I'm not gonna claim it a conspiracy but did anyone see last nights Game?? God, How many times will Stockton be allowed to push D. Fischer or Nick Van Exel into a Karl Malone Pick? I'm not talking about running them into the pick either. Last Night on about 5 occassions when Stockton drove to the hoop, he would use his arm to push off the defender. (If they meet Mikey and Da Bulls in the finals, I can assure you the Refs and whoever is announcing the game will see it. ) Worst than that were those phantom calls that the Jazz recieved. A few times Karl Malone got the Call when he was all alone. I believe that theres a conspiracy going on but let's wait and see.
In article <Diesel-1905980913570...@as5200-13.sl033.cns.vt.edu>, Die...@GSULaw.edu (Diesel) wrote:
> I'm not gonna claim it a conspiracy but did anyone see last nights Game?? > God, How many times will Stockton be allowed to push D. Fischer or Nick > Van Exel into a Karl Malone Pick?
About as long as Shaq will use his butt to shove Foster out of the way.
>I'm not talking about running them into > the pick either. Last Night on about 5 occassions when Stockton drove to > the hoop, he would use his arm to push off the defender. (If they meet > Mikey and Da Bulls in the finals, I can assure you the Refs and whoever is > announcing the game will see it. ) Worst than that were those phantom > calls that the Jazz recieved. A few times Karl Malone got the Call when > he was all alone. I believe that theres a conspiracy going on but let's > wait and see.
What comes around goes around.
Jeff
-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==----- http://www.dejanews.com/ Now offering spam-free web-based newsreading
> I'm not gonna claim it a conspiracy but did anyone see last nights Game??
Yes I saw it and am still vomitting in disgust.
> God, How many times will Stockton be allowed to push D. Fischer or Nick > Van Exel into a Karl Malone Pick?
As many times as it takes them to gain the lead and secure it in the 4th quarter.
> Last Night on about 5 occassions when Stockton drove to > the hoop, he would use his arm to push off the defender.
You only counted 5? Open your eyes man!!!!!
> Worst than that were those phantom > calls that the Jazz recieved. A few times Karl Malone got the Call when > he was all alone.
The most blatant was that last one on Shaq after Malone took the jump shot. He was not touched at all. I must admire the Lakers for maintaining their composure in the face of such blatant favoratism to the Jazz.
> I believe that theres a conspiracy going on but let's > wait and see.
Why wait and see? You are probably right. The Lakers are gonna have plenty of time to win championships down the road with their young team. The league has gotta give Utah another chance before arthritis and senility start setting in.
Sandalio Gonzalez <sgonz...@osf1.gmu.edu> wrote: > On 19 May 1998, Diesel wrote:
> > I'm not gonna claim it a conspiracy but did anyone see last nights Game??
> Yes I saw it and am still vomitting in disgust.
> > God, How many times will Stockton be allowed to push D. Fischer or Nick > > Van Exel into a Karl Malone Pick?
> As many times as it takes them to gain the lead and secure it in > the 4th quarter.
> > I believe that theres a conspiracy going on but let's > > wait and see.
> Why wait and see? You are probably right. The Lakers are gonna > have plenty of time to win championships down the road with their young > team. The league has gotta give Utah another chance before arthritis > and senility start setting in.
You gotta think Bigger than just Utah. Nobody wants Utah to win except their families and fans (that's about the same). The conspiracy is Da Bulls. Now D. Stern has centered this playoff run as to keep Da Bulls together. He realizes that if Da Bulls loose they will definitely split ways. If they win it all, the owner will do everything possible to keep them together. ( I interpret that as he will make Phil Jacks. the GM of Da Bulls) . This insures that MJ stays in the league. Ultimately, the league continues to make money off the millions of Sheep that believe that Jordan is better than Wilt. So the game that D. Stern starts to play is who can Da Buils beat?? Well, they beat Utah last year and Ostertag is not that much better than last year. Shaq and the Lakers totally dismantled a very good defensive team (Seattle). Da Bulls hasn't played very well against dominate Centers. So Utah gets the free ride. What does this Mean? Well in the 2nd round the Spurs had to be eliminated they were too big and played defense too well; Chuck Norris Malone and his Super Kick to the Rescue. Chuck Norris Malone's kick were tolerated that whole series and they made a difference in the mental portion of the game. I guareentee that Chuck Norris Malone will get a Memo about kicks before the Chicago Series . ShaqFu is too Dominate. PushEm Down Stockton to the rescue. This is no longer basketball, it has become some type of soap opera. Tune in tonight to see if they allow Da Bulls to foul as they please?
