Draw with 9 wkts down in 4th inns
Aslam Siddiqui
wickets were down in the fourth innings of the match. The 10th wicket
partnership is in the first column and the players involved in the
partnership are in the second line.
+ indicates #s 10 and 11 were at the crease when the match ended
14* Eng (294 & 153-5d) v Ind (170 & 152-9) Manchester 1946
SW Sohoni (11*)/DD Hindlekar (4*)
66* WI (393 & 432-6d) v Aus (366 & 273-9) Adelaide 1960-61
KD Mackay (62*)/LF Kline (15*)
0* WI (301 & 229) v Eng (297 & 228-9) Lord's 1963
MC Cowdrey (19*)/DA Allen (4*)
0* WI (414 & 264) v Eng (371 & 206-9) Georgetown 1967-68
APE Knott (73*)/IJ Jones (0*)
6* WI (276 & 616) v Aus (533 & 339-9) Adelaide 1968-69
AP Sheahan (11*)/AN Connolly (6*)
14* Pak (435 & 291) v WI (421 & 251-9) Bridgetown 1976-77
AME Roberts (9*)/CEH Croft (5*)
0* Aus (343 & 305-3d) v WI (280 & 258-9) Kingston 1977-78
N Phillips (26*)/RR Jumadeen (0*)
0* Ind (300 & 361-1d) v WI (327 & 197-9) Calcutta 1978-79
S Shivnarine (36*)/ST Clarke (0*)
3* NZ (317 & 286) v Aus (357 & 230-9) Melbourne 1987-88
CJ McDermott (10*)/MR Whitney (2*)+
0* WI (174 & 391) v Pak (194 & 341-9) Port-of-Spain 1987-88
Ijaz Faqih (10*)/Abdul Qadir (0*)+
1* Aus (400 & 138-2d) v NZ (251-6d & 223-9) Hobart 1997-98
SB Doull (1*)/SB O'Connor (0*)+
3* Zim (507 & 200-7d) v WI (335 & 207-9) Harare 2003-04
RD Jacobs (60*)/FH Edwards (1*)
2* SL (331 & 226) v Eng (235 & 210-9) Galle 2003-04
AF Giles (17*)/MJ Hoggard (0*)
17* Eng (444 & 280-6d) v Aus (302 & 371-9) Manchester 2005
B Lee (18*)/GD McGrath (5*)+
1* Ind (241 & 521-6d) v WI (371 & 298-9) St John’s 2006
FH Edwards (1*)/CD Collymore (1*)+
19* Eng (298 & 282) v Ind (201 & 282-9) Lord’s 2007
MS Dhoni (76*)/S Sreesanth (4*)
17* Eng (566-9 & 221-8)v WI (285 & 370-9) St John’s 2008-09
DBL Powell (22*)/FH Edwards (5*)+
10* SAf (418 & 301-7) v Eng (356 & 228-9) Pretoria 2009-10
PD Collingwood (26*)/G Onions (1*)
6* SAf (291 & 447-7) v Eng (273 & 296-9) Cape Town 2009-10
GP Swann (10*)/G Onions (0*)+
aslam
GO COLTS!!!
tendulkar.com
Why are 3rd innings (but still in deficit) left out?
dechucka
"tendulkar.com" <tendul...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e5fd0f22-78a2-4ebe...@m3g2000yqf.googlegroups.com...
> FH Edwards (1*)/CD Collymore (1*)+
>
> MS Dhoni (76*)/S Sreesanth (4*)
>
> DBL Powell (22*)/FH Edwards (5*)+
>
> 10* SAf (418 & 301-7) v Eng (356 & 228-9) Pretoria 2009-10
> PD Collingwood (26*)/G Onions (1*)
>
> 6* SAf (291 & 447-7) v Eng (273 & 296-9) Cape Town 2009-10
> GP Swann (10*)/G Onions (0*)+
>
> aslam
> GO COLTS!!!
Why are 3rd innings (but still in deficit) left out?
======================================
because that is not the point of this list or have I missed your point (
sorry than )?
tendulkar.com
> "tendulkar.com" <tendulkar....@gmail.com> wrote in message
> > FH Edwards (1*)/CD Collymore (1*)+
>
> > MS Dhoni (76*)/S Sreesanth (4*)
>
> > DBL Powell (22*)/FH Edwards (5*)+
>
> > 10* SAf (418 & 301-7) v Eng (356 & 228-9) Pretoria 2009-10
> > PD Collingwood (26*)/G Onions (1*)
>
> > 6* SAf (291 & 447-7) v Eng (273 & 296-9) Cape Town 2009-10
> > GP Swann (10*)/G Onions (0*)+
>
> > aslam
> > GO COLTS!!!
>
> Why are 3rd innings (but still in deficit) left out?
>
> ======================================
>
> because that is not the point of this list or have I missed your point (
> sorry than )?
The point of this list is to list teams that are '1 Wicket away from
losing the match'[I know the title doesn't mislead us and is indeed
correct]. This list is the sub-set of the full list which most people
are interested. There is absolutely no difference between 'fighting to
avoid innings defeat' vs 'fighting to avoid runs defeat' in these
exciting matches.
dechucka
> > FH Edwards (1*)/CD Collymore (1*)+
>
> > MS Dhoni (76*)/S Sreesanth (4*)
>
> > DBL Powell (22*)/FH Edwards (5*)+
>
> > 10* SAf (418 & 301-7) v Eng (356 & 228-9) Pretoria 2009-10
> > PD Collingwood (26*)/G Onions (1*)
>
> > 6* SAf (291 & 447-7) v Eng (273 & 296-9) Cape Town 2009-10
> > GP Swann (10*)/G Onions (0*)+
>
> > aslam
> > GO COLTS!!!
