Re: digest, volume 2454492
Art Deco
>Deco ... must ... crosspost ... Still suffering from attribution
>problems, Deco? Classic erroneous presupposition. Classic ambiguity.
>Classic evasion on your part, Deco. Deco ... must ... crosspost ...
>Deco ... must ... crosspost ... Deco ... must ... crosspost ... Deco
>... must ... crosspost ... Deco ... must ... crosspost ... Still
>suffering from attribution problems, Deco? How ironic. Deco ... must
>... crosspost ... Deco ... must ... crosspost ... Deco ... must ...
>crosspost ... Boilerplate spam from Art Deco. How hypocritical of
>him, considering his own remarks: Deco is still operating under the
>delusion that his family name is Deco: Caught in a rather obvious
>lie, Deco has now started backpedalling: Classic inconsistency;
>first "only", now "either...or". But consider the implication: Deco
>doesn't have a pair of neurons, and that's according to Deco
>himself. I see that you evaded the evidence for your psychic usenet
>astrology, Deco. No surprise there, really. Did you finally figure
>out what your earlier posting had to do with demon.local, Deco? You
>did, after all, add the newsgroup to the distribution and then ask
>what your posting had to do with that newsgroup. I see that you
>completely evaded the matter of your cross-posting to irrelevant
>newsgroups, Deco. No surprise there, really. How ironic. What does
>your ongoing "kookdance" have to do with the irrelevant newsgroups
>to which you cross-post, Deco? Not that I'm really expecting an
>answer from you, Deco. So, Deco is responding to one of his
>sockpuppets. Seek professional help, Deco. No wonder you misuse and
>misspell so many words, Deco, but it's up to you if you want to look
>like a fool. Further evidence of your reading comprehension problem,
>Deco, given that I clearly stated that I never said that you wrote
>the quote. Rather, I said that Art Deco wrote the quote, Deco, and
>that's because Art Deco did write the quote, as evidenced by the
>message ID that I provided the first time you made the accusation.
>Further evidence of your counting problem, Deco, given that your
>posting total hadn't reached five digits at the time of your
>question. Also further evidence of your reading comprehension
>problem, Deco, given that the combined total from all posters was
>correctly reported to five digits over three years ago. Further
>evidence of your counting problem, Deco, given that Deco made it to
>four figures in a single year for three years running. Don't bother
>auditioning for "The Wizard of Oz", Deco. Having trouble remembering
>to which newsgroups you've followed me, Deco? Oh that's right. You
>don't need a memory. So, you admit to poking people, Deco, and
>you're comfortable doing so under normal circumstances. Seek
>professional help, Deco. Classic hypocrisy. Classic unsubstantiated
>and erroneous claim. Rather, most of the traffic in cooa consists
>of people responding to you, Deco, after you've added the newsgroup
>to the distribution, and then the ongoing follow-up to those
>articles. In other words, you're responsible for most of the
>traffic in cooa, Deco. Hypocritically, you didn't take it to email,
>ah. No surprise there, really. What does that have to do with OS/2,
>Hucker?
Another tedious load of Tholen Lames (forwarded to rsbc so the regulars
can see the deleterious effects of many years of close exposure to the
Holy Digestor.
--
Official Art Deco Post
Joe Malloy's Sock Puppet
Well, the relatively few remaining rsbc regulars are well aware of the
logic sinkhole that is tho...@antispam.ham. I recall having a couple
go-rounds with Tholenizer v1.0 about a decade or so ago.
Jesus, a whole fucking decade. I'll be dead in a few more decades.
Art Deco
Just count yourselves fortunate he didn't opt for spamming his
"digests" there, day after day, month after month, year after year, as
part of his anti-antagonist pogroms.
>Jesus, a whole fucking decade. I'll be dead in a few more decades.
Tholen is quite ready to outlast all of usenet in the sure and certain
hope that he will absolutely have the very Last Word.
pluto
The last word is irrelevant, Deco, as he's told us many times.
tho...@antispam.ham
> Art Deco wrote:
>> Joe Malloy's Sock Puppet wrote:
>>> Jesus, a whole fucking decade. I'll be dead in a few more decades.
>> Tholen is quite ready to outlast all of usenet in the sure and certain
>> hope that he will absolutely have the very Last Word.
> The last word is irrelevant, Deco, as he's told us many times.
Reading comprehension makes cameo appearance.
Archie Leach's Sockpuppet
What does your latest classic erroneous presupposition have to do with
demon.local, Tholen?
--
02D2D2
tho...@antispam.ham
> -- fuzzled:
Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>> pluto wrote:
>>> Art Deco wrote:
Ironically, you've made a classic erroneous presupposition that I made
a classic erroneous presupposition, Sockpuppet.
Archie Leach's Sockpuppet
>Archie Leach's Sockpuppet writes:
>
>> -- fuzzled:
>
>Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
argument. What does your derogatory question have to do with OS/2,
Tholen?
>
>>> pluto wrote:
>
>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>
>>>>> Joe Malloy's Sock Puppet wrote:
>
>>>>>> Jesus, a whole fucking decade. I'll be dead in a few more decades.
>
>>>>> Tholen is quite ready to outlast all of usenet in the sure and certain
>>>>> hope that he will absolutely have the very Last Word.
>
>>>> The last word is irrelevant, Deco, as he's told us many times.
>
>>> Reading comprehension makes cameo appearance.
>
>> What does your latest classic erroneous presupposition have to do with
>> demon.local, Tholen?
>
>Ironically, you've made a classic erroneous presupposition that I made
>a classic erroneous presupposition, Sockpuppet.
Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
argument. Classic pedantic buffoonery.
--
02D2D2
tho...@antispam.ham
> -- burbled:
Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>>> -- fuzzled:
>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
> argument.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> What does your derogatory question have to do with OS/2, Tholen?
Classic inconsistency, given that you attributed the text to "--"
above, Sockpuppet. Do make up your mind, Sockpuppet.
>>>> pluto wrote:
>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>> Joe Malloy's Sock Puppet wrote:
>>>>>>> Jesus, a whole fucking decade. I'll be dead in a few more decades.
>>>>>> Tholen is quite ready to outlast all of usenet in the sure and certain
>>>>>> hope that he will absolutely have the very Last Word.
>>>>> The last word is irrelevant, Deco, as he's told us many times.
>>>> Reading comprehension makes cameo appearance.
>>> What does your latest classic erroneous presupposition have to do with
>>> demon.local, Tholen?
>> Ironically, you've made a classic erroneous presupposition that I made
>> a classic erroneous presupposition, Sockpuppet.
> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
> argument.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> Classic pedantic buffoonery.
I'm well aware of your buffoonery, Sockpuppet. No need to tell me
about it.
Archie Leach's Sockpuppet
>> -- burbled:
>
>Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
Who is "Sockpuppet", Tholen? There is no one in this newsgroup using
that alias.
>
>>>> -- fuzzled:
>
>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>
>> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
>> argument.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>> What does your derogatory question have to do with OS/2, Tholen?
>
>Classic inconsistency, given that you attributed the text to "--"
>above, Sockpuppet. Do make up your mind, Sockpuppet.
Classic inconsistency, given that you are using the descriptor
"Sockpuppet" as an invective. Do try to keep up.
>
>>>>> pluto wrote:
>
>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>
>>>>>>> Joe Malloy's Sock Puppet wrote:
>
>>>>>>>> Jesus, a whole fucking decade. I'll be dead in a few more decades.
>
>>>>>>> Tholen is quite ready to outlast all of usenet in the sure and certain
>>>>>>> hope that he will absolutely have the very Last Word.
>
>>>>>> The last word is irrelevant, Deco, as he's told us many times.
>
>>>>> Reading comprehension makes cameo appearance.
>
>>>> What does your latest classic erroneous presupposition have to do with
>>>> demon.local, Tholen?
>
>>> Ironically, you've made a classic erroneous presupposition that I made
>>> a classic erroneous presupposition, Sockpuppet.
>
>> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
>> argument.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>> Classic pedantic buffoonery.
>
>I'm well aware of your buffoonery, Sockpuppet.
On your part.
>No need to tell me
>about it.
Non sequitur.
--
02D2D2
tho...@antispam.ham
> -- coughed:
Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>>> -- burbled:
>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
> Who is "Sockpuppet", Tholen? There is no one in this newsgroup using
> that alias.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. No surprise that you are
unable to comprehend your own alias, Sockpuppet.
>>>>> -- fuzzled:
>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>>> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
>>> argument.
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> On your part.
Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>> What does your derogatory question have to do with OS/2, Tholen?
>> Classic inconsistency, given that you attributed the text to "--"
>> above, Sockpuppet. Do make up your mind, Sockpuppet.
> Classic inconsistency, given that you are using the descriptor
> "Sockpuppet" as an invective.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> Do try to keep up.
Classic erroneous presupposition.
>>>>>> pluto wrote:
>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>> Joe Malloy's Sock Puppet wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Jesus, a whole fucking decade. I'll be dead in a few more decades.
>>>>>>>> Tholen is quite ready to outlast all of usenet in the sure and certain
>>>>>>>> hope that he will absolutely have the very Last Word.
>>>>>>> The last word is irrelevant, Deco, as he's told us many times.
>>>>>> Reading comprehension makes cameo appearance.
>>>>> What does your latest classic erroneous presupposition have to do with
>>>>> demon.local, Tholen?
>>>> Ironically, you've made a classic erroneous presupposition that I made
>>>> a classic erroneous presupposition, Sockpuppet.
>>> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
>>> argument.
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> On your part.
Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>> Classic pedantic buffoonery.
>> I'm well aware of your buffoonery, Sockpuppet.
> On your part.
Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Sockpuppet?
>> No need to tell me
>> about it.
> Non sequitur.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Archie Leach's Sockpuppet
>Archie Leach's Sockpuppet writes:
>
>> -- coughed:
>
>Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
Classic invective.
>
>>>> -- burbled:
>
>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>
>> Who is "Sockpuppet", Tholen? There is no one in this newsgroup using
>> that alias.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>No surprise that you are
>unable to comprehend your own alias, Sockpuppet.
Classic erroneous presupposition on your part, Tholen.
>
>>>>>> -- fuzzled:
>
>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>
>>>> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
>>>> argument.
>
>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>> What does your derogatory question have to do with OS/2, Tholen?
>
>>> Classic inconsistency, given that you attributed the text to "--"
>>> above, Sockpuppet. Do make up your mind, Sockpuppet.
>
>> Classic inconsistency, given that you are using the descriptor
>> "Sockpuppet" as an invective.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>> Do try to keep up.
>
>Classic erroneous presupposition.
On your part.
>
>>>>>>> pluto wrote:
>
>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>> Joe Malloy's Sock Puppet wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>> Jesus, a whole fucking decade. I'll be dead in a few more decades.
>
>>>>>>>>> Tholen is quite ready to outlast all of usenet in the sure and certain
>>>>>>>>> hope that he will absolutely have the very Last Word.
>
>>>>>>>> The last word is irrelevant, Deco, as he's told us many times.
>
>>>>>>> Reading comprehension makes cameo appearance.
>
>>>>>> What does your latest classic erroneous presupposition have to do with
>>>>>> demon.local, Tholen?
>
>>>>> Ironically, you've made a classic erroneous presupposition that I made
>>>>> a classic erroneous presupposition, Sockpuppet.
>
>>>> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
>>>> argument.
>
>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>> Classic pedantic buffoonery.
>
>>> I'm well aware of your buffoonery, Sockpuppet.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Sockpuppet?
Classic derogatory and loaded question.
>
>>> No need to tell me
>>> about it.
>
>> Non sequitur.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Non sequitur.
--
02D2D2
ah
How ironic.
--
ah
Archie Leach's Sockpuppet
I'm aware of the rich irony of the Tholen Digests, ah. No need to
remind me.
--
02D2D2
ah
No surprise there, really.
--
ah
tho...@antispam.ham
> -- diced:
>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>>> -- coughed:
>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
> Classic invective.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>> -- burbled:
>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>>> Who is "Sockpuppet", Tholen? There is no one in this newsgroup using
>>> that alias.
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> On your part.
Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>> No surprise that you are
>> unable to comprehend your own alias, Sockpuppet.
> Classic erroneous presupposition on your part, Tholen.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>>>> -- fuzzled:
>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>>>>> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
>>>>> argument.
>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>> On your part.
>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> On your part.
Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>> What does your derogatory question have to do with OS/2, Tholen?
>>>> Classic inconsistency, given that you attributed the text to "--"
>>>> above, Sockpuppet. Do make up your mind, Sockpuppet.
>>> Classic inconsistency, given that you are using the descriptor
>>> "Sockpuppet" as an invective.
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> On your part.
Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>> Do try to keep up.
>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
> On your part.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>>>>> pluto wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Joe Malloy's Sock Puppet wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Jesus, a whole fucking decade. I'll be dead in a few more decades.
>>>>>>>>>> Tholen is quite ready to outlast all of usenet in the sure and certain
>>>>>>>>>> hope that he will absolutely have the very Last Word.
>>>>>>>>> The last word is irrelevant, Deco, as he's told us many times.
>>>>>>>> Reading comprehension makes cameo appearance.
>>>>>>> What does your latest classic erroneous presupposition have to do with
>>>>>>> demon.local, Tholen?
>>>>>> Ironically, you've made a classic erroneous presupposition that I made
>>>>>> a classic erroneous presupposition, Sockpuppet.
>>>>> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
>>>>> argument.
>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>> On your part.
>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> On your part.
Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>> Classic pedantic buffoonery.
>>>> I'm well aware of your buffoonery, Sockpuppet.
>>> On your part.
>> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Sockpuppet?
> Classic derogatory and loaded question.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>> No need to tell me
>>>> about it.
>>> Non sequitur.
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> Non sequitur.
Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
tho...@antispam.ham
> ah wrote:
>>> -- diced:
>>>>> -- coughed:
>>> Classic invective.
>>>>>>> -- burbled:
>>> On your part.
>>>>>>>>> -- fuzzled:
>>>>> On your part.
>>> On your part.
>>> On your part.
>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>>> On your part.
>>>>>>>>>> pluto wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>> On your part.
>>> On your part.
>>>>>>> Classic pedantic buffoonery.
>>>>> On your part.
>>>>> Non sequitur.
>>> Non sequitur.
>> How ironic.
Classic hallucination on your part, Sockpuppet.
Archie Leach's Sockpuppet
Fully documented and evident to anyone, ah.
--
02D2D2
Archie Leach's Sockpuppet
>Archie Leach's Sockpuppet writes:
>
>> -- diced:
>
>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>
>>>> -- coughed:
>
>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>
>> Classic invective.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>>>> -- burbled:
>
>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>
>>>> Who is "Sockpuppet", Tholen? There is no one in this newsgroup using
>>>> that alias.
>
>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>> No surprise that you are
>>> unable to comprehend your own alias, Sockpuppet.
>
>> Classic erroneous presupposition on your part, Tholen.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>>>>>> -- fuzzled:
>
>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>
>>>>>> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
>>>>>> argument.
>
>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> On your part.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>>>> What does your derogatory question have to do with OS/2, Tholen?
>
>>>>> Classic inconsistency, given that you attributed the text to "--"
>>>>> above, Sockpuppet. Do make up your mind, Sockpuppet.
>
>>>> Classic inconsistency, given that you are using the descriptor
>>>> "Sockpuppet" as an invective.
>
>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>> Do try to keep up.
>
>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>> pluto wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>>> Joe Malloy's Sock Puppet wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Jesus, a whole fucking decade. I'll be dead in a few more decades.
>
>>>>>>>>>>> Tholen is quite ready to outlast all of usenet in the sure and
>>>>>>>>>>> certain
>>>>>>>>>>> hope that he will absolutely have the very Last Word.
>
>>>>>>>>>> The last word is irrelevant, Deco, as he's told us many times.
>
>>>>>>>>> Reading comprehension makes cameo appearance.
>
>>>>>>>> What does your latest classic erroneous presupposition have to do with
>>>>>>>> demon.local, Tholen?
>
>>>>>>> Ironically, you've made a classic erroneous presupposition that I made
>>>>>>> a classic erroneous presupposition, Sockpuppet.
>
>>>>>> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
>>>>>> argument.
>
>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> On your part.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>>>> Classic pedantic buffoonery.
>
>>>>> I'm well aware of your buffoonery, Sockpuppet.
>
>>>> On your part.
>
>>> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Sockpuppet?
>
>> Classic derogatory and loaded question.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>>> No need to tell me
>>>>> about it.
>
>>>> Non sequitur.
>
>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> Non sequitur.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
--
02D2D2
Archie Leach's Sockpuppet
Who is "Sockpuppet", Tholen? There is no in this newsgroup using that
alias.
--
02D2D2
tho...@antispam.ham
> -- muzzled:
Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>>> -- diced:
>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>>>>> -- coughed:
>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>>> Classic invective.
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> On your part.
Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
tho...@antispam.ham
> Tholen did the Tholen:
Classic ambiguity.
Archie Leach's Sockpuppet
>Archie Leach's Sockpuppet writes:
>
>> Tholen did the Tholen:
>
>Classic ambiguity.
Note: no response.
On your part, Tholen.
--
02D2D2
Archie Leach's Sockpuppet
>Archie Leach's Sockpuppet writes:
>
>> -- muzzled:
>
>Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
Who is "Sockpuppet", Tholen? There is no one in this newsgroup using
that alias.
>
>>>> -- diced:
>
>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>
>>>>>> -- coughed:
>
>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>
>>>> Classic invective.
>
>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>>>>>> -- burbled:
>
>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>
>>>>>> Who is "Sockpuppet", Tholen? There is no one in this newsgroup using
>>>>>> that alias.
>
>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> On your part.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>>> No surprise that you are
>>>>> unable to comprehend your own alias, Sockpuppet.
>
>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition on your part, Tholen.
>
>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>> -- fuzzled:
>
>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>
>>>>>>>> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
>>>>>>>> argument.
>
>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> On your part.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>>>>>> What does your derogatory question have to do with OS/2, Tholen?
>
>>>>>>> Classic inconsistency, given that you attributed the text to "--"
>>>>>>> above, Sockpuppet. Do make up your mind, Sockpuppet.
>
>>>>>> Classic inconsistency, given that you are using the descriptor
>>>>>> "Sockpuppet" as an invective.
>
>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> On your part.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>>>> Do try to keep up.
>
>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
>>>> On your part.
>
>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
On your part.
>>>>>>>>>>> pluto wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe Malloy's Sock Puppet wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jesus, a whole fucking decade. I'll be dead in a few more
>decades.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tholen is quite ready to outlast all of usenet in the sure and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> certain
>>>>>>>>>>>>> hope that he will absolutely have the very Last Word.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The last word is irrelevant, Deco, as he's told us many times.
>
>>>>>>>>>>> Reading comprehension makes cameo appearance.
>
>>>>>>>>>> What does your latest classic erroneous presupposition have to do
>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>> demon.local, Tholen?
>
>>>>>>>>> Ironically, you've made a classic erroneous presupposition that I made
>>>>>>>>> a classic erroneous presupposition, Sockpuppet.
>
>>>>>>>> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
>>>>>>>> argument.
>
>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> On your part.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>>>>>> Classic pedantic buffoonery.
>
>>>>>>> I'm well aware of your buffoonery, Sockpuppet.
>
>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Sockpuppet?
>
>>>> Classic derogatory and loaded question.
>
>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>>>>> No need to tell me
>>>>>>> about it.
>
>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>
>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> Non sequitur.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
--
02D2D2
tho...@antispam.ham
> Tholen did the nasty:
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>> Tholen did the Tholen:
>> Classic ambiguity.
> Note: no response.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
tho...@antispam.ham
> -- coughed:
Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>>> -- muzzled:
>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
> Who is "Sockpuppet", Tholen? There is no one in this newsgroup using
> that alias.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. No surprise that you are
unable to comprehend your own alias, Sockpuppet.
>>>>> -- diced:
Archie Leach's Sockpuppet
>Archie Leach's Sockpuppet writes:
>
>> Tholen did the nasty:
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>> Tholen did the Tholen:
>
>>> Classic ambiguity.
>
>> Note: no response.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Note: still no response.
On your part, Tholen.
--
02D2D2
Archie Leach's Sockpuppet
>Archie Leach's Sockpuppet writes:
>
>> -- coughed:
>
>Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
Who is "Sockpuppet", Tholen? There is no one in this newsgroup using
that alias.
>
>>>> -- muzzled:
>
>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>
>> Who is "Sockpuppet", Tholen? There is no one in this newsgroup using
>> that alias.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. No surprise that you are
>unable to comprehend your own alias, Sockpuppet.
Your inability to understand possessive grammar forms is not my
concern, Tholen.
>
>>>>>> -- diced:
>
>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>
>>>>>>>> -- coughed:
>
>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>
>>>>>> Classic invective.
>
>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> On your part.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>> -- burbled:
>
>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>
>>>>>>>> Who is "Sockpuppet", Tholen? There is no one in this newsgroup using
>>>>>>>> that alias.
>
>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> On your part.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>>>>> No surprise that you are
>>>>>>> unable to comprehend your own alias, Sockpuppet.
>
>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition on your part, Tholen.
>
>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> On your part.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>> -- fuzzled:
>
>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>
>>>>>>>>>> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
>>>>>>>>>> argument.
>
>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> On your part.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>> What does your derogatory question have to do with OS/2, Tholen?
>
>>>>>>>>> Classic inconsistency, given that you attributed the text to "--"
>>>>>>>>> above, Sockpuppet. Do make up your mind, Sockpuppet.
>
>>>>>>>> Classic inconsistency, given that you are using the descriptor
>>>>>>>> "Sockpuppet" as an invective.
>
>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> On your part.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>>>>>> Do try to keep up.
>
>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> On your part.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>> Classic pedantic buffoonery.
>
>>>>>>>>> I'm well aware of your buffoonery, Sockpuppet.
>
>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Sockpuppet?
>
>>>>>> Classic derogatory and loaded question.
>
>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> On your part.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>> No need to tell me
>>>>>>>>> about it.
>
>>>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>
>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>
>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> On your part.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
--
02D2D2
ah
I'm well aware of the demonstrated evidence, als.
--
ah
Archie Leach's Sockpuppet
No surprise there at all, ah.
--
02D2D2
tho...@antispam.ham
> Tholen drove over the cliff:
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>> Tholen did the nasty:
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> On your part.
Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>> Tholen did the Tholen:
>>>> Classic ambiguity.
>>> Note: no response.
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> Note: still no response.
Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
ah
Are you fully digested, yet, als?
--
ah
Archie Leach's Sockpuppet
>Archie Leach's Sockpuppet writes:
>
>> Tholen drove over the cliff:
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Ambiguous.
>
>>>> Tholen did the nasty:
>
>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>>>> Tholen did the Tholen:
>
>>>>> Classic ambiguity.
>
>>>> Note: no response.
>
>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> Note: still no response.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Note: still no response.
On your part.
>
--
02D2D2
Archie Leach's Sockpuppet
>Archie Leach's Sockpuppet writes:
>
>> -- barked:
>
>Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
Who is "Sockpuppet", Tholen? There is no one in this newsgroup using
that alias.
>
>>>> -- coughed:
>
>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>
>> Who is "Sockpuppet", Tholen? There is no one in this newsgroup using
>> that alias.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. No surprise that you are
>unable to comprehend your own alias, Sockpuppet.
Who is "Sockpuppet", Tholen? There is no one in this newsgroup using
that alias.
>
>>>>>> -- muzzled:
>
>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>
>>>> Who is "Sockpuppet", Tholen? There is no one in this newsgroup using
>>>> that alias.
>
>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. No surprise that you are
>>> unable to comprehend your own alias, Sockpuppet.
>
>> Your inability to understand possessive grammar forms is not my
>> concern, Tholen.
>
>Classic erroneous presupposition.
Ambiguous.
Archie Leach's Sockpuppet
Not at all, ah. nelohT has been fully occupied with cascades so none
have been forthcoming.
--
02D2D2
tho...@antispam.ham
> Tholen flumed out:
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>> Tholen drove over the cliff:
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> Ambiguous.
Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Archie Leach's Sockpuppet
>Archie Leach's Sockpuppet writes:
>
>> Tholen flumed out:
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Ambiguous.
>
>>>> Tholen drove over the cliff:
>
>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> Ambiguous.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>>>> Tholen did the nasty:
>
>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> On your part.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>>>>>> Tholen did the Tholen:
>
>>>>>>> Classic ambiguity.
>
>>>>>> Note: no response.
>
>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> Note: still no response.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> Note: still no response.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
On your part.
>
--
02D2D2
Archie Leach's Sockpuppet
>Archie Leach's Sockpuppet writes:
>
>> Tholen declareth profusely:
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Ambiguous.
>
>>>> -- barked:
>
>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>
>> Who is "Sockpuppet", Tholen? There is no one in this newsgroup using
>> that alias.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. No surprise that you are
>still unable to comprehend your own alias, Sockpuppet.
Who is "Sockpuppet", Tholen? There is no one in this newsgroup using
that alias.
>
>>>>>> -- coughed:
>
>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>
>>>> Who is "Sockpuppet", Tholen? There is no one in this newsgroup using
>>>> that alias.
>
>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. No surprise that you are
>>> unable to comprehend your own alias, Sockpuppet.
>
>> Who is "Sockpuppet", Tholen? There is no one in this newsgroup using
>> that alias.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. No surprise that you are
>still unable to comprehend your own alias, Sockpuppet.
Who is "Sockpuppet", Tholen? There is no one in this newsgroup using
that alias.
>
>>>>>>>> -- muzzled:
>
>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>
>>>>>> Who is "Sockpuppet", Tholen? There is no one in this newsgroup using
>>>>>> that alias.
>
>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. No surprise that you are
>>>>> unable to comprehend your own alias, Sockpuppet.
>
>>>> Your inability to understand possessive grammar forms is not my
>>>> concern, Tholen.
>
>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
>> Ambiguous.
>
ah
What does this have to do with demon.local, Tholen?
--
ah
tho...@antispam.ham
> Tholen puffed out his chest and exhaled:
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>> Tholen declareth profusely:
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> Ambiguous.
Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>> -- barked:
>>>>>>> -- coughed:
>>>>>>>>> -- muzzled:
>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>>> Ambiguous.
> On your part.
Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Archie Leach's Sockpuppet
>Archie Leach's Sockpuppet writes:
>
>> Tholen found it necessary to:
>
>How ironic.
How ironic.
>
>>>> Tholen flumed out:
>
>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> Ambiguous.
>
Archie Leach's Sockpuppet
>Archie Leach's Sockpuppet writes:
>
>> Tholen puffed out his chest and exhaled:
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Ambiguous.
>
>>>> Tholen declareth profusely:
>
>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> Ambiguous.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>> -- diced:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- coughed:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic invective.
>
>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> On your part.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- burbled:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who is "Sockpuppet", Tholen? There is no one in this newsgroup
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> using
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that alias.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> On your part.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> No surprise that you are
>>>>>>>>>>>>> unable to comprehend your own alias, Sockpuppet.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition on your part, Tholen.
>
>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> On your part.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- fuzzled:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> argument.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> On your part.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What does your derogatory question have to do with OS/2,
>Tholen?
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic inconsistency, given that you attributed the text to
>"--"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> above, Sockpuppet. Do make up your mind, Sockpuppet.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic inconsistency, given that you are using the descriptor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Sockpuppet" as an invective.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> On your part.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do try to keep up.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> On your part.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic pedantic buffoonery.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm well aware of your buffoonery, Sockpuppet.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Sockpuppet?
>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic derogatory and loaded question.
>
>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> On your part.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No need to tell me
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about it.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>
>>>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> On your part.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
--
02D2D2
Archie Leach's Sockpuppet
I have been wondering if there is an answer to this question myself, ah.
--
02D2D2
tho...@antispam.ham
> Tholen pulled this lint out:
Classic erroneous presupposition.
>>> Tholen puffed out his chest and exhaled:
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> Ambiguous.
Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Archie Leach's Sockpuppet
>Archie Leach's Sockpuppet writes:
>
>> Tholen on the white horse delt thusly:
>
>Classic erroneous presupposition.
Classic auto-non-response.
>
>>>> Tholen found it necessary to:
>
>>> How ironic.
>
>> How ironic.
>
>Glad you agree that your response was ironic, Sockpuppet.
Irrelevant, given that I never claimed my response was ironic, Tholen.
Archie Leach's Sockpuppet
>Archie Leach's Sockpuppet writes:
>
>> Tholen pulled this lint out:
>
>Classic erroneous presupposition.
Ambiguous.
>
>>>> Tholen puffed out his chest and exhaled:
>
>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> Ambiguous.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>>>> Tholen declareth profusely:
>
>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> Ambiguous.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- diced:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- coughed:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic invective.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> On your part.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- burbled:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who is "Sockpuppet", Tholen? There is no one in this newsgroup
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> using
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that alias.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> On your part.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No surprise that you are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unable to comprehend your own alias, Sockpuppet.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition on your part, Tholen.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> On your part.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- fuzzled:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a
>logical
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> argument.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> On your part.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What does your derogatory question have to do with OS/2,
>Tholen?
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic inconsistency, given that you attributed the text to
>"--"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> above, Sockpuppet. Do make up your mind, Sockpuppet.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic inconsistency, given that you are using the descriptor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Sockpuppet" as an invective.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> On your part.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do try to keep up.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> On your part.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic pedantic buffoonery.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm well aware of your buffoonery, Sockpuppet.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Sockpuppet?
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic derogatory and loaded question.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> On your part.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No need to tell me
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about it.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> On your part.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
--
02D2D2
tho...@antispam.ham
> Tholen crept through the swamp:
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>> Tholen on the white horse delt thusly:
>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
> Classic auto-non-response.
I'm well aware that you've been using an auto non-response, Sockpuppet.
No need to tell me about it.
>>>>> Tholen found it necessary to:
>>>> How ironic.
>>> How ironic.
>> Glad you agree that your response was ironic, Sockpuppet.
> Irrelevant, given that I never claimed my response was ironic, Tholen.
Illogical, given that your response was the only one that could be
considered ironic, Sockpuppet, therefore by the process of
elimination, you had to be talking about your response.
tho...@antispam.ham
> Tholen pecked:
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>> Tholen pulled this lint out:
>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
> Ambiguous.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
ah
Interesting ygetarts, als.
--
ah
ah
It's the question that drives nelohT mad, als.
--
ah
Archie Leach's Sockpuppet
>Archie Leach's Sockpuppet writes:
>
>> Tholen crept through the swamp:
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
How ironic.
>
>>>> Tholen on the white horse delt thusly:
>
>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
>> Classic auto-non-response.
>
>I'm well aware that you've been using an auto non-response, Sockpuppet.
>No need to tell me about it.
Note: no response.
>
>>>>>> Tholen found it necessary to:
>
>>>>> How ironic.
>
>>>> How ironic.
>
>>> Glad you agree that your response was ironic, Sockpuppet.
>
>> Irrelevant, given that I never claimed my response was ironic, Tholen.
>
>Illogical, given that your response was the only one that could be
>considered ironic, Sockpuppet, therefore by the process of
>elimination, you had to be talking about your response.
Illogical.
>
>>>>>>>> Tholen flumed out:
>
>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>> Ambiguous.
>
>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> On your part.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>> Tholen drove over the cliff:
>
>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>> Ambiguous.
>
>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> On your part.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Tholen did the nasty:
>
>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> On your part.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tholen did the Tholen:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic ambiguity.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Note: no response.
>
>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>> Note: still no response.
>
>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>> Note: still no response.
>
>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> On your part.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
On your part.
>
--
02D2D2
Archie Leach's Sockpuppet
>Archie Leach's Sockpuppet writes:
>
>> Tholen pecked:
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Ambiguous.
>
>>>> Tholen pulled this lint out:
>
>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
>> Ambiguous.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>>>> Tholen puffed out his chest and exhaled:
>
>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> Ambiguous.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>>>>>> Tholen declareth profusely:
>
>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>> Ambiguous.
>
>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> On your part.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- diced:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- coughed:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic invective.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> On your part.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- burbled:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who is "Sockpuppet", Tholen? There is no one in this
>newsgroup
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> using
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that alias.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> On your part.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No surprise that you are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unable to comprehend your own alias, Sockpuppet.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition on your part, Tholen.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> On your part.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- fuzzled:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a
>logical
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> argument.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> On your part.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do try to keep up.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> On your part.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic pedantic buffoonery.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm well aware of your buffoonery, Sockpuppet.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems,
>Sockpuppet?
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic derogatory and loaded question.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> On your part.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No need to tell me
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about it.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>> On your part.
>
>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> On your part.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> On your part.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part.
>
--
02D2D2
Archie Leach's Sockpuppet
He *hates* cascades, ah.
--
02D2D2
Archie Leach's Sockpuppet
nelohT will never answer, ah.
--
02D2D2
tho...@antispam.ham
> Tholen chewed the cud:
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>> Tholen crept through the swamp:
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> How ironic.
Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>> Tholen on the white horse delt thusly:
>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>>> Classic auto-non-response.
>> I'm well aware that you've been using an auto non-response, Sockpuppet.
>> No need to tell me about it.
> Note: no response.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>>>> Tholen found it necessary to:
>>>>>> How ironic.
>>>>> How ironic.
>>>> Glad you agree that your response was ironic, Sockpuppet.
>>> Irrelevant, given that I never claimed my response was ironic, Tholen.
>> Illogical, given that your response was the only one that could be
>> considered ironic, Sockpuppet, therefore by the process of
>> elimination, you had to be talking about your response.
> Illogical.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>>>>>> Tholen flumed out:
tho...@antispam.ham
> Tholen howled:
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>> Tholen pecked:
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> Ambiguous.
Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>> Tholen pulled this lint out:
>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>>> Ambiguous.
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> On your part.
Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
ah
He *berates* cascades, als.
--
ah
ah
nelohT wants to, but hasn't the balls, als.
--
ah
Archie Leach's Sockpuppet
He *follows* cascades, ah.
--
02D2D2
Archie Leach's Sockpuppet
nelohT keeps lits of poast counts, ah.
--
02D2D2
ah
He *allows* cascades, als.
--
ah
ah
nelohT misses a few, though, als.
--
ah
Archie Leach's Sockpuppet
He *digests* cascades, ah.
--
02D2D2
Archie Leach's Sockpuppet
nelohT is a defective litsor, ah.
--
02D2D2
ah
He *ingests* cascades, als.
--
ah
ah
nelohT is a defective, als.
--
ah
Archie Leach's Sockpuppet
He *creates* cascades, ah.
--
02D2D2
Art Deco
nelohT is a usenet bot, ah.
--
"Classic erroneous presupposition."
-- David Tholen
Art Deco
>-- Art Deco writes: Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>What does your question have to do with OS/2, Deco? Deco ... must
>... cross-post ... Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? Deco ... must ...
>cross-post ... Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? What
>does that have to do with college basketball, Deco? Deco ... must
>... cross-post ... Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? Deco ... must ...
>cross-post ... Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? Deco
>... must ... cross-post ... Still suffering from attribution
>problems, Deco? Deco ... must ... cross-post ... Deco ... must ...
>cross-post ... Deco ... must ... cross-post ... Deco ... must ...
>cross-post ... Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? Deco
>... must ... cross-post ... Deco ... must ... cross-post ... Deco
>... must ... cross-post ... Deco ... must ... cross-post ... Deco
>... must ... cross-post ... Deco ... must ... cross-post ... Deco
>... must ... cross-post ... Deco ... must ... cross-post ... Deco
>... must ... cross-post ... Deco ... must ... cross-post ... Deco
>... must ... cross-post ... Deco ... must ... cross-post ... Deco
>... must ... cross-post ... Deco ... must ... cross-post ... Deco
>... must ... cross-post ... Deco ... must ... cross-post ... Deco
>... must ... cross-post ... Deco ... must ... cross-post ... Deco
>... must ... cross-post ... Deco ... must ... cross-post ... Deco
>... must ... cross-post ... Deco ... must ... cross-post ...
>Boilerplate spam from Art Deco. How hypocritical of him, considering
>his own remarks: --Art Deco --Art Deco --Art Deco --Art Deco --Art
>Deco --Art Deco --Art Deco --Art Deco Deco is still operating under
>the delusion that his family name is Deco: --Art Deco --Art Deco
>--Art Deco --Art Deco --Art Deco Caught in a rather obvious lie,
>Deco has now started backpedalling: --Art Deco Classic
>inconsistency; first "only", now "either...or". But consider the
>implication: Deco doesn't have a pair of neurons, and that's
>according to Deco himself. I see that you evaded the evidence for
>your psychic usenet astrology, Deco. No surprise there, really. Did
>you finally figure out what your earlier posting had to do with
>demon.local, Deco? You did, after all, add the newsgroup to the
>distribution and then ask what your posting had to do with that
>newsgroup. I see that you completely evaded the matter of your
>cross-posting to irrelevant newsgroups, Deco. No surprise there,
>really. --Art Deco How ironic. What does your ongoing "kookdance"
>have to do with the irrelevant newsgroups to which you cross-post,
>Deco? Not that I'm really expecting an answer from you, Deco. --Art
>Deco --Art Deco So, Deco is responding to one of his sockpuppets.
>Seek professional help, Deco. --Art Deco No wonder you misuse and
>misspell so many words, Deco, but it's up to you if you want to look
>like a fool. --Art Deco Further evidence of your reading
>comprehension problem, Deco, given that I clearly stated that I
>never said that you wrote the quote. Rather, I said that Art Deco
>wrote the quote, Deco, and that's because Art Deco did write the
>quote, as evidenced by the message ID that I provided the first time
>you made the accusation. --Art Deco Further evidence of your
>counting problem, Deco, given that your posting total hadn't reached
>five digits at the time of your question. Also further evidence of
>your reading comprehension problem, Deco, given that the combined
>total from all posters was correctly reported to five digits over
>three years ago. --Art Deco Further evidence of your counting
>problem, Deco, given that Deco made it to four figures in a single
>year for three years running. --Art Deco --Art Deco --Art Deco
>--Kali --Richard Head --Miguel --Miguel --Art Deco --Art Deco Don't
>bother auditioning for "The Wizard of Oz", Deco. --Art Deco --Art
>Deco Having trouble remembering to which newsgroups you've followed
>me, Deco? Oh that's right. You don't need a memory. --Art Deco So,
>you admit to poking people, Deco, and you're comfortable doing so
>under normal circumstances. Seek professional help, Deco. --Art Deco
>--Art Deco Classic hypocrisy. --Art Deco Classic unsubstantiated and
>erroneous claim. Rather, most of the traffic in cooa consists of
>people responding to you, Deco, after you've added the newsgroup to
>the distribution, and then the ongoing follow-up to those articles.
>In other words, you're responsible for most of the traffic in cooa,
>Deco. --Art Deco, who cross-posts to newsgroups that have nothing to
>do with the topic of the groups he cross-posts them into, including:
>24hoursupport.helpdesk alt.usage.english alt.2600 alt.usenet.kooks
>alt.alien.research alt.wee.davey.mom-a-fat-whore
>alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk aus.general alt.alien.visitors
>aus.invest alt.antichristnet aus.science alt.aratzio cam.misc
>alt.astronomy comp.lang.fortran alt.astronomy.art-deco
>comp.os.linux.advocacy alt.atheism comp.os.os2.advocacy
>alt.bad.clams comp.os.os2.apps alt.bible.prophecy comp.os.os2.misc
>alt.buzzard.rules comp.sys.mac alt.cascade demon.local
>alt.christnet.christianlife gac.physics.astronomy
>alt.christnet.prayer ne.weather alt.comedy.standup news.groups
>alt.conspriacy rec.arts.marching.drumcorps alt.culture.alaska
>rec.arts.movies.current-films alt.digestors.holy rec.arts.poems
>alt.fan.art-bell rec.arts.sf.written alt.fan.art-bell.art-deco
>rec.aviation.products alt.fan.keanu-reeves rec.gambling.lottery
>alt.fan.letter.m rec.music.classical alt.fan.madonna rec.org.mensa
>alt.fan.rush-limbaugh rec.sports.basketball.college
>alt.fan.states.new-jersey rec.sports.football.college
>alt.fan.states.texas rec.woodworking alt.fan.steveleyland
>sci.archaeology alt.flame sci.astro alt.fucknozzles
>sci.electronics.basics alt.gothic sci.electronics.design
>alt.hackers.malicious sci.geo.earthquakes alt.home.repair
>sci.geo.geology alt.languages.french sci.math alt.messianic
>sci.med.cardiology alt.music.michael-jackson sci.philosophy.tech
>alt.music.white-power sci.physics alt.non.sequitur
>sci.physics.cond-matter alt.os.windows-xp sci.physics.relativity
>alt.paranet.ufo sci.psychology.psychotherapy
>alt.paranormal.crop-circles sci.skeptic alt.psychology.help
>sci.space.history alt.religion.christian sci.space.policy
>alt.religion.islam soc.culture.israel alt.religion.kibology
>soc.culture.jewish alt.revisionism soc.men alt.sailing.asa
>soc.singles alt.satellite.tv.europe soc.subculture.bondage-bdsm
>alt.sci.physics.new-theories talk.politics.misc alt.security.alarms
>triangle.general alt.snuh uk.food+drink.misc alt.society.liberalism
>uk.media.radio.bbc-r4 alt.spirituality.radical-faerie
>uk.sci.astronomy alt.troll ah writes: Hypocritically, you didn't
>take it to email, ah. No surprise there, really. TheBookman writes:
>What does that have to do with OS/2, TheBookman? Sir Gilligan Horry
>writes: What does that have to do with OS/2, Horry? Kadaitcha Man
>writes: What does that have to do with OS/2, Kadaitcha? marika
>writes: What does that have to do with OS/2, marika? Archie Leach's
>Sockpuppet writes: What does that have to do with OS/2, Sockpuppet?
