Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
NUMP Womens Top 20--Feb 25
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  9 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
ageric...@yahoo.com  
View profile  
 More options Feb 25 2009, 7:51 am
Newsgroups: rec.sport.disc
From: ageric...@yahoo.com
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:51:32 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Feb 25 2009 7:51 am
Subject: NUMP Womens Top 20--Feb 25
The National Ultimate Media Panel's Womens Top 20 for the weeks
beginning Feb 25, 2009 can be found below.
The NUMP is proud to annouce that, i believe, for the first time in
the organization's history that the Womens voting out numbered the
Mens!

3 columns this week...current rank, team name and number of points
earned thru the balloting.
4 different teams earned first place votes, as indicated in the
parentheses.
UC SB earned 11, Oregon only 1 but finished #2 in the rankings...while
Washington garnered 8 first place votes and Wisconsin 3.

In 4 rankings this season, 3 teams have been ranked #1
UCSB in the preseason poll, followed by UBC, then Washington and again
UCSB.

I hope you enjoy keeping up with these rankings....please post them to
your website if you'd like...and use them to rank teams at your next
tournament!

comments welcome.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

rank    team    pts
1       UC Santa Barbara(11)    421
2       Oregon(1)       401
3       Washington(8)   397
4       Wisconsin(3)    395
5       Stanford        344
6       Michigan        320
7       Ottawa  316
8       UCLA    280
9       British Columbia        246
10      Cal Berkeley    243
11      Carleton        188
12      Southern Cal    159
13      North Carolina  120
14      Wake Forest     98
15      Colorado        86
16      Pittsburgh      85
17      UNC-Wilmington  71
18      Northeastern    67
19      UC San Diego    67
20      Texas   64

Other teams receiving votes this week include....
Arizona 30, Georgia 30, UC San Diego 20, Illinois 19 and Truman State
16


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
ageric...@yahoo.com  
View profile  
 More options Feb 25 2009, 7:55 am
Newsgroups: rec.sport.disc
From: ageric...@yahoo.com
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:55:14 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Feb 25 2009 7:55 am
Subject: Re: NUMP Womens Top 20--Feb 25
I am a dork.
please see the bottom of this post to see corrections to the "other
teams receiving votes include" portion of the top 20 rankings
i posted a previous weeks "other teams"........
sorry.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

On Feb 25, 7:51 am, ageric...@yahoo.com wrote:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Wisconsin Eau Claire 60, Arizona 41, Illinois 31, Florida 30 and
Western Washington 28

thank you
Mike Gerics
NUMP Tabulator


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jason Weddle  
View profile  
 More options Feb 25 2009, 8:03 am
Newsgroups: rec.sport.disc
From: Jason Weddle <jason_wed...@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 05:03:33 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Feb 25 2009 8:03 am
Subject: Re: NUMP Womens Top 20--Feb 25
Is the points column a total for each week or is it a running total
for the season?

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
ageric...@yahoo.com  
View profile  
 More options Feb 25 2009, 8:08 am
Newsgroups: rec.sport.disc
From: ageric...@yahoo.com
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 05:08:14 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Feb 25 2009 8:08 am
Subject: Re: NUMP Womens Top 20--Feb 25
> Is the points column a total for each week or is it a running total
> for the season?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

---that is the dumbest question EVER on rsd.
duh.....the points column are the number of votes tabulated for a
given team for ONE PARTICULAR week of voting.

The UC Santa Barbara women earned 421 votes THIS week....and were
voted #1 by 11 of the National Ultimate Media Panel Members

did you find your green case?


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jason Weddle  
View profile  
 More options Feb 25 2009, 8:15 am
Newsgroups: rec.sport.disc
From: Jason Weddle <jason_wed...@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 05:15:28 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Feb 25 2009 8:15 am
Subject: Re: NUMP Womens Top 20--Feb 25
> ---that is the dumbest question EVER on rsd.
> duh.....the points column are the number of votes tabulated for a
> given team for ONE PARTICULAR week of voting.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ever? Doubtful.

> did you find your green case?

