Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Iceberg Dead Ahead!

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick

unread,
Jan 20, 2010, 8:44:11 PM1/20/10
to
That Old Obama Magic Is Back
by Ann Coulter

01/20/2010


Once again, the people have spoken, and this time they quoted what Dick
Cheney said to Pat Leahy.

Less than two weeks ago, The New York Times said that so much as a
"tighter-than-expected" victory for Massachusetts Democratic Senate
candidate Martha Coakley would incite "soul-searching among Democrats
nationally," which sent Times readers scurrying to their dictionaries to
look up this strange new word, "soul."

A close win for Coakley, the Times said, would constitute "the first real
barometer of whether problems facing the party" will affect the 2010
elections.


But when Coakley actually lost the election by an astounding 5 points, the
Chicago boys in the White House decided it was the chick's fault.

Democratic candidate Martha Coakley may be a moral monster, but it's
ridiculous to blame her for losing the election. She lost because of the
Democrats' obsession with forcing national health care down the nation's
throat.

Coakley campaigned exactly the way she should have.

As a Democrat running in a special election for a seat that had been held by
a Democratic icon (and another moral monster) for the past 46 years in a
state with only 12 percent registered Republicans, Coakley's objective was
to have voters reading the paper on Friday, saying: "Hey, honey, did you
know there was a special election four days ago? Yeah, apparently Coakley
won, though it was a pretty low turnout."

Ideally, no one except members of government unions and Coakley's immediate
family would have even been aware of the election.

And until Matt Drudge began covering it like a presidential election a week
ago, it might have turned out that way.

Coakley had already won two statewide elections, while her Republican
opponent, Scott Brown, had only won elections in his district. She had
endorsements from the Kennedy family and the current appointed Democratic
senator, Paul Kirk -- as well as endless glowing profiles in The Boston
Globe.

And by the way, as of Jan. 1, Brown had spent $642,000 on the race, while
Coakley had spent $2 million.

On Jan. 8, just 11 days before the election, The New York Times reported: "A
Brown win remains improbable, given that Democrats outnumber Republicans by
3 to 1 in the state and that Ms. Coakley, the state's attorney general, has
far more name recognition, money and organizational support."

It was in that article that the Times said a narrow Coakley win would be an
augury for the entire Democratic Party. But now she's being hung out to dry
so that Democrats don't have to face the possibility that Obama's left-wing
policies are to blame.

Alternatively, Democrats are trying to write off Brown's colossal victory as
the standard seesawing of public sentiment that hits both Republicans and
Democrats from time to time. As MSNBC's Chris Matthews explained, it was
just the voters saying "no" generally, but not to anything in particular.

Except when Republicans win political power, they hold onto it long enough
to govern. The Democrats keep being smacked down by the voters immediately
after being elected and revealing their heinous agenda.

As a result, for the past four decades, American politics has consisted of
Republicans controlling Washington for eight to 14 years -- either from the
White House or Capitol Hill -- thus allowing Americans to forget what it was
they didn't like about Democrats, whom they then carelessly vote back in.
The Democrats immediately remind Americans what they didn't like about
Democrats, and their power is revoked at the voters' first possible
opportunity.

Obama has cut the remembering-what-we-don't-like-about-Democrats stage of
this process down from two to four years to about 10 months. Folks, I'm
convinced that if we all work really hard, we can get it down to three
months.

Four years of Jimmy Carter gave us two titanic Reagan landslides, peace and
prosperity for eight blessed years -- and even a third term for his feckless
vice president, George H.W. Bush.

Two years of Bill Clinton gave us a historic Republican sweep of Congress,
which killed the entire Clinton agenda (with the exception of partial-birth
abortion and felony obstruction of justice) -- and also gave us two terms
for George W. Bush.

And now, merely one year of Obama and a Democratic Congress has given us the
first Republican senator from Massachusetts in 31 years.

In other recent news, last November, New Jersey voters, who haven't voted
for a Republican for president since 1988, threw out their incumbent
Democratic governor, Jon Corzine. In Virginia, which Obama carried by 6
points a year earlier, a religious-right Republican won the governor's
office by 17 points.

Sen. Ben Nelson, Democrat of Nebraska, won his last election in 2006 by 28
points -- the largest margin for a Democratic Senate candidate in that state
in a quarter-century.

Since voting for the Senate health care bill last Christmas, the
once-bulletproof Sen. Nelson not only gets booed out of Omaha pizzerias, but
he has also seen his job approval rating fall to 42 percent and his
disapproval rating soar to 48 percent. (Meanwhile, the junior senator from
Nebraska, Mike Johanns, who voted against the bill, has a job approval
rating of 63 percent.)

The Democrats have no natural majority because they have no fundamental
principles -- at least none that they are willing to state out loud. They
are like a drunken vagrant who emerges from the alley to cause havoc every
few years. They are the perpetual toothache of American politics.

To be sure, the fact that 52 percent of Massachusetts voters are racist,
sexist tea-baggers -- i.e., voted for a Republican -- means only that the
Democrats just went from having the largest congressional majority in a
generation to the second largest.

But this was "Teddy Kennedy's seat."

And it was in Massachusetts.

Now, no Democrat is safe.

But the country just got a lot safer.

Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick

unread,
Jan 20, 2010, 8:53:30 PM1/20/10
to

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4aQCiRjvZY

Must See.

"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popey...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:kqWdnUb9nNnsLMrW...@supernews.com...

Scott

unread,
Jan 21, 2010, 2:28:33 AM1/21/10
to

"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popey...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:3fOdnaZZvts9LsrW...@supernews.com...
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4aQCiRjvZY
>
> Must See.

Priceless


Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick

unread,
Jan 21, 2010, 7:38:15 PM1/21/10
to

CABLE NEWS RACE
TUES. JAN. 19, 2010
ELECTION NIGHT

FOXNEWS HANNITY 6,809,000
FOXNEWS GRETA 6,399,000
FOXNEWS O'REILLY 5,228,000
FOXNEWS BECK 3,446,000
FOXNEWS BAIER 3,338,000
FOXNEWS SHEP 3,241,000
CNN KING 1,681,000
CNN COOPER 1,508,000
CNN BROWN 1,308,000
MSNBC OLBERMANN 1,274,000
MSNBC MADDOW 1,236,000
CNN BLITZER 1,135,000
CNNHN BEHAR 845,000
MSNBC HARDBALL 798,000


Breaking: Air America Ceases Live Programming, Will File for Bankruptcy
Posted by Frank Ross Jan 21st 2010 at 1:59 pm in News, Radio | Comments
(462) From AirAmerica.com:

It is with the greatest regret, on behalf of our Board, that we must
announce that Air America Media is ceasing its live programming operations
as of this afternoon, and that the Company will file soon under Chapter 7 of
the Bankruptcy Code to carry out an orderly winding-down of the business.

The very difficult economic environment has had a significant impact on Air
America's business. This past year has seen a "perfect storm" in the media
industry generally. National and local advertising revenues have fallen
drastically, causing many media companies nationwide to fold or seek
bankruptcy protection. From large to small, recent bankruptcies like Citadel
Broadcasting and closures like that of the industry's long-time trade
publication Radio and Records have signaled that these are very difficult
and rapidly changing times.

Those companies that remain are facing audience fragmentation as a result of
new media technologies, are often saddled with crushing debt, and have
generally found it difficult to obtain operating or investment capital from
traditional sources of funding. In this climate, our painstaking search for
new investors has come close several times right up into this week, but
ultimately fell short of success.
With radio industry ad revenues down for 10 consecutive quarters, and
reportedly off 21% in 2009, signs of improvement have consisted of hoping
things will be less bad. And though Internet/new media revenues are
projected to grow, our expanding online efforts face the same monetization
and profitability challenges in the short term confronting the Web
operations of most media companies

When Air America Radio launched in April, 2004 with already-known
personalities like Al Franken and then-unknown future stars like Rachel
Maddow, it was the only full-time progressive voice in the mainstream
broadcast media world. At a critical time in our nation's history - when
dissent on issues such as the Iraq war were often denounced as
"un-American" - Air America and its talented team helped millions of
Americans remember the importance of compelling discussion about the most
pivotal events and decisions of our generation.

Through some 100 radio outlets nationwide, Air America helped build a new
sense of purpose and determination among American progressives. With this
revival, the progressive movement made major gains in the 2006 mid-term
elections and, more recently, in the election of President Barack Obama and
a strongly Democratic Congress.

Laws have changed for the better thanks to this revival...but all the same
our company cannot escape the laws of economics. So we intend a rapid,
orderly closure over the next few days. All current employees will be paid
through today, January 21. A severance package will be offered tomorrow to
full-time current employees with more than six months of tenure.

We will strive to assist affiliates and partners in achieving a smooth
transition. Starting at 6 pm EST today, we will provide our affiliates,
listeners and users a selection of encore programming until 9 pm EST on
Monday, January 25, at which time Air America programming will end.

We are proud that Air America's mission lives on through the words and
actions of so many former radio hosts who are active today in progressive
causes and media nationwide. In the years ahead, as we look back, we should
all be proud of our passionate determination to assure that our nation's
progressive voice would be heard loud and clear. Through the hard work and
dedication of current staff, and those who preceded you, a lasting legacy
was forged which will now continue through other voices and venues.

Thank you.


Joe

unread,
Jan 22, 2010, 6:21:17 PM1/22/10
to
As you know I am a registered democrat but lean pretty much to the
right. I Couldn't vote for Obama because I do not believe in his
policies of which how could we know since he didn't vote much, and
didn't do much of anything.

I'm not sure that the Massachusetts vote was so much National Health
Care as it is about a message to our "leaders" that we are fed up with
the business as usual in Washington. The bribes, backroom deals, hidden
agenda, and just outright lies to the American people - I know Obama
didn't begin this - it has been going on for years.

The actions of this congress I believe has awaken the American Silent
Majority. I am hoping that future elections sees a higher turnout of
voters of all parties, and they use some type of thought process to
choose the right candidate. I think you are going to see a major
shakeup throughout the country in our leadership - again not just
democrats but republicans for sure. It is about time that our leaders
vote for what is right for their constituents - not their party. Their
aristocratic attitude towards the American people has awaken a sleepy giant.

Dillon Pyron

unread,
Jan 28, 2010, 12:27:05 PM1/28/10
to
[Default] Thus spake Joe <J*e...@joe.com>:

>As you know I am a registered democrat but lean pretty much to the
>right. I Couldn't vote for Obama because I do not believe in his
>policies of which how could we know since he didn't vote much, and
>didn't do much of anything.

The far lefties are complaining that he's just left of center, just
like GHWB was to the right.

>
>I'm not sure that the Massachusetts vote was so much National Health
>Care as it is about a message to our "leaders" that we are fed up with
>the business as usual in Washington. The bribes, backroom deals, hidden
>agenda, and just outright lies to the American people - I know Obama
>didn't begin this - it has been going on for years.

Massachusetts was the first of "hey, maybe you guys should think about
retireing". I heard a commentary, but no less than Robert "I'm a
Socialist beause Clinton wouldn't have appointed a Communist" Reicher
where he said that there's a third party, that Mad as Hell party and
both Democrats and Republicans had better be afraid of them. Either
the incumbent will lose the primary or the general (or barely squeak
by).

>
>The actions of this congress I believe has awaken the American Silent
>Majority. I am hoping that future elections sees a higher turnout of
>voters of all parties, and they use some type of thought process to
>choose the right candidate. I think you are going to see a major
>shakeup throughout the country in our leadership - again not just
>democrats but republicans for sure. It is about time that our leaders
>vote for what is right for their constituents - not their party. Their
>aristocratic attitude towards the American people has awaken a sleepy giant.

I don't forsee a sea change in the party makeup of Congress, but I do
see the idealogies changing.

I also foresee a lot of one term presidnets in the futrue. Starting
with Obama.

BTW, I saw a Palin/Brown 2012 bumpersticker the other day.
--

- dillon I am not invalid

I love my country, It's my government I fear.

Hey, turnabout's fair play.

Greg Mossman

unread,
Jan 28, 2010, 5:24:04 PM1/28/10
to
On Jan 28, 9:27 am, Dillon Pyron <invaliddmpy...@austin.rr.com> wrote:

> I also foresee a lot of one term presidnets in the futrue.  Starting
> with Obama.
>
> BTW, I saw a Palin/Brown 2012 bumpersticker the other day.

You guys run Palin and there's no way Obama will be a one-termer.

Joe

unread,
Jan 29, 2010, 10:29:43 PM1/29/10
to

I am afraid, Greg is correct. I'd do Palin, and I like her simple talk,
but I don't think she is presidential material - maybe at some point but
she isn't ready yet - we already have some one in the White House that
is way to green to lead this country

Greg Mossman

unread,
Jan 29, 2010, 10:54:30 PM1/29/10
to
On Jan 29, 7:29 pm, Joe <J...@joe.com> wrote:

> I am afraid, Greg is correct.  I'd do Palin, and I like her simple talk,
> but I don't think she is presidential material - maybe at some point but
> she isn't ready yet - we already have some one in the White House that
> is way to green to lead this country

I think she's as much presidential material as Monica Lewinsky was,
that's the only way a woman like her will get into the Oval Office.
And Joe, you must be color blind. Obama isn't green, he's black.

Joe

unread,
Jan 30, 2010, 9:47:25 AM1/30/10
to


he's not black - he's much to light-skinned to be considered black, and
he doesn't talk with a black dialect.

I think Pain has a lot more credentials to be president over Blewinsky(I
hate when people do that to people's names - but then I, Greg, is a
hypocritic!)

If the election were held today (actually Illinois's is Tuesday)I have
no idea who I will vote for. MY congressman is a good friend of mine,
he is a democrat, I call for a democratic ballot - always. I did not
vote for him(I voted early at the courthouse). He sold his vote for
OBamacare - he told us we was against it - but then the democratic
leadership gave him what he needed on the Mississippi River Leevees. I
wonder how much our leaders really gave away to have this boondoggle of
legislation any chance at all to pass.

I found this ray stevens music video quite funny

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dc_-L4fyLUo

Greg Mossman

unread,
Jan 30, 2010, 10:06:53 AM1/30/10
to
On Jan 30, 6:47 am, Joe <J...@joe.com> wrote:
> Greg Mossman wrote:
> > On Jan 29, 7:29 pm, Joe <J...@joe.com> wrote:
>
> >> I am afraid, Greg is correct.  I'd do Palin, and I like her simple talk,
> >> but I don't think she is presidential material - maybe at some point but
> >> she isn't ready yet - we already have some one in the White House that
> >> is way to green to lead this country
>
> > I think she's as much presidential material as Monica Lewinsky was,
> > that's the only way a woman like her will get into the Oval Office.
> > And Joe, you must be color blind.  Obama isn't green, he's black.
>
> he's not black - he's much to light-skinned to be considered black, and
> he doesn't talk with a black dialect.

Maybe you don't consider him black, but his father was 100% African
which makes Obama a lot blacker than many black people in the U.S.
I'm not sure what a "black" dialect is. He sounds like an American to
me.

> I think Pain has a lot more credentials to be president over Blewinsky(I
> hate when people do that to people's names - but then I, Greg, is a
> hypocritic!)

I never suggested either should be President, I merely suggested they
might be useful in some Oval Office capacity. I bet Palin can polish
a cigar as good as Lewinsky.

Curtis

unread,
Jan 30, 2010, 3:21:43 PM1/30/10
to
"Joe" wrote

>>> BTW, I saw a Palin/Brown 2012 bumpersticker the other day.

>> You guys run Palin and there's no way Obama will be a one-termer.

> I am afraid, Greg is correct. I'd do Palin, and I like her simple talk,
> but I don't think she is presidential material - maybe at some point but
> she isn't ready yet - we already have some one in the White House that is
> way to green to lead this country

Joe, "I'd do Palin" just makes you sound like one of the FSLMs who like
to personally attack conservative women, especially if they're attractive.
Accepting a cheap shot, nothing less.


She's way more qualified to be president than Obama is, she's actually
run local and state government, with more success than Obama has had in his
first year.


Obama holds his line, he could be defeated by a "Snoopy" write in.

Curtis


Joe

unread,
Jan 31, 2010, 6:16:46 PM1/31/10
to
Don't disagree with a thing you said

Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick

unread,
Jan 31, 2010, 8:22:55 PM1/31/10
to

"Greg Mossman" <mos...@qnet.com> wrote in message
news:2ebccd64-4a91-41ac...@a5g2000prg.googlegroups.com...


Palin is as much Presidential material, or more, than Obama was.

She'd be in a good spot for V.P. this time around.

Like we all predicted, Obama's rube-ishness has cost him -and- us.

Monica had the Presidential material inside her.

--
--
Popeye
"If one does as God does enough times, one
will become as God is." -Dr. Hannibal Lector.

www.finalprotectivefire.com
http://picasaweb.google.com/Popeye8762

Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick

unread,
Jan 31, 2010, 8:24:18 PM1/31/10
to

"Joe" <J*e...@joe.com> wrote in message
news:4b644317$0$24812$ec3e...@news.usenetmonster.com...

> Greg Mossman wrote:
>> On Jan 29, 7:29 pm, Joe <J...@joe.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I am afraid, Greg is correct. I'd do Palin, and I like her simple talk,
>>> but I don't think she is presidential material - maybe at some point but
>>> she isn't ready yet - we already have some one in the White House that
>>> is way to green to lead this country
>>
>> I think she's as much presidential material as Monica Lewinsky was,
>> that's the only way a woman like her will get into the Oval Office.
>> And Joe, you must be color blind. Obama isn't green, he's black.
>
>
> he's not black - he's much to light-skinned to be considered black, and he
> doesn't talk with a black dialect.

Coulter: "Half-rican".

Priceless.

Greg Mossman

unread,
Feb 1, 2010, 9:45:43 AM2/1/10
to
On Jan 31, 5:22 pm, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick"
<Popeye8...@gmail.com> wrote:
> "Greg Mossman" <moss...@qnet.com> wrote in message

>
> news:2ebccd64-4a91-41ac...@a5g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On Jan 29, 7:29 pm, Joe <J...@joe.com> wrote:
>
> >> I am afraid, Greg is correct.  I'd do Palin, and I like her simple talk,
> >> but I don't think she is presidential material - maybe at some point but
> >> she isn't ready yet - we already have some one in the White House that
> >> is way to green to lead this country
>
> > I think she's as much presidential material as Monica Lewinsky was,
> > that's the only way a woman like her will get into the Oval Office.
> > And Joe, you must be color blind.  Obama isn't green, he's black.
>
>   Palin is as much Presidential material, or more, than Obama was.

Palin is dumb as a stump. Obama is highly intelligent.

If you think being dumb qualified Bush, then Palin is really qualified
under that standard. Some of us, however, believe that there's more
to being presidential material than being dumb.

But I agree with Joe: I'd do her too.

>   She'd be in a good spot for V.P. this time around.

Please do. She was great as VP last time: provided plenty of humor,
and gave us the White House even though we ran an inexperienced black
guy. Now she has her Fox News background, so she'll really be
prepared.

>   Like we all predicted, Obama's rube-ishness has cost him -and- us.

He's hardly done yet. Bush already had the country in shambles by
this time in his Presidency, then left it in shambles again before
Obama could come in to save everybody. Already, the economy has
improved immensely and we're in no more danger of immediate failing
and that's only after one year. When he's done with the other seven,
this country will look like it underwent one of those "Makeover" TV
shows.

glarbb

unread,
Feb 1, 2010, 2:40:32 PM2/1/10
to
Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick wrote:
>
> "Greg Mossman" <mos...@qnet.com> wrote in message
> news:2ebccd64-4a91-41ac...@a5g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>> On Jan 29, 7:29 pm, Joe <J...@joe.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I am afraid, Greg is correct. I'd do Palin, and I like her simple talk,
>>> but I don't think she is presidential material - maybe at some point but
>>> she isn't ready yet - we already have some one in the White House that
>>> is way to green to lead this country
>>
>> I think she's as much presidential material as Monica Lewinsky was,
>> that's the only way a woman like her will get into the Oval Office.
>> And Joe, you must be color blind. Obama isn't green, he's black.
>
>
> Palin is as much Presidential material, or more, than Obama was.
>
> She'd be in a good spot for V.P. this time around.
>
> Like we all predicted, Obama's rube-ishness has cost him -and- us.
>
> Monica had the Presidential material inside her.
>
>
>


You're a fucking idiot...a pompous, arrogant, condescending, fucking idiot.

Scott

unread,
Feb 1, 2010, 3:38:24 PM2/1/10
to
"glarbb" <gla...@gsmtail.com> wrote in message
news:hk7ane$mkt$1...@speranza.aioe.org...

> You're a fucking idiot...a pompous, arrogant, condescending, fucking
> idiot.

At least he isnt a child molester nor the very definition of coward, which
you are.

You should try and understand that sophomoric "insults" and name calling
from you is water off a duck.


glarbb

unread,
Feb 1, 2010, 4:42:23 PM2/1/10
to

OK..how about...Shut the fuck up, Pussy.
You don't have a fucking clue what you're talking about...not a fucking
clue. You too are nothing but a pompous, arrogant, condescending fucktard.

Scott

unread,
Feb 1, 2010, 5:52:18 PM2/1/10
to

"glarbb" <gla...@gsnail.kom> wrote in message
news:hk7hru$1ct$1...@speranza.aioe.org...

