NUMP 2008 Mens Final Rankings
The group you are posting to is a
Usenet group . Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Newsgroups: rec.sport.disc
From:
"Mike Gerics" <mger... @ec.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 06:56:22 -0400
Local: Wed, May 21 2008 6:56 am
Subject: NUMP 2008 Mens Final Rankings
Below you will find the National Ultimate Media Panels Final Rankings for the Mens Division of College Ultimate.... Rank Team / #1 Votes Pts 1 Wisconsin---12--- 300 2 Florida 286 3 Colorado 278 4 Carleton 263 5 Georgia 242 6 Arizona 239 7 Illinois 234 8 Stanford 189 9 Michigan 187 10 UC Santa Cruz 172 11 North Carolina 170 12 Texas 169 13 Pittsburgh 155 14 Harvard 153 15 North Texas 137 16 Dartmouth 117 17 British Columbia 79 18 Delaware 71 19 UNC Wilmington 63 20 Minnesota 57 21 UC Santa Barbara 46 22 NC State 40 23 Ohio State 37 24 Claremont 36 25 Cal Berkeley 35
Other teams that received votes included: Tufts 29, Central Florida 26, Whitman 25, Oregon 23 and Las Positas 14.
Tabulator's note: Top 20 finish by the UNCW Seamen!!! nice work!!!
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.disc
From:
andrewr... @comcast.net
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 04:17:33 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, May 21 2008 7:17 am
Subject: Re: NUMP 2008 Mens Final Rankings
On May 21, 6:56 am, "Mike Gerics" <mger... @ec.rr.com> wrote:
> Below you will find the National Ultimate Media Panels Final Rankings for
> the Mens Division of College Ultimate....
> Rank Team / #1 Votes Pts > 1 Wisconsin---12--- 300 > 2 Florida 286 > 3 Colorado 278 > 4 Carleton 263 > 5 Georgia 242 > 6 Arizona 239 > 7 Illinois 234 > 8 Stanford 189 > 9 Michigan 187 > 10 UC Santa Cruz 172 > 11 North Carolina 170 > 12 Texas 169 > 13 Pittsburgh 155 > 14 Harvard 153 > 15 North Texas 137 > 16 Dartmouth 117 > 17 British Columbia 79 > 18 Delaware 71 > 19 UNC Wilmington 63 > 20 Minnesota 57 > 21 UC Santa Barbara 46 > 22 NC State 40 > 23 Ohio State 37 > 24 Claremont 36 > 25 Cal Berkeley 35
> Other teams that received votes included: > Tufts 29, Central Florida 26, Whitman 25, Oregon 23 and Las Positas 14.
> Tabulator's note: Top 20 finish by the UNCW Seamen!!! nice work!
BIAS MIKE G! BIAS!
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.disc
From:
backintheu... @gmail.com
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 10:24:41 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, May 21 2008 1:24 pm
Subject: Re: NUMP 2008 Mens Final Rankings
On May 21, 6:56 am, "Mike Gerics" <mger... @ec.rr.com> wrote:
> Below you will find the National Ultimate Media Panels Final Rankings for
> the Mens Division of College Ultimate....
> Rank Team / #1 Votes Pts > 1 Wisconsin---12--- 300 > 2 Florida 286 > 3 Colorado 278 > 4 Carleton 263 > 5 Georgia 242 > 6 Arizona 239 > 7 Illinois 234 > 8 Stanford 189 > 9 Michigan 187 > 10 UC Santa Cruz 172 > 11 North Carolina 170 > 12 Texas 169 > 13 Pittsburgh 155 > 14 Harvard 153 > 15 North Texas 137 > 16 Dartmouth 117 > 17 British Columbia 79 > 18 Delaware 71 > 19 UNC Wilmington 63 > 20 Minnesota 57 > 21 UC Santa Barbara 46 > 22 NC State 40 > 23 Ohio State 37 > 24 Claremont 36 > 25 Cal Berkeley 35
> Other teams that received votes included: > Tufts 29, Central Florida 26, Whitman 25, Oregon 23 and Las Positas 14.
> Tabulator's note: Top 20 finish by the UNCW Seamen!!! nice work!!!
UCF beats UNCW twice yet gets ranked 8 spots below?
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.disc
From:
Jay Schulkin <Jay.Schul... @gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 10:34:12 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, May 21 2008 1:34 pm
Subject: Re: NUMP 2008 Mens Final Rankings
On May 21, 10:24 am, backintheu... @gmail.com wrote:
> On May 21, 6:56 am, "Mike Gerics" <mger
... @ec.rr.com> wrote:
> > Below you will find the National Ultimate Media Panels Final Rankings for > > the Mens Division of College Ultimate....
> > Rank Team / #1 Votes Pts > > 1 Wisconsin---12--- 300 > > 2 Florida 286 > > 3 Colorado 278 > > 4 Carleton 263 > > 5 Georgia 242 > > 6 Arizona 239 > > 7 Illinois 234 > > 8 Stanford 189 > > 9 Michigan 187 > > 10 UC Santa Cruz 172 > > 11 North Carolina 170 > > 12 Texas 169 > > 13 Pittsburgh 155 > > 14 Harvard 153 > > 15 North Texas 137 > > 16 Dartmouth 117 > > 17 British Columbia 79 > > 18 Delaware 71 > > 19 UNC Wilmington 63 > > 20 Minnesota 57 > > 21 UC Santa Barbara 46 > > 22 NC State 40 > > 23 Ohio State 37 > > 24 Claremont 36 > > 25 Cal Berkeley 35
> > Other teams that received votes included: > > Tufts 29, Central Florida 26, Whitman 25, Oregon 23 and Las Positas 14.
