I am going to create a subject-index to threads from rec.sport.disc,
probably going back to Nov, 2001, when 10th edition rules went into
effect. Im going read a ton of threads, and, based on the overall
discussion in the threads, assign one or more subject headings to each
one.
I'll put all of this into a database, and then generate a sweet
webpage where you can look up your topic of choice, either
alphabetially (like in the back of a book), or hierarchially (like
yahoo).
I realize that you can search the postings by keyword, however, my
index will be beneficial, for example, if you want to read ALL the
discussions about the traveling rule, but dont want articles about
traveling to a foreign country.
Even if you think this index is pointless, its just for a school
project, so don't worry, Im doing most of the work anyway. All I need
from you is a list of topics I should include in the index.
Add to this list:
1. Anything dealing with the rules
2.
There ya go. That should cover it.
3. anything pertaining to rankings
4. regional strength/ alignments
6. Photos. Maybe a sub-index of the Major Tournaments. Many rabid fans
and people less familiar with the game would benefit from a photo site
index.
Wiggity
MedMen
6. School Assignments
7. Tournaments / Tournament Info
8. Shit talking
Sounds like you got your work cut out for you. Hopefully we can all use it.
3. Information about pick-up games in various cities
Threads calling for refs
Ultimate in the Olympics polls (... bowling too)
And "ultimate should be on TV" posts
You forgot about "move coed/open/women to the summer" and "west coast
schools need more bids to nationals."
2. professional athletes vs elite ultimate and other inane discussions
3. media that <gasp> mention ultimate in an unflattering light
4. team x is a bunch of cheaters
5. hey now, i play for team x and i don't cheat ? none of us cheat
6. what did you play before you played ultimate?
7. santa cruz stole my bid and won't give it back
music on tap: dj shadow, diminishing returns
dusty
srhodes at drew dot edu
that's the end of part one--
on part two we learn how the badger got his stripes,
and i'll be playing more records by people you've never heard of and
don't like very much
9. Luke Smith's ski-trip reports
2. Wildcards, and why the NW whined so much about them.
3. Tournament (and UPA?) budget info.
4. Tournament party winners.
5. Yearly final divisional standings, UPA and Worlds.
6. The debate over the US rep to Worlds.
7. Nerdy rosham bullshit (just so they'll quit posting about it).
8. How-to posts about throwing (like you can learn that way).
9. Anyone who's participated in a landshark (so as to avoid them).
10. Tournament formats (search on "Brian Canniff").
11. "How do I rehab a ___ injury?"
12. Luke's thread reviews.
13. Top 10 things overheard while watching Open/Women's/Masters/Mixed
14. Poor spirit call-outs.
15. Callahan nominations.
are you gonna use the dewey decimal system to catagorize things too?
glad to see the profession of librarian is still going strong in a
world that is relying so much on other sourses of knowledge.
-mxs
sh...@simmons.edu (Adam Shire) wrote in message news:<7840f92d.0402...@posting.google.com>...
> Im working on a project for school and i need some input from the
> rec.sport.disc community.
>
> I'll put all of this into a database, and then generate a sweet
> webpage where you can look up your topic of choice, either
> alphabetially (like in the back of a book), or hierarchially (like
> yahoo).
>
> I realize that you can search the postings by keyword, however, my
> index will be beneficial, for example, if you want to read ALL the
> discussions about the traveling rule, but dont want articles about
> traveling to a foreign country.
>
> i see you have your work cut out for you mad dog. lets hope you're not
> busy in the library all spring and can still make it to practices.
>
> are you gonna use the dewey decimal system to catagorize things too?
>
> glad to see the profession of librarian is still going strong in a
> world that is relying so much on other sourses of knowledge.
>
> -mxs
Ahh, but are they /credible/ sources?
--
When a Search Engine Isn't Enough, Call a Librarian
New York Times
February 5, 2004
By JEFFREY SELINGO
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/05/technology/circuits/05libr.html?ex=1077
381301&ei=1&en=9d876c4c8cf92bc7
that's cataloging...
> > glad to see the profession of librarian is still going strong in a
> > world that is relying so much on other sourses of knowledge.
spelling resources even...
> Ahh, but are they /credible/ sources?
yeah librarians... doing it in the stacks...
anybody up for some disc at ALA this year?