On Sunday, April 28, 2013 11:46:57 PM UTC-4,
sugarl...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, April 28, 2013 2:26:29 PM UTC-4, DCI wrote: > On Saturday, April 27, 2013 8:31:03 PM UTC-7,
sugarl...@gmail.com wrote: > On Saturday, April 27, 2013 11:04:38 PM UTC-4, DCI wrote: > > > On Saturday, April 27, 2013 6:42:27 PM UTC-7,
sugarl...@gmail.com wrote: > On Saturday, April 27, 2013 11:52:27 AM UTC-4, SkippyPB wrote: > > > > >Disagree. > >DCI Liston was just a big slugger. Joe Louis was a boxer. A boxer wins everytime.>> > > > > > > With all due admiration of both DCI and you, it is imperative to differ with both of you. Imperative--always say that. Sugar, I must agree with you. After Louis dispatched Liston and when Liston woke up, it would be imperative to consider a rematch . . . for easy money. DCI > > > > You see, and many thought DCI was not creative. Yes, DCI is creative but is he right? No, he is not right in this particular, situational situation. Not right at all. Always say all. Always say thatta, thatta, thatta. Sugar, good stuff, but why? And you're the one who thinks Liston would top Louis? There is no comparison in the skills of Liston and Louis, none. Their records show this very clearly. DCI All conditions would have to be equal; Sonny's career was never allowed to fully flourish because of those who owned and controlled him. Sonny never had piece of mind, either, being hounded by the law wherever he went. This took a merciless emotional toll. Joe Louis had no such afflictions, as it were. The two fighters in their prime with the same trainer, manager etc. would reveal a Sonny too tough for any heavyweight ever, including Joe L.