Stats rec.skydiving (last 7 days)
robot reporter
"Caveat: Quantity is not necessarily a measure of Quality"
Newsgroup.................: rec.skydiving
Stats Were Taken..........: Mon, 10 May 2004 07:04:54 GMT
Stats Begin...............: Mon, 03 May 2004 07:21:37 GMT
Stats End.................: Sun, 09 May 2004 05:25:40 GMT
Days......................: 7
Total No. of Articles.....: 381
Total No. of Characters...: 651253
Total Volume..............: 635
Messages Per Day..........: 54.4
Characters Per Day........: 93036.1
Average Daily Volume......: 90 kB
Total Posters This Week...: 38
Messages with Sigs........: 0.26%
Original Content Rating...: 52.86%
Top 10 Prolific Posters: Posts / Posts per Day / Percent Share
==============================================================
1. Jerry K ..........................................: 83 11.9 21.8%
2. Capt . Hook.......................................: 71 10.1 18.6%
3. Mr . Tricky Man...................................: 54 7.7 14.2%
4. sooperjumper......................................: 43 6.1 11.3%
5. Chuck.............................................: 36 5.1 9.4%
6. Peanut4040........................................: 15 2.1 3.9%
7. Skydiverrick......................................: 13 1.9 3.4%
8. Bigjim............................................: 10 1.4 2.6%
9. Jimbo.............................................: 10 1.4 2.6%
10. Tom B.............................................: 4 0.6 1.0%
Top 10 Bandwidth-Consuming Posters: kBytes / kBytes per Day / Percent Share
===========================================================================
1. Jerry K ..........................................: 197 28.3 31.1%
2. sooperjumper......................................: 96 13.7 15.1%
3. Capt . Hook.......................................: 92 13.2 14.5%
4. Mr . Tricky Man...................................: 78 11.3 12.4%
5. Chuck.............................................: 44 6.4 7.0%
6. Skydiverrick......................................: 20 2.9 3.2%
7. Peanut4040........................................: 13 1.9 2.1%
8. Bigjim............................................: 10 1.5 1.6%
9. Airman1270........................................: 9 1.4 1.5%
10. Jimbo.............................................: 9 1.3 1.4%
Top 10 Popular Threads: Posts / Posts per Day / Percent Share
=============================================================
1. Terry Walker from Canada..........................: 84 12.0 22.0%
2. (T) Snuffy lies again.............................: 61 8.7 16.0%
3. John Kerry almost ready to announce Snuffy Smith a: 53 7.6 13.9%
4. Snuff admits to being gay.........................: 39 5.6 10.2%
5. Rhome???/Jon is an idiot..........................: 26 3.7 6.8%
6. A long very sad US Marine Story...................: 19 2.7 5.0%
7. Thomas Hamill or Peanut...........................: 16 2.3 4.2%
8. Jerry K's Video weep..............................: 10 1.4 2.6%
9. COOL GEAR BAG FOR SALE............................: 6 0.9 1.6%
10. Newbie: What should l look for in ground school?..: 6 0.9 1.6%
Top 10 Bandwidth-Consuming Threads: kBytes / kBytes per Day / Percent Share
===========================================================================
1. Terry Walker from Canada..........................: 149 21.4 23.6%
2. (T) Snuffy lies again.............................: 104 14.9 16.4%
3. John Kerry almost ready to announce Snuffy Smith a: 96 13.7 15.1%
4. Rhome???/Jon is an idiot..........................: 60 8.7 9.6%
5. Snuff admits to being gay.........................: 47 6.7 7.4%
6. A long very sad US Marine Story...................: 27 3.9 4.3%
7. Jerry K's Video weep..............................: 18 2.7 2.9%
8. John Kerry Now AH HA you rolled over.............: 17 2.5 2.8%
9. Thomas Hamill or Peanut...........................: 15 2.2 2.4%
10. Little Sailor Sings...............................: 9 1.3 1.5%
Top 10 Original Content Ratings: (Original Bytes) / (Orig. + Quoted Bytes)
==========================================================================
1. Bigjim....................................................: 79.0%
2. Mr . Tricky Man...........................................: 69.8%
3. Capt . Hook...............................................: 65.1%
4. Peanut4040................................................: 57.7%
5. Jerry K ..................................................: 54.1%
6. Jimbo.....................................................: 46.2%
7. Chuck.....................................................: 29.9%
8. sooperjumper..............................................: 27.5%
9. Skydiverrick..............................................: 18.7%
Top 10 Crossposting Groups: Posts in Group
==========================================
1. uk.rec.skydiving.............................................: 9
==============================
End of stats for rec.skydiving
Mr. tricky man
>2. Capt . Hook.......................................:
> 3. Mr . Tricky Man...................................:
> 5. Chuck.............................................:
HEY CHUCK YOU SUCK
Jerry K.
Not that I ever considered these rankings to be considered something
to be proud or ashamed of but it appears Jimmie does. Thus,
HEY JIMMIE YOU SUCK
...bsrp
...jlk
Mr. tricky man
>>
>>>2. Capt . Hook.......................................:
>>
>>> 3. Mr . Tricky Man...................................:
>>
> 5. Chuck.............................................:
>>
>>HEY CHUCK YOU SUCK
>Not that I ever considered these rankings to be considered something
>to be proud or ashamed of but it appears Jimmie does. Thus,
>
>HEY JIMMIE YOU SUCK
This from a skydiver who cares so much about the USPA's technicalitys on 1 2 3
and Competition by division Rating that he lied by ommission just to up one his
teams early medals from intermediate to expert on a web page? Oh yeah Jerry you
really cut my old flailing ass to the bone.. Its clear Chuck's not even in the
running even though he works his ass off to stay up with the wreck posting
Champions ;-*
Capt. hook
>tooyt
> even though he works his ass off to stay >up with the wreck posting Champions
;-*
>
>YOU STILL SUCK JIMMY!
Yeah? Well at least I'm 2 and 3, you are 5, might as well as turned your
computer off and went to the dz son.
chuck
>From: to...@aol.com (Capt. hook)
>Date: 5/10/04 3:06 PM Eastern Daylight Time
>Message-id: <20040510150624...@mb-m25.aol.com>
>Yeah? Well at least I'm 2 and 3, you are 5, might as well as turned your
>computer off and went to the dz son.
Just waiting for you to spill your cough syrup on the keyboard again, the tide
will turn, and you'll have to broach your boat again.
Jerry K.
>>1. Jerry K ..........................................:
>>>
>>>>2. Capt . Hook.......................................:
>>>
>>>> 3. Mr . Tricky Man...................................:
>>>
>
>> 5. Chuck.............................................:
>>>
>>>HEY CHUCK YOU SUCK
>
>
>
>>Not that I ever considered these rankings to be considered something
>>to be proud or ashamed of but it appears Jimmie does. Thus,
>>
>>HEY JIMMIE YOU SUCK
>
>This from a skydiver who cares so much about the USPA's technicalitys on 1 2 3
>and Competition by division Rating
Yo, dummy - not me caring so much and doing the chickendance over
supposed "technicalities."
>that he lied by ommission
Baseless accusation - gee, I spanking someone yet? There was no
ommission. There was no lie - by me or anyone else.
>just to up one his
>teams early medals from intermediate to expert on a web page?
As has been (often) explained before, no mdeals were "upped" and as
for the web page, the information detailed concerned a team I was
*not* a member of when the medals were awarded and described and as
for the webpage, it wasn't my webpage - I was on it the following year
but I was never its webmaster - so you're wrong on that point, too.
>Oh yeah Jerry you
>really cut my old flailing ass to the bone..
You give me too much credit - you do it all yourself - I just take
your words and the filleting occurs as a matter of course.
>Its clear Chuck's not even in the
>running even though he works his ass off to stay up with the wreck posting
>Champions
Ah, well - I guess Chuck will just have to console himself, eh?
Oh, yeah ------> HEY JIMMIE YOU SUCK
...bsrp
...jlk
Jerry K.
It's the little victories, I suppose, which make it all worth while,
eh Jimmie?
...bsrp
...jlk
Capt. hook
>>
>>
>Yeah? Well at least I'm 2 and 3, you >are 5, might as well as turned your
>computer off and went to the dz son.
>It's the little victories, I suppose, which >make it all worth while,
>eh Jimmie?
