Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Score one for the traditionalists.

0 views
Skip to first unread message

alvey

unread,
Jan 5, 2010, 7:55:55 PM1/5/10
to
Would anyone care to argue against the opinion that a Gilchristian "keeper"
can cost you a Test?

alvey

Will S

unread,
Jan 5, 2010, 8:09:05 PM1/5/10
to

"alvey" <al...@play.com> wrote in message
news:12m4m3paisorg.1...@40tude.net...

I would argue that a Healyian keeper can cost you a Test and unlike you I
have the data to back it up

Ben Gussey

unread,
Jan 5, 2010, 10:45:39 PM1/5/10
to

What a catch by Haddin!

Fran

unread,
Jan 5, 2010, 10:47:58 PM1/5/10
to

Old "bad hands" strikes ... ;-)

Fran

Andrew Dunford

unread,
Jan 5, 2010, 7:57:27 PM1/5/10
to

"alvey" <al...@play.com> wrote in message
news:12m4m3paisorg.1...@40tude.net...

> Would anyone care to argue against the opinion that a Gilchristian
> "keeper"
> can cost you a Test?

Good timing, as Akmal clangs another about five minutes later.

One question. My local bookie doesn't seem to have yet twigged that
Australia won, so I reckon I can get good odds on predicting the exact
margin of victory, if you wouldn't mind just posting it here. Thanks.

Andrew

alvey

unread,
Jan 6, 2010, 4:16:00 PM1/6/10
to

No probs.
Pakistan by 6 wickets.

alvey

alvey

unread,
Jan 6, 2010, 4:21:22 PM1/6/10
to

Indeed.
Maybe he's evolving from batsman/stopper to keeper/rabbit?


alvey

0 new messages