>
> Why are 3rd innings (but still in deficit) left out?
>
> ======================================
>
> because that is not the point of this list or have I missed your point (
> sorry than )?
The point of this list is to list teams that are '1 Wicket away from
losing the match'[I know the title doesn't mislead us and is indeed
correct]. This list is the sub-set of the full list which most people
are interested. There is absolutely no difference between 'fighting to
avoid innings defeat' vs 'fighting to avoid runs defeat' in these
exciting matches.
==========================================
Fair enough. I can't think of any such matches off hand but than again that
is why we have Aslam
Andrew B.
> "tendulkar.com" <tendulkar....@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:89cc15e7-9b52-4dfa...@a6g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
> On Jan 7, 5:20 pm, "dechucka" <vo...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "tendulkar.com" <tendulkar....@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> > ======================================
>
> > because that is not the point of this list or have I missed your point (
> > sorry than )?
>
> The point of this list is to list teams that are '1 Wicket away from
> losing the match'[I know the title doesn't mislead us and is indeed
> correct]. This list is the sub-set of the full list which most people
> are interested. There is absolutely no difference between 'fighting to
> avoid innings defeat' vs 'fighting to avoid runs defeat' in these
> exciting matches.
>
> ==========================================
>
> Fair enough. I can't think of any such matches off hand but than again that
> is why we have Aslam
If I've used Statsguru correctly, you're right, there are no such
matches. The closest are England v SA at Old Trafford in 1998, when
the scores were level at the end, and the Test at Cardiff last summer.
In both matches, England were still facing an innings defeat when the
9th wicket fell.
tendulkar.com
At Cardiff, England had overtaken Australia by 13 runs
Andrew B.
At the end they had. When the 9th wicket fell, they were 6 runs behind.
JPD
> 0* Aus (343 & 305-3d) v WI (280 & 258-9) Kingston 1977-78
> N Phillips (26*)/RR Jumadeen (0*)
Match abandoned due to riots. No guarantees Australia would have won,
of course, but there was plenty of time remaining when it happened.
> 3* NZ (317 & 286) v Aus (357 & 230-9) Melbourne 1987-88
> CJ McDermott (10*)/MR Whitney (2*)+
NZL robbed - at least two plumb lbws were turned down in the dying
overs.
--
JPD
Andrew Dunford
"Andrew B." <bul...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9613f759-bc0d-4681...@a32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
Another near miss, but which did produce a result, was Christchurch 1991/92.
New Zealand was still four runs in arrears of England with ten minutes
remaining when the final wicket fell.
Andrew
Jayen
> "Andrew B." <bull...@gmail.com> wrote in message
"Gaah! Sydney". Just another over or two would have sufficed.
IvWI 2001-02 5th test is another case where it started raining
immediately after the last wicket had fallen and didn't stop for a
week. Wright says that he took the top order batsmen who had perished
while playing grandiose strokes out to the balcony to watch the
pouring rain with a "Now about the stroke that you played ..." sermon.
Regards,
Jayen
Andrew Dunford
"Jayen" <rsc_p...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:15950764-404c-417b...@m16g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
Captain Crowe was dismissed trying to hit the four that would have levelled
the scores and saved the game, there not being time for a change of innings.
Andrew
Andrew B.
> On Jan 8, 6:05 am, Aslam Siddiqui <asidd...@iupui.edu> wrote:
>
> > 0* Aus (343 & 305-3d) v WI (280 & 258-9) Kingston 1977-78
> > N Phillips (26*)/RR Jumadeen (0*)
>
> Match abandoned due to riots. No guarantees Australia would have won,
> of course, but there was plenty of time remaining when it happened.
6.2 of the final 20 overs remained to be bowled.
Andrew B.
> "Jayen" <rsc_pos...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
I remember reading at the time that the umpires said that if Crowe had
been out the next ball, England would have had 1 over to score the run
needed. Can't see anything online which confirms or denies this.
Aslam Siddiqui
>
> Why are 3rd innings (but still in deficit) left out?
Here is a list of all Tests which were drawn after 9 wickets were down
in the third (the LAST of the match) innings. The sides batting first
are listed first.
Eng (95 & 180-9) v Aus (182) Manchester 1884
SAf (513-8d) v Eng (350 & 252-9) Cape Town 1930-31
NZ (293 & 308-9) v Eng (482) The Oval 1949
Ind (415 & 275-9) v WI (644-8d) Delhi 1958-59
NZ (192 & 147-9) v Eng (254-8d) Dunedin 1965-66
Eng (253 & 463-9) v NZ (551-9d) Lord’s 1973
Eng (353 & 432-9) v WI (583-9d) Kingston 1973-74
Eng (370 & 209-9) v WI (265) The Oval 1980
Pak (128 & 204-9) v WI (169) Karachi 1980-81
Aus (255 & 299-9) v WI (468-8d) Port-of-Spain 1983-84
Eng (294 & 258-9) v Pak (353) Karachi 1987-88
Eng (344 & 278-9) v Ind (429) Lord’s 1996
Ind (521 & 211-9) v Eng (564-9d) Nottingham 1996
NZ (390 & 248-9) v Eng (521) Auckland 1996-97
SAf (552-5d) v Eng (183 & 369-9) Manchester 1998
Eng (551-6d) v SL (192 & 537-9) Lord’s 2006
Eng (435 & 252-9) v Aus (674-6d) Cardiff 2009
aslam
GO COLTS!!!
skp
So, if I am reading this right and barring rain issues, the only
"nailbiting finshes" in this supplementary list would appear to be in
the 1998 Manchester and 2009 Cardiff matches....
As always, many thanks, Aslam.