If the league has decided to hand the Bulls the championship by means of the officiating, why would it care who the team faced in the finals? Similarly, if the Lakers can be eliminated by bad refereeing in the Utah series, why not simply save that part of the plan until the finals? Surely the league and NBC would prefer a Bulls/Lakers series than a repeat of last year's matchup. As Diesel himself (the ng contributor, not the center) points out, "nobody wants Utah to win except their families and fans." This theory has some holes in it.
In article <6jt7p6$nc...@newsd-141.iap.bryant.webtv.net>, wi...@webtv.net wrote: > If the league has decided to hand the Bulls the championship by means of > the officiating, why would it care who the team faced in the finals? > Similarly, if the Lakers can be eliminated by bad refereeing in the Utah > series, why not simply save that part of the plan until the finals? > Surely the league and NBC would prefer a Bulls/Lakers series than a > repeat of last year's matchup. As Diesel himself (the ng contributor, > not the center) points out, "nobody wants Utah to win except their > families and fans." This theory has some holes in it.
I did say nobody wants Utah but I was mistaken. Utah 1st and foremost is a team that the Bulls can run with. Utah will not run many fast breaks and tire the Bulls out. The Lakers on the other hand would. The key to the conspiracy still resides in the fact that the Bulls must win. It doesn't matter anymore what fans want. I would hope that all fans would want fairly called games and the best team wins. (If not then somebody should just hand the title to the Bulls now. Also take away both of Houston's Championships from a few years ago and most of the Celtics championships while Wilt was with the 76ers.) That's not what we're getting when the refs whistle can determine the winner and loser of these games. That's not what we're getting when D. Stern tell refs to protect the superstars. We no longer have Basketball, we have Sports Entertainment.
The **if** is correct, there's no real proof of a conspiracy yet. The other thing is that Utah looks better on paper and is a perfect team for the unsuspecting sheep. The unsuspecting sheep will believe Utah gives a challenge because they hold homecourt advantage over the Bulls but D. Stern will make sure that Homecourt means nothing. If you listened to D. Stern during the Half of the Indiana game, he made it no secret whom he wants to win it all and has said he'd do anything to keep the Bulls together and Michael in the league.. As far as what NBC wants, all they want is MJ in the finals. They went to great lengths to get the Bulls on NBC on Sundays @ 5:30p.m during the playoffs. It was bad to see the Lakers start playing at 12:00 p.m. to appease those bulls sheep. It was worst to see the jazz San Antonio play on TNT at 4:00 so that the Bulls wouldn't have to play @7:00 p.m. Also, NBC keep MJs main Man (and Babysitter, Chef, Butler, Carwasher, Groundskeeper, etc) Ahmad Rashaad employed. From day to day I try and determine who's the worst suckup. Ahmaad, Isaiah, Billy Walton, or Big Red Kerr. I think it's Ahmaad by far. That's a shame for any journalist to be so biased.
On 20 May 1998 04:12:48 GMT, Die...@GSULaw.edu (Diesel) wrote:
>I did say nobody wants Utah but I was mistaken. Utah 1st and foremost is >a team that the Bulls can run with. Utah will not run many fast breaks >and tire the Bulls out. The Lakers on the other hand would. The key to >the conspiracy still resides in the fact that the Bulls must win. It >doesn't matter anymore what fans want. I would hope that all fans would >want fairly called games and the best team wins. (If not then somebody >should just hand the title to the Bulls now. Also take away both of >Houston's Championships from a few years ago and most of the Celtics >championships while Wilt was with the 76ers.) That's not what we're >getting when the refs whistle can determine the winner and loser of these >games. That's not what we're getting when D. Stern tell refs to protect >the superstars. We no longer have Basketball, we have Sports >Entertainment.
Does this mean we can take away the Lakers' championships of the 80's, or did they play a perfectly fair game of basketball, with no ref biases?
> On 20 May 1998 04:12:48 GMT, Die...@GSULaw.edu (Diesel) wrote:
> >I did say nobody wants Utah but I was mistaken. Utah 1st and foremost is > >a team that the Bulls can run with. Utah will not run many fast breaks > >and tire the Bulls out. The Lakers on the other hand would. The key to > >the conspiracy still resides in the fact that the Bulls must win. It > >doesn't matter anymore what fans want. I would hope that all fans would > >want fairly called games and the best team wins. (If not then somebody > >should just hand the title to the Bulls now. Also take away both of > >Houston's Championships from a few years ago and most of the Celtics > >championships while Wilt was with the 76ers.) That's not what we're > >getting when the refs whistle can determine the winner and loser of these > >games. That's not what we're getting when D. Stern tell refs to protect > >the superstars. We no longer have Basketball, we have Sports > >Entertainment.