>...bsrp
Shit you were number one Jerr, its prolly up on your vanity page
already...Besides I'm working with Chuck here. its something you have to try
after shock therapy fails....he's got a personality problem and I'm trying to
give him a Labotomy thru his ass. 0;->
Capt. hook
>to be proud or ashamed of
>This from a skydiver who cares so much about the USPA's technicalitys on 1 2
>3 and Competition by division Rating
>Yo, dummy - not me caring so much and >doing the chickendance over
>supposed "technicalities."
>that he lied by ommission
>Baseless accusations
Yeah I would say that if I got caught also ;)
>There was no lie - by me or anyone else.
This from a nit picker who wants to walk around with a yardstick measuring boot
camp bayonets fails to mention it was intermediate and not expert medal?
tsk tsk tsk.
>As has been (often) explained before, no >mdeals were "upped"
Yeah, you do protest a lot kid
>I was *not* a member of when the medals >were awarded
yeah, thats about right, distance yourself
from the crime boy, throw it on prior team mates!
>I was never its webmaster
oh yeah, your computer was down and you were in the Hospital with a coma right?
>so you're wrong on that point, too.
Oh yeah, make me the bad guy for pointing out something you failed to mention.
ANYWAY
>Its clear Chuck's not even in the
>running even though he works his ass off >to stay up with the wreck posting
>Champions
>Ah, well - I guess Chuck will just have to >console himself, eh?
Yeah, he cain't win for loosing.
>YOU SUCK
CHUCK SUCKS WORSE ooooorah
"Fit Via Vi"
Jerry K.
>>YOU STILL SUCK JIMMY!
>>>
>>>
>>Yeah? Well at least I'm 2 and 3, you >are 5, might as well as turned your
>>computer off and went to the dz son.
>
>>It's the little victories, I suppose, which >make it all worth while,
>>eh Jimmie?
>
>>...bsrp
>
>Shit you were number one Jerr,
Not that that's anything to be proud or ashamed of but, on that note,
HEY JIMMIE YOU SUCK
>its prolly up on your vanity page
>already...
Probably not but why don't you just go take a look - your vanity page,
btw, was cancelled due to lack of interest.
>Besides I'm working with Chuck here. its something you have to try
>after shock therapy fails....
What, working with Chuck? How's it been going?
>he's got a personality problem and I'm trying to
>give him a Labotomy thru his ass.
Lobotomy via his ass? You would do this? Utilizing an electronic
medium to accomplish this idea? Now, this isn't representitive of a
personality problem at all, oh no. Oh, wait...
...bsrp
...jlk
chuck
>Message-id: <20040510164719...@mb-m25.aol.com>
>Shit you were number one Jerr, its prolly up on your vanity page
>already...Besides I'm working with Chuck here. its something you have to try
>after shock therapy fails....he's got a personality problem and I'm trying to
>give him a Labotomy thru his ass. 0;->
There you go again Jimmy, talking about someone else's ass. You really need to
keep that "little sailor" in check.
BY THE WAY JIMMY, DO YOU REALLY SUCK? I mean outside of skydiving, everyone
knows that you SUCKED back in the day. In that respect, you're current:)
Jerry K.
>>Not that I ever considered these rankings >to be considered something
>>to be proud or ashamed of
>
>>This from a skydiver who cares so much about the USPA's technicalitys on 1 2
>>3 and Competition by division Rating
>
>>Yo, dummy - not me caring so much and >doing the chickendance over
>>supposed "technicalities."
>
>>that he lied by ommission
>
>>Baseless accusations
>
>Yeah I would say that if I got caught also ;)
No, when you get caught, as has often been demonstrated in here, your
technique is to change the subject, lie, cast aspersions, attack the
method of argument as opposed to the argument itself, or even try to
explain it all away with the idea that if something, no matter how
far-fetched, *could* happen, well, that's what happened - all the
while pointedly *not* providing proof supporting the far-fetched
notion. As for me, I'm absolutely openminded to the idea that I can
be "caught," but then, for all your accusations, baseless that they
have been thus far, you have yet to come up with any proof, past or
present, with which to "catch" me, or anyone else. Sorry, Jimmie -
saying something went down doesn't mean it went down so describe the
website, provide the links, quote the text, detail the offense.
"Catch" me if you can. Oh, lordy, he might call my bluff!!! What
ever will I do!? Harharhar!!! Here's the link, now get to work:
http://users2.ev1.net/~hinsonll/
>
>>There was no lie - by me or anyone else.
>
>This from a nit picker who wants to walk around with a yardstick measuring boot
>camp bayonets
Hell, it wasn't me who described this WWI bayonet as, not just looking
or appearing, but *being* a yard long. When I read that, the meager
amount of military trivia I possess suggested to me that while WWI
bayonets were long, as compared to the WWII issue, they couldn't be a
yard long - that would be ridiculous. Cracked some books, surfed the
net, did some research, tried to find *any* reference to a yard long
bayonet in WWI but came up with nothing. Busted you on it and what
did you say? Oh, they *appeared* a yard long. Frick'n weak, dude.
You woulda been better off just saying you were mistaken and moved on.
>fails to mention it was intermediate and not expert medal?
>tsk tsk tsk.
Ya know, no matter how often you drag this really worthless contention
as a line of argument up, the fact remains now as it ever was: the
medal classification was detailed and until you come up with some sort
proof (talking *real* proof, not some other baseless accusation), you
don't have a leg to stand on. It's kinda whittling down your
arguments when you keep on bringing this idea up but somehow, never
ever post some sort of proof to support your contention. Stop being
an ass - support a claim for once.
>>As has been (often) explained before, no >mdeals were "upped"
>
>Yeah, you do protest a lot kid
It's inversely proportional to the amount of proof you present. Every
time you bring it up (which is a lot) it gets denied. Seems you have
a choice: you can, 1) present some proof in which case, denying would
be pointless or you could 2) give it up in which case denying would be
unnecesarry. But then, there is the 3rd option which is far easier
for you, a lot more comforting, but certainly ineffective: continue
making baseless accusations as a substitute for proof. Unfortunately,
you'll have to weather future denials and ridicule. I'm down with it.
>
>>I was *not* a member of when the medals >were awarded
>
>yeah, thats about right, distance yourself
>from the crime boy, throw it on prior team mates!
Hardly, just (another) unassailable argument thus denying your
contention. Not that any "crime" was ever committed - you've yet to
prove that as well but even if there *had* been a crime, it would have
been committed in circumstances where I was not a factor. Unless you
want to, maybe after you prove some sort of "crime" was committed,
also provide proof detailing how I was, somehow, a part of this crime.
>>I was never its webmaster
>
>oh yeah, your computer was down and you were in the Hospital with a coma right?
No, of course not. Having a working computer does not a webmaster
make. If you looked at the site then, as you certainly can now, you
will see, quite clearly just who the webmaster was and still is and
you will see that it is not now, nor was it ever, myself. So, that
contention has just also been sunk...for the upteenth time...
>>so you're wrong on that point, too.
>
>Oh yeah, make me the bad guy for pointing out something you failed to mention.
Stop you're whining you dumb bitch. You brought it up. Lucky for you
you're too weak to get to a dz and try it live - I'd give you an
Atomic Wedgie for being such an ass. As for pointing out something
"(I) failed to mention..." all you have is someone *else* pointing
out an apparent anomaly which was quite handily, reasonably and
legitimately explained at the time. Weak little bitch that you were
(and still are), you sizied upon this fingerfull of chaff as an angle
of aspersion which you recyle, over and over, every few months, weeks,
and lately - days. Each time you get spanked and ridiculed for it
because each time you fail to put up any sort of proof beyond you
saying, such and such occurred. Not me making you out to be some "bad
guy," you give me too much credit. It's you, all you, bringing it on.
You're an ass.
>
> ANYWAY
>>Its clear Chuck's not even in the
>>running even though he works his ass off >to stay up with the wreck posting
>>Champions
>
>>Ah, well - I guess Chuck will just have to >console himself, eh?
>
>Yeah, he cain't win for loosing.
>
>>YOU SUCK
>
>CHUCK SUCKS WORSE ooooorah
Ah, well - ritual seppeku time, eh? Oh the FACE he has lost...
...bsrp
...jlk
Jerry K.
Call it splitting hairs but I don't think he sucked at rw (just wasn't
as good as he would have others believe) but he was a sucky canopy
pilot - that's clear.
...bsrp
...jlk
Capt. hook
>>already...
>
>Probably not but why don't you just go take a look - your vanity page,
>btw, was cancelled due to lack of
>interest.
