Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Muralitharan on record-chasing

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Rodney Ulyate

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 9:56:41 PM1/4/10
to
Q: "How do you want to be remembered?"

A: "I think I've had a pretty good career. I have both bowling records
in Test and ODIs. I have taken 66 five-fors and 45 four-fors, which
means out of 132 Tests I have failed only in a handful -- maybe three
per cent to five per cent. In one-day cricket I have taken 512
wickets in 334 matches, average 22 and an economy rate of 3.9.

"I never thought of records."

<http://www.cricinfo.com/magazine/content/story/441936.html?CMP=NLC-
DLY>

Rodney Ulyate

jzfredricks

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 10:21:36 PM1/4/10
to
On Jan 5, 12:56 pm, Rodney Ulyate <rodney.uly...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Q: "How do you want to be remembered?"
>
> A: "I think I've had a pretty good career. I have both bowling records
> in Test and ODIs.  I have taken 66 five-fors and 45 four-fors, which
> means out of 132 Tests I have failed only in a handful -- maybe three
> per cent to five per cent.  In one-day cricket I have taken 512
> wickets in 334 matches, average 22 and an economy rate of 3.9.
>
> "I never thought of records."

Ha. He clearly HAS thought of records, as he knows his own very well.

Somehow it missed the fact that he also held the ODI record.

I know this will pain Ratboy, but damn Murali is a good bowler!

Vicky

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 10:55:59 PM1/4/10
to
On Jan 5, 2:21 pm, jzfredricks <jzfredri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > "I never thought of records."
>
> Ha. He clearly HAS thought of records, as he knows his own very well.
>
> Somehow it missed the fact that he also held the ODI record.
>
> I know this will pain Ratboy, but damn Murali is a good bowler!

Hypothetically, he might have had a look at his records a few weeks
ago. He never 'thought' of records, but just realised!

His logic that he failed in a 5% of the matches fails. He failed to
take more than one wicket at least in 30 matches, and out of them at
least 10 were wicketless Tests for him. I admit however that I do not
know how he defines failure.

So, I could live with his claim - Murali never thought of records.

Vicky:

jzfredricks

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 11:04:17 PM1/4/10
to
> So, I could live with his claim - Murali never thought of records.

I'm also happy to do this, but I will assume "thought of" means "been
motivated by, or worried about".

Will S

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 11:51:04 PM1/4/10
to

"Vicky" <vigne...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:6735b8e7-af5c-4bdc...@f5g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...

I guess you believe in the tooth fairy and santa claus as well

**MattO**

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 11:58:04 PM1/4/10
to

Murali will always be a cheat and that's how he'll be remembered.

viper

unread,
Jan 5, 2010, 2:04:38 AM1/5/10
to

"Rodney Ulyate" <rodney...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:0327e1db-1758-4791...@m25g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...

I think he's had a pretty good 'career' too. Who would have thought that his
bowling
action could have been so creatively used by the sub continental memebers of
the ICC
to promote their own agendas and who would have thought that the ICC indeed
could
have re-written the laws to accommodate his bowling action.

The surprise remains the absence of another bowler who 'chucks' to the same
extent.
When one does appear, millions will be focussed on his career progression

Viper


Will S

unread,
Jan 5, 2010, 2:50:04 AM1/5/10
to

"**MattO**" <mat...@rleague.com> wrote in message
news:657ba5a7-8c05-4a38...@r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...

by rednecks like you...yes

Vicky

unread,
Jan 5, 2010, 3:50:33 AM1/5/10
to
On Jan 5, 3:51 pm, "Will S" <wi...@nomail.com.au> wrote:
> "Vicky" <vignes1...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> I guess you believe in the tooth fairy and santa claus as well- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Sorry ... But, Under 15s are allowed to have parental guidance.

Vicky:

Vicky

unread,
Jan 5, 2010, 3:58:17 AM1/5/10
to
On Jan 5, 6:04 pm, "viper" <vi...@rugby.com> wrote:
> I think he's had a pretty good 'career' too. Who would have thought that his
> bowling
> action could have been so creatively used by the sub continental memebers of
> the ICC
> to promote their own agendas and who would have thought that the ICC indeed
> could
> have re-written the laws to accommodate his bowling action.
>
> The surprise remains the absence of another bowler who 'chucks' to the same
> extent.
> When one does appear, millions will be focussed on his career progression
>
> Viper

This is nothing new.

When Pakistani bowlers did reverse swing, they were called cheats.
Manyh thought and wrote that without bottle caps reverse swing is
impossible. Now, the commentators of certain countries would go on to
speak volumes about how wonderful 'their bowlers' are will moderately
old ball.

When Saqlain and Murali bowled their Doosra, many jumped up and down
to say one cannot bowl doosra without chucking. Now, we all are
invited to look at Hauritz's doosra.

Remember... Sub-continent was NOT the power base when Murali was
accused of chucking. There was ample support for him from players and
commentators of non sub-continent origin.

Vicky:

**MattO**

unread,
Jan 5, 2010, 5:31:43 AM1/5/10
to
On Jan 5, 6:50 pm, "Will S" <wi...@nomail.com.au> wrote:
> "**MattO**" <matt...@rleague.com> wrote in message
> by rednecks like you...yes- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

Murali is a chucker and rules changed to suit his chucking.

alvey

unread,
Jan 5, 2010, 2:15:42 PM1/5/10
to
On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 18:56:41 -0800 (PST), Rodney Ulyate wrote:


Q: "How do you want to be remembered?"

A: "As the most successful chucker in the history of the game."


Wish granted.


alvey

0 new messages