> OK..how about...Shut the fuck up, Pussy.

Shut me up, punk.

Anytime you squealing little bitch.

> You don't have a fucking clue what you're talking about...not a fucking
> clue. You too are nothing but a pompous, arrogant, condescending fucktard.

More compliments!

And patented liberal faggot buzzwords.

Getting a little more difficult for you to find little kids to abuse eh? At
least the ones you can get away with.

So you vent here, take out your inadequacies from a position of fortified
cowardice.

A place for you to run your foul mouth that makes you feel safe. Kinda like
all those kids did before you destroyed them.

The kharmic circle is going to slam shut on you, the only bummer is We wont
likely be able to see it happen.

We can be fairly sure your bullshit posts and cowardly attacks will stop
then, wont they?

glarbb

unread,
Feb 1, 2010, 6:34:04 PM2/1/10
to
Scott wrote:
> "glarbb" <gla...@gsnail.kom> wrote in message
> news:hk7hru$1ct$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
>
>> OK..how about...Shut the fuck up, Pussy.
>
> Shut me up, punk.
>
> Anytime you squealing little bitch.
>


Couldn't be bothered, Pussy.
I jump right over little pissants like you to get at a real man.
Dance, Pussy, dance.

Scott

unread,
Feb 1, 2010, 10:42:09 PM2/1/10
to
"glarbb" <gla...@gsnailer.kom> wrote in message
news:hk7odc$a5i$1...@speranza.aioe.org...

> Couldn't be bothered, Pussy.

Yet here you are, time and time again, nipping at Popeyes and my ankles.

Posts that have nothing to do with you, no mention of your worthless ass,
but you *must* show your ass, time after time.

> I jump right over little pissants like you to get at a real man.

What; 9, 13 or 15 years old?

> Dance, Pussy, dance.

Anytime bitch. You wanna know where I am now so you can puss out again? And
again?

You calling anyone a pussy is a feather in the cap.

Come back tomorrow when you have 4 posts to waste on your latest nym.

Joe

unread,
Feb 2, 2010, 8:26:46 PM2/2/10
to

And that is an understatement! Drum Roll, please. Let the good times roll

Dillon Pyron

unread,
Feb 4, 2010, 9:53:26 AM2/4/10
to
[Default] Thus spake Joe <J*e...@joe.com>:

>Greg Mossman wrote:

Yeah, she's not a president. She should never have resigned, she
should have run for the Senate and be happy there. Brown as a VP in 2
years? That's wishful thinkging. We've had about 40 minutes of him
as a Senator.

Right now I can't think of a good Republican candidate for 2012. It
souncs like Rick Perry wants it, but the election will have happen in
January, or some other cold day.

Greg, who do you see for 2016 on the Democrat side? Clinton is
probably out of it. Feinstein is so far left that she would lose in a
landslide. Reid?

Greg Mossman

unread,
Feb 4, 2010, 10:03:33 AM2/4/10
to
On Feb 4, 6:53 am, Dillon Pyron <invaliddmpy...@austin.rr.com> wrote:

> Greg, who do you see for 2016 on the Democrat side?  Clinton is
> probably out of it.  Feinstein is so far left that she would lose in a
> landslide.  Reid?

Clinton is definitely out of it. I think Reid is on his way out.
Let's see how Obama fares for the next couple years. If his ratings
go back up and he decides to run (and wins) 2012 with a different VP,
that VP would be the natural choice for 2016. Don't worry, it won't
be me. I already told Obama where he could put his VP position the
last time they called begging, which is why Biden eventually got the
nod.

Dillon Pyron

unread,
Feb 4, 2010, 11:05:30 AM2/4/10
to
[Default] Thus spake "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick"
<Popey...@gmail.com>:

>
>"Greg Mossman" <mos...@qnet.com> wrote in message
>news:2ebccd64-4a91-41ac...@a5g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>> On Jan 29, 7:29 pm, Joe <J...@joe.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I am afraid, Greg is correct. I'd do Palin, and I like her simple talk,
>>> but I don't think she is presidential material - maybe at some point but
>>> she isn't ready yet - we already have some one in the White House that
>>> is way to green to lead this country
>>
>> I think she's as much presidential material as Monica Lewinsky was,
>> that's the only way a woman like her will get into the Oval Office.
>> And Joe, you must be color blind. Obama isn't green, he's black.
>
>
> Palin is as much Presidential material, or more, than Obama was.