Nope George Rabe prolly went back to skydiving and quit maintaining and paying
for it, cuz jumping is expensive, that was his toy..It just gave him something
to do till he got well plus, Jimbo squeeled him off over those invisible pull
up cords he was selling hahahahaha
JimBo
>From: to...@aol.com (Capt. hook)
>Nope George Rabe prolly went back to skydiving and quit maintaining and
>paying
>for it, cuz jumping is expensive, that was his toy..It just gave him
>something
>to do till he got well
damn ,you are such a know nothing.
got well ?
went back to skydiving ?
boy are you dumb.
Jim D-10154
Man small... why fall ? Skies call... thats all.
Capt. hook
>Call it splitting hairs but I don't think he >sucked at rw
Yeah the first couple of hundred jumps I sucked big time. Everybody usually
does....THEN IT CLICKED....not bad for a creaky old fukker that started in his
mid 50's, it just takes airtime, airtime,airtime and patience, If I'd of been
as young as you when I started I'd of have been a world class bigway skydiver
by 600 jumps kid...doubt I wudda joined a team though, that looked more like a
grind than fun and I was a fun jumper every step of the way
Capt. hook
by me or anyone else.
>This from a nit picker who wants to walk >around with a yardstick measuring
>boot camp bayonets from 45/50 years >ago?
>Hell, it wasn't me who described this >WWI bayonet
well yard stick or not ya ain't touching my bayonet or anything else below the
waist longhaired cityboy, you'll just have to take my word for it....its big! .
0;-*
Capt. hook
>got well ?
>went back to skydiving ?
>boy are you dumb.
>
>Jim D-10154
>
wreck about those pull up cords that caused him to fold his tent huh?
JimBo
>From: to...@aol.com (Capt. hook)
> the hip operation or whatever wasn't sucessfull? so it was you whining on
>wreck about those pull up cords that caused him to fold his tent huh?
you are that dumb........geezus
Capt. hook
>wreck about those pull up cords that >caused him to fold his tent huh?
>
>you are that dumb........geezus
>
>Jim D-10154
nobody ever tells me anything, afraid I'll profile them most likely ;)P
SkydiverRick
....he's got a personality problem
> and I'm trying to give him a Labotomy thru his ass. 0;->
Your probe's too short.
SkydiverRick
> Yeah the first couple of hundred jumps I sucked big time. Everybody
> usually does....THEN IT CLICKED....
At least you had a dozen good jumps.
chuck
>Message-id: <20040510203230...@mb-m03.aol.com>
>Yeah the first couple of hundred jumps I sucked big time. Everybody usually
>does....THEN IT CLICKED....
Then he took off his combat boots.
chuck
>Date: 5/10/04 8:57 PM Eastern Daylight Time
>Message-id: <20040510205711...@mb-m29.aol.com>
>
>
>> the hip operation or whatever wasn't sucessfull? so it was you whining on
>>wreck about those pull up cords that caused him to fold his tent huh?
>
>you are that dumb........geezus
>
>Jim D-10154
Yes he is.
chuck
>Date: 5/10/04 9:20 PM Eastern Daylight Time
>Message-id: <7TVnc.77295$NR5....@fe1.texas.rr.com>
Hell, the only way that he can find his probe is when yellow fluid starts
pouring from one of the folds of fat in his gut.
Capt. hook
>>does....THEN IT CLICKED....
>
>Then he took off his combat boots.
yeah those go devils created turbulance and were to heavy to run out a landing
at my age...I just wore them cuz
heavy boots freaked out the cypres natzi's
who seemed to live in fear of being knocked out...The cowboy boots got more of
a reaction on a yuppie load though.
"OH MY GOD HE'S GOT BOOTS ON, SOMEBODYS GOING TO GET KNOCKED OUT!" Hell you got
a AAD
don't you, whats the problem? BTW let me tell you a secret about jump boots,
they may protect your ankles some, your leg just breaks above the boot top if
you hit hard and don't plf right. ;-*
Capt. hook
Yeah your boy Jerry has been measuring things and sez its only half as long as
I think it is, <eg>
Capt. hook
>usually does....THEN IT CLICKED....
>At least you had a dozen good jumps.
>Rinkydink
every one I survived was good as far as I was concerned
chuck
>Date: 5/10/04 10:55 PM Eastern Daylight Time
>Message-id: <20040510225525...@mb-m22.aol.com>
> I >sucked big time. Everybody usually
>>>does....THEN IT CLICKED..
>>Then he took off his combat boots
>yeah those go devils created turbulance and were to heavy to run out a
>landing
>at my age...I just wore them cuz
>heavy boots freaked out the cypres natzi's
You wore those boots 'cause the DZO got tired of you walking knee deep in your
own bullshit
chuck
>Message-id: <20040510230700...@mb-m22.aol.com>
That sounds like the mark of a true professional.........the parachute is only
a means of getting to work, you want to get it right.....or no mission, chapter
21, Co Van's manual on dock repair.
Jerry K.
Uh...that's what I said - lack of interest. Pay attention.
...bsrp
...jlk
Jerry K.
>>BY THE WAY JIMMY, DO YOU >REALLY SUCK? I mean outside of >skydiving, everyone
>knows that you >SUCKED back in the day. In that >respect, you're current Chuck
>
>>Call it splitting hairs but I don't think he >sucked at rw
>
>Yeah the first couple of hundred jumps I sucked big time. Everybody usually
>does....THEN IT CLICKED....not bad for a creaky old fukker that started in his
>mid 50's, it just takes airtime, airtime,airtime and patience, If I'd of been
>as young as you when I started I'd of have been a world class bigway skydiver
>by 600 jumps kid...
That's pretty funny. Good 'un.
>doubt I wudda joined a team though, that looked more like a
>grind than fun and I was a fun jumper every step of the way
Weren't you on some team?
...bsrp
...jlk
Jerry K.
That's what you got for fixating on another man's bayonet.
...bsrp
...jlk
Jerry K.
I think you protest too much.
...bsrp
...jlk
chuck
>Date: 5/11/04 1:01 AM Eastern Daylight Time
>Message-id: <jfn0a0dbslmp1701g...@4ax.com>
Snuff:
>>doubt I wudda joined a team though, that looked more like a
>>grind than fun and I was a fun jumper every step of the way
>
>Weren't you on some team?
>
>...bsrp
>...jlk
The "A" Team, it ran on TV for a while. Snuff played the part of a black man
who wore a lot of gold jewelry.
Jerry K.
Idi Amin?
...bsrp
...jlk
Capt. hook
>Rinkydink
>every one I survived was good as far as I >was concerned
>That sounds like the mark of a true >professional..
Nope a super adrenaline junkie professional take a more conservative approach,
I was a fun jumper...always
out there pushing the edge of the envelope,
never took a nickle from the sport either.. Loved it to much ;-P
Capt. hook
being a What you call it auntrapaneur?
He prolly thought my bad reputation
would attract skydivers to his money making skeems. The page was more a cartoon
and made me look kinda bad
by go along to get along USPA standards I'm thinking.
>Uh...that's what I said - lack of interest. >Pay attention.
All I can say is Thank God <g>
Capt. hook
and I >was a fun jumper every step of the way
>
>Weren't you on some team?
Yeah the Hoop dive, Horney Gorilla & Ferris wheel team's, they were pick up
teams though...at the POPS Nationals
that was a scrables team, their usual style. No name, never seen each other
much less jumped with each other before They try to keep it fair you know! 0;)P
Capt. hook
>Baseless accusations, there was no lie -
>by me or anyone else.
this is an example of why you should always strive try to do the right thing
kid.
Doing the right thing is often painfull and don't always make you look smart in
a hedonistic back stabbing society, thats why its called doing the right thing
rather than doing the wrong thing to make myself look good thing. LOG IT 0;-*
Jerry K.
Hmmmm...those people from Waller on that team you were on - you'd
never seen, much less jumped with any of them before either? Do tell.
...bsrp
...jlk
Jerry K.
Duly logged but keep in mind that the "right thing," at least in my
understanding of it, never included making baseless accusations or
telling lies.
...bsrp
...jlk
SkydiverRick
> I was a fun jumper...always
> out there pushing the edge of the envelope,
You're not supposed to push it with your face.
SkydiverRick
> They try to keep it
> fair you know! 0;)P
Kind of like: you take Snuffy and we'll take the blind parapalegic.
Capt. hook
HAW HAW HAW, yep my reputation preceeded me
Capt. hook
>by me or anyone else.
>this is an example of why you should >always strive try to do the right thing
kid.