> Does this mean we can take away the Lakers' championships of the 80's, > or did they play a perfectly fair game of basketball, with no ref > biases?
The Lakers of the 80's had the Celtics. It was not a foregone conclusion who would be the champions. D. Stern has said things to the effect that the Bulls MUST win this year. It's really hard to beat a team when all the rules favor them. Last night, Jordan claimed that Larry Bird is a coach. He was testifying to the fact that the REFs give him calls. He even qualified this it by saying he felt the same way when Larry was a player. i.e. that the REFs gave Larry calls. It's bad when the REFs give Jordan bad calls but it's worst when Jordan start to expect them. Everytime Jordan doesn't get a call or gets called for a foul he crys to the REFs. He's the only player in the History of the Game that can put his finger in a REFs face and not get punished for it. I never saw Bird crying to the REFs.
> If the league has decided to hand the Bulls the championship by means of > the officiating, why would it care who the team faced in the finals? > Similarly, if the Lakers can be eliminated by bad refereeing in the Utah > series, why not simply save that part of the plan until the finals? > Surely the league and NBC would prefer a Bulls/Lakers series than a > repeat of last year's matchup. As Diesel himself (the ng contributor, > not the center) points out, "nobody wants Utah to win except their > families and fans." This theory has some holes in it.
What is your explanation for the blatant favoritism then? If you have eyes, I assume you have noted it? The NBA will ride the Laker jock for a long time once jordon and the Jazz are done. The NBA can benefit by playing up the Malone/Stockton "fairytale" in the finals one more time thus giving a small market that just so happens to have two 'Famers some wide recognition, whereas LA will always have a following no matter what (especially with the dual cockroach factor of Shaq and Kobe).
In article <6k09m8$mp...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>, <jpyo...@io.com> wrote: > The Laker fans in rsbp have really raised this to a new level of >hilarity. A conspiracy ? NBA wants certain teams to win and are issuing >orders to referees?
> Because I am ROTFL at the posts in this thread already, I would like >to hear your thoughts on these questions: > 5) Is there any chance that this will one day leak out and cause a >massive restructuring of basketball? What would be the penalty for breaking >the code of silence? Firing? Blackmail threats carried out? Murder?
Of course there would never be a disgruntled ex-employee with a secret to sell to the media... cause everyone loves this game!
>Let go of reason
[snip]
Too late.
-- "Ed is the standard text editor." (excerpt from Patrick J. Lopresti) When IBM, in its ever-present omnipotence, needed to base their "edlin" on a UNIX standard, did they mimic vi? No. Emacs? Surely you jest. They chose the most karmic editor of all. The standard.
JAKE, I have to think it would be easier for the league to promote a series between the Bulls and Lakers than between the Bulls and Jazz. Once the Lakers are out you've lost the casual-fan part of the second largest TV market in the country, to say nothing of potential viewers around the country and the world who know the Lakers from Magic and Shaq from his movies. The league *could* choose to promote the fairy-tale angle with Malone and Stockton, but that's just extra work when there's a team that has already marketed itself well. For that matter, why choose the Jazz for one's fairy tale? Other teams have players seemingly more willing and able to play charismatic front-man (viz. C. Barkley) than either Malone or Stockton. Might as well promote those teams. Incidentally, I haven't seen either of the Lakers/Jazz games, so I'll have to take your word for the crappy officiating. How can I account for it, short of a conspiracy? Well, I do notice Steve Javie was on the crew for Game 2. That may be all one needs to know, because this guy seems to feel the need to make his presence felt in any game he works. Maybe it's a sign he's a good ref that he seems so uniformly disliked throughout the league, but I've seen more than one instance where his tendency to dominate not only the play but even the other officials has led to a circus on the court. Does this mean he's crooked? It could, but I think a simpler explanation is he's an asshole. I can easily picture the Lakers bitching about a couple [non] calls, Javie being more of a jerk about it than was necessary, and just like that LA is out of their game. Interestingly, I see the only technicals in the game (except for illegal D) were against Utah.