> > Tabulator's note: Top 20 finish by the UNCW Seamen!!! nice work!!!
> UCF beats UNCW twice yet gets ranked 8 spots below?
Sigh... Doesn't someone say something like that about UCF every time? Apparently the NUMP voters all have different standards than you.
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.disc
From:
rch... @mail.usf.edu
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 12:06:24 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, May 21 2008 3:06 pm
Subject: Re: NUMP 2008 Mens Final Rankings
I don't understand how UCF and is behind UNC wilmington.....they beat them when it mattered......makes no sense whatsoever
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.disc
From:
"Mike Gerics" <mger... @ec.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 15:20:42 -0400
Local: Wed, May 21 2008 3:20 pm
Subject: Re: NUMP 2008 Mens Final Rankings
>> Tabulator's note: Top 20 finish by the UNCW Seamen!!! nice work!
> BIAS MIKE G! BIAS!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ --really they finished at like.....#37, but i double their votes each time.
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.disc
From:
"Mike Gerics" <mger... @ec.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 15:21:19 -0400
Local: Wed, May 21 2008 3:21 pm
Subject: Re: NUMP 2008 Mens Final Rankings
> UCF beats UNCW twice yet gets ranked 8 spots below?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ---i guess the rest of the season had an impact.
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.disc
From:
ME <greg.vas... @gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 12:31:58 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, May 21 2008 3:31 pm
Subject: Re: NUMP 2008 Mens Final Rankings
NUMP doesn't have to make sense. It's an arbitrary ranking by Ultimate fans and compiled by Mike. UCF beat us at Regionals, when it mattered. I'm sure they're happier with that than they are disappointed with a NUMP ranking.
On May 21, 3:06 pm, rch... @mail.usf.edu wrote:
> I don't understand how UCF and is behind UNC wilmington.....they beat > them when it mattered......makes no sense whatsoever
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.disc
From:
Daag Alemayehu <daag.alemay... @gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 13:51:14 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, May 21 2008 4:51 pm
Subject: Re: NUMP 2008 Mens Final Rankings
On May 21, 3:06 pm, rch... @mail.usf.edu wrote:
> I don't understand how UCF and is behind UNC wilmington.....they beat > them when it mattered......makes no sense whatsoever
This is an opinion poll, not a heavyweight boxing title. Just because one team beats another doesn't mean they MUST be ranked higher. Have you ever watched college football or college basketball?
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.disc
From:
Nitro <bummer... @hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 09:34:56 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, May 22 2008 12:34 pm
Subject: Re: NUMP 2008 Mens Final Rankings
On May 21, 4:51 pm, Daag Alemayehu <daag.alemay... @gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 21, 3:06 pm, rch
... @mail.usf.edu wrote:
> > I don't understand how UCF and is behind UNC wilmington.....they beat > > them when it mattered......makes no sense whatsoever
> This is an opinion poll, not a heavyweight boxing title. Just because > one team beats another doesn't mean they MUST be ranked higher. Have > you ever watched college football or college basketball?
Yes but when you beat 7 of the top 25 you start to think the poll may be a little bias.
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.disc
From:
"Mike Gerics" <mger... @ec.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 12:48:44 -0400
Local: Thurs, May 22 2008 12:48 pm
Subject: Re: NUMP 2008 Mens Final Rankings
Yes but when you beat 7 of the top 25 you start to think the poll may be a little bias.
---i'm sorry.....what does that mean?
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.disc
From:
adam wiseman <codyeandr... @gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 10:15:35 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, May 22 2008 1:15 pm
Subject: Re: NUMP 2008 Mens Final Rankings
hahaha, ucf, always bitching. i love it.
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.disc
From:
Daag Alemayehu <daag.alemay... @gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 11:29:30 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, May 22 2008 2:29 pm
Subject: Re: NUMP 2008 Mens Final Rankings
On May 22, 12:34 pm, Nitro <bummer... @hotmail.com> wrote:
> Yes but when you beat 7 of the top 25 you start to think the poll may > be a little bias.
UCF lost more games than 19 of the teams in the NUMP top 25. Of its 16 losses, more than half were to teams not in the NUMP top 25. Meanwhile, UNCW had only 5 of its 12 losses come to unranked teams, and 2 of those were to UCF. You can call it bias if you want, but if you take some less favorable factors into account it doesn't seem so unreasonable.
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.disc
From:
Bryce <bryce.mca... @gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 14:16:07 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, May 22 2008 5:16 pm
Subject: Re: NUMP 2008 Mens Final Rankings
On May 22, 2:29 pm, Daag Alemayehu <daag.alemay... @gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 22, 12:34 pm, Nitro <bummer
... @hotmail.com> wrote:
> > Yes but when you beat 7 of the top 25 you start to think the poll may > > be a little bias.
> UCF lost more games than 19 of the teams in the NUMP top 25. Of its > 16 losses, more than half were to teams not in the NUMP top 25. > Meanwhile, UNCW had only 5 of its 12 losses come to unranked teams, > and 2 of those were to UCF.
> You can call it bias if you want, but if you take some less favorable > factors into account it doesn't seem so unreasonable.
who cares if its biased? the season is over. make another highlight video, maybe that will help
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.