~getting caught sucks~
>keep in mind that the "right thing," at >least in my understanding of it,
never >included making baseless accusations or
>telling lies.
you got busted by people with higher standards, your peers/not me------give it
up
Mr. tricky man
go over the top and report its own thread
Mr. tricky man
>HEY JIMMIE YOU SUCK
>...bsrp
>...jlk
Geeze kid, better tone it down. We done
had so many flame wars somebody's beginning to Archive the overflow on the
web......Bad day at the DZ Jerr? is there
;-o
Jerry K.
>> Jerry K. sky...@pdq.net
>
>>HEY JIMMIE YOU SUCK
>
>>...bsrp
>>...jlk
>
>Geeze kid, better tone it down.
Hell, if you can bring it down on comeone else for something so inane
as post statistics posting stats, I certainly can throw the same shit
at you - what's the problem?
>We done
>had so many flame wars somebody's beginning to Archive the overflow on the
>web......
Why should *that* be taken into account?
>Bad day at the DZ Jerr?
What makes you think I was at the DZ today?
>is there
or is there not?
...bsrp
...jlk
Mr. tricky man
on the web......
>
>Why should *that* be taken into account?
because it was under Vietnamese junks
How do I know they ain't still got a reward on my head over there? Somebody
with a boner might be reading it.
>Bad day at the DZ Jerr?
>
>What makes you think I was at the DZ today?
That was the thread dummy, don't you remember it? I'm going to start calling
myself Chuck....Maybe the the DRV will
think he is me when they ask for extradition proceedings 0;-*
Jerry K.
>>We done had so many flame wars >somebody's beginning to Archive the >overflow
>on the web......
>>
>>Why should *that* be taken into account?
>
>because it was under Vietnamese junks
>How do I know they ain't still got a reward on my head over there?
Perhaps the award isn't worth the bother.
>Somebody
>with a boner might be reading it.
Well, I suppose even paranoid people might have enemies.
>
>>Bad day at the DZ Jerr?
>>
>>What makes you think I was at the DZ today?
>
>That was the thread dummy, don't you remember it? I'm going to start calling
>myself Chuck....Maybe the the DRV will
>think he is me when they ask for extradition proceedings
And here I thought the thread was on posting stats to a skydiving
newsgroup. I don't think you need to worry, if anyone reads your
swill, it's doubtfull they'll ever get the impression you ever had
anything to do with skydiving. Kick back.
...bsrp
...jlk
Mr. tricky man
>newsgroup. I don't think you need to >worry, if anyone reads your
>swill, it's doubtfull they'll ever get the >impression you ever had
>anything to do with skydiving. Kick >back.
>...bsrp
yeah they will be as confused as Chuck then, he has the impression I was never
in the Navy HAW HAW HAW
Jerry K.
That's a pretty easy conclusion to draw - unless you mean the little
guy in the boat, floating around in the toilet tank. I'd buy you
coulda been in *that* Navy.
...bsrp
...jlk
Capt. hook
>...jlk
Why did you attach it to your vanity page then? See I been trying to tell you
all along
Glory is fleeting, its best just to do the right thing and let the people that
actually won it have the Glory instead of trying to horn in by weak
association. Write this
on the blackboard 100 times.
~Its best to do the right thing~
Jerry K.
You saying I didn't do the right thing, didn't give it up then?
...bsrp
...jlk
Jerry K.
>>Perhaps the award isn't worth the bother.
>>...bsrp
>>...jlk
>
>Why did you attach it to your vanity page then?
Pay attention, doofus - you were talking about the reward on your
head. As for my "vanity" page - there is no such thing and if you
mean the team page, show where I attached any sort of award.
>ee I been trying to tell you
>all along
>Glory is fleeting,
And best assigned by someone else. - self described glory is only
bragging.
>its best just to do the right thing and let the people that
>actually won it have the Glory instead of trying to horn in by weak
>association.
Are you suggesting I was trying to "horn in" on someone else's awards?
>Write this
>on the blackboard 100 times.
> ~Its best to do the right thing~
Get back with me in a few years after you finish all the pushups to
cover the instances where you failed to do the right thing.
...bsrp
...jlk
Capt. hook
> ~getting caught sucks~
>keep in mind that the "right thing," at >least in my understanding of it,
>never included making baseless >accusations or telling lies.
Yeah you got caught on the second clauze. Not realizing someone ahead of you
had lied by omission, then under the third degree had to admit you weren't a
member of the team when the medal in question was won...NOW tell us why it was
even attached to your vanity page?
Besides
>you got busted by people with higher >standards, your peers/not me------give
>it up
>You saying I didn't do the right thing, >didn't give it up then?
All I heard was alibi's, you didn't didn't do the right thing and come clean.
I'm charging you with being USPA2000
in wreck court
Jerry K.
>> you should always strive try to do the >right thing kid.
> Cuz
>> ~getting caught sucks~
>
>>keep in mind that the "right thing," at >least in my understanding of it,
>>never included making baseless >accusations or telling lies.
>
>Yeah you got caught on the second clauze. Not realizing someone ahead of you
>had lied by omission,
I got caught in not being aware of some lie by omission by someone
else? Okay - except, that's bullshit since there was no lie by
omission.
>then under the third degree had to admit you weren't a
>member of the team when the medal in question was won...
I "had to admit" nothing - it we me who provided that detail when it
was suggested (without any base in reality, mind you) that I was
somehow responsible for this (unproven) "lie by omission," when it was
abundantly clear and described on the webpage that I only joined the
team the following season, after the medal was awarded (and
accurately, without omission described).
>NOW tell us why it was
>even attached to your vanity page?
As for *my* vanity page, no such thing exists, beyond the one on yahoo
where a bunch of my shots are, but as for the team page - the team won
some medals one year and some more the next since and as the webpage
was being updated as the seasons, before I joined and after,
transpired, meet results were not unreported.
> Besides
>>you got busted by people with higher >standards, your peers/not me------give
>>it up
>
>>You saying I didn't do the right thing, >didn't give it up then?
>
>All I heard was alibi's, you didn't didn't do the right thing and come clean.
So you admit I had alibi's for your baseless accusations. Gee, I
understand an alibi to be proof against an accusation and you've, as
yet, been unable to: 1) make any accusation that wasn't baseless, and
2) disprove any alibi provided thus far. As for not doing the right
thing and not coming clean - when the question was raised, it was
immediately addressed and completely explained - just as it has been
explained in reponse to the numerous attempts by you to muckrake this
(non) issue into some sort of angle of aspersion. Funny, how
everytime the end result is you never having proved a thing beyond
your evident enjoyment of being ridiculed.
>
>I'm charging you with being USPA2000
>in wreck court
Oh gawd, here we go - he's been watching Wapner on the satellite tv
again so, once again, now it's back to the old and oft tried angle of
some sort of legalistic charade. Fine and good - I've danced circles
around you in this angle in the past just as I shall, no doubt, do in
the future - as I am doing so now.
As to the charge, I plead not guilty and suggest the prosecution drop
his charge on the grounds that "USPA2000" is too vague of a notion, a
subjective assignation, not one currently described by law or even
"common knowledge," and because it is only the frivilous, assmunch
blatherings of an already proven liar. State your case, Madam
Prosecutor.
...bsrp
...jlk
Capt. hook
>...bsrp
>...jlk
"Glory is fleeting" but why did you attach it
to your vanity page when you didn't earn it is my question?
>Pay attention, doofus - you were talking >about the reward on your head.
That was standard PLF/NLF policy...all Advisers had it on their head, we were
considered brigands and mercenary's
by the front but what it boiled down to was "they" like you and chuck didn't
like their own medicine.
> ~Its best to do the right thing~ Jerry
>Get back with me in a few years after >you finish all the pushups to
>cover the instances where you failed to >do the right thing.
Yeah we shouldn't have been there I guess
Unlike these modern day terr's they were no danger to the Continental US
It was a proxy fight with communism and they were Nationalists at heart Our
very act of being there forced them to pay lip service to the PRC and USSR to
get aide.
They actually had a history of hating China
and Uncle Ho loved and admired America
till we stepped in to save the French.
Capt. hook
yes only so many people can take credit for a 4 way medal ya know ;)
>Okay - except, that's bullshit
I could see you thought that when you copped it for your personal page
> under the third degree had to admit you >weren't even a member of the team
when >the medal in question was won...
>I "had to admit" nothing
thats why your on public trial.
>All I heard was alibi's, you didn't didn't do >the right thing and come clean.
>So you admit I had alibi's
claimed alibi's they were pretty flimsy
and arn't holding up in this investigation.
