Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Dravid, Ganguly also not good type fellows

4 views
Skip to first unread message

ppan...@my-deja.com

unread,
May 28, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/28/99
to
I was asking ponayan, who he is BHEL captain and having one of the mst
super knowledge of cricket about Dravid and Ganguly. He is saying they
are also coming from gutter water. Dravid is having too much cunning and
keeping name like Dravidian, becuase his father wants him to get Meidcal
or Engineering. Ganguly is not tribal fellow. Some Bengali type fleoows
are tribal fellows and he is not tribal fellow. He is putting Ganguly
name to cheat other tribal fellows but he is also gutter water fellow.

Now I am saying India is having only some small number of good talented
fellows. Azharuddheen, Dodda, Mongayya and David.

Also am seeing match report carefully and everybody is saying Ganguly s
not having talent but having good amount of selfishness. I am seeing
recording of batting and aggreeing he is poor in attacking. Also Dravid.
When I am seeing recording, every ball he is in bad position. Worst type
of fellow. He is not having good talent but he is having good amont of
luck. Only becuase of the mtach video and Ponayans point I am getting
this opinion.

Many days thief will be caught one day and peacock will loose feathers.
That time we will get good proof that Azharuddheen is the most super
batsman and best captain we are having.

Yours Faithfully
Perumselva Pandiyan


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.

Execoff6

unread,
May 28, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/28/99
to

Is this a real person or a joker posting to flame?

Shuvo Brahmachari

unread,
May 28, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/28/99
to
Execoff6 wrote:

> Is this a real person or a joker posting to flame?

No sir! Joker he is not! He is Sir Pandiyan! One of the most revered
and for obvious reasons hated by jealous rival 'type of fellows' for
both his literary skills and profound knowledge of the game. Of his
accomplishments, he's coined several words now in common use in rsc
('bandinakku' being one). Also he is credited in taking Queen's English
to new heights! I for one, am an unabashed fan of Sir Pandiyan.

tus...@my-deja.com

unread,
May 28, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/28/99
to
Add me to that list of fans..

This is one guy's post I won't be missing!!

Pure entertainment.. I wonder if we could entice him to air his views on
other things than SL cricket.. It would make for excellent reading..

T


In article <374EACA0...@pursuitsoftware.com>,

lech...@my-deja.com

unread,
May 28, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/28/99
to
In article <374EACA0...@pursuitsoftware.com>,
Shuvo Brahmachari <shuvo...@pursuitsoftware.com> wrote:
> Execoff6 wrote:
>
> > Is this a real person or a joker posting to flame?
>
> I for one, am an unabashed fan of Sir Pandiyan.

Me too.
/LeChuck GP
PS: This was my second or third "Me too" post ever.

Ramakrishnan G

unread,
May 28, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/28/99
to
Methinks maybe we should work towards an
alt.fan.pandiyan where all us diehard PP fans can put forth our views &
have a good time. :-)

I am sure it would be worth it.
While at it, could any Sir PP fan care to elucidate on the term
"Bandinakku"...
It frankly bamboozles me...

I am moderately sure this is not a Tamil term..
Could it be Sinhalese or something???

grams

>
> > Is this a real person or a joker posting to flame?
>

> No sir! Joker he is not! He is Sir Pandiyan! One of the most
revered
> and for obvious reasons hated by jealous rival 'type of fellows' for
> both his literary skills and profound knowledge of the game. Of his
> accomplishments, he's coined several words now in common use in rsc
> ('bandinakku' being one). Also he is credited in taking Queen's
English

> to new heights! I for one, am an unabashed fan of Sir Pandiyan.

news

unread,
May 28, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/28/99
to
I think Sir Pandiyyan is just another frustrated arm-chair, couch potato
critic who tries to generate heat ( draw attention to himself) by making
outrageous comments about things he doesn't have the faintest clue about.
Such people do not deserve to be taken seriously.

Shuvo Brahmachari wrote in message
<374EACA0...@pursuitsoftware.com>...

Shuvo Brahmachari

unread,
May 28, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/28/99
to
Bandi - closed
nakku - nose

Giving bandinakku is equivalent to closing somebodys nose, and hence
suffocating to death! Am I right Sir Pandiyan?!!!!

Ramakrishnan G wrote:

> Methinks maybe we should work towards an
> alt.fan.pandiyan where all us diehard PP fans can put forth our views &
> have a good time. :-)
>
> I am sure it would be worth it.
> While at it, could any Sir PP fan care to elucidate on the term
> "Bandinakku"...
> It frankly bamboozles me...
>
> I am moderately sure this is not a Tamil term..
> Could it be Sinhalese or something???
>
> grams
>
> >

> > > Is this a real person or a joker posting to flame?
> >

RV

unread,
May 28, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/28/99
to
Excellent derivation ! 'Band(i)nak(ku)' does mean closed nose !

But Sir Pandian had explained in his earlier note that 'Bandinakku' meant
'kick in the butt'. Here is a quote from his mail:

"In our college baandinakku means giving in the bottox one complete
beatings. Paapan fellows got partiality from teachers and got high
marks. but our Nadar boys gave them baandinaku in sports. Anyway try to
support azharuddheen, senthilnathan, dravid and other good peoples.
when we get majoity in cricket we will give papaan crows bandinakku.
Also tendulker is maharastri and also bombay cannot control other
states."

Don't you thank lord for sending this gem amogst us lesser mortals ?

Shuvo Brahmachari <shuvo...@pursuitsoftware.com> wrote in message
news:374ED2CC...@pursuitsoftware.com...

Ramakrishnan G

unread,
May 28, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/28/99
to
Nice Try, Shuvo!! :-)
But my limited knowledge of the Tamil language tells me that nakku is
tongue....
And both interpretations are in Hindi.. - a language I am sure Sir PP
doesnt know....


Shuvo Brahmachari <shuvo...@pursuitsoftware.com> wrote:
> Bandi - closed
> nakku - nose
>
> Giving bandinakku is equivalent to closing somebodys nose, and hence
> suffocating to death! Am I right Sir Pandiyan?!!!!

NishCAM Stereo ®

unread,
May 28, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/28/99
to
"Sala beta tokey to danda diye pitano uchit"!

I'm sure thats what Ganguly would say
--
NishCAM Stereo ®

ppan...@my-deja.com wrote in message <7ilc5t$vjs$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>...

Sanjay Kondhalkar

unread,
May 28, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/28/99
to
bhen chowd

ravi iyengar

unread,
May 28, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/28/99
to
sahee. bilkul sahee.

Sanjay Kondhalkar wrote in message <374f...@mercury.nildram.co.uk>...
>bhen chowd


Alvey

unread,
May 29, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/29/99
to
On 28 May 1999 14:39:22 GMT, exec...@aol.com (Execoff6) wrote:

>
>Is this a real person or a joker posting to flame?


You mean you can't tell the difference?

Alvey


lech...@my-deja.com

unread,
Jun 3, 1999, 3:00:00 AM6/3/99
to
In article <7img4t$71n$1...@news.cc.ukans.edu>,

"news" <bpr...@ittc.ukans.edu> wrote:
> I think Sir Pandiyyan is just another frustrated arm-chair, couch
> potato critic who tries to generate heat ( draw attention to himself)
> by making outrageous comments about things he doesn't have the
> faintest clue about. Such people do not deserve to be taken seriously.

I think you are a full strong jealous type of fellow.

/LeChuck "Pandiyan for ICC president" GP

0 new messages