A Question

[pigo]

Do those that watch only the regime's approved media outlets know that congress is trying to pass a law exempting them and their aid and other employees from Obama "care"? What do you think of that? Is "dear leader" and his family going to be subject to it?

[twobuddha]

On Thursday, April 25, 2013 9:41:08 AM UTC-7, pigo wrote:
> Do those that watch only the regime's approved media outlets know that congress is trying to pass a law exempting them and their aid and other employees from Obama "care"? What do you think of that? Is "dear leader" and his family going to be subject to it?

Holy shit. Birther Bob is foaming at the mouth again with his insane tea party nutjob conspiracy theories.
Since I watch an approved media outlet (approved by ethical, decent, sane human beings), damned if a Democratic Congressman was just condemning such exemptions and point out how the Republicans sponsor and support the exemption.
That's right, Swift Boat Thompson. Your people are behind it, but in your deranged mind, it has to be the liberals conspiring to take away your freedoms, your assault weapons, your diapers.
Batshit crazy. As usual.
Here's a thought, Tranny Boob. You sure as hell have no problem contacting the regime and lying to them about me. Still waiting to hear from LE.......

[twobuddha]

Flipping channels and stumbled across a documentary about militias. Damned if they all don't sound and look like Swift Boat Bob. Assault rifles, paranoia, racism, batshit crazy. Somebody take away Thompson's guns before he goes all Timothy McVeigh.

[lal_truckee]

On 4/25/13 9:41 AM, pigo wrote:
> Do those that watch only the regime's approved media outlets know that congress is trying to pass a law exempting them and their aid and other employees from Obama "care"? What do you think of that? Is "dear leader" and his family going to be subject to it?
>

As you well know, people with employee paid health care will already not
feel any "Obamacare" impact. That includes all those you mention, plus
all the rest of the government (even republicans.)

Just for interest, where did you hear this misdirected rant?

[twobuddha]

The aliens beamed it straight into his alcohol shrunken cerebellum, since they have figured out how to defeat Batshit Bob's tinfoil hat.

[Goober Jones]

Try the liberal site Politico. And for the record you might try toning down the rhetoric because
it makes you look stupid too.

[pigo]

On Thursday, April 25, 2013 12:24:56 PM UTC-6, lal_truckee wrote:

> As you well know, people with employee paid health care will already not
> feel any "Obamacare" impact. That includes all those you mention, plus
> all the rest of the government (even republicans.)
> Just for interest, where did you hear this misdirected rant?

http://www.politico.com/story/2013/04/obamacare-exemption-lawmakers-aides-90610.html

I didn't say it was a partisan issue. I don't want any of those imposing that on us to be exempt from it. I think I've heard that part of bho's bill is for the cost of employee health care programs will be counted as income and taxed. There is also a 3% tax on top of every real estate sale to fund the garbage known as bhocare. EVERYONE is going to feel the effect of bhocare.

[pigo]

On Thursday, April 25, 2013 2:04:54 PM UTC-6, Goober Jones wrote:
> Try the liberal site Politico. And for the record you might try toning down the rhetoric because
>
> it makes you look stupid too.

I had just heard it. But given the question from lal I googled it. It was the first thing on the list when I googled something like obamacare exemptions. It's amazing the length some will go to to not see what they don't want to.

[twobuddha]

On Thursday, April 25, 2013 1:04:54 PM UTC-7, Goober Jones wrote:
> Try the liberal site Politico. And for the record you might try toning down the rhetoric because
>
> it makes you look stupid too.

Actually, it makes every single freak who posts here look stupid, because only truly stupid people would be civil to Birther Bob. Or truly vile. You're both, freak.

[twobuddha]

Sure are. Especially those who are screwed by this disgusting system, who will feel better because they actually will have health care. And those who pay less for health care. Idiot. Hey, freak? Last time I heard, your wife worked for the state. Which means you are on government health care.
Ain't logic a bitch?

[twobuddha]

Holy shit. Brain Fried Bob Thompson talking about denial. And he proves his own point, but it too stupid to know it, going to any length to not see what he does not want to see. Of course, I've always been amazed at the lengths he will go to to avoid seeing ME in person. BWHAHAHAHAHAHA, etc. This is HILARIOUS!!!!!!

[pigo]

On Thursday, April 25, 2013 12:24:56 PM UTC-6, lal_truckee wrote:

> Just for interest, where did you hear this misdirected rant?

And yet more bullshit from this lawless regime:

"The chief of the FAA told Congress today that Washington-area airports will largely escape the effects of the air traffic controller furloughs -- a blessing for lawmakers who fly out of the nation’s capitol. Michael Huerta, head of the Federal Aviation Administration, told a congressional panel that the Washington region’s airports are spaced out enough and have enough spare capacity that furloughs to air traffic controllers won’t hurt as much here."

Everyone (that pays attention) knows that the "cuts" are actually not as big an increase, but still and increase in funding. And that furloughs and the like are made in areas designed to hurt the public at large, and Republicans can't be blamed if those reductions are made and everything carries on as normal.

Happy to provide the news you don't want to hear.

You're Welcome

[twobuddha]

On Thursday, April 25, 2013 4:31:09 PM UTC-7, pigo wrote:
> On Thursday, April 25, 2013 12:24:56 PM UTC-6, lal_truckee wrote:
>
>
>
> > Just for interest, where did you hear this misdirected rant?
>
>
>
> And yet more bullshit from this lawless regime:

Holy shit. Brain Fried Thompson is so fucking crazy that he calls the fucking government LAWLESS!!!!!
Amazing insanity. This from a former cocaine dealer who flaunted his lawbreaking, a pathetic stalker who lies to the cops, a true nutcase racist.
I LOVE IT!!!!!

>
>
>
> "The chief of the FAA told Congress today that Washington-area airports will largely escape the effects of the air traffic controller furloughs -- a blessing for lawmakers who fly out of the nation’s capitol. Michael Huerta, head of the Federal Aviation Administration, told a congressional panel that the Washington region’s airports are spaced out enough and have enough spare capacity that furloughs to air traffic controllers won’t hurt as much here."

I just gotta read Thomson explaining how Congress taking care of its own selfish interests equates to lawlessness.

>
>
>
> Everyone (that pays attention) knows that the "cuts" are actually not as big an increase, but still and increase in funding. And that furloughs and the like are made in areas designed to hurt the public at large, and Republicans can't be blamed if those reductions are made and everything carries on as normal.

And then he excuses the insane hostage taking of his tea party buddies. Just like he never takes any responsibility for his own actions.

>
>
>
> Happy to provide the news you don't want to hear.

Au contraire, idiot. I just love hearing you. I don't know any tea party wack jobs, watching the insane rationalize their insanity is fascinating.
>
>
>
> You're Welcome

Now go change your diapers, idiot.

[Walt]

On 4/25/2013 2:24 PM, lal_truckee wrote:

>
> Just for interest, where did you hear this misdirected rant?
>

Here's the bckstory:

"The whole thing started back in 2009 when Republicans decided to
embarrass Democrats by proposing an amendment that forced members of
Congress to use Obamacare. Democrats then surprised them by agreeing to
it. The problem, it turns out, is that because the amendment was
originally intended to be only for show, it was poorly drafted. Big
employers aren't even allowed to use the Obamacare exchanges until 2017,
so there are no rules for how to handle their premium contributions:

That's where the problem comes in....It's not clear that the federal
government has the authority to pay for congressional staffers on the
exchanges, the way it pays for them now in the federal benefits program.

....You'll notice a lot of hedged language here: "Ifs" and "coulds". The
reason is that the Office of Personnel Management � which is the agency
that actually manages the federal government's benefits � hasn't ruled
on their interpretation of the law. So no one is even sure if this will
be an issue. "

http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2013/04/real-problem-obamacare

[pigo]

On Friday, April 26, 2013 5:53:28 AM UTC-6, Walt wrote:
>Big
> employers aren't even allowed to use the Obamacare exchanges until 2017,
> so there are no rules for how to handle their premium contributions:


> That's where the problem comes in....It's not clear that the federal
> government has the authority to pay for congressional staffers on the
> exchanges, the way it pays for them now in the federal benefits program.

"Big companies (unionized ones) have been getting exemptions from the bill since soon after it passed. I'm pretty sure that there are over 1000 now.