>www.freedomtofascism.com <tr...@r.us> writes: What does that have to
>do with OS/2, www.freedomtofascism.com <tr...@r.us>?
Now this is a proper digest, Tholen, complete with 106 instances of
your obsession with Art Deco.
John "C"
"Art Deco" <er...@caballista.org> wrote in message
news:050420081955400141%er...@caballista.org...
HJ
Art Deco
>14159> Art Deco, worshipped by net.ko0ks all around Usenet.
>
>Boilerplate spam from Art Deco, coupled with delusions of grandeur.
Yes, Tholen, you may approach the throne.
--
Art Deco, worshipped by net.ko0ks all around Usenet.
Art Deco
>--
>Art Deco
>Deco?
>Deco?
>Deco
>Deco
>Deco.
>Deco
>Deco?
>Deco.
>Deco
>Deco?
>Deco
>Deco
>Deco
>Deco
>Deco
>Deco?
>Deco?
>Deco
>Deco
>Deco?
>Deco?
>Deco?
>Deco
>Deco
>Deco?
>Deco
>Deco?
>Deco?
>Art Deco
>Art Deco
>Art Deco
>Art Deco
>Art Deco
>Art Deco
>Art Deco
>Art Deco
>Art Deco
>Deco Deco:
>Art Deco
>Art Deco
>Art Deco
>Art Deco
>Art Deco
>Deco
>Art Deco
>Deco
>Deco
>Deco.
>Deco?
>Deco.
>Art Deco
>Deco?
>Deco.
>Art Deco
>Art Deco
>Deco
>Deco.
>Art Deco
>Deco,o
>Art Deco
>Deco,
>Art Deco Deco,
>Art Deco
>Art Deco
>Deco,
>Deco,
>Art Deco
>Deco,
>Art Deco
>Art Deco
>'Art Deco',
>Art Deco
>Mr. Deco.
>Art Deco
>Deco,
>Deco.
>Art Deco
>Art Deco
>Deco.
>Art Deco
>Art Deco
>Deco?
>Art Deco
>Deco,
>Deco.
>Art Deco
>Art Deco
>Art Deco
>Deco,
>Deco.
>Art Deco,
>alt.astronomy.art-deco
>alt.fan.art-bell.art-deco
>alias # today total year 4 year 3 year 2
>-------------- ------- ----- ------ ------ ------
>deco 20 3209 4393 3722 2268
Yes! It's all about ME!
John "C"
> --
>
> >14159> Art Deco, worshipped by net.ko0ks all around Usenet.
> >
> >Boilerplate spam from Art Deco, coupled with delusions of grandeur.
>
> Yes, Tholen, you may approach the throne.
>
HJ
Lora Crighton
>
> Yes! It's all about ME!
>
Isn't there an alt.fan group that you could post this kind of thing to?
--
Blessed Cecilia, appear in visions
To all musicians, appear and inspire:
Translated Daughter, come down and startle
Composing mortals with immortal fire.
NB
> Art Deco wrote:
>
> > Yes! It's all about ME!
>
> Isn't there an alt.fan group that you could post this kind of thing to?
When are you and Tholen going to hook up?
tho...@antispam.ham
> Lora Crighton wrote:
>> Art Deco wrote:
>>> Yes! It's all about ME!
>> Isn't there an alt.fan group that you could post this kind of thing to?
> When are you and Tholen going to hook up?
What does your question have to do with college basketball, nobuyout?
NB
What does your question have to do with demon.local, tholen?
tho...@antispam.ham
>>> Lora Crighton wrote:
>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>> Yes! It's all about ME!
>>>> Isn't there an alt.fan group that you could post this kind of thing to?=
>>> When are you and Tholen going to hook up?
>> What does your question have to do with college basketball, nobuyout?
> What does your question have to do with demon.local, tholen?
I see that you didn't answer the question, nobuyout. No surprise there,
really.
NB
Classic hypocrisy from Tholen.
tho...@antispam.ham
Art Deco writes:
14160> Newsgroups: rec.music.classical,alt.usenet.kooks,demon.local,rec.sport.basketball.college
Deco ... must ... cross-post ...
14160> :nelohT
Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
14160> Yes! It's all about ME!
14161> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.astronomy.art-deco,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.aratzio
Deco ... must ... cross-post ...
14161> And the surper-specitial quoting format.
14162> Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,demon.local,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
Deco ... must ... cross-post ...
14162> Croissant of wot?
14163> Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,demon.local,alt.usenet.kooks,soc.men,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
Deco ... must ... cross-post ...
14163> *pffft*
14164> Newsgroups: alt.os.windows-xp,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,24hoursupport.helpdesk,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advocacy
Deco ... must ... cross-post ...
14164> "Cut! Wrap!"
14165> Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,demon.local,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
Deco ... must ... cross-post ...
14165> <crickets>
14166> Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,demon.local,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
Deco ... must ... cross-post ...
14166> LIES!
14167> Newsgroups: demon.local,alt.astronomy,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.fan.steveleyland,alt.music.white-power
Deco ... must ... cross-post ...
14167> T-menos quatro . . .
14168> Newsgroups: demon.local,alt.astronomy,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.fan.steveleyland,alt.music.white-power
Deco ... must ... cross-post ...
14168> Not sure, but the faglaming parade will probably know.
14169> Newsgroups: demon.local,alt.astronomy,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.fan.steveleyland,alt.music.white-power,alt.talk.bollocks,alt.aratzio
Deco ... must ... cross-post ...
14169> OUT YOU LOT KNWO!!18!
14170> Newsgroups: demon.local,alt.astronomy,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.config
Deco ... must ... cross-post ...
14170> John is a barcode stamper?
14171> Newsgroups: alt.guitar.bass,alt.usenet.kooks,demon.local,alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,comp.os.os2.advocacy
Deco ... must ... cross-post ...
14172> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,rec.music.makers.bagpipe,soc.men,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advocacy,ne.weather,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.os.windows-xp,24hoursupport.helpdesk,alt.aratzio
Deco ... must ... cross-post ...
14172> Curried?
14173> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,rec.music.makers.bagpipe,soc.men,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advocacy,ne.weather,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.os.windows-xp,24hoursupport.helpdesk,alt.aratzio
Deco ... must ... cross-post ...
14173> Wot?
14174> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,demon.local,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
Deco ... must ... cross-post ...
14174> Frontal lobe crash.
14175> Newsgroups: alt.religion.jehovahs-witn,alt.talk.creationism,alt.atheism,alt.astronomy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
Deco ... must ... cross-post ...
14175> I am lying.
14176> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,demon.local,alt.aratzio
Deco ... must ... cross-post ...
14176> Quiet, k0ok.
Practice what you preach, Deco.
14177> Newsgroups: soc.men,misc.legal,comp.os.os2.advocacy,demon.local
Deco ... must ... cross-post ...
14177> Have a nice day.
14178> Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,comp.os.os2.advocacy,demon.local,alt.alien.research
Deco ... must ... cross-post ...
14178> Hi, Tholen!
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
14178> Hi, Alexa!
14179> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.astronomy.art-deco,demon.local,alt.astronomy,rec.sport.basketball.college
Deco ... must ... cross-post ...
14179> --
14179> Yes, Tholen, you may approach the throne.
14180> Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college,rec.sport.football.college
Deco ... must ... cross-post ...
14180> :nelohT
Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
14180> Still antagonizing anyone you interact with on Usenet, eh Tholen?
14181> Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,rec.arts.poems
Deco ... must ... cross-post ...
14181> :nelohT
Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
14181> You'd better be nice to Cockbrain, Tholen, lest he start faglaming you
14181> non-stop.
14182> Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,rec.arts.poems
Deco ... must ... cross-post ...
14182> :nelohT
Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
14183> Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college
14183> :nelohT
Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
14183> A new title offered by a kook -- thanks, Tholen.
14184> Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college
14184> :nelohT
Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
14185> Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college
14185> :nelohT
Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
14185> Illogical.
14186> Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college
14186> :nelohT
Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
14186> Sorry, Tholen, wrong. Let's [tinu] see, from r.m.c just today:
14186> [...]
14186> Can you sort out the answer to your question now?
14187> Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college,alt.usenet.kooks
Deco ... must ... cross-post ...
14187> :nelohT
Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
14187> Classic prevarication.
14187> Classic intellectual dishonesty.
14187> I will await your lame post-edit of your typo, Tholen.
14188> Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell
Deco ... must ... cross-post ...