And when I look at the box score from Game 1, I see the Lakers were called for seven fewer fouls and shot 16 more free throws than Utah. Again, I didn't see the game, so I don't know how these calls were set in the flow of the action, but this sure wasn't what I expected to find based on the level of dismay in this thread. I'm not convinced by these conspiracy theories, though I think the league wouldn't mind at all if the Bulls won again. jpyoung, in another posting, laid out most of the arguments against the plausibility of such a conspiracy. I can't add much to what he/she said, but I do feel it's odd that fans who are so convinced this league is rigged have anything more to do with it. I should take my time and money elsewhere.
In article <6k09m8$mp...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>, jpyo...@io.com wrote: > The Laker fans in rsbp have really raised this to a new level of > hilarity. A conspiracy ? NBA wants certain teams to win and are issuing > orders to referees?
I'm not at all a Laker fan but I do like good basketball, even the Bulls but there are some problems with Stern.
> 1) How many people are involved in this conspiracy. Clearly the > referees, but all of them? David Stern would almost have to be involved, but > how far down in the NBA does it go? NBA VPs? Owners? GMs? Coaches? Players? > Some people have also mentioned NBC -- are they involved or not? Turner > broadcasting? Reporters for other networks? Newspaper reporters? I mean, all > these guys who cover sports for a living _must_ know. After all, its so > obvious, right. Occam's razor insists that it must be the true answer to the > Lakers losses last year and this year and during the regular season :-)
D. Stern made it a conspiracy against the Sport when he told REFs to "protect the superstars". How can you have a fair game if Malone and jordan are allowed to foul without penalty while if a Rookie does the same thing, it's a foul and somethimes a Flagrant. Remember when MJ hit Mark Jackson in the back of the Head with the Basketball earlier this Year?? Can you remember the penalty he receved? Now imagine if Mark Jackson had done the same thing to Jordan or if Rodman had done it to anyone? I can guareentee you that whoever did it would have missed several games. The Bottom line is there can be no fairness in sports until there is only one set of rules that apply to everyone. Larry Bird is right: If Pippen played for the Pacer and he guarded Jordan the way he Guards Jackson, he would foul out before the half. That's because there are two sets of rules in place. Note Jordan does nothing to deny that fact. In Fact, he encourages and looks foreward to them.
> 2) When did it all start? Year 1? with TV acceptance? Who has won > legitimate titles (if anybody)?
It started when D. Stern promoted making money over playing the game. You wonder why High School recruiting goes on and Shoe Contracts start as early as the 8th grade. You wonder why players leave college and High School early and Garnett won't play for less than $120 Mill. It's because the league has placed making Money above the Game.
> 3) Do the fixers ever fail? Have they ever failed before? If the > Lakers win, will it be because it was willed that they lose a certain number > of games and then go through, or are they the one team that might just have > enough talent to 'buck the system'.
When you watch a boxing match and the REF does everything to make sure one person looks good, how often does that fail. The REFs in basketball have a lot of power. Two quick fouls in the 1st 30 seconds of a game can place Shaq on the bench until the 2nd quarter. The game can be over by then. The pt. is that the REFs have power. Karl Malone has shown us that it doesn't matter if he's fouled or not, he can still "Manufacture" points on the charity stripe.
Now put yourself in D. Stern shoes. You are the figure head of the NBA. Your job is to make the league Money. How do you do that?? Well, Jordan is the most Recognized name in Basketball, he fill the arenas, people buy his stuff. Those two years he became Mr. Baseball, we didn't do too well financially. A sunday evening car drive preempted our most cherished game one of that year. Not to mention the sweep. Do you let this man Retire and leave the NBA forever?? No!! This is a simple case of Supply and Demand. The Sheep has demanded Jordan so D. Stern must Supply. How does D. Stern Supply Jordan? Well to make sure he doesn't retire, you gotta keep his team together. That means they must win it all so the Owner can make the Coach the new GM/Coach and everybody's happy.
Next time you think about it, put yourself in D. Stern's place. The on Sat. ask yourself, why is it that Pippen is allowed to Bump, Mawl, and rape Mark jackson like that. Why is it that Stockton pushes the smaller players into the Karl Malone Pick?? Why is it that everytime Shaq gets the Ball underneath, he gets beaten senseless by an illegal double team (listen to the Smacks on this one). Why is it that Karl Malone and MJordan "manufacture" points so easily when they are not even being fouled?
> Lakers are out you've lost the casual-fan part of the second largest TV > market in the country, to say nothing of potential viewers around the > country and the world who know the Lakers from Magic and Shaq from his > movies.
Hmmm..There're very *few* people who know Shaq from his movies.
His movies are big, big flops in the box-office. I just state the fact.
