Newsgroups: rec.sport.disc
From: CR <ckrich...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 15:26:54 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, May 8 2008 6:26 pm
Subject: "Super" Bids
So I've been tossing this idea around for a bit in my head, and with
the completion of the UPA Coordinators Survey today, I finally put it all down on paper. In sum, it is an idea for college bid allocation. From what I've read, many people (or at least the ones on RSD) do not like that strength bids are decided based on the previous year's results. I propose that the UPA create a subjective poll, as opposed to the objective computer algorithm. This poll would be of all the coordinators in the college division, and would eliminate one strength bid and one size bid. They would rank the top 16 teams in the nation from week to week, and the week before regionals begin the poll would be analyzed as follows. Super Size Bid Super Strength Bid Tiebreakers for both bids will be decided by whichever region has the So looking at this year's series, and using the NUMP (since it is Strength Bid 1 - Southwest (Colorado) Size Bid 1 - ME Super Size Bid - AC (3 teams + UNC ranked 12 compared to UBC at 15 and Super Strength Bid - AC=7, CN=7.67, SW=5, GL=6.5, S=9.5, NW=12, ME, NE This gives us a nationals of... So how does this look as a slightly more current-season based way to CR Note: This post does not represent the views of the UPA. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||