Andrew Dunford wrote:
> <ramapriy
...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
news:1147153261.388914.181240@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>> Wanted to know why he played just 8 Tests despite averaging nearly 50.
>> Any here who's seen him bat?
> My only recollection is of him batting for an interminable length of time at
> Auckland in 1977/78. This was a six-day Test on which time ran out before
> the third innings was completed, and otherwise memorable only for the
> roly-poly NZ 'keeper Jock Edwards scoring entertaining twin half centuries.
> I gather Radley could bat more positively than that in different
> circumstances.
> Graham Barlow, OTOH, recently coached Central Districts to the domestic
> first-class title in New Zealand.
> Andrew
Just tossing an idea off the top of my head. I wouldn't mind seeing a
6th day rule for tests. i.e at the point where a match can be called
on the 5th day either captain can call for the 6th day if they believe
that their team can force a "W" decision. But if they can't at that
point then the other team automatically wins. I'm sure there's all
kinds of things wrong with the idea, but a drawn 6 day test seems like
such a waste of time and effort. Maybe more bowler friendly pitches
would be a good idea too, though that would reduce the mystique of
high-scoring batsmen I suppose.
--
Cheers,
SDM -- a 21st century schizoid man
Systems Theory internet music project links:
soundclick <
www.soundclick.com/systemstheory>
garageband <
http://www.garageband.com/artist/systemstheory>
"Soundtracks For Imaginary Movies" CD released Dec 2004
"Codetalkers" CD coming very soon in 2006
NP: nothing