> baseless,
Thats what everybody...even if caught red handed like the ENRON 12, likes to
think
Therefore their must be a investigation
>when the question was raised, it was
>immediately addressed and completely >explained
yeah, I was kept in the dark and wasn't involved right? It was your page, had
"JERRY KORNSHACK" across it in banner letters and a picture of two Chicks.
Jerry K.
>>I got caught in not being aware of some >lie by omission by someone else?
>
>yes only so many people can take credit for a 4 way medal ya know ;)
Yep, it's limited to the team members but that's by the by, you've yet
to describe or prove anything beyond baseless accusation regarding
this purported "lie by omission by *anyone,* let alone specifically
myself.
>
>>Okay - except, that's bullshit
>
>I could see you thought that when you copped it for your personal page
I certainly did no such thing. Provide the link to this "personal
page." Detail the elements within this "personal page," where
anything was "copped." You can't and you won't but I dare you,
nonetheless. After you're done, feel free to dare me to detail
instances where *you* lied by omission concerning the nature of your
National RW Medal.
>> under the third degree had to admit you >weren't even a member of the team
>when >the medal in question was won...
>
>>I "had to admit" nothing
>
>thats why your on public trial.
Nevermind that what you cut out from my statement was that a complete
and full answer to the question made at the time was provided -
without the benefit or coersion of some bullshit "3rd degree" but only
in response to the simple question. Well, by all means, proceed with
the prosecution - thus far it's been nothing but baseless accusations
- hardly a prosecution of anything.
>>All I heard was alibi's, you didn't didn't do >the right thing and come clean.
>
>>So you admit I had alibi's
>
>claimed alibi's they were pretty flimsy
>and arn't holding up in this investigation.
No, they are as strong now as they were then. State your case and the
*very same* alibis, and not flimsy ones by any means, will do the job
again, as you shall see.
>
>> baseless,
>
>Thats what everybody...even if caught red handed like the ENRON 12, likes to
>think
They are baseless and as you prefer making your accusations without
any base, so they shall remain.
>Therefore their must be a investigation
I'm not stopping you. Go right ahead. But I *will* ridicule for
being an ass. I can stand the "investigation" - we'll see how the
investigation measures up to reality and how the "investigator" stands
up to the ridicule. We'll see how the "investigator," himself stands
up to questions concerning his *own* lies of omission.
>
>>when the question was raised, it was
>>immediately addressed and completely >explained
>
>yeah, I was kept in the dark and wasn't involved right?
Not that there was anything to be involved in but as for being kept in
the dark, no - I looked at the webpage before and after I became a
member of the team.
>t was your page,
Oh, if you mean specifically the various pages devoted to each of the
team members then, yes - there was a page within the team webpage
devoted to me. That said, wherein on that specific page was there any
lie, omission, medal misclassification, ect?
>had
>"JERRY KORNSHACK" across it in banner letters and a picture of two Chicks.
No, you must be thinking of a different page from the one I'm thinking
of. Provide the link specific to this part of your investigation,
Madam Investigator, and I'll address any and all questions regarding
the page you are trying to describe, no matter how stupid.
...bsrp
...jlk
Jerry K.
>>Perhaps the award isn't worth the bother.
>>...bsrp
>>...jlk
>
>"Glory is fleeting" but why did you attach it
>to your vanity page when you didn't earn it is my question?
I didn't attach anything to my "vanity page" concerning awards, ect.
1) there was no attachement of my own personal award information, & 2)
I was incapable of attaching anything to this supposed vanity page as
I am now, as I was then, never its webmaster. But then, I'm still
waiting for some sort of proof (like a link or something beyond
baseless accusation). Denying your bullcrap is easy - but as for
proof - that might prove more tough - you might try presenting some if
you desire to prove anything.
>
>>Pay attention, doofus - you were talking >about the reward on your head.
>
>That was standard PLF/NLF policy...all Advisers had it on their head, we were
>considered brigands and mercenary's
>by the front but what it boiled down to was "they" like you and chuck didn't
>like their own medicine.
And when you were doing the chickendance abotu "there might still be a
price on (your) head, I suggested, as you're still here, that this
award might not be worth the bother.
>
>> ~Its best to do the right thing~ Jerry
>
>>Get back with me in a few years after >you finish all the pushups to
>>cover the instances where you failed to >do the right thing.
>
>Yeah we shouldn't have been there I guess
>Unlike these modern day terr's they were no danger to the Continental US
>It was a proxy fight with communism and they were Nationalists at heart Our
>very act of being there forced them to pay lip service to the PRC and USSR to
>get aide.
>They actually had a history of hating China
>and Uncle Ho loved and admired America
>till we stepped in to save the French.
Yeah, yeah - you sound embarassed about all that but I was thinking
more along the lines of the many instances, documented instances, of
you being busted for not doing the right thing.
...bsrp
...jlk
Mr. tricky man
>yes only so many people can take credit for a 4 way medal ya know ;)
10 in this case because there were 2 divisions
>Yep, it's limited to the team members >but that's by the by, you've yet
>to describe your National RW Medal.
Bronze, not worth mentioning cause thats 3rd.....but it was a National
competition
1995 POPS NATIONALS SDD.
>Just a POPS medal?
Yup but unlike your average video geek, which you areI had to actually take
grips
and guess what, unlike you
I WAS ACTUALLY ON THE TEAM THAT WON IT!! HAW HAW HAW
Mr. tricky man
>>>...bsrp
>>>...jlk
Putting it on your page damn sure wuzzn't.
Why didn't you wait till you actually won a medal of your own?
Mr. tricky man
didn't >earn it is my question?
>I didn't attach anything to my "vanity >page" concerning awards, ect.
Well don't bother now cuz it will be suspect even if you earned it. See this
is one of the reasons doing the right
thing pays off...You did the wrong thing,
and got caught...anything after that is
tainted............................................
GEEZE WHAT WERE YOU THINKING?
Mr. tricky man
>I certainly did no such thing.
did
> under the third degree you had to admit you weren't even a member of the team
>>when the medal in question was won...
The problem is ya made your former team members look bad by failing to point
out it was a intermediate medal and not a expert
Somebody won the expert, who was it?
See how your deception has spread, like
a pebble thrown into a pool of water the ringlets spread..Find out who they
were
make a public appology on your teams behalf. chizzler
>I "admit" nothing
determained to keep the stolen medal classification huh?
>Nevermind that what you cut out from my >statement was that a complete
>and full answer to the question made at >the time was provided
more like a weak excuse...
BE A MAN, DO THE RIGHT THING.
>without the benefit or coersion of some >bullshit "3rd degree"
yeah I artta be in Iraq interagating prisoners huh? Bet I could make
them talk without dropping their pants
besides
>All I heard was alibi's, you didn't didn't do >the right thing and come clean.
>So you admit I had alibi's
>
Every crooked sumbitch in the world does.
but
>hey were pretty flimsy and arn't holding up in this pre trial investigation
>No, they are as strong now as they were >then
NOT assume the position Forward Leaning Rest prisoner ;-*
chuck
>From: afan...@aol.com (Mr. tricky man)
>Date: 5/12/04 5:42 PM Eastern Daylight Time
>Message-id: <20040512174241...@mb-m16.aol.com>
Jimmy Smith wrote:
> more like a weak excuse...
>BE A MAN, DO THE RIGHT THING.
Oh my Princess, soooooooo forceful of you, the poster child of being a man and
doing the right thing.......how is the weather in Bavaria.....chilly?
Mr. tricky man
question?
>I didn't attach anything to my "vanity >page. I was incapable of attaching
>anything to this supposed vanity page
>I am now, as I was then, never its >webmaster.
Well your taking the fall, your name and picture were on the Page, the WEB
Master has escaped because he's not stoopid enuff to argue with a great
criminal mind on wreck, you will have to take your grievance up with him in
civil court at a
later date, why not huh?....you already drug your entire team history through
the mud, one more guy won't count USPA2000 skydivers tsk tsk tsk
Mr. tricky man
>I got caught
yes you did, but facing it is the first step on the road to recovery..
NOW GO APOLOGIZE TO THE EXPERT CLASS 4-WAY YAWL STOLD IT FROM
Capt. hook
>That was standard PLF/NLF policy...all >Advisers had it on their head, we were
>considered brigands and mercenary's
>by the front and usually lived locally
with the little people, they wanted them to get us. Got BAQ & COLA as a matter
of fact even though they sent us c-rats and other foodstuffs. If you were in a
big American Area you could fall in the chow line....nobody ever checked I.D's
or asked you if you had Cost of Living allowance...cuz see if you did, you were
supposed to pay for your meal when eating in the rear.