I'm afraid you're right.

>
> She'd be in a good spot for V.P. this time around.
>
> Like we all predicted, Obama's rube-ishness has cost him -and- us.

I've heard "Change, the second time around." By no less than a Boston
paper.

>
> Monica had the Presidential material inside her.

When she wore a blue dress, you could see President all over her.


"Anybody can make it look liked suicide, and expert can make it look
like an accident but a true professional makes it look like natural
causes" - some former KGB spy

I predict that Bill Clinton will catch some short but fatal disease
shortly after Hillary leaves the State Dept.

>
>
>
>--

Dillon Pyron

unread,
Feb 4, 2010, 11:09:40 AM2/4/10
to
[Default] Thus spake "Curtis" <cavey_...@yahoo.com>:

In his defense, Obama seems to have done a good job of spreading money
arounf "the community". It's what made him so popular with precinct
captains.

>
>
> Obama holds his line, he could be defeated by a "Snoopy" write in.

A couple of years ago I saw a bumper sticker "I'd vote for Bill before
I'd vote for Hill", the concept being that Bill can't be President.

We need to start a write-in campaign. I know of a nice Texan who
would be great. He's an archer, a teacher, an author, a hunter and
serves on the board of a national organization. And he's an
entertainer.

>
>Curtis

Scott

unread,
Feb 4, 2010, 1:06:56 PM2/4/10
to

"Dillon Pyron" <invalid...@austin.rr.com> wrote in message
news:43slm5drgno37almb...@4ax.com...

> We need to start a write-in campaign. I know of a nice Texan who
> would be great. He's an archer, a teacher, an author, a hunter and
> serves on the board of a national organization. And he's an
> entertainer.

Uncle Ted!


Joe

unread,
Feb 4, 2010, 6:03:45 PM2/4/10
to


So Brown is right there with a little more experience than Obama

I think Reid is done - not because of politics - I think ever incumbent
is at risk. I hate to lose my congressman, he is a personal friend.
But everybody wants to lose the incumbents - but not theirs. I think
voting every incumbent out is a nice idea - the country would be in a
big mess - but can it be any worse - not blaming Obama - I'm blaming
every elected official in Washington

Dillon Pyron

unread,
Feb 23, 2010, 2:31:23 AM2/23/10
to
[Default] Thus spake Greg Mossman <mos...@qnet.com>:

>On Feb 4, 6:53�am, Dillon Pyron <invaliddmpy...@austin.rr.com> wrote:
>
>> Greg, who do you see for 2016 on the Democrat side? �Clinton is
>> probably out of it. �Feinstein is so far left that she would lose in a
>> landslide. �Reid?
>
>Clinton is definitely out of it. I think Reid is on his way out.

Well, it now appears that Reid may have real trouble keeping his seat.

>Let's see how Obama fares for the next couple years. If his ratings
>go back up and he decides to run (and wins) 2012 with a different VP,
>that VP would be the natural choice for 2016. Don't worry, it won't
>be me. I already told Obama where he could put his VP position the
>last time they called begging, which is why Biden eventually got the
>nod.

Unless Joe says he wants out in some sort of statesman like fashion,
he'll be running with Obama. Obama would be crucified in a heartbeat
for dumping him. People wouldn't vote against him, they just wouldn't
vote.

Scott

unread,
Feb 23, 2010, 2:21:46 PM2/23/10
to

"Dillon Pyron" <invalid...@austin.rr.com> wrote in message
news:rt07o5tp0tbn4g9mt...@4ax.com...

While suturing up a cut on the hand of a 75 year old rancher, whose hand had
been caught in the gate whileworking his cattle, the doctor struck up a
conversation with the oldman. Eventually the topic got around to Obama, and
his being ourpresident. The old rancher said, "Well, ya know, Obama is just
a Post Turtle."

Now ...not being familiar with the term, the doctor asked, What's a "Post
Turtle?"The old rancher said, "When you're driving down a country road and
you come across a fence post with a turtle balanced on top, that's a post
turtle."

The old rancher saw the puzzled look on the doctor's face so he continued to
explain. "You know he didn't get up there by himself, he doesn't belong up
there, he doesn't know what to do while he's up there, he sure as heck ain't
goin' anywhere, and you just wonder what kind of dumb ass put him up there
in the first place."


0 new messages