Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

FLASH - ObaMao Diaganosed with Terminal Disease

0 views
Skip to first unread message

saltyfi...@gmail.com

unread,
Aug 30, 2008, 9:56:34 PM8/30/08
to
Naïve, foolish, ignorant of facts, unrealistically idealistic,
dreamers,
willfully in denial or deceptive. They hail from the ranks of the
chronically unhappy, the anarchists, the aspiring revolutionaries,
the
neurotics who are at war with life, the disaffected alienated from
government, corporations, and just about any and all institutions of
society.

Derives satisfaction from being anti-establishment. He finds perverse
gratification in aiding the forces that aim to dismantle an existing
order,
whatever it may be: an order he neither approves of nor he feels he
belongs
to.

He is conflicted and dishonest. He fails to look inside himself and
discover
the causes of his own problems and unhappiness while he readily
enlists
himself in causes that validate his distorted perception.

He is a master practitioner of scapegoating. He assigns blame to
others
while absolving himself of responsibility, has a long handy list of
candidates for blaming anything and everything, and by living a
distorted
life, he contributes to the ills of society.

He may even engage in willful misinformation and deception when it
suits
him.

The disease is http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=23947

RHF

unread,
Aug 31, 2008, 6:34:28 AM8/31/08
to

- The disease is : LIBERALISM
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=23947

Liberalism Is a Mental Disorder -by- Michael Savage
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberalism_Is_a_Mental_Disorder
.

Dave

unread,
Aug 31, 2008, 9:47:00 AM8/31/08
to
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 03:34:28 -0700, RHF wrote:

> - The disease is : LIBERALISM
> http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=23947
>
> Liberalism Is a Mental Disorder -by- Michael Savage
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberalism_Is_a_Mental_Disorder
> .

To demonise liberalism is to demonise the founding of the USA.
Liberalism is at the root of Americanism. Mike Weiner is a despicable
hate-monger.

saltyfi...@gmail.com

unread,
Aug 31, 2008, 4:33:35 PM8/31/08
to

President Ronald Reagan said he believed that "the very heart and soul
of conservatism is libertarianism."

Once again Dr. DaviD - PhD (Piled higher & Deeper) eschews historical
facts and injects the Neo-Communist propaganda lie.
The Liberalism equated with the founders of the U.S. is the farthest
from the reality behind the high-jacking of the term Liberalism by Neo-
Communists.

The correct term to describe Dr. DaviD - PhD is Liberal Socialist or
Neo-Liberal or Liberal Fascist. It does away with everything the
founders represent and injects the Neo-Communist philosophy under the
guise of Liberalism. Communists will always high-jack any cause which
will attract the largest gullable participants.

The term of modern Liberalism and the ilk of its followers is indeed
deserving of the distain heaped upon the term.

Read your history and know your facts to avoid the ills of the
Dr.DaviD - PhD disease!

bw

unread,
Aug 31, 2008, 6:25:43 PM8/31/08
to

"Dave" <j...@somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:ceGdnSoGS6lJPSfV...@earthlink.com...

In that historical era, the term liberalism meant liberty from monarchical
fascism.
Today, the term liberalism is the equivalent of social fascism.


RHF

unread,
Aug 31, 2008, 8:05:30 PM8/31/08
to
On Aug 31, 6:47 am, Dave <j...@somewhere.com> wrote:
- On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 03:34:28 -0700, RHF wrote:

FLASH - ObaMao Diaganosed with Terminal Disease :
One World Liberal Elitist Socialism (OWLES)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23GCSZEB-8g

Beware the OWLES -cause- They Are Elitist
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_elite
http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Limousine-liberal
The OWLES = One World Liberal Elitists Socialists
* The Problem with the OWLES is not that they are One Worlders.
* The Problem with the OWLES is not that they are Liberals.
* The Problem with the OWLES is not that they are Socialists.
* The Problem With The OWLES 'is' That They Are ELITISTS [.]

Barack Hussein Obama II is a Fine Example of a typical
OWLES "Liberal-Elitist" Thinking concerning 'the masses'
that they alone have been Chosen to Lead . . . Because Only
"They" {Elitist Liberals} Are The Enlightened Ones Anointed
To Lead the {Brainless} Masses Onward to Glory and a Better
Tomorrow for Everyone under Their Anointed Leardership.

Comrade Barack Hussein Obama II : Arrogant Elitist Socialist :
US Job Destroyer and National Economy Wrecker
http://raymondpronk.wordpress.com/2008/06/25/comrade-barack-obama-arrogant-elitist-socialist-us-job-destroyer-and-economy-wrecker/

Barack Hussein Obama II : Obamaism : Elitist Socialist Agenda
http://www.babalublog.com/archives/008016.html
http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/11/photoshop-of-the-week-typical-liberal-snob/

Praise Be Obama
http://michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/snob.jpg

Obama in another Life and another Time
http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/45a/648b.png

The Great Obama
http://michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/barackcaesar.jpg
- - - The disease is : LIBERALISM
- - - http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=23947

- - Liberalism Is a Mental Disorder -by- Michael Savage
- - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberalism_Is_a_Mental_Disorder
- - .