In article <6k2rhl$sd...@newsd-143.iap.bryant.webtv.net>, wi...@webtv.net wrote: > JAKE, > I have to think it would be easier for the league to promote a series > between the Bulls and Lakers than between the Bulls and Jazz. Once the > Lakers are out you've lost the casual-fan part of the second largest TV > market in the country, to say nothing of potential viewers around the > country and the world who know the Lakers from Magic and Shaq from his > movies. The league *could* choose to promote the fairy-tale angle with > Malone and Stockton, but that's just extra work when there's a team that > has already marketed itself well. For that matter, why choose the Jazz > for one's fairy tale?
If there is a conspiracy, Utah is perfect. In order to make more money in the future it will be necessary to make the Smaller Markets bigger. The Lakers have already established a fan base back when Magic played. Utah has been a really good secret for years. Making teams like Utah, Minnesota, Orlando, and San Antonio better has gotta be a priority. (via Draft or Playoffs) Teams like the Clippers, Kings, and the Nets can stay in their situation becuase there is the Lakers, and Knicks. The second reason why Utah is perfect is because they have Home court advantage over the Bulls. On paper Utah looks really good. There's Malone and Stockton and home court advantage. This is something that will make the sheep say, "Da Bulls might lose this series" . Any knowledgable fan knows that the Bulls are more likely to beat the jazz than to beat the Lakers in a fairly called finals. For the most part, I believe that the Finals will be called fairly. That's simply because All Eyes will be tuned into the Finals.
> In article <6k09m8$mp...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>, jpyo...@io.com wrote:
> > The Laker fans in rsbp have really raised this to a new level of > > hilarity. A conspiracy ? NBA wants certain teams to win and are issuing > > orders to referees?
> I'm not at all a Laker fan but I do like good basketball, even the Bulls > but there are some problems with Stern.
> > 1) How many people are involved in this conspiracy. Clearly the > > referees, but all of them? David Stern would almost have to be involved, but > > how far down in the NBA does it go? NBA VPs? Owners? GMs? Coaches? Players? > > Some people have also mentioned NBC -- are they involved or not? Turner > > broadcasting? Reporters for other networks? Newspaper reporters? I mean, all > > these guys who cover sports for a living _must_ know. After all, its so > > obvious, right. Occam's razor insists that it must be the true answer to the > > Lakers losses last year and this year and during the regular season :-)
> D. Stern made it a conspiracy against the Sport when he told REFs to > "protect the superstars".
I don't recall the exact text of Stern's statement. Did he say "Protect the superstars from getting fouled out," or "Protect the superstars from getting injured"
> How can you have a fair game if Malone and > jordan are allowed to foul without penalty while if a Rookie does the same > thing, it's a foul and somethimes a Flagrant. Remember when MJ hit Mark > Jackson in the back of the Head with the Basketball earlier this Year?? > Can you remember the penalty he receved? Now imagine if Mark Jackson had > done the same thing to Jordan or if Rodman had done it to anyone?
I don't think we can use Rodman as a good example. Rodman I believe leads the league in the double foul. It seems almost every other time Rodman is fouled by another player, the refs whistle a fould on Rodman.
> I can > guareentee you that whoever did it would have missed several games. > The Bottom line is there can be no fairness in sports until there is only > one set of rules that apply to everyone. Larry Bird is right: If Pippen > played for the Pacer and he guarded Jordan the way he Guards Jackson, he > would foul out before the half. That's because there are two sets of > rules in place. Note Jordan does nothing to deny that fact. In Fact, he > encourages and looks foreward to them.
> > 2) When did it all start? Year 1? with TV acceptance? Who has won > > legitimate titles (if anybody)?
It started the year after Conspiracy theorist's team won their last title.
> > 3) Do the fixers ever fail? Have they ever failed before? If the > > Lakers win, will it be because it was willed that they lose a certain number > > of games and then go through, or are they the one team that might just have > > enough talent to 'buck the system'.
It's called setting up an excuse for your team losing. If they lose, well then they were robbed. If they win, the team is just that much greater for overcoming the "fix"
> It's all about $$$$$
Do you know how much trouble college basketball players get in when they conspire to fix meaningless college basketball games (e.g. Northwestern players earlier this year). The federal government gets involved, and there are severe penalties. Gamblers, mafia, etc. can make a lot of money from knowing the outcome of the game, even the point difference.
Don't you think that if anyone seriously thought the results of the NBA were fixed, that the federal government would get involved? Or is the federal government involved in a conspiracy to make NBA/C more money? Are Janet Reno/ Bill Clinton closet Bulls fans? Will this plot turn up on the X-Files the week after they revisit the mutant hillbillies or alien spores again?