> ....You'll notice a lot of hedged language here: "Ifs" and "coulds". The

> reason is that the Office of Personnel Management — which is the agency
> that actually manages the federal government's benefits — hasn't ruled

> on their interpretation of the law. So no one is even sure if this will
> be an issue. "

Remember "we can read it after we pass it"?

My insurance comes trough a company that is self insured. With a medical clinic onsite. Hopefully they will be able to negotiate this with us being dragged down to the lowest common denominator like most non union folks.

[pigo]

On Friday, April 26, 2013 5:53:28 AM UTC-6, Walt wrote:

> http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2013/04/real-problem-obamacare

Now I remember where I have heard of "motherjones". They're the ones that illegally recorded the campaign strategy meeting of a Senator that Ashley Judd considered running against. And the libs were more upset about them using information that she herself made public in a book than about the possible illegal bugging of his office. Good source!

[twobuddha]

On Friday, April 26, 2013 8:01:27 AM UTC-7, pigo wrote:
> On Friday, April 26, 2013 5:53:28 AM UTC-6, Walt wrote:
>
>
>
> > http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2013/04/real-problem-obamacare
>
>
>
> Now I remember where I have heard of "motherjones".

You sure as hell never read it. Something about telling the truth, facts, etc.

> They're the ones that illegally recorded the campaign strategy meeting of a Senator that Ashley Judd considered running against.

Actually, Mother Jones had nothing to do with the recording, they merely disseminated what they were given by the person who recorded the meeting. But don't let the facts stop you from lying your ass off. Not to mention that what your right wing asshole buddies proposed is exactly what you've been doing to me: lie, defame, stalk, harass in a pathetic attempt to deny reality.

> And the libs were more upset about them using information that she herself made public in a book than about the possible illegal bugging of his office. Good source!

Sure makes me wonder what YOUR source for this is. Did you pull it out of your ass? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[scat...@hotmail.com]

> There is also a 3% tax on top of every real estate sale to fund the garbage known as bhocare. EVERYONE is going to feel the effect of bhocare.

EVERY real estate transaction? Or just some more of your overblown bullshit to try to get people to agree with your warped sense of reality? You and Trunky are two peas in a pod.

Actually, it's the stupidity that makes you look so stupid.

[twobuddha]

On Tuesday, April 30, 2013 6:11:33 PM UTC-7, scat...@hotmail.com wrote:
> > There is also a 3% tax on top of every real estate sale to fund the garbage known as bhocare. EVERYONE is going to feel the effect of bhocare.
>
>
>
> EVERY real estate transaction? Or just some more of your overblown bullshit to try to get people to agree with your warped sense of reality? You and Trunky are two peas in a pod.

Holy shit. You are so fucking insane you compare me and Bob Thompson? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>
>
>
> Actually, it's the stupidity that makes you look so stupid.

That stupidity just made you look stupid, stupid.

[pigo]

A tax on the sale of your house. Look it up. It could be on houses over 100K or something? That means I'd be paying it. I'm against unfair taxation of the wealthy weather I am directly harmed by it or not.

[Alan Baker]

In article <14c4646f-89b7-4018...@googlegroups.com>,

Fiction.

"There Is No Obamacare Tax On Most Home Sales. Really.

A home is for sale in Glendale, California May 31, 2011. US home prices
fell to new, post-bubble lows in March with no end to the decline in
sight according to analysts. The latest Standard & Poors Case-Shiller
home price index figures released May 31 show prices for homes in 20
cities fell 0.8 percent from February, the eighth drop in a row. Prices
are down 33.1 percent from their July 2006 pre-bust peak. (Image credit:
AFP/Getty Images via @daylife)

It is the unfounded rumor that never dies: You will have to pay a 3.8
percent federal health care tax on the sale of your house.

For all but a handful of taxpayers, this is not true. It is wrong. It is
urban myth. It is the revenue equivalent of death panels or the
Halliburton conspiracy to start the Iraq war.

This is one of those seemingly immortal Internet stories. You know the
ones: They usually start with the assertion that, łThey donąt want to
know this butŠ.˛ In the words of one blogger, łObamacare will impose a
3.8 percent tax on all home sales and real estate transactions.˛

Umm, no it wonąt. Yes, the health law will impose a 3.8 percent tax on
investment profits and other non-wage income starting in 2013. But that
tax applies only to couples with adjusted gross income of $250,000 (or
individuals with AGI of $200,000). About 95 percent of households make
less than that, and will be exempt from the law no matter what.

In addition, couples who sell a personal residence can exclude the first
$500,000 in profit from tax ($250,000 for singles). That would be profit
from a home sale, not proceeds. So a couple that bought a house for
$100,000 and sold it for $599,000 would owe no tax, even under the
health law."

<http://www.forbes.com/sites/beltway/2012/04/02/there-is-no-obamacare-tax
-on-most-home-sales-really/>

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
"If you raise the ceiling four feet, move the fireplace from that wall
to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you
sit in the bottom of that cupboard."

[twobuddha]

He DID look it up, idiot. Stupidity.

[pigo]

Well I'm in it under the gross income perspective. I don't thing any of my houses would make a $500K profit though. But as I said before I don't think it's fair to penalize the successful to pay for the irresponsible. To create a family that you cannot afford is irresponsible.

As for "death panels". Just because you don't call them that doesn't mean that the regime will not review your proposed medical care against your prognosis for improvement and decide whether you live or die, becoming a "death panel" even if you call it a "bang for your buck" review.

[twobuddha]

And once again, Tea Party Bob Thompson shows he has no conscience. Nothing unusual there. Personlly, I think that lying your ass off on usenet while hiding behind your computer is irresponsible, but spewing his shit in person is certainly something he cannot afford to do.

>
>
>
> As for "death panels". Just because you don't call them that doesn't mean that the regime will not review your proposed medical care against your prognosis for improvement and decide whether you live or die, becoming a "death panel" even if you call it a "bang for your buck" review.

There is already death panels, dumbfuck. The current health system, stupid. I can only wish I was on a panel that denied YOU health care because your prognosis for improvement is terminal: you will always be a stupid asshole.

[The Real Bev]

Around here a $100K house is ripe for condemnation.


--
Cheers, Bev
=============================================
You are more likely to catch swine flu from a
police officer than from an actual pig.

[Horva...@net.net]

On Wed, 01 May 2013 16:20:30 -0700, The Real Bev
<bashl...@gmail.com> wrote this crap:

>On 05/01/2013 08:32 AM, pigo wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday, April 30, 2013 7:11:33 PM UTC-6, scat...@hotmail.com
>> wrote:
>>>> There is also a 3% tax on top of every real estate sale to fund
>>>> the garbage known as bhocare. EVERYONE is going to feel the
>>>> effect of bhocare.
>>>
>>> EVERY real estate transaction? Or just some more of your overblown
>>> bullshit to try to get people to agree with your warped sense of
>>> reality? You and Trunky are two peas in a pod.
>>>
>>> Actually, it's the stupidity that makes you look so stupid.
>>
>> A tax on the sale of your house. Look it up. It could be on houses
>> over 100K or something? That means I'd be paying it. I'm against
>> unfair taxation of the wealthy weather I am directly harmed by it or
>> not.
>
>Around here a $100K house is ripe for condemnation.

I didn't know there were houses worth less than 100K that people could
live in.


This signature is now the ultimate
power in the universe

[Walt]

On 5/1/2013 7:20 PM, The Real Bev wrote:
> On 05/01/2013 08:32 AM, pigo wrote:

>>>> There is also a 3% tax on top of every real estate sale to fund
>>>> the garbage known as bhocare. EVERYONE is going to feel the
>>>> effect of bhocare.

>>

>> A tax on the sale of your house. Look it up. It could be on houses
>> over 100K or something? That means I'd be paying it. I'm against
>> unfair taxation of the wealthy weather I am directly harmed by it or
>> not.
>

Right. Look it up. According to the National Association Of Realtors:

"Q- 1: Is there a 3.8% real estate “sales tax” or a transfer tax created
in health care bill?

A: No. There is neither a real estate “sales tax” nor a real estate
transfer tax under any federal law. The Internet has generated several
viral items describing such a tax. *Those Internet postings are totally
false.*


http://www.realtor.org/small_business_health_coverage.nsf/docfiles/government_affairs_health_ref_faqs.pdf/$FILE/government_affairs_health_ref_faqs.pdf

Sheesh, if ignorance were snow, we'd be having a powder day here.

> Around here a $100K house is ripe for condemnation.

And it probably costs more than $100k to tear it down.