No, I will be rushing home this afternoon to look for it though.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
MWeddle  
View profile  
 More options Feb 25 2009, 2:12 pm
Newsgroups: rec.sport.disc
From: MWeddle <matw4...@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:12:57 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Feb 25 2009 2:12 pm
Subject: Re: NUMP Womens Top 20--Feb 25
On Feb 25, 8:15 am, Jason Weddle <jason_wed...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > ---that is the dumbest question EVER on rsd.
> > duh.....the points column are the number of votes tabulated for a
> > given team for ONE PARTICULAR week of voting.

> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Ever? Doubtful.

> > did you find your green case?

> No, I will be rushing home this afternoon to look for it though.

Haha I found mine

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Lindsay  
View profile  
 More options Feb 25 2009, 2:53 pm
Newsgroups: rec.sport.disc
From: Lindsay <lindsayl...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:53:05 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Feb 25 2009 2:53 pm
Subject: Re: NUMP Womens Top 20--Feb 25
Similar to the men's side in that the "big names" seem to have the
advantage in the poll. At any rate, this list is great locker room
motivation for those teams that were overlooked this week...

And, of course, 6 of the top 10 from NW.

On Feb 25, 6:51 am, ageric...@yahoo.com wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
FJR  
View profile  
 More options Feb 26 2009, 3:23 pm
Newsgroups: rec.sport.disc
From: FJR <f...@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:23:37 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs, Feb 26 2009 3:23 pm
Subject: Re: NUMP Womens Top 20--Feb 25
Who was overlooked?   I'd love to hear more about teams that aren't
getting enough respect. I can't say that I'll agree but I'm always
interested to hear other viewpoints.

The only major oddity I see in the rankings is that Berkeley should be
a couple spots higher.  They are 2-0 vs. UCLA and 1-0 vs. UBC. Plus,
their only losses have been to Stanford and UCSB.

Also, I only see 5 NW teams in the top 10. All of them are deserving
(fyi, I'm not from the NW).

I think all four of the teams that got 1st place votes are good
candidates for number one but I'm a bit surprised that UW has so many
votes despite losing to Oregon at Bellingham. Maybe those voters think
that UW will be the better team down the road but I think you've got
to factor in regular season results, right?

Wisconsin vs. UCSB for number one would be a much more intriguing
debate if Bella Donna had won TiV. I'm sure that they will be in the
mix come Memorial Day.

On Feb 25, 11:53 am, Lindsay <lindsayl...@gmail.com> wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Lindsay  
View profile  
 More options Feb 27 2009, 1:21 pm
Newsgroups: rec.sport.disc
From: Lindsay <lindsayl...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:21:55 -0800 (PST)
Local: Fri, Feb 27 2009 1:21 pm
Subject: Re: NUMP Womens Top 20--Feb 25
On Feb 26, 2:23 pm, FJR <f...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

> Who was overlooked?   I'd love to hear more about teams that aren't
> getting enough respect. I can't say that I'll agree but I'm always
> interested to hear other viewpoints.

Specifically, I think Dartmouth looked pretty good at Mardi Gras last
weekend and faired a bit better against Michigan than Texas (though we
were not at full strength).  Emory, though not particularly deep, also
has the potential to match up with those listed. I'm also suprised
that Illinois didn't break the top 20 after a pretty good showing at
President's Day.

> The only major oddity I see in the rankings is that Berkeley should be
> a couple spots higher.  They are 2-0 vs. UCLA and 1-0 vs. UBC. Plus,
> their only losses have been to Stanford and UCSB.

I agree. I guess missing Semi's at Pres Day probably hurt them in the
rankings.

> Also, I only see 5 NW teams in the top 10. All of them are deserving
> (fyi, I'm not from the NW).

True. I mis-counted.  Also, I was just pointing it out...I played
college in the NW, so the continued dominance is fine by me :).  These
teams play eachother so much. It goes a long way to raise and maintain
the higher level of play.

> I think all four of the teams that got 1st place votes are good
> candidates for number one but I'm a bit surprised that UW has so many
> votes despite losing to Oregon at Bellingham. Maybe those voters think
> that UW will be the better team down the road but I think you've got
> to factor in regular season results, right?

> Wisconsin vs. UCSB for number one would be a much more intriguing
> debate if Bella Donna had won TiV. I'm sure that they will be in the
> mix come Memorial Day.

That's a good point, but looking at Vegas is tough this year what with
the crazy weather.  Also, it was probably Wisco's first time playing
outside in quite a while.

Always happy to see a women's thread get a bump on RSD...
linds


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »