Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

OT- Could see it coming

1 view
Skip to first unread message

BCBlazysusan

unread,
Mar 2, 2009, 3:47:14 AM3/2/09
to
I can't say I am surprised. Every senator and congressman should be
labeled "traitor" and anyone in cahoots should be brought before the
people of the USA and judged IMO.
I wonder how Hillary felt as the person from China signed this.

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=0f8_1235673139&comment_order=newest_first

If this is genuine and on the up and up, I feel this country has
reached the point of no return. Why have I not heard about this on my
local news or any other news outlet? "Yes We Can" - - I guess this was
the "Change" we were all told about.

Brenda Ann

unread,
Mar 2, 2009, 5:27:38 AM3/2/09
to

"BCBlazysusan" <gk...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:4d6b61c1-0594-41b9...@x38g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...

Hal Turner is a class A, grade number one whack job with a lifetime supply
of tinfoil hats.

No part of the government has the power to make such a concession.


Mike

unread,
Mar 2, 2009, 7:20:02 AM3/2/09
to


The fact that you re-post Hal Turner gossip is all anyone needs to
know about your brand of Christianity.

dxAce

unread,
Mar 2, 2009, 7:35:33 AM3/2/09
to

Please, inform us of the PhDufus brand of Christianity.


dave

unread,
Mar 2, 2009, 8:34:25 AM3/2/09
to
BCBlazysusan wrote:

>
> http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=0f8_1235673139&comment_order=newest_first
>
> If this is genuine and on the up and up, I feel this country has
> reached the point of no return. Why have I not heard about this on my
> local news or any other news outlet? "Yes We Can" - - I guess this was
> the "Change" we were all told about.

You must be joking. This is not genuine.

Mike

unread,
Mar 2, 2009, 10:00:55 AM3/2/09
to
On Mar 2, 8:34 am, dave <d...@dave.dave> wrote:

>
> You must be joking.  This is not genuine.

Of course it's not genuine. The original source was the infamous Hal
"Kill the Mud People" Turner, former rascist broadcaster on WBCQ...

cuh...@webtv.net

unread,
Mar 2, 2009, 12:37:31 PM3/2/09
to
Retired Major General Carroll D.Childers said as soon as Obama stepped
up to be inaugurated, he should have been arrested and deported.

Retired Major General Carroll D.Childers is Right.
cuhulin

Mike

unread,
Mar 2, 2009, 1:29:48 PM3/2/09
to

And did the Retired Major General suggest what charges Obama should be
arrested for? We do require there to be a reason to arrest and deport
someone, don't we?

Personally, I think Retired Major General Childers is a crackpot.

BDK

unread,
Mar 2, 2009, 1:52:23 PM3/2/09
to
In article <c85da9fd-d811-473f-aca2-
9c0b47...@d36g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, mwbr...@aol.com says...

He's another of the Obama birth certificate kooks, along with several
others in this group. What is making these people so insane?
--
BDK

BDK Klan leader?
kOOk Magnet!
NJJ CLUB #1
Shillmaster

dxAce

unread,
Mar 2, 2009, 2:03:28 PM3/2/09
to

Michael W. Bryant, the dufus who once claimed to have a PhD, wrote:

Personally, I think you're a crackpot who once lied about having a PhD.


Message has been deleted

dave

unread,
Mar 2, 2009, 4:46:36 PM3/2/09
to

That is the height of irresponsibility. The CIC must have unquestioned
credibility with the fighting forces. Anyone who spreads rumors that
question the President's legitimacy is undermining national security.
When a retired general adds to the doubt it is very very serious.

dave

unread,
Mar 2, 2009, 4:47:29 PM3/2/09
to

They have skin issues.

Brenda Ann

unread,
Mar 2, 2009, 6:27:53 PM3/2/09
to

"dave" <da...@dave.dave> wrote in message
news:49ac53be$0$31170$bd46...@news.dslextreme.com...

It seems that the extreme right has a new "Sedition/Treason of the Day"
policy. Though many on the far left didn't like Bush, and hoped fervently
for his impeachment and questioned the legitimacy of his presidency, none
that I know of ever actively sought his death or a violent overthrow of
elected government as some of the worst extreme right loons are doing now.

That general should mind carefully what he says about the CIC, by the way.
I believe that the UCMJ does allow for recommissioning to court martial....
I welcome any possible correction to this belief, but I have seen them bring
NCO's back in just to court martial them for serious enough crimes.


Telamon

unread,
Mar 2, 2009, 8:46:01 PM3/2/09
to
In article
<4d6b61c1-0594-41b9...@x38g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>,
BCBlazysusan <gk...@earthlink.net> wrote:

The Chinese have been buying Federal reserve debt. That ugly hag Hillary
was just over there trying to get them to buy more so it is technically
correct. This is how the trade balance has been maintained between China
and the USA since we helped make them the huge manufacturing concern
they are today. Basically the Chinese own us right now. It could have
been worse, it could have been India.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

~ RHF

unread,
Mar 2, 2009, 8:54:36 PM3/2/09
to
On Mar 2, 1:46 pm, dave <d...@dave.dave> wrote:

> cuhu...@webtv.net wrote:
> > Retired Major General Carroll D.Childers said as soon as Obama stepped
> > up to be inaugurated, he should have been arrested and deported.
>
> > Retired Major General Carroll D.Childers is Right.
> > cuhulin

- That is the height of irresponsibility.

Dave -proclaims- - That Is The Height Of Irresponsibility. {ROTFL}

Relax Dave - Just Substitute "Bush" for 'Obama'
and You Can Go Back To Screaming It From
The Nearest Minaret.

Hello Liberals - Pay-Back is a B-I-T-C-H !
blame obama, Blame Obama. BLAME OBAMA !
- - - It's the 'Blame Game . . .

- The CIC must have unquestioned credibility with the fighting
forces.

-  Anyone who spreads rumors that question the President's legitimacy
is undermining national security.

Dave -proclaims- Anyone Who Spreads Rumors
That Question The President's Legitimacy Is
Undermining National Security.

Ah Dave -so- Now You Admit That You Were
"Undermining National Security" from 2001 to
2009 During The George 'W' Bush Presidency !

- When a retired general adds to the doubt it is very very serious.
.
.

cuh...@webtv.net

unread,
Mar 2, 2009, 9:15:37 PM3/2/09
to
I remember watching it live (or it might have been recently taped and
put on tv way back then) on tv, Nixon standing on top of that big wall
in China, I watched it on my tv set.Was Nixon the one who opened up
China to America?
cuhulin

cuh...@webtv.net

unread,
Mar 2, 2009, 9:10:23 PM3/2/09
to
On the web,
airpower.au.af.mil Keskel
cuhulin

BDK

unread,
Mar 2, 2009, 9:34:28 PM3/2/09
to
In article <49ac53f2$0$31170$bd46...@news.dslextreme.com>,
da...@dave.dave says...

Well yeah, I suppose their bigotry overrides any sanity they might have
left.

Now watch them start tap dancing and deny it's why they buy into the BC
insanity..

cuh...@webtv.net

unread,
Mar 2, 2009, 9:21:52 PM3/2/09
to
My brother in law is a Retired Air Force Colonel.
He isn't the type of person to talk much about politics.He also worked
at the Pentagon back in the 1980s.
I feel sure he questions Obama's eligibility.
cuhulin

Telamon

unread,
Mar 2, 2009, 9:41:19 PM3/2/09
to
In article <MPG.2416613c9...@news.buckeye-express.com>,
BDK <TopS...@sanity.com> wrote:

You are an authority on sanity! Now that's a keeper Kookaburra.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

~ RHF

unread,
Mar 2, 2009, 10:19:31 PM3/2/09
to
On Mar 2, 4:20 am, Mike <mwbry...@aol.com> wrote:
> On Mar 2, 3:47 am, BCBlazysusan <gk...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> > I can't say I am surprised. Every senator and congressman should be
> > labeled "traitor" and anyone in cahoots should be brought before the
> > people of the USA and judged IMO.
> > I wonder how Hillary felt as the person from China signed this.
>
> >http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=0f8_1235673139&comment_order=newest_first
>
> > If this is genuine and on the up and up, I feel this country has
> > reached the point of no return. Why have I not heard about this on my
> > local news or any other news outlet? "Yes We Can" - - I guess this was
> > the "Change" we were all told about.
>
- The fact that you re-post Hal Turner gossip
- is all anyone needs to know about your brand
- of Christianity.

MWB - Glad to see that you are exercising such
'restraint' in your Replies to all these Off-Topic Posts.

but it is good to swing at a few gophers
once a week - just for the fun of it ~ RHF
{ aka - NewsGroup Golf }
.
.

cuh...@webtv.net

unread,
Mar 2, 2009, 10:39:51 PM3/2/09
to
Barack Obama T-Q-F-U
www.jtf.org/news.php
cuhulin

BDK

unread,
Mar 3, 2009, 3:56:37 AM3/3/09
to
In article <telamon_spamshield-81D0F8.18411902032009
@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com>,
telamon_s...@pacbell.net.is.invalid says...


I'm certainly more of an authority than you, Telemundo.

Burr

unread,
Mar 3, 2009, 7:05:24 AM3/3/09
to

"Telamon"

>
> You are an authority on sanity! Now that's a keeper Kookaburra.
>
> --
> Telamon
> Ventura, California

You're still an ass hole

Burr


dave

unread,
Mar 3, 2009, 8:36:46 AM3/3/09
to
~ RHF wrote:
>
> Ah Dave -so- Now You Admit That You Were
> "Undermining National Security" from 2001 to
> 2009 During The George 'W' Bush Presidency !
>
> - When a retired general adds to the doubt it is very very serious.
> .