>you were doing the chickendance abotu "there might still be a
>price on (your) head.
Yeah that effected my mind, made it a personal thing....like a vendetta you
know.
I ain't never got over it even with the coping skills trained into us durning
the program..
You see that shit the MP's done to the Iraqi prisoners? That ain't shit, just
the basics or first stages of breaking people down mentally for information and
perhaps brain washing. Sleep dreprivation is a given in the military. Food and
water were
also witheld from us on a regular basis in all phases of training. In the POWTC
the first step was being stripped naked and not being given your cloths or
boots back...They used blindfolds not hoods though and made us kneel in rows
while
a cardre walked behind the rows with a cadre with a bamboo staff using a
halting stop walked behind us. You would hear clump clump clump pause
WACK Auggggg! Clump clump clump
pause...felt like he was behind you about then and nothing, clump clump clump
he would stand behind another canadate...their might be a whack and scream of
pain and maybe not...it was all about mind games you see. ;)
Gotta take a crap or otherwise releave yourself? big trouble They had a large
pit just outside the wire filled with human waste from the class's ahead of
you...ok ya gotta go you gotta go...so they pick someone out of the line and
tie you together on a short rope, then you walk down into the pit
barefooted...get out knee deep and the guy who had to do his buisness has to do
it.. Guards are standing above you on the berm in Mao hats with a cross between
Chicom and Castro uniforms on holding bolt action rifles cussing you and
working the bolts or throwing dirt clods. Then they had these three box's
buryed in the ground...if you didn't cooperate to their satisfaction durning
interrogation you had to squat down in one a size to small while they forced
the lid down on your head cramming you in...talk about hurt. I gave them a good
cussing so they pulled me out and beat the holy shit out of me....Good deal, it
got me outta the box long enuff to stretch...They also had a wall of studs they
liked to sling you up against...Its about the mind Jerry...their just working
on your mind because thats where the pain begins and ends...Wanting all those
4-way medals is in your mind Jerry. Toughen up and try to get them the old
fahioned/ right way, earn them with sweat, don't try to cop them!!. ;-P
Jerry K.
>>I got caught in not being aware of some >lie by omission by someone else?
>
>>yes only so many people can take credit for a 4 way medal ya know ;)
>10 in this case because there were 2 divisions
By that token, 30 actually since the medals come in bronze, silver,
and gold.
>
>>Yep, it's limited to the team members >but that's by the by, you've yet
>>to describe your National RW Medal.
>
>Bronze, not worth mentioning cause thats 3rd.....but it was a National
>competition
>1995 POPS NATIONALS SDD.
Nevermind that you, on numerous occasions, *did* mention it - yet,
often neglected to mention *its* classification. What, you now saying
Pops ain't worth mentioning?
>
>>Just a POPS medal?
>
>Yup but unlike your average video geek, which you areI had to actually take
>grips
But then, unlike your average flail monkey, which you *were, you
didn't have to be in the right place at the right time, all the time.
>and guess what, unlike you
>
>I WAS ACTUALLY ON THE TEAM THAT WON IT!! HAW HAW HAW
And you're wrong about that, too. Videogeeks are on the teams, win,
lose, or draw - and, guess what, they hand out the medals to the
entire team which, whadya know, includes the vidgeek.
...bsrp
...jlk
Jerry K.
Lameass cutn'paste. Here's what I wrote:
>>>I got caught in not being aware of some lie by omission by someone
>>>else? Okay - except, that's bullshit since there was no lie by
>omission.
As for the rest, no one stole anything from anyone and you've yet to
do anything but say it - you've certainly haven't proven it.
You can't. Prove me wrong. Maybe you better go apologize to Pops for
those numerous times you failed to mention its classification when you
were bragging about your National medal. Shall I post one of the
instances which you should apologize to Pops for for your bragging
without giving them due credit? There are many to choose from.
...bsrp
...jlk
Capt. hook
>determained to keep the stolen medal >classification huh?
>without the benefit or coersion of some >bullshit "3rd degree"
Oh I dunno, your dancing around pretty good. Got the hot foot?
Jerry K.
>>bullshit
>>I certainly did no such thing.
>
> did
>
>> under the third degree you had to admit you weren't even a member of the team
>>>when the medal in question was won...
>The problem is ya made your former team members look bad by failing to point
>out it was a intermediate medal and not a expert
No one was made to look bad, one way or the other, since the medal's
classification was indeed pointed out as soon as mention of it was put
on the website.
>Somebody won the expert, who was it?
This information was also pointed to on the website.
>See how your deception has spread,
No, can't say I do but then, there was no deception beyond you
deceiving yourself into believing that your contention has any basis
in reality and again, saying something is so is nothing - any jackass
can do that. Prove it. Provide the links. Detail what was
described, omitted, or otherwise. You can't - all you got is just
your sayso and as you have often proved in the past, your sayso is
often significantly outside of the truth and reality. Don't just say
it - prove it. Until then you're just blowing smoke out of your ass.
>like
>a pebble thrown into a pool of water the ringlets spread..Find out who they
>were
>make a public appology on your teams behalf. chizzler
No reason to since there was no deception. Detail this supposed
deception on my or anyone else's part. Show where on the website
there was deception. Quote the text, provide the link. Display the
proof which backs your contention. You can't.
>
>>I "admit" nothing
>
>determained to keep the stolen medal classification huh?
Another stupid cutn'paste - superior method, jackass - sure beats
making a solid argument, eh? Do you really think the history, what
people write, isn't out there? Do you actually believe that if you
change what was written you can win an argument. Here's what you
said:
>>>>>then under the third degree had to admit you weren't a
>>>>>member of the team when the medal in question was won...
and here's what I said:
>>>>I "had to admit" nothing - it was me who provided that detail when it
>>>>was suggested (without any base in reality, mind you) that I was
>>>>somehow responsible for this (unproven) "lie by omission," when it was
>>>>abundantly clear and described on the webpage that I only joined the
>>>>team the following season, after the medal was awarded (and
>>>>accurately, without omission described).
As for being "determained to keep the stolen medal classification,"
no, of course not, since no medal classification was ever stolen by
me, the team, the team's website, or its webmaster.
>
>>Nevermind that what you cut out from my >statement was that a complete
>>and full answer to the question made at >the time was provided
>
> more like a weak excuse...
>BE A MAN, DO THE RIGHT THING.
As if a complete a full answer to ta valid question *isn't* the right
thing to do? Bullcrap. As if making baseless accusations *is* the
right thing to do. Hogwash. Keep it coming Jimmie, I'll play this
dumb game of yours for as long as you like and *I'll keep beating
you.* I know you love my lashes.
>
>
>>without the benefit or coersion of some >bullshit "3rd degree"
>
>yeah I artta be in Iraq interagating prisoners huh? Bet I could make
>them talk without dropping their pants
I'd buy that - but you'd be the one turning to the wall and dropping
trow.
> besides
>>All I heard was alibi's, you didn't didn't do >the right thing and come clean.
That's bullshit - making a straight answer to a legitimate question is
*exactly* what I did and that, in a nutshell, was the right thing to
do. Shall I post the exchange and rub your face in it? I can.
>
>>So you admit I had alibi's
>>
>
>Every crooked sumbitch in the world does.
Yeah, well - it's up to you to disprove them, I guess, eh? Calling
them alibis does not make them any less true. Providing proof which
destroys the alibis is the *only* way to prove what you're trying to
prove. Until then, they are legitimate and proven answers to the
questions made at the time. They stood up then, do you doubt they
would not stand up now? The exchange is just a few clicks of a mouse
away. Gonna bring it up or shall I?
> but
>>hey were pretty flimsy and arn't holding up in this pre trial investigation
Describe thse flimsy alibis. Detail what what I said vs. what was
contended. That information is also availbale for review. You just
go right ahead and destroy these "flimsy" alibis, why doncha?
>
>>No, they are as strong now as they were >then
>
>NOT assume the position Forward Leaning Rest prisoner
No, they most certainly are. Shall I bring them up for you to read
(again)? I dare you to dare me. On your knees, bitch.
...bsrp
...jlk
Capt. hook
>Just a POPS medal?
>
>Yup but unlike your average video geek, >which you are I had to actually take
>grips
>AND WAS ACTUALLY ON THE TEAM THAT WON IT!! HAW HAW HAW
>And you're wrong about that, too. >Videogeeks are on the teams, win,
>lose, or draw - and, guess what, they >hand out the medals to the
>entire team which, whadya know, >includes the vidgeek.
