Ridiculous selection of Player of the match in Aus vs NZ ODI
Benjamin Franklin
Ponting 111 of 122 balls with 8 fours and 1 six
Hayden 117 of 111 balls with 15 fours
Oram 101 of 72 balls with 4 fours and 6 sixes
Orams innings came under HIGH voltage pressure compared to both Hayden and
Ponting and hence should have been the PLAYER OF THE MATCH........
These Ponting ass lickers, I tell ya...........
max.it
-
-Ponting 111 of 122 balls with 8 fours and 1 six
-
-Hayden 117 of 111 balls with 15 fours
-
-Oram 101 of 72 balls with 4 fours and 6 sixes
-
-
-Orams innings came under HIGH voltage pressure compared to both
Hayden and
-Ponting and hence should have been the PLAYER OF THE MATCH........
-
-
-These Ponting ass lickers, I tell ya...........
-
-
-
Oram played out of the box right to the last ball, and even when the
match was lost he set about narrowing the margin. Never say die.
JE
news:45bd03f2$0$7835$a82e...@reader.athenanews.com...
> http://content-usa.cricinfo.com/cbs/engine/current/match/249230.html
>
> Ponting 111 of 122 balls with 8 fours and 1 six
>
> Hayden 117 of 111 balls with 15 fours
>
> Oram 101 of 72 balls with 4 fours and 6 sixes
>
>
> Orams innings came under HIGH voltage pressure compared to both Hayden and
> Ponting and hence should have been the PLAYER OF THE MATCH........
Useless 100, didn't win the game, might as well got a duck!
Bobs
On Jan 29, 9:15 am, "Benjamin Franklin" <BenjaminFrank...@America.com>
wrote:
You forgot the 0-50 Oram bowled off 5 overs.
That might have something to do with it.....
Rod
I'm guessing that Ponting got MOM, never bothered to stay up for the
presentation. While Oram's was a great innings, Ponting's contributed
to the side winning the match.
I had a bad feeling that it was going to be given to Hayden which is
partly the reason I didn't stay up for it, would have kept me annoyed
and awake for hours. :\
Cheers,
Rod.
Benjamin Franklin
"Bobs" <mcau...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1170021187....@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
Its a VERY HIGH SCORING match with TOTAL RUNS scored = 678
For example
GD McGrath 10 0 72 1
NW Bracken 10 1 75 0
MG Johnson 6 0 48 1
KD Mills 10 1 72 1
MR Gillespie 10 1 76 1
Orams bowling should NOT have been a FACTOR in deciding the PoTM.
Too many Ponting ass lickers.......
Benjamin Franklin
"JE" <nos...@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:45bd15b7$0$13571$5a62...@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
You missed the POINT.
Orams BRILLIANT ATTACK ALMOST won the match for NZ against World Champion
Aus which is scorching its path to WC2007.
They fell short by a MERE 9 runs from a hopeless position of 198/5 with just
14.4 overs left and 146 to score at 10 RUNS an over.
John Dennis
wrote:
> "Bobs" <mcaula...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:1170021187....@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On Jan 29, 9:15 am, "Benjamin Franklin" <BenjaminFrank...@America.com>
> > wrote:
> >>http://content-usa.cricinfo.com/cbs/engine/current/match/249230.html
>
> >> Ponting 111 of 122 balls with 8 fours and 1 six
>
> >> Hayden 117 of 111 balls with 15 fours
>
> >> Oram 101 of 72 balls with 4 fours and 6 sixes
>
> >> Orams innings came under HIGH voltage pressure compared to both Hayden
> >> and
> >> Ponting and hence should have been the PLAYER OF THE MATCH........
>
> >> These Ponting ass lickers, I tell ya...........
>
> > You forgot the 0-50 Oram bowled off 5 overs.
>
>
> For example
>
> GD McGrath 10 0 72 1
>
> NW Bracken 10 1 75 0
>
> MG Johnson 6 0 48 1
>
> KD Mills 10 1 72 1
>
> MR Gillespie 10 1 76 1
>
> Orams bowling should NOT have been a FACTOR in deciding the PoTM.
>
> Too many Ponting ass lickers.......
And if Oram had bowled at even 8 runs per over perhaps NZ might have
won - but he didn't. Too bad. Fortunately the MoM is not decided by
who shouts loudest....
Andrew Dunford
"John Dennis" <den...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1170049460.1...@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
Vettori's bowling arguably stood out as much as Oram's batting.
Fortunately nobody sane really cares who won the MoM award.
Andrew
Benjamin Franklin
"John Dennis" <den...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1170049460.1...@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
And if PONTING and/or HAYDEN bowled 5 overs each perhaps NZ might have
won......but they DIDNT........
>Too bad. Fortunately the MoM is not decided by
> who shouts loudest....
I agree.......it is decided by Ponting ASSLICKERS.........
Benjamin Franklin
"Andrew Dunford" <adun...@artifax.net> wrote in message
news:525g3pF...@mid.individual.net...
ANOTHER "PRICELESS" wisdom pearl from my rsc God dumbford.
> Fortunately nobody sane really cares who won the MoM award.
>
> Andrew
But everybody on rsc AND your WORSHIPPER LIST including ME cares about
obituaries, score comparisons from the present with the past ones, tomato
soups, sarcastic remarks about T-Shirts (as if a player wearing anothers
T_shirt is NEW) and pictures and scores from a match played between C-class
clubs from remote jungles to name a few.........
Hail rsc god Dumbford..........
John Dennis
wrote:
> "John Dennis" <denj...@hotmail.com> wrote in messagenews:1170049460.1...@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
> won......but they DIDNT........