--
//Walt

[twobuddha]

On Thursday, May 2, 2013 7:50:38 AM UTC-7, Walt wrote:
> On 5/1/2013 7:20 PM, The Real Bev wrote:
>
> > On 05/01/2013 08:32 AM, pigo wrote:
>
>
>
> >>>> There is also a 3% tax on top of every real estate sale to fund
>
> >>>> the garbage known as bhocare. EVERYONE is going to feel the
>
> >>>> effect of bhocare.
>
>
>
> >>
>
> >> A tax on the sale of your house. Look it up. It could be on houses
>
> >> over 100K or something? That means I'd be paying it. I'm against
>
> >> unfair taxation of the wealthy weather I am directly harmed by it or
>
> >> not.
>
> >
>
>
>
> Right. Look it up. According to the National Association Of Realtors:
>
>
>
> "Q- 1: Is there a 3.8% real estate “sales tax” or a transfer tax created
>
> in health care bill?
>
>
>
> A: No. There is neither a real estate “sales tax” nor a real estate
>
> transfer tax under any federal law. The Internet has generated several
>
> viral items describing such a tax. *Those Internet postings are totally
>
> false.*
>
>
>
>
>
> http://www.realtor.org/small_business_health_coverage.nsf/docfiles/government_affairs_health_ref_faqs.pdf/$FILE/government_affairs_health_ref_faqs.pdf
>
>
>
> Sheesh, if ignorance were snow, we'd be having a powder day here.

Every day Bob Thompson posts is a powder day on rsa.

[pigo]

On Thursday, May 2, 2013 8:50:38 AM UTC-6, Walt wrote:

> Right. Look it up. According to the National Association Of Realtors:
>
> "Q- 1: Is there a 3.8% real estate “sales tax” or a transfer tax created
>
> in health care bill?

> A: No. There is neither a real estate “sales tax” nor a real estate
> transfer tax under any federal law. The Internet has generated several
> viral items describing such a tax. *Those Internet postings are totally
> false.*
http://www.realtor.org/small_business_health_coverage.nsf/docfiles/government_affairs_health_ref_faqs.pdf/$FILE/government_affairs_health_ref_faqs.pdf

> Sheesh, if ignorance were snow, we'd be having a powder day here.

Ok? Two of you want to shoot down my information that there is a new tax on real estate sales due to bhocare. I had it in the 3+% range but perhaps there are some qualifications WRT sales price and profit? OK, we're still reading the bill, right?

But now here comes a post saying there is none. Which is it?

[lal_truckee]

On 5/2/13 10:52 AM, pigo wrote:
> Ok? Two of you want to shoot down my information that there is a new tax on real estate sales due to bhocare. I had it in the 3+% range but perhaps there are some qualifications WRT sales price and profit? OK, we're still reading the bill, right?
>
> But now here comes a post saying there is none. Which is it?

You could avoid these situations if you got your news from reputable
sources and not Fox or Rush or the like.

But if it induces powder days, please, go right ahead promoting the Fox
line.

BTW, aren't we do for another round of Death Panels?
Here, I'll start! Obamacare is going to require Panels to ration scarce
medical resources which will inevitably result in the death of all
grandmothers who have after all finished what god put them on the planet
to do. Besides aspirin is expensive; but not to worry, an aspirin black
market will emerge. Supply and demand.

[Walt]

On 5/2/2013 2:37 PM, lal_truckee wrote:
> On 5/2/13 10:52 AM, pigo wrote:
>> Ok? Two of you want to shoot down my information that there is a new
>> tax on real estate sales due to bhocare. I had it in the 3+% range but
>> perhaps there are some qualifications WRT sales price and profit? OK,
>> we're still reading the bill, right?
>>
>> But now here comes a post saying there is none. Which is it?
>
> You could avoid these situations if you got your news from reputable
> sources and not Fox or Rush or the like.

In this case it's not even of Fox or Rush quality - this is more along
the lines of one of those FW: FW: FW: FW: FW: emails WRITTEN IN ALL CAPS
WITH LOTS OF MIPSELLINGS AND EXCLAMATION POINTS!!!!! Anyone with any
sense learns to ignore these, but some people are so gullible that
they'll believe anything.