It was 4-way scrambles and we were using pool video people so I doubt they got
a medal.
>I WAS ACTUALLY ON THE TEAM
>AND GOT ONE
>And you're wrong about that, too. >Videogeeks are on the team
Nottttttttttt in your case The original video geek that won that medal was gone
as well as the makeup of the original team, you new guys picked up the francise
and started claiming their medals WHAT A CROCK OF UNDERHANDED CRAP ;-P
"Fit Via Vi"
Jerry K.
>>Perhaps the award isn't worth the bother.
>>>>...bsrp
>>>>...jlk
>
>Putting it on your page damn sure wuzzn't.
Pay attention, buttmunch. The award I was referencing above is the
one supposedly being delivered by those phantoms who had put a price
on your head, you were freaking out about earlier.
As for medals on the team's webpage, it was worth it to the webmaster
and the rest of us appreciated it.
>Why didn't you wait till you actually won a medal of your own?
Well, as far as *that's* concerned, you saying the medal on that
webpage was the only medal I had ever won at that point? Same as
always, you don't have a fucking clue what you're talking about but
keep it coming - let's see where this goes. You're just a glutton for
punishment, aintcha?
...bsrp
...jlk
Capt. hook
>intermediate medal and not a expert
>No one was made to look bad, one way >or the other, since the medal's
>classification was indeed pointed out as >soon as mention of it was put
>on the website.
Corrected it huh? I guess all my hell raising does do some good/besides its fun
"Fit Via Vi"
Jerry K.
>>Glory is fleeting" but why did you attach >it to your vanity page when you
>didn't >earn it is my question?
>
>>I didn't attach anything to my "vanity >page" concerning awards, ect.
>
>Well don't bother now cuz it will be suspect even if you earned it.
Who gives a rat's ass about that. The ones I got I know I earned and
if someone suspects their legitimacy, that's their boneheaded problem.
Unlike you, I'm not out pretending that medals somehow afford
legitimacy. The world has bigger fish to fry.
>See this
>is one of the reasons doing the right
>thing pays off...
As if you would know, let alone even being capable of doing, what the
right thing is. There's a whole, documented history of you doing
specifically the *wrong* thing - and getting busted for it.
>You did the wrong thing,
>and got caught...
I most certainly did not and I most certainly was not - there was
nothing to catch - no bust was made. A legitimate question was raised
and completely answered at the get go. What all this is, is you
flailing about for some angle of aspersion and annoyance but no big
deal, you say one thing but never come close to moving past contending
to proving and as for annoying, no, this is highly amusing. Like I
said, I'll play your dumbass games as long as you want because it is
so much fun to watch you freak out as you continuously try every angle
to win your game but fail, time after time, after time.
>anything after that is
>tainted............................................
Whew! Good thing it didn't happen then.
>GEEZE WHAT WERE YOU THINKING?
Actually, it was a step above thinking - it was knowing. It was
knowing that you've yet to make an argument and you've yet to prove a
thing. I know that you're just a pathetic dingleberry who would
rather make baseless accusations than put up any proof to support his
contentions. I know you're an ass.
...bsrp
...jlk
Jerry K.
>>why did you attach it to your vanity page >when you didn't earn it is my
>question?
>
>>I didn't attach anything to my "vanity >page. I was incapable of attaching
>>anything to this supposed vanity page
>>I am now, as I was then, never its >webmaster.
>
>Well your taking the fall, your name and picture were on the Page,
Taking the fall, am I? Well, you go right ahead and make it happen,
sweetie. You just go right ahead. As for my name and picture on the
page - absolutely - there's nothing on that page which is not
representitive of the truth and reality and we had a great team.
>the WEB
>Master has escaped because he's not stoopid enuff to argue with a great
>criminal mind on wreck,
The webmaster, if he cared to, would take you apart, just as I have
and often do. He, also is quite capable of pointing to a link or
quoting text which would, quite easily, blow your idiotic contentions
out of the water but whether he does or does not is his own lookout.
>you will have to take your grievance up with him in
>civil court at a
>later date, why not huh?....
No, I will not have to do anything because, as is evident on the site,
there is no problem and no issue which brings about any grievance.
>you already drug your entire team history through
>the mud, one more guy won't count USPA2000 skydivers tsk tsk tsk
No, you made an *attempts* at doing that but you've yet to provide a
link, detailed what was said (or not said), nor have you provided any
proof *whatsoever* that 1) something reprehensible occurred, and 2)
that this (unproven) issue was caused by myself or anyone else on the
team. In fact, all you've done is make baseless accusations. Whoopty
shit. If anything, condemnation from you equates to a vote of
confidence for the rest of the world. Thanks for the props, dude!
...bsrp
...jlk
Jerry K.
>>only so many people can take credit for >a 4 way medal ya know ;)
>
>>Just a POPS medal?
>>
>
>>Yup but unlike your average video geek, >which you are I had to actually take
>>grips
>>AND WAS ACTUALLY ON THE TEAM THAT WON IT!! HAW HAW HAW
>
>>And you're wrong about that, too. >Videogeeks are on the teams, win,
>>lose, or draw - and, guess what, they >hand out the medals to the
>>entire team which, whadya know, >includes the vidgeek.
>
>It was 4-way scrambles and we were using pool video people so I doubt they got
>a medal.
And in my case it's been Nationals, America Cup, Texas 20Way, and
Texas Skydiving League and ya know what? It includes the videogeek.
>
>>I WAS ACTUALLY ON THE TEAM
>>AND GOT ONE
>
>>And you're wrong about that, too. >Videogeeks are on the team
>
>Nottttttttttt in your case The original video geek that won that medal was gone
Yep, he couldn't be on the team the following season.
>as well as the makeup of the original team,
No, you're wrong - I was the only change in the lineup.
>you new guys picked up the francise
>and started claiming their medals
No, you're mistaken (big surpise, not) - it was the same team both
years, excepting the video slot which I flew in the team's 2nd year -
it's all there on the website.
>WHAT A CROCK OF UNDERHANDED CRAP
Settle down, Beavis - you're obvioulsy mistaken - there's nothing
underhanded to it at all. No need to freak out. Take a Midol, for
God's sake!
...bsrp
...jlk
Jerry K.
From a mere cutn'paste? Try again.
...bsrp
...jlk
Capt. hook
>anything to this supposed vanity page
>I am now, as I was then, never its >webmaster.
>Well your taking the fall, your name and >picture were on the Page,
>Taking the fall, am I? Well, you go right >ahead and make it happen,
Already have, as soon as you started defending the act and arguing endlessly
with me instead of saying "WOW THANKS FOR THE HEADS UP-didn't notice that, we
will fix it!" you lost your arguement.
Now everytime someone looks at your
vanity page their gonna remember this and
think "Wonder what that teams covering up now?" I got no USPA reputation to
speak of, now you are in the same classification, shudda done the right thing,
made the right move and salvaged what was left of your reputation
boy......Thats the Psyops world boy, think - don't just react 0;)P
Capt. hook
>Corrected it huh? I guess all my hell >raising does do some good/besides its
>fun
>You been hell-raising? Call it a big bitch and whine-fest, maybe.
whatever it takes to get yawl to do the right thing.....I'm here for you kid
0;->
Jerry K.
>>I WAS ACTUALLY ON THE TEAM
>>WHEN IT GOT ONE
>
>>And you're wrong about that, too. >Videogeeks are on the team
>>
>
>>Nottttttttttt in your case The original >video geek that won that medal was
>>gone
>
>>Yep, he couldn't be on the team the >following season.
>
>did he physically leave you his medal or did you just take credit?
Neither. Perhaps you'd like to state where you got such a ridiculous
idea?
>
>>you new guys picked up the francise
>>and started claiming their medal
>
>>No, you're mistaken (big surpise, not) - it >was the same team both
>>years, excepting the video slot
>
>Well, that lets them off the hook...
Oh, I'm sure they're *relieved.*
>except
>for the failure to mention competition class
Not that such a supposed failure actually ocurred, of course.
>I want yawl to stand in a circle and shout
>"WE WILL STRIVE TO DO THE RIGHT THING!" henceforth before each huddle
>break...
You first.
>thats your new team motto and you should remember it, don't whine
>its better than "What would coach do?"
>Snarf gurrgle HAW HAW HAW HO HO
It's a little too late because, you see, if you had been paying
attention you would have noticed the team concluded it final
competition in 2002.
