his book, which
> > > > > > > was published before he got elected in 2008.
>
> > > > > > Nothing new at all.  Just that the MSM didn't care then,
>
> > > > >http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/02/AR200...
>
> > > > >http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/09/us/politics/09obama.html?pagewanted...
>
> > > > >http://realclearpolitics.blogs.time.com/2007/01/04/obamas-drug-use/
>
> > > > > I found others as well.
>
> > > > > The reason it wasn't that big of a deal is because he came out and
> > > > > admitted it.
>
> > > > Don't talk reason to the Enright. It wastes your time and
> > > > only makes the Enright mad.
>
> > > Story #1 from the WaPo puts a positive spin on Obama's
> > > cocaine use:
>
> > >http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tim-graham/2012/05/10/did-washpost-repor...
Was the right 'honest in their candor' during the Swiftboating of
Kerry?

timv

unread,
May 11, 2012, 3:39:52 PM5/11/12
to
Most of the stories I've seen on this is about how ham-handedly Mitt handled this, ie lack of candor.

I doubt it would have gotten another minute of attention outside of the left's echochamber if he just would have said, "Yeah, I remember that. Looking back on it, it was a really dumb thing to do, but at the time we really weren't trying to be that malicious." But it is becoming really clear that Mitt is just an animatronic robot programmed for maximum dishonesty.

T

xyzzy

unread,
May 11, 2012, 3:43:27 PM5/11/12
to
On May 11, 3:39 pm, timv <timvr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday, May 11, 2012 12:51:10 PM UTC-5, freddy...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > On Friday, May 11, 2012 1:31:35 PM UTC-4, timv wrote:
> > > On Friday, May 11, 2012 11:26:54 AM UTC-5, freddy...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > > > On Friday, May 11, 2012 11:53:51 AM UTC-4, timv wrote:
> > > > > On Friday, May 11, 2012 10:37:31 AM UTC-5, J.C. Watts wrote:
> > > > > > On May 11, 9:51 am, freddy_ha...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > > > > > > On Friday, May 11, 2012 10:44:03 AM UTC-4, xyzzy wrote:
> > > > > > > > On May 11, 10:38 am, freddy_ha...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > > > > > > > > <chirp...chirp...chirp>
>
> > > > > > > > > -Tom Enright
> > > > > > > > Got anything new?  So far these "yabut he's as big a douche as Romney"
> > > > > > > > attacks on Obama are all based on what he's written in his book, which
> > > > > > > > was published before he got elected in 2008.
>
> > > > > > > Nothing new at all.  Just that the MSM didn't care then,
>
> > > > > >http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/02/AR200...
>
> > > > > >http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/09/us/politics/09obama.html?pagewanted...
>
> > > > > >http://realclearpolitics.blogs.time.com/2007/01/04/obamas-drug-use/
>
> > > > > > I found others as well.
>
> > > > > > The reason it wasn't that big of a deal is because he came out and
> > > > > > admitted it.
>
> > > > > Don't talk reason to the Enright. It wastes your time and
> > > > > only makes the Enright mad.
>
> > > > Story #1 from the WaPo puts a positive spin on Obama's
> > > > cocaine use:
>
> > > >http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tim-graham/2012/05/10/did-washpost-repor...
You owe me $1

freddy...@yahoo.com

unread,
May 11, 2012, 3:55:33 PM5/11/12
to
Yes, but that's not the point. The SwiftVets were a special interest, not a media organ.

-Tom Enright

freddy...@yahoo.com

unread,
May 11, 2012, 3:59:12 PM5/11/12
to
“There’s an iPod 3, and a Mitt Romney 4; they worked all the bugs out - he’s not killing hobos at night anymore.”

Last night's 30 Rock.

-Tom Enright

> T

xyzzy

unread,
May 11, 2012, 4:01:10 PM5/11/12
to
On May 11, 3:59 pm, freddy_ha...@yahoo.com wrote:
> On Friday, May 11, 2012 3:39:52 PM UTC-4, timv wrote:
> > On Friday, May 11, 2012 12:51:10 PM UTC-5, freddy...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > > On Friday, May 11, 2012 1:31:35 PM UTC-4, timv wrote:
> > > > On Friday, May 11, 2012 11:26:54 AM UTC-5, freddy...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > > > > On Friday, May 11, 2012 11:53:51 AM UTC-4, timv wrote:
> > > > > > On Friday, May 11, 2012 10:37:31 AM UTC-5, J.C. Watts wrote:
> > > > > > > On May 11, 9:51 am, freddy_ha...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Friday, May 11, 2012 10:44:03 AM UTC-4, xyzzy wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On May 11, 10:38 am, freddy_ha...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > <chirp...chirp...chirp>
>
> > > > > > > > > > -Tom Enright
> > > > > > > > > Got anything new?  So far these "yabut he's as big a douche as Romney"
> > > > > > > > > attacks on Obama are all based on what he's written in his book, which
> > > > > > > > > was published before he got elected in 2008.
>
> > > > > > > > Nothing new at all.  Just that the MSM didn't care then,
>
> > > > > > >http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/02/AR200...
>
> > > > > > >http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/09/us/politics/09obama.html?pagewanted...
>
> > > > > > >http://realclearpolitics.blogs.time.com/2007/01/04/obamas-drug-use/
>
> > > > > > > I found others as well.
>
> > > > > > > The reason it wasn't that big of a deal is because he came out and
> > > > > > > admitted it.
>
> > > > > > Don't talk reason to the Enright. It wastes your time and
> > > > > > only makes the Enright mad.
>
> > > > > Story #1 from the WaPo puts a positive spin on Obama's
> > > > > cocaine use:
>
> > > > >http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tim-graham/2012/05/10/did-washpost-repor...
I did nut know he parties with Craig James.

> Last night's 30 Rock.

Do you normally watch 30 Rock, or are you just on the lookout for ways
to be offended?
0 new messages