- To demonise liberalism is to demonise the founding
- of the USA.
-
- Liberalism is at the root of Americanism.
-
- Mike Weiner is a despicable hate-monger.

Americanism "God & County" {Inalienable Individual Liberty}
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inalienable_rights
is the Root of America -versus- Englandism "King & Country"
{Subjugation to the Monarchy and the Rule of Men}.
http://www.answers.com/subjugation&r=67
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monarchy
.

Dave

unread,
Aug 31, 2008, 8:10:27 PM8/31/08
to

How so? Name a real liberal. It wasn't just the Crown; it was the
Church and the Aristocracy as well.

bw

unread,
Aug 31, 2008, 9:52:32 PM8/31/08
to

"Dave" <j...@somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:yuKdnaKwIoNurybV...@earthlink.com...

Obviously it changes. Democritus? Marcus Aurelius?
de Tocqueville? Hegel?? Mill??
Woodrow Wilson?
Today, just about anyone in a western society who can fabricate a cogent
paragraph is more liberal than the equivalent person of 1908.


m II

unread,
Sep 1, 2008, 2:04:43 AM9/1/08
to


The communists seem to disagree with you.

http://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/works/1944/1944-fas.htm

mike

-
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __
/ /\ / /\ / /\ / /\ / /\ / /\ / /\ / /
/ /\ \ /'Think Tanks Cleaned Cheap'/ /\ \/ /
/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/

Densa International©
For the OTHER two percent.

Due to the insane amount of spam and garbage,
I block all postings with a Gmail, Google Mail,
Google Groups or HOTMAIL address.
I also filter everything from a .cn server.


For solutions which may work for you, please check:
http://improve-usenet.org/

m II

unread,
Sep 1, 2008, 2:20:01 AM9/1/08
to
bw wrote:

> Today, just about anyone in a western society who can fabricate a cogent
> paragraph is more liberal than the equivalent person of 1908.

If literacy implies Liberalism, what exactly does illiteracy imply? And
why are they in the White House?


mike

--

RHF

unread,
Sep 1, 2008, 6:39:45 AM9/1/08
to
On Aug 31, 11:04 pm, m II <C...@in.the.hat> wrote:
> bw wrote:
> > "Dave" <j...@somewhere.com> wrote in message
> >news:ceGdnSoGS6lJPSfV...@earthlink.com...
> >> On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 03:34:28 -0700, RHF wrote:
> >> To demonise liberalism is to demonise the founding of the USA.
> >> Liberalism is at the root of Americanism.  Mike Weiner is a despicable
> >> hate-monger.
>
> > In that historical era, the term liberalism meant liberty from monarchical
> > fascism.
> > Today, the term liberalism is the equivalent of social fascism.
>
> The communists seem to disagree with you.
>
> http://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/works/1944/1944-fas.htm
>
> mike
>

Stand-Up like a Liberal and Blame Someone Else
.

saltyfi...@gmail.com

unread,
Sep 1, 2008, 10:30:35 AM9/1/08
to
On Aug 31, 8:52 pm, "bw" <bweg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Dave" <j...@somewhere.com> wrote in message
>
> news:yuKdnaKwIoNurybV...@earthlink.com...
>
> > On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 17:25:43 -0500, bw wrote:
>
> >> "Dave" <j...@somewhere.com> wrote in message
> >>news:ceGdnSoGS6lJPSfV...@earthlink.com...
> >>> On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 03:34:28 -0700, RHF wrote: To demonise liberalism
> >>> is to demonise the founding of the USA. Liberalism is at the root of
> >>> Americanism.  Mike Weiner is a despicable hate-monger.
>
> >> In that historical era, the term liberalism meant liberty from
> >> monarchical fascism.
> >> Today, the term liberalism is the equivalent of social fascism.
>
> > How so?  Name a real liberal.  It wasn't just the Crown;  it was the
> > Church and the Aristocracy as well.
>
> Obviously it changes. Democritus? Marcus Aurelius?
> de Tocqueville? Hegel?? Mill??
> Woodrow Wilson?
> Today, just about anyone in a western society who can fabricate a cogent
> paragraph is more liberal than the equivalent person of 1908.

Woodrow Wilson was the first Liberal Fascist of Communist-Socialist
decent.

Read the history book which documents Liberal Fascism.
Listen to an interview with the author here:
http://www.reason.com/blog/show/124122.html

cuh...@webtv.net

unread,
Sep 1, 2008, 11:25:36 AM9/1/08
to
Better yet,,, watch Tom & Jerry on the cartoon channel.
cuhulin

0 new messages