I think you missed my point. Oram's five overs were quite possibly
what lost the game for New Zealand. Why would you give MoM to someone
whose performance has lost the game?
Benjamin Franklin
ANOTHER "PRICELESS" wisdom pearl from my rsc God dumbford.
> Fortunately nobody sane really cares who won the MoM award.
>
> Andrew
But everybody on rsc AND your WORSHIPPER LIST including ME cares about
obituaries, score comparisons from the present with the past ones, tomato
soups, sarcastic remarks about T-Shirts (as if a player wearing anothers
T_shirt is NEW) and pictures and scores from matches played between C-class
clubs from remote jungles to name a FEW.........
Your TOMATO SOUP post for the UNINITIATED and ANY NEWBIES......
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.cricket/msg/e395b959806215c0?hl=en&
Hail rsc god Dumbford..........
Benjamin Franklin
You missed NOT only my point but you missed the FOREST........
1)
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.cricket/msg/dc80673a029cb9d0?hl=en&
2)
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.cricket/msg/bef07e4eedffa896?hl=en&
3) Oram 101 of 72 balls with 4 fours and 6 sixes with a STRIKE RATE of
140.27
His STRIKE RATE made up the extra 10 runs more than normal in this match.
Oram is STILL +20 runs with his batting EVEN after DEDUCTING the EXTRA 10
runs.
CASE is FUCKING CLOSED........
DONT COME BACK and waste my time........
Fran
On Jan 29, 7:15 am, "Benjamin Franklin" <BenjaminFrank...@America.com>
wrote:
> http://content-usa.cricinfo.com/cbs/engine/current/match/249230.html
>
> Ponting 111 of 122 balls with 8 fours and 1 six
>
> Hayden 117 of 111 balls with 15 fours
>
> Oram 101 of 72 balls with 4 fours and 6 sixes
>
> Orams innings came under HIGH voltage pressure compared to both Hayden and
> Ponting and hence should have been the PLAYER OF THE MATCH........
You make a strong point.
I'd have given it to Oram. See my post on Clarke's MOTM to see why.
Fran
Nozza
What about ponting's dropped catch then
John Dennis
wrote:
> "John Dennis" <denj...@hotmail.com> wrote in messagenews:1170050494.4...@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
>
> 1)
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.cricket/msg/dc80673a029cb9d0...
>
> 2)
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.cricket/msg/bef07e4eedffa896...
>
> 3) Oram 101 of 72 balls with 4 fours and 6 sixes with a STRIKE RATE of
> 140.27
>
> His STRIKE RATE made up the extra 10 runs more than normal in this match.
>
> Oram is STILL +20 runs with his batting EVEN after DEDUCTING the EXTRA 10
> runs.
>
> CASE is FUCKING CLOSED........
>
> DONT COME BACK and waste my time........
That's cool. I have trouble reading words written in block capitals,
like I used when I was 4 years old.
JE
>>> Useless 100, didn't win the game, might as well got a duck!
>
> You missed the POINT.
>
> Orams BRILLIANT ATTACK ALMOST won the match for NZ against World Champion
> Aus which is scorching its path to WC2007.
Nope, point not missed, the key point that you so carefully highlighted is
ALMOST......almost what? 1 run might loss might as well be 1000, in the end
the result is the same, NZ LOST...
Now go back to your sheep!
sdavmor
And Vettori's dropped catch? And the other life Hayden received? This
list of possible what ifs goes on and on. i.e. Vettori's 10 overs were
huge, but in the other direction. Had he gone for even 5 an over then
there's no way NZ gets close to threatening Oz. Ultimately the rain
coming when it did, disrupting NZs flow, played as big a role as any
player in affecting the final outcome IMO.
--
Cheers,
SDM -- a 21st century schizoid man
Systems Theory internet music project links:
official site <www.systemstheory.net>
soundclick <www.soundclick.com/systemstheory>
garageband <www.garageband.com/artist/systemstheory>
"Soundtracks For Imaginary Movies" CD released Dec 2004
"Codetalkers" CD coming Nov 2006
NP: nothing
daemon9
> And if Oram had bowled at even 8 runs per over perhaps NZ might have
> won - but he didn't. Too bad. Fortunately the MoM is not decided by
> who shouts loudest....
MoM was Vettori. (1/34 in a score of 343)
1st runner up Oram. (has brought life back into NZ and the series)
2nd runner up Ponting. (100+ is just standard stuff for him)
d9
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Benjamin Franklin
Dont worry........I will MAKE you get used to it UNCONSCIOUSLY.......
Trust me.......its only a matter of time.......
Benjamin Franklin
"daemon9" <a...@c.invalid> wrote in message
news:1vgqcxv9bkn2q$.1eape61p8kltc.dlg@40tude.net...
> On 28 Jan 2007 21:44:20 -0800, John Dennis wrote:
>
>> And if Oram had bowled at even 8 runs per over perhaps NZ might have
>> won - but he didn't. Too bad. Fortunately the MoM is not decided by
>> who shouts loudest....
>
> MoM was Vettori. (1/34 in a score of 343)
NEVER in OD cricket history was a player given PoTM for a performance like
Vettoris with JUST ONE WICKET.
Benjamin Franklin
"sdavmor" <sda...@fakeemailaddy.com> wrote in message
news:zhivh.42821$%l2.3...@fe10.news.easynews.com...
Benjamin Franklin
Low iq stupidfuck,
You go back and fuck your pets, your whore mom, whore sisters, whore
wife/girl friend and whore daughter.