14188> :nelohT
Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
14188> Hardly, Tholen, it refuted your lie about not posting digests.
14188> For his propensity to "argue" via Pee Wee Herman IKYABWAIs and blatant
14188> lies, I nominate Wee Davie Tholen for the Joseph Bartlo Memorial
14188> Pathetic Anal Pineapple.
14188> Seconds?
14189> Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college,demon.local,alt.usenet.kooks
Deco ... must ... cross-post ...
14189> :nelohT
Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
14189> Still suffering from intellectual honesty problems, nelohT?
Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
14190> Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college,demon.local,alt.usenet.kooks
Deco ... must ... cross-post ...
14190> Have you seen where the bot removes itself from attribution chains?
14191> Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college,demon.local,alt.usenet.kooks
Deco ... must ... cross-post ...
14191> Still suffering from digestion problems, nelohT?
Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
14192> Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college,demon.local,alt.usenet.kooks
Deco ... must ... cross-post ...
14192> <nods> He is not everyone's [tine] cup of tea.
14192> Art Deco, worshipped by net.ko0ks all around Usenet.
Boilerplate spam from Art Deco, coupled with delusions of grandeur.
How hypocritical of him, considering his own remarks:
"Oh lookie, my boilerplate spam from the Davie Files is now
up to 80 lines."
--Art Deco
"I order you to add this quote to your boilerplate spam."
--Art Deco
"Out-of-context quotes in your boilerplate spam, Davie,
how kooky."
--Art Deco
"This was in response to your boilerplate spam that includes
out-of-context quotes by different people."
--Art Deco
"Put my words into your boilerplate screed, Tholen, without
your selective, out-of-context quoting. I dare you."
--Art Deco
"Just more of your boilerplate screed, without meaning."
--Art Deco
"Along with his spamming of his boilerplate screeds"
--Art Deco
"Classic control issues on your part, given that you are
powerless to stop me from doing as I please, other than
repeated whining via your boilerplate screed. No surprise
here, really."
--Art Deco
Deco is still operating under the delusion that his family name is Deco:
Message-ID: <290720060819346837%er...@netcabal.com>
"Apparently in Tholen World, everyone is supposed to refer to
everyone else solely by their family name, anything else is
verboten."
--Art Deco
Message-ID: <050820060758108935%er...@netcabal.com>
"My personal favorite is how he demands that everyone refer to
him as 'tho...@antispam.ham', yet when he quotes others, he
hacks everything off except what he figures is the family name."
--Art Deco
Message-ID: <240220070923413658%er...@caballista.org>
"One last note about the holy digestor -- as it is a reflection
of Davey's bizarre world where everyone must be referred to only
by their family name"
--Art Deco
Message-ID: <120420071251145347%er...@caballista.org>
"This behavior can be explained by Davie's apparent belief that
all should be referenced by their family name alone and nothing
else."
--Art Deco
Message-ID: <090520071324119553%er...@caballista.org>
"As for why he thinks people should only use family names, I
have no idea."
--Art Deco
Caught in a rather obvious lie, Deco has now started backpedalling:
Message-ID: <300720071940133793%er...@caballista.org>
"It is plainly evident to anyone with a pair of neurons that
you use either the family name or some other form of shorthand
to form the labels for your oh-so-important count categories."
--Art Deco
Classic inconsistency; first "only", now "either...or".
But consider the implication: Deco doesn't have a pair of neurons,
and that's according to Deco himself.
I see that you evaded the evidence for your psychic usenet astrology,
Deco. No surprise there, really.
Did you finally figure out what your earlier posting had to do with
demon.local, Deco? You did, after all, add the newsgroup to the
distribution and then ask what your posting had to do with that
newsgroup.
I see that you completely evaded the matter of your cross-posting to
irrelevant newsgroups, Deco. No surprise there, really.
"Not one of which was posted to rec.music.classical, yet you felt it
necessary to spew your off-topic regurgitation into an irrelevant
newsgroup anyway."
--Art Deco
How ironic.
What does your ongoing "kookdance" have to do with the irrelevant
newsgroups to which you cross-post, Deco? Not that I'm really
expecting an answer from you, Deco.
"Tread carefully, Tholen, 'Archie Leach' is another
one of my sockpuppets."
--Art Deco
"Archie Leach wrote:
WAY TO GO, HAGAR!!! WE KNOW YOU TRIED YOUR DAMNDEST!!!"
--Art Deco
So, Deco is responding to one of his sockpuppets. Seek professional
help, Deco.
"I don't read dictionaries, tholen."
--Art Deco
No wonder you misuse and misspell so many words, Deco, but it's up to
you if you want to look like a fool.
"Why do you keep spamming this quote over and over, Tholen?
I did not write it."
--Art Deco
Further evidence of your reading comprehension problem, Deco, given
that I clearly stated that I never said that you wrote the quote.
Rather, I said that Art Deco wrote the quote, Deco, and that's because
Art Deco did write the quote, as evidenced by the message ID that I
provided the first time you made the accusation.
"Or perhaps your pathetic Holy Digestor FORTRAN code can't handle a
five-digit total?"
--Art Deco
Further evidence of your counting problem, Deco, given that your posting
total hadn't reached five digits at the time of your question. Also
further evidence of your reading comprehension problem, Deco, given that
the combined total from all posters was correctly reported to five digits
over three years ago.
"So ham, do you think 'deco' can make it to four-figures in a single
'year'?"
--Art Deco
Further evidence of your counting problem, Deco, given that Deco made
it to four figures in a single year for three years running.
"the FNVW is also my sockpuppet."
--Art Deco
"Everything I type is a lie."
--Art Deco
"Who is 'Art Deco', Tholen?"
--Art Deco
"You really are one of the litsiest people I know, Mr. Deco."
--Kali
"It's Time for Art Deco to Remove Itself From Usenet Altogether."
--Richard Head
"Deco, you sick obsessed freak. Get help."
--Miguel
"Get a life, Deco."
--Miguel
"Actually, I haven't a clue"
--Art Deco
"I don't need a memory"
--Art Deco
Don't bother auditioning for "The Wizard of Oz", Deco.
"To which newsgroups have I followed you around?"
--Art Deco
"I monitor your personal sandbox"
--Art Deco
Having trouble remembering to which newsgroups you've followed me,
Deco? Oh that's right. You don't need a memory.
"True that, but he apparently just lost his wife of many years,
and I no longer feel comfortable poking him."
--Art Deco
So, you admit to poking people, Deco, and you're comfortable doing so
under normal circumstances. Seek professional help, Deco.
"[massive sneckage]"
--Art Deco
"You removed the context"
--Art Deco
Classic hypocrisy.
"99.9% of the traffic in cooa consists of your digests and
people replying to them"
--Art Deco
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Rather, most of the
traffic in cooa consists of people responding to you, Deco, after
you've added the newsgroup to the distribution, and then the ongoing
follow-up to those articles. In other words, you're responsible for
most of the traffic in cooa, Deco.
"...which have nothing to do with the topic of the groups you
multi-post them into."
================================================================================
honestjohn writes:
1322> Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,rec.arts.poems
1322> Message-ID: <-tKdnez538TpM2Ta...@centurytel.net>
1323> Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college,alt.usenet.kooks
1323> Proving that you have NO LIFE, Pedo Deco.
1324> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.astronomy.art-deco,demon.local,alt.astronomy,rec.sport.basketball.college
1324> Shut your Lying Mouth, "satan" Deco!
1325> Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell
1325> Only Meat Spatula would by stupid enough to do that!
1326> Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,rec.arts.poems
1326> That doesn't happen to Normal human beings like D. Tholen; only to
1326> Jackals and Cowards like you, Deco.
1327> Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college,demon.local,alt.usenet.kooks
1327> Funny, Deco also obsesses about someone he refers to as Clockbrain.
1327> I can't imagine who that is.
1328> Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy,rec.sport.basketball.college,alt.alien.visitors,alt.fan.art-bell
1328> Why is there no award named for Tholen? Is there actually someone who
1328> is a bigger kook than Tholen?
1328> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1328> Tholen's not a Ko0K!
What does that have to do with college basketabll, honestjohn?
================================================================================
nobu...@gmail.com writes:
279> Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,demon.local,rec.sport.basketball.college
279> When are you and Tholen going to hook up?
280> Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college,rec.sport.football.college
280> I thought this was going to be a thread about Tholen's brain.
281> Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy,rec.sport.basketball.college,alt.alien.visitors,alt.fan.art-bell
281> Why is there no award named for Tholen? Is there actually someone who
281> is a bigger kook than Tholen?
282> Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college
282> Tholen got PWNed by Stuyck.
283> Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy,rec.sport.basketball.college,alt.alien.visitors,alt.fan.art-bell
283> He may not be a Ko0K, but he is a kook.
284> Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,demon.local,rec.sport.basketball.college
284> What does your question have to do with demon.local, tholen?
285> Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college,rec.sport.football.college
285> What you think is worthless, tholen.
What does any of that have to do with college basketball, nobuyout?
================================================================================
Kadaitcha Man writes:
207> Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college,demon.local,alt.usenet.kooks
207> No. Far more often than not, as soon as I see the Tholenspeak, a sudden,
207> involuntary spasm engulfs the middle finger on my right hand, whereupon I
207> cannot regain control of it until after it has hit the delete key.
What does that have to do with college basketball, Kadaitcha?
================================================================================
Meat Plow writes:
37> Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell
37> Happily!
What does that have to do with college basketball, Plow?
================================================================================
Archie Leach's Sockpuppet writes:
357> Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,rec.arts.poems
357> Another load of standard Tholen lies and lames.
Another classic unsubstantiated and erroneous clim.
Lora Crighton
What makes you think we will? If I ever end up in his city (unlikely), I would
try to go hear HCCB play, but even then I doubt that we would "hook up".
Hagar
Your illusions of grandeur know no bounds,
do they, asshole ...
oh look, you just pissed on yourself ..
-- "Art Deco - Loved by himself, reviled by millions"
Motto: Pederasts R Us
Art Deco
>14192> Art Deco, worshipped by net.ko0ks all around Usenet.
>
>Boilerplate spam from Art Deco, coupled with delusions of grandeur.
>How hypocritical of him, considering his own remarks:
Oh look, the digests have infected rec.sport.basketball.college.
Tholen is now triple-posting his odes to moi.
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahha
--
John "C"
> :nelohT
>
> >14192> Art Deco, worshipped by net.ko0ks all around Usenet.
> >
> >Boilerplate spam from Art Deco, coupled with delusions of grandeur.
> >How hypocritical of him, considering his own remarks:
>
> Oh look, the digests have infected rec.sport.basketball.college.
>
> Tholen is now triple-posting his odes to moi.
>
HJ
tho...@antispam.ham
>>>>> Lora Crighton wrote:
>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>> Yes! It's all about ME!
>>>>>> Isn't there an alt.fan group that you could post this kind of thing to?
>>>>> When are you and Tholen going to hook up?
>>>> What does your question have to do with college basketball, nobuyout?
>>> What does your question have to do with demon.local, tholen?
>> I see that you didn't answer the question, nobuyout. No surprise there,
>> really.
> Classic hypocrisy from Tholen.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim from nobuyout.
tho...@antispam.ham
> :nelohT
Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>> 14192> Art Deco, worshipped by net.ko0ks all around Usenet.
>>
>> Boilerplate spam from Art Deco, coupled with delusions of grandeur.
>> How hypocritical of him, considering his own remarks:
> Oh look, the digests have infected rec.sport.basketball.college.
Courtesy of Archie Leach and you, Deco.
> Tholen is now triple-posting his odes to moi.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahha
What does that have to do with college basketball, Deco?
NB
Classic hypocrisy from Tholen, no surprise there really.
NB
Yet another classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim from Tholen.
NB
> NB wrote:
> > On Apr 7, 11:06 am, Lora Crighton <lcrigh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Art Deco wrote:
>
> >>> Yes! It's all about ME!
> >> Isn't there an alt.fan group that you could post this kind of thing to?
>
> > When are you and Tholen going to hook up?
>
> What makes you think we will?
After over 50 years of unfulfillment, there is a strong possibility
that Tholen would be receptive to it.
>If I ever end up in his city (unlikely),
Perhaps Tholen will end up in your city at some point.
> I would
> try to go hear HCCB play, but even then I doubt that we would "hook up".
If you don't believe it will happen, then it won't. Open yourself to
the possibility, and it may in fact happen.
Lora Crighton
> On Apr 7, 5:51 pm, Lora Crighton <lcrigh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> NB wrote:
>>> On Apr 7, 11:06 am, Lora Crighton <lcrigh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>> Yes! It's all about ME!
>>>> Isn't there an alt.fan group that you could post this kind of thing to?
>>> When are you and Tholen going to hook up?
>> What makes you think we will?
>
> After over 50 years of unfulfillment, there is a strong possibility
> that Tholen would be receptive to it.
>
LOL! You have quite an imagination.
NB
> NB wrote:
> > On Apr 7, 5:51 pm, Lora Crighton <lcrigh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> NB wrote:
> >>> On Apr 7, 11:06 am, Lora Crighton <lcrigh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> Art Deco wrote:
> >>>>> Yes! It's all about ME!
> >>>> Isn't there an alt.fan group that you could post this kind of thing to?
> >>> When are you and Tholen going to hook up?
> >> What makes you think we will?
>
> > After over 50 years of unfulfillment, there is a strong possibility
> > that Tholen would be receptive to it.
>
> LOL! You have quite an imagination.
It can happen, Lora! I think you have to make the move, though.
tho...@antispam.ham
>>>>> Lora Crighton wrote:
>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>> Yes! It's all about ME!
>>>>>> Isn't there an alt.fan group that you could post this kind of thing to?
>>>>> When are you and Tholen going to hook up?
>>>> What does your question have to do with college basketball, nobuyout?
>>> What does your question have to do with demon.local, tholen?
>> I see that you didn't answer the question, nobuyout. No surprise there,
>> really.
> Classic hypocrisy from Tholen, no surprise there really.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
tho...@antispam.ham
>>>>>>> Lora Crighton wrote:
>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>> Classic hypocrisy from Tholen.
Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim from nobuyout.
tho...@antispam.ham
> Lora Crighton <lcri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> NB wrote:
>>> Lora Crighton <lcri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>> Yes! It's all about ME!
>>>> Isn't there an alt.fan group that you could post this kind of thing to?
>>> When are you and Tholen going to hook up?
>> What makes you think we will?
> After over 50 years of unfulfillment, there is a strong possibility
> that Tholen would be receptive to it.
Classic erroneous presupposition.
>> If I ever end up in his city (unlikely),
> Perhaps Tholen will end up in your city at some point.
What does that have to do with college basketball, nobuyout?
>> I would
>> try to go hear HCCB play, but even then I doubt that we would "hook up".
> If you don't believe it will happen, then it won't. Open yourself to
> the possibility, and it may in fact happen.
What does that have to do with college basketball, nobuyout?
tho...@antispam.ham
> Lora Crighton <lcri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> NB wrote:
>>> Lora Crighton <lcri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> NB wrote:
>>>>> Lora Crighton <lcri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>> Yes! It's all about ME!
>>>>>> Isn't there an alt.fan group that you could post this kind of thing to?
>>>>> When are you and Tholen going to hook up?
>>>> What makes you think we will?
>>> After over 50 years of unfulfillment, there is a strong possibility
>>> that Tholen would be receptive to it.
>> LOL! You have quite an imagination.
> It can happen, Lora!
What does that have to do with college basketball, nobuyout?
> I think you have to make the move, though.
What you think is irrelevant, nobuyout.
Pluto
> NB <nobu...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Lora Crighton <lcri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> NB wrote:
>
>>>> Lora Crighton <lcri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>>> NB wrote:
>
>>>>>> Lora Crighton <lcri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>
>>>>>>>> Yes! It's all about ME!
>
>>>>>>> Isn't there an alt.fan group that you could post this kind of thing to?
>
>>>>>> When are you and Tholen going to hook up?
>
>>>>> What makes you think we will?
>
>>>> After over 50 years of unfulfillment, there is a strong possibility
>>>> that Tholen would be receptive to it.
>
>>> LOL! You have quite an imagination.
>
>> It can happen, Lora!
>
> What does that have to do with college basketball, nobuyout?
>
She became a fan of wind music because of you - perhaps she will learn to love
basketball as well.
>> I think you have to make the move, though.
>
> What you think is irrelevant, nobuyout.
>
What do you think, Tholen?
Pluto
Have you seen her photo? She's not going to attract any guy worth having.
.
..
...
Maybe she does have a chance with Tholen.
Archie Leach
>Courtesy of Archie Leach and you, Deco.
Oh, sure, just blame it on me, Dave.
I was wrong. I was dead wrong about Kansas and Bill Self. They won
The Big Game, and with great character shown throughout.
I offer my congratulations to the Jayhawks.
Art Deco
On your part, Tholen.
--