I just wanted to note that in general, it is pointless to try to argue conspiracies with conspiracy theorists. Naturally, the very nature of conspiracies are that they can grow to encoumpass anything. Anyone might be part of the conspiracy and any documentation or contrary proof that people offer to counter it may have been altered to protect the conspiracy. (I doubt that this particular one has had enough time to grow to involve brainwashing and murders for hire, but you never know. Taken in this light the deaths of Reggie Lewis and Len Bias of Boston really are starting to look rather fishy. Perhaps the NBA realized that Boston was a fading market and adjusted them accordingly...)
Conspiracy theories are only palatable as theater, hence the movie of the same name; comedy and tragedy rolled into one. That's why I am so interested in some full descriptions of this new conspiracy that I have discovered. Write on Lakers fans. Give me some good laughs. By the was, you guys definitely need to add CBS to all of your conspiracy lists. Just read their incredibly biased column entitled "Lakers crying a river over rough play". The _only_ way that they could _possibly_ print this _total_ pack of _lies_ would be if ... THEY'RE IN ON IT. The text shows that Rick Fox may also be an undercover agent. Be sure to watch his play carefully and remember those two open shots that he bricked at the end of game 2.
The one part of the Jazz and Lakers series that I can't understand is why there is no support within the Lakers community inside rsbp for them to come back to _win_ the series. I am no Lakers fan, but I think that their odds aren't really that bad, regardless of the history. They have loads of talent and could mature right before our eyes and beat the veteran Jazz. However, all their fans in this newsgroup seem to have sold them down the river after they went 0-2 in Utah. With fans like the ones in rsbp, who needs hecklers. You might also want to read the column "Lakers hoping for more fan support" also at Sportsline's site.
-- J. P.
-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==----- http://www.dejanews.com/ Now offering spam-free web-based newsreading
> Diesel wrote: > > Remember when MJ hit Mark > > Jackson in the back of the Head with the Basketball earlier this Year?? > > Can you remember the penalty he receved? Now imagine if Mark Jackson had > > done the same thing to Jordan or if Rodman had done it to anyone?
Actually, Mark Jackson himself did a similar thing to another player (David Wesley??). What did he got? He got a T. New York's Chris Childs threw the ball at Jordan's chest on Dec.9 in Chicago. What did he got? No more, no less: a T. ( He was ejected because he already got a T in the first half. ) He didn't get fingerprinted, arrested or grilled.
Diesel, Yah, I guess there's an argument to be made for the desirability of Utah as a foil for the Bulls, or for promoting small-market teams in general. You have to wonder why it has taken the league so long to stumble on this idea though. The opinion I heard on the street was that if the Lakers beat Utah they would have to be playing well enough to represent a legitimate threat to the Bulls, so I don't think it would have been hard to gin up interest in a Lakers/Bulls final. Your argument seems to be that the league wanted a phony threat, however, because it couldn't chance fixing games in the finals. To that I have no answer except let's wait and see. Maybe the Lakers still will come back against Utah, perhaps with some home-court help from the refs. And let's see whether the officiating does turn out to be better in the finals. I think there are enough bad refs around to make that hope tenuous.
Also, for the poster who mentioned Shaq's movie flops: You're right, but even a bomb will have earned him more name/face recognition than Malone or Stockton enjoy, especially among kids and overseas. Every little bit helps, says the NBA marketer.
This station may be silent for a few days. Long weekend, don't you know. Drive safely, all -- you too, Malone.
> The one part of the Jazz and Lakers series that I can't understand is > why there is no support within the Lakers community inside rsbp for them to > come back to _win_ the series.
Says who? Most have just been commenting on the terrible officiating of Game 2. This does not translate into lack of support.
> However, all their fans in this newsgroup seem to have sold them down the > river after they went 0-2 in Utah. With fans like the ones in rsbp, who needs > hecklers.
Being an avid Laker fan since I began following basketball, I can tell you I have tremendous faith in the purple and gold. I wouldn't be all that surprised if they won or lost at this point though. I just hope they make it a series.
wi...@webtv.net wrote: > Also, for the poster who mentioned Shaq's movie flops: You're right, but > even a bomb will have earned him more name/face recognition than Malone > or Stockton enjoy, especially among kids and overseas. Every little bit > helps, says the NBA marketer.
Hmmm...No! You can mention anything but movies. If you ever see the box-office numbers, it's an unbelievable disaster.