> On 2012-07-12 11:49 , bullshark wrote:
>> It appears that a couple of guys have bought the remains of Uemis
>> with plans to get it back into production.
> Why did it go bankrupt?
Bad management. Same reason every company goes broke. Great looking computer. I was close to getting one but ended up getting a Mares Icon once Uemis went belly up.
> On Jul 12, 11:49 am, bullshark <bullsh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> It appears that a couple of guys have bought the remains of Uemis with plans to get it back into production.
On Jul 17, 9:42 pm, Alan Browne <alan.bro...@FreelunchVideotron.ca>
wrote:
> On 2012-07-17 20:28 , -hh wrote:
> > On Jul 12, 11:49 am, bullshark <bullsh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> It appears that a couple of guys have bought the remains of Uemis with plans to get it back into production.
> > Any idea of the anticipated retail price? It didn't jump out at me on
> > their website.
> ... if you have to ask the price ...
...its to figure out if it is a reasonable value. <g>
There's some features on it that I like, but they're not particularly
critical to the type of diving I most typically do, so its more of a
case of 'want' rather than 'need'. Mostly, I'm seeking if this is
expected to be competing at around the $500 device level, at the a $1K
device level, more, less, etc.
> On Jul 17, 9:42 pm, Alan Browne <alan.bro...@FreelunchVideotron.ca>
> wrote:
>> On 2012-07-17 20:28 , -hh wrote:
>>> On Jul 12, 11:49 am, bullshark <bullsh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> It appears that a couple of guys have bought the remains of Uemis with plans to get it back into production.
>>> Any idea of the anticipated retail price? It didn't jump out at me on
>>> their website.
>> ... if you have to ask the price ...
> ...its to figure out if it is a reasonable value. <g>
> There's some features on it that I like, but they're not particularly
> critical to the type of diving I most typically do, so its more of a
> case of 'want' rather than 'need'. Mostly, I'm seeking if this is
> expected to be competing at around the $500 device level, at the a $1K
> device level, more, less, etc.
I was just being tongue in cheek. But I suspect it's quite pricy. It looks (from the website) to be very advanced. But as you say the tool has to be right for the work. This seems very Buck Rogersish but it may have the elements that some divers need and a lot more 'want'.
-- "Civilization is the limitless multiplication of unnecessary necessities."
-Samuel Clemens.
