How do you guys think he does against the Super Six, throwing in Bute
and Andrade just for fun.
If he's arguable not a big puncher at Welterweight, does he not crack
an egg at 168?
STRATEGY
I think he beats the limited Andrade and the shot Taylor but loses to
Bute.
As for the rest, it's debatable. I want to see Kessler's next bout
because some feel he's in decline.
Williams is a good boxer but he needs more pop if he moves up to
SuperMiddle. There are too many guys there that would walk right
through his punches and take his head off Bute being one of them.
Regards,
--
////
(o o)
-oOO--(_)--OOo-
WOODY: "Can I pour you a beer Mr. Peterson?"
NORM: "A little early isn't it, Woody?"
WOODY: "For a beer?"
NORM: "No, for stupid questions."
-- From the USA TV Show "Cheers"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Remove nospam to email me.
Steve
>On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 19:29:26 -0800 (PST), "D. Flynn" <gu...@msn.com>
>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>STRATEGY wrote:
>>> Since Pavlik will probably never fight Williams and his middleweight
>>> belt is a bit tainted (imo), will Williams be able to bring it up to
>>> 168 successfully? he's obviously not a big KO puncher up there, but
>>> doesn't mean he couldn't find success.
>>>
>>> How do you guys think he does against the Super Six, throwing in Bute
>>> and Andrade just for fun.
>>>
>>> If he's arguable not a big puncher at Welterweight, does he not crack
>>> an egg at 168?
>>>
>>> STRATEGY
>>
>>I think he beats the limited Andrade and the shot Taylor but loses to
>>Bute.
>>
>>As for the rest, it's debatable. I want to see Kessler's next bout
>>because some feel he's in decline.
>>
>
>Williams is a good boxer but he needs more pop if he moves up to
>SuperMiddle. There are too many guys there that would walk right
>through his punches and take his head off Bute being one of them.
>
>Regards,
Good management and training will keep Paul williams safe and cuddly
until the "Big Bucks" are put on the table. At that time, we will find
out how good he really is on the depth charts. Remember, it's about
the money.
DCI
Really? He just fought probably the toughest lesser-known fighter
around and almost lost, doesn't sound like very "safe" handling to me,
sounds like he's willing to fight the best across several weight
classes to me.
STRATEGY
As the tension grows so does the gate receipts. Almost lost is on the
records as a "WIN." Willing to fight and fighting is a management
decision. So far Paul's management team is doing well on the ladder to
the Big Bucks. It is a time worn process, upward toward the top.
DCI
Along w/his power, he also loses some of his reach advantage moving
up.
The more I think about it, rather than bouncing up and down in
different weight classes the last few years Williams should have
stayed at 147 where he's most effective.
That way he could have forced big $ fights against the likes of
Mosley, Cotto, Berto and maybe even Floyd or Manny.
> On Dec 27, 12:33 pm, SkippyPB <swieg...@Nospam.neo.rr.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 19:29:26 -0800 (PST), "D. Flynn" <gu...@msn.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >STRATEGY wrote:
>> >> Since Pavlik will probably never fight Williams and his middleweight
>> >> belt is a bit tainted (imo), will Williams be able to bring it up to
>> >> 168 successfully? he's obviously not a big KO puncher up there, but
>> >> doesn't mean he couldn't find success.
>>
>> >> How do you guys think he does against the Super Six, throwing in Bute
>> >> and Andrade just for fun.
>>
>> >> If he's arguable not a big puncher at Welterweight, does he not crack
>> >> an egg at 168?
>>
>> >> STRATEGY
>>
>> >I think he beats the limited Andrade and the shot Taylor but loses to
>> >Bute.
>>
>> >As for the rest, it's debatable. I want to see Kessler's next bout
>> >because some feel he's in decline.
>>
>> Williams is a good boxer but he needs more pop if he moves up to
>> SuperMiddle. There are too many guys there that would walk right
>> through his punches and take his head off Bute being one of them.
>>
>> Regards,
>> --
Having the balls to admit you were wrong and correctly setting your
signature would mean the free service known as usenet would not get
spammed with your overly long (4 lines is the established maximum)
signature with each reply to your posts.
Once more in case you missed it -
The .sig separator should be "-- " NOT "--"
Then most decent news readers will snip the reply for those too lazy to
do it manually.
Why do you insist on continuing to be so anti social and break
established standards?
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv Spam
>> ////
>> (o o)
>> -oOO--(_)--OOo-
>>
>> WOODY: "Can I pour you a beer Mr. Peterson?"
>> NORM: "A little early isn't it, Woody?"
>> WOODY: "For a beer?"
>> NORM: "No, for stupid questions."
>>
>> -- From the USA TV Show "Cheers"
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>> Remove nospam to email me.
>>
>> Steve- Hide quoted text -
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Spam.
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> Along w/his power, he also loses some of his reach advantage moving
> up.
>
> The more I think about it, rather than bouncing up and down in
> different weight classes the last few years Williams should have
> stayed at 147 where he's most effective.
>
> That way he could have forced big $ fights against the likes of
> Mosley, Cotto, Berto and maybe even Floyd or Manny.
Floyd and Manny are too big now for anyone to get anthing near "big" :
they call the shots.
And why do you have to be such a Nazi Usenet Asshole?
<snip>
And by the way, Usenet is not free.
Cheers,
--
////
(o o)
-oOO--(_)--OOo-
"I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning
I will be sober and you will still be ugly."
-- Winston Churchill
Steve and Walter, how many rounds wil this conflict last? ;D
DCI
++ Shows you what Calzaghe did to the Dane mentally... that loss to JC
just took the edge off him...
P
++ Yep... that's about the way it would go...
P