Snopes has a good entry on it - if you realize capital gains, and your
income is above a certain amount, and the capital gains are above a
certain amount, it is subject to a 3.8% medicare tax. Whether the
capital gains accrue from a real-estate sale or elsewhere is irrelevant,
so it's not a "tax on real estate sales".


http://www.snopes.com/politics/taxes/realestate.asp

By the way, this 3.8% medicare tax is the exact same rate that anybody
who works for a living pays. What's new is that both wage income and
investment income (above certain thresholds) are subject to it.

IOW, rich folks who make most of their income via investments now pay
medicare tax at the same rate as we working stiffs do.

Cry me a fucking river. Other taxes - income and FICA - are still taxed
at a much lower rate.



--
//Walt

[twobuddha]

Every day is a stupid day on rsa....

[Bob F]

Wow! It sure is nice to see a few people putting the lie to some of the
ridiculous anti-Obama claims for a change. I was very pleased by the healthcare
bill, and my insurance has gone up, but not nearly as fast as it did during the
Bush years.

[pigo]

I'm glad to see that the regime has ordered customs to verify and enforce entry "requirements" for student visas effective immediately. The question has to be: why would in enforcement of the immigration laws need to be ordered? One can only hope this adds credibility to the ICE lawsuit against the regime that _orders_ the same thing WRT illegal aliens .

[twobuddha]

Speaking of lie, liar, how about calling your Bob buddy a pathologicalliar? Ooops, forgot, YOU are a pathological liar, too.

[twobuddha]

On Friday, May 3, 2013 10:46:27 AM UTC-7, pigo wrote:
> I'm glad to see that the regime has ordered customs to verify and enforce entry "requirements" for student visas effective immediately. The question has to be: why would in enforcement of the immigration laws need to be ordered? One can only hope this adds credibility to the ICE lawsuit against the regime that _orders_ the same thing WRT illegal aliens .

Tranny Boob, why aren't you down on the border, doing your job, defending America? You could even find a use for your assault rifle, other than as a sex toy.
Speaking of credibility, not that you ever care, here is a clue, Mr. Swift Boat. When you call the legally elected government of the US a "regime", you just expose yourself as the nutcase tea party wack job you are. Sure weren't calling the Bush coup a regime. You remember, when they stole the election in Florida?
Oh, that's different.

[scat...@hotmail.com]

You're the one who should look it up since you obviously got it wrong.

[scat...@hotmail.com]

That's because it's not a sales tax, it's a tax on investment profit over $500,000 ($250,000). But you already knew that are you're just trying to spread around your bullshit. Just like Trunky. I'll bet you two are secretly best friends.

[scat...@hotmail.com]

Pigo sure has some nerve criticizing our tax system considering all the money he made from illegal drug sales that he never paid taxes on.

[twobuddha]

You can call me an asshole. You can call me a child molester. But calling me a friend of Brain Fried Bob Thompson is crossing the line. How disgusting. How despicable.

[twobuddha]

Exactly. What is really hilarious is that Thompson is a racist screaming about illegal immigration, yet he hired illegal Mexicans all the time when he was running construction jobs.
Not to mention that his wife is a foreigner who got to be a citizen because she fucked Tranny Boob. Oh, forgot. In Thompson's mind, white people can't be illegal immigrants, even when they perpetrate a fraud.
Geez, this is fun. And mostly true.

[pigo]

It increases your AGI. It's not too hard to move a couple with decent jobs that sell a house over the limit. But that doesn't concern trunky, he only takes, no contributions.

[scat...@hotmail.com]

I have never ever called you a child molester, you liar. That's all part of your fantasy world.

But you have hung out with pigo and have been to his house. Secret friends!

[twobuddha]

Says the guy who wants to contribute nothing to anyone, unless it is the NRA or the Tea Party.
Hey, Tranny Boob? Got ANY facts to back up your lies? Of course not. In the insane mind of this right wing nutjob, anybody with a conscience is a "taker".

[twobuddha]

Another ridiculous lie. But getting busted lying is pretty much like getting busted breathing. You can't help yourself.

>
>
> But you have hung out with pigo and have been to his house. Secret friends!

As I was saying. Last time I saw that asshole was fourteen years ago or so. Never set foot in his house. Only time we "hung" was at an Invasion party, for a half hour. I always thought he was an asshole, nothing has changed. Busted making up another whopper. How humiliating.