Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Sorry Undead Kennedy
11 views
Skip to first unread message
xyzzy
May 31, 2012, 4:37:45 PM5/31/12
to
Looks like you'll be competing for bar chycks with John Edwards again.
The Cheesehusker, Trade Warrior
May 31, 2012, 4:42:09 PM5/31/12
to
On May 31, 3:37 pm, xyzzy <xyzzy.d...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Looks like you'll be competing for bar chycks with John Edwards again.
He got off?
> Looks like you'll be competing for bar chycks with John Edwards again.
so to speak...
xyzzy
May 31, 2012, 4:49:39 PM5/31/12
to
On May 31, 4:42 pm, "The Cheesehusker, Trade Warrior"
Not guilty on 1 charge.
Mistrial on the other 5.
Mistrial on the other 5.
The Cheesehusker, Trade Warrior
May 31, 2012, 4:52:15 PM5/31/12
to
proof that "innocence by richwhiteness" is not party oriented
xyzzy
May 31, 2012, 4:55:38 PM5/31/12
to
On May 31, 4:52 pm, "The Cheesehusker, Trade Warrior"
scumbag, in and of itself, is not a federal crime.
I always thought this case was pretty shaky. Lots of debate on
whether or not a crime was committed at all.
<iamtj4l...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 31, 3:49 pm, xyzzy <xyzzy.d...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On May 31, 4:42 pm, "The Cheesehusker, Trade Warrior"
>
> > <iamtj4l...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On May 31, 3:37 pm, xyzzy <xyzzy.d...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Looks like you'll be competing for bar chycks with John Edwards again.
>
> > > He got off?
>
> > > so to speak...
>
> > Not guilty on 1 charge.
> > Mistrial on the other 5.
>
> lulz
>
> proof that "innocence by richwhiteness" is not party oriented
Or, as his defense so eloquently put it: proof that being a total
> On May 31, 3:49 pm, xyzzy <xyzzy.d...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On May 31, 4:42 pm, "The Cheesehusker, Trade Warrior"
>
> > <iamtj4l...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On May 31, 3:37 pm, xyzzy <xyzzy.d...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Looks like you'll be competing for bar chycks with John Edwards again.
>
> > > He got off?
>
> > > so to speak...
>
> > Not guilty on 1 charge.
> > Mistrial on the other 5.
>
> lulz
>
> proof that "innocence by richwhiteness" is not party oriented
scumbag, in and of itself, is not a federal crime.
I always thought this case was pretty shaky. Lots of debate on
whether or not a crime was committed at all.
Huck Kennedy
May 31, 2012, 7:19:59 PM5/31/12
to
ridiculous, and that the only question of the trial would be whether
or not the jury could differentiate between John Edwards the scumbag
and John Edwards the accused law breaker.
Huck
the_andr...@yahoo.com
May 31, 2012, 11:12:08 PM5/31/12
to
On May 31, 4:37 pm, xyzzy <xyzzy.d...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Looks like you'll be competing for bar chycks with John Edwards again.
on the way home tonight I heard the judge sent 'em back.
> Looks like you'll be competing for bar chycks with John Edwards again.
I hope they drop the prosecution and change the election laws
NapalmHeart
Jun 1, 2012, 8:52:59 AM6/1/12
to
"Huck Kennedy" <temp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:8695a52f-632d-4985...@l5g2000pbo.googlegroups.com...
IAWTP Seems to be the consensus of the reports I've seen.
Ken
The Undead Edward M. Kennedy
Jun 1, 2012, 11:44:57 AM6/1/12
to
"xyzzy" <xyzzy...@gmail.com> wrote
> Looks like you'll be competing for bar chycks with John Edwards again.
Eh, we lounge lizards have a certain code of honor.
BTW, who the fuck thought of sending female soldiers to active war zones?
That defeats the whole purpose of having wars.
--Tedward
> Looks like you'll be competing for bar chycks with John Edwards again.
BTW, who the fuck thought of sending female soldiers to active war zones?
That defeats the whole purpose of having wars.
--Tedward
Michael Press
Jun 1, 2012, 4:06:22 PM6/1/12
to
In article <jqao1q$f2v$1...@dont-email.me>,
Camp followers by another name. plus ça change ...
--
Michael Press
--
Michael Press
0 new messages