You, on the other hand, are still *trying* to compete but doing the
right thing, as is evident, was never in your game plan.
...bsrp
...jlk
Jerry K.
>>I didn't attach anything to my "vanity >page. I was incapable of attaching
>>anything to this supposed vanity page
>>I am now, as I was then, never its >webmaster.
>
>>Well your taking the fall, your name and >picture were on the Page,
>
>>Taking the fall, am I? Well, you go right >ahead and make it happen,
>
>Already have,
Have I now? No, can't say that I have because, as I've explained on
numerous occasions, the very same occasions where you failed to base
any of your stupid contentions upon proof, there's been no fall to
take
>as soon as you started defending the act and arguing endlessly
>with me
All in days work in taking the words of an ass and showing him how
much of an ass he really is.
>instead of saying "WOW THANKS FOR THE HEADS UP-didn't notice that, we
>will fix it!" you lost your arguement.
Well, by that argument when you decided to attempt an argument based
on baseless accusation instead of fact and proof, instead of saying,
"Wow! I guess I don't have any proof beyond someone asking a
question," while ignoring the answer, you lost your argument. But
anyone could have predicted that - you couldn't argue your way out of
a wet paper bag.
>Now everytime someone looks at your
>vanity page their gonna remember this and
>think "Wonder what that teams covering up now?"
Well, that's their own lookout but if they've read my reponses to your
accusations, when they check out the page they might very well think,
"Wonder what sort of bullshit, line of crap Jimmie's gonna be
shrieking next?"
>I got no USPA reputation to
>speak of, now you are in the same classification, shudda done the right thing,
>made the right move and salvaged what was left of your reputation
>boy......
Oh, woe - *My reputation, my reputation!!!* Yo, Jimmie - most of us
here on this planet manage to get by just fine without worrying about
what others might be thinking - let alone what some jackass might
infer because someone else had a question about a webpage.
>Thats the Psyops world boy, think - don't just react
You might take that lesson to heart sometime. I mean, you been
reacting bigtime but as for thinking? Nope, nary a sign.
...bsrp
...jlk
Jerry K.
I knew you loved my lashes. What's next - gonna buy me a tie or
tickets to the ballet to truly express how you really feel?
...bsrp
...jlk
Capt. hook
USPA rules, funny they consider them important enough to leverage them in
yet fail to create a rating for them.
besides
A lot of outside competitions, having a better grip on the concept of RW being
about transition and docking use pool video people seeing them more as a
tool. in your case The original video geek that won that medal was gone
>Yep, he couldn't be on the team the >following season
>did he physically leave you his medal or >did you just take the credit?
>
>Perhaps you'd like to state where you >got such a ridiculous idea?
Oh yeah you know I'm always up for that.
~Your vanity page~
Capt. hook
>Well your taking the fall, you better roll over for the prosecution
>Taking the fall, am I?
big time.
>there's been no fall to take
>Now everytime someone looks at your
>vanity page their gonna remember this
investigation and wonder what kind of scam your running now?
>Yo, Jimmie - most of us
>here on this planet manage to get by just >fine without worrying about
>what others might be thinking
why the vanity page you put up then?
I mean its allowable, I'm just trying to get
you to examine your own motives
Jerry K.
>>And you're wrong about that, too. >Videogeeks are on the team
>
>USPA rules,
And reality too. Damned inconvienent, eh?
>funny they consider them important enough to leverage them in
>yet fail to create a rating for them.
Yeah - I wonder what the covert angle on that one is, eh?
> besides
>A lot of outside competitions, having a better grip on the concept of RW being
>about transition and docking use pool video people seeing them more as a
>tool. in your case
Hasn't been a pool at Nationals since Sebastian in '99. Sure, if you
don't have vid, you can scrounge around and maybe dig someone up but
they gotta register with the team and pay to compete, just like
everyone else. As for vid being used for a tool - duh - training and
judging, but the vidgeek slot is just as much a part of a team as
inside center or point.
>The original video geek that won that medal was gone
>
>>Yep, he couldn't be on the team the >following season
>
>>did he physically leave you his medal or >did you just take the credit?
>>
>
>>Perhaps you'd like to state where you >got such a ridiculous idea?
>
>Oh yeah you know I'm always up for that.
> ~Your vanity page~
So you say - all right - and what specifically on my "vanity page"
lead you to that conclusion. It all comes down to proof, dummy - you
gonna buck up and do the legwork? You've yet to show me the link
wherein such nonsense is written, described, or alluded to,
Quote, chapter and verse, wherein it is written, says, or even
suggests the camerageek in year one either left me his medal and/or I
took credit for it. Go ahead, numbnuts. You can't, you won't
------>just a bag of wind.
It's interesting to note that I've dared you on numerous occasions,
and even welcomed you to come up with this evidence, beyond just what
you just assert, while at the same time you seem somewhat *hesitant*
in suggesting I come up with the evidence which supports my own
assertions concerning your own medal misrepresentations. Wonder why
that is, Jimmie? Got something to hide? The Pops folk might very
well think so. You gonna bite the bullet and dare me? Wriggle away!
...bsrp
...jlk
Jerry K.
>>I didn't attach anything to my "vanity >page
>
>>Well your taking the fall, you better roll over for the prosecution
>
>>Taking the fall, am I?
>
>big time.
In what way? Near as I can tell, and you've certainly presented
nothing to support your ideas, there's been no foul. I'm not to clear
on how, if there was no fall, it could be taken.
>
>>there's been no fall to take
>
>>Now everytime someone looks at your
>>vanity page their gonna remember this
>investigation and wonder what kind of scam your running now?
>
>>Yo, Jimmie - most of us
>>here on this planet manage to get by just >fine without worrying about
>>what others might be thinking
>
>why the vanity page you put up then?
Well, you'd have to ask the webmaster why he built it and put it up
but my understanding is that it would be fun to have a webpage for our
team which begs the question, why were you bragging on the usenet
about your medal while at the same time neglecting to accurately
describe what kind of medal it was? Vanity? Vanity is too soft of a
word----->try arrogance.
>I mean its allowable, I'm just trying to get
>you to examine your own motives
What, motivation behind the website? You're asking the wrong person -
try asking the webmaster who created it - but be sure to explain to
him and certainly don't forget to point out to him where and what on
the website is so odious. Specifically this misrepresentation you
speak of but don't just say such a thing occurred because, as you've
proven, any jackass can make any one of assorted dumbass
pronouncements and accusations - you gotta detail it. Otherwise, you
run the risk of having what actually exists shoved in your face and
what actually exists as compared to what you say exists might very
well be worlds apart. If you mean the motivation behind this supposed
misrepresentation, well then, I say there was no misrepresentation and
it's kinda difficult to describe a motivation behind an action which
never occurred. If you can establish it occurred then a motivation
might be discovered but then, you sure have been hesitant to establish
anything, beyond you just being an ass.
...bsrp
...jlk
Mr. tricky man
>here on this planet manage to get by just >fine without worrying about
>what others might be thinking
not young skydivers in particular I'm thinking for instance why the vanity
page?
>any jackass can make any one of >assorted dumbass pronouncements and
>accusations
Don't get in a huff, nothing wrong with it
as long as the content is truthfull.
>If you mean the motivation behind this >supposed misrepresentation, well then,
I say there was no misrepresentation.
Yes there was, sly but not slick enuff to fool old sharpies in the bleachers.
;)P
Jerry K.
>>Yo, Jimmie - most of us
>>here on this planet manage to get by just >fine without worrying about
>>what others might be thinking
>
>not young skydivers in particular I'm thinking for instance why the vanity
>page?
Why not? I mean - you had a vanity page, didn'tcha?
>
>>any jackass can make any one of >assorted dumbass pronouncements and
>>accusations
>
>Don't get in a huff, nothing wrong with it
>as long as the content is truthfull.
Then I fail to see why you're been throwing such a hissyfit over it -
especially since you've yet to present any shred of its content as
being untruthfull. Sure, you've suggested such a thing but actually
establishing the idea? Nope, not at all, but I'm still patiently
waiting for such an occurance and just as I enjoy skiing, I'm also
patiently waiting to ski the black diamonds across the back bowls of
hell.
>
>>If you mean the motivation behind this >supposed misrepresentation, well then,
>I say there was no misrepresentation.
>
>Yes there was, sly but not slick enuff to fool old sharpies in the bleachers.
Then, by all means, stopping passing gas and cite this supposed
misrepresentation. Until then, all you're doing is just being an ass.
...bsrp
...jlk