I have no power to influence anyone, unlike a retired Major General.

cuh...@webtv.net

unread,
Mar 3, 2009, 11:45:03 AM3/3/09
to
When do the Bikini Judging contests get started over in Ventura? Can I
get in on that?
cuhulin, the Bikini

cuh...@webtv.net

unread,
Mar 3, 2009, 3:10:50 PM3/3/09
to

~ RHF

unread,
Mar 3, 2009, 6:22:41 PM3/3/09
to

- the President's legitimacy is undermining
- national security.

Dave -proclaims- Anyone Who Spreads Rumors
That Question The President's Legitimacy Is
Undermining National Security.

Ah Dave -so- Now You Admit That You Were
"Undermining National Security" from 2001 to
2009 During The George 'W' Bush Presidency !

-or- Is this 'rule' only good In the Age of Obama-R-Us© ?
.
.

Burr

unread,
Mar 3, 2009, 8:06:27 PM3/3/09
to

"~ RHF"

- Anyone who spreads rumors that question
- the President's legitimacy is undermining
- national security.

Dave -proclaims- Anyone Who Spreads Rumors
That Question The President's Legitimacy Is
Undermining National Security.

Ah Dave -so- Now You Admit That You Were
"Undermining National Security" from 2001 to
2009 During The George 'W' Bush Presidency !

-or- Is this 'rule' only good In the Age of Obama-R-Us© ?
.

Roy,
I didn't spread rumors. I voted for Bush because "In my Opinion" he
was the best choose.
I didn't like what he did and I wrote him and told him that (I don't think
he cared what I thought).
I didn't voted for Obama and I don't care for what he is doing and I hope
things "Change at about six months!!!!

This is America and we are free to do and say what we want as long as we
don't hurt others!

I think if you say/make a statement then it needs to be right! If you
say "I Think" then that's just what it is, an opinion. If you ask a question
then it's a question but I think at times it plants a seed in the mind of
the reader.

In my post to or about Telamon I said I think or I asked a question, I
was playing with words. I don't care what he says or thinks, if he runs his
mouth at me then I do the same. Same with Mike and I went out of my way to
be friends with him for years after all the mess and he still came back her
and started runing his mouth about me and my wife.

So yes, we have the right under law to ask questions of anyone and for
sure the President.

Burr
.


~ RHF

unread,
Mar 3, 2009, 8:12:55 PM3/3/09
to

Burr,

Dave just represents a classic example of a
two faced Liberal who spent 8-Years of constantly
Blaming President Bush; and now Whines when
someone in return Blames President Obama. ~ RHF
.

Telamon

unread,
Mar 3, 2009, 8:30:44 PM3/3/09
to
In article <n-idna0mBdabgDDU...@iwvisp.com>,
"Burr" <pit...@iwvisp.com> wrote:

> "Telamon"
> >
> > You are an authority on sanity! Now that's a keeper Kookaburra.
> >

> You're still an ass hole

Get lost you piece of human trash.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Telamon

unread,
Mar 3, 2009, 8:30:02 PM3/3/09
to
In article <MPG.2416bacc9...@news.buckeye-express.com>,
BDK <TopS...@sanity.com> wrote:

Only in your reality disconnected mind Kookaburra.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Burr

unread,
Mar 3, 2009, 8:48:57 PM3/3/09
to

"~ RHF"

Burr,

Dave just represents a classic example of a
two faced Liberal who spent 8-Years of constantly
Blaming President Bush; and now Whines when
someone in return Blames President Obama. ~ RHF
.

Roy "IF" he voted then he has a right to say anything he wants to say about
Obama or Bush or you and me as long as he says it is his "Opinion".

That's why we are a democracy. I live right now where they have killed about
400 reporters in the last four years.

Burr


cuh...@webtv.net

unread,
Mar 3, 2009, 8:44:24 PM3/3/09
to
UPDATE! 101 total plaintiffs, 9 of them are active, 3 in Iraq, numerous
in active recall

www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=257749
cuhulin

Bushcraftgregg

unread,
Mar 3, 2009, 9:57:54 PM3/3/09
to
On Mar 2, 5:27 am, "Brenda Ann" <bren...@shinbiro.com> wrote:

> Hal Turner is a class A, grade number one whack job with a lifetime supply
> of tinfoil hats.

Indeed he is. I remember listening to him the first month I owned a
shortwave.
>
> No part of the government has the power to make such a concession.

That is what I would have thought, but they DO - do things secretively
at times. They will include terrible things IMO into bills but have
them somewhat cloaked. I just wish "normal" people could be in charge
but I also think that once they got in there and they started glad
handing and pushing palms with the lobbyist, they would turn the same
way. It is all about money, when you rip down the veils and really
look at how bills get passed it is ALWAYS because someone is pocketing
some money or favors. I wished there was a better way, but greed would
get into any form of government IMO unless there were actually honest
people in there.


Burr

unread,
Mar 3, 2009, 10:03:27 PM3/3/09
to

"Bushcraftgregg" <gk...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:3e719e23-a8d5-4489...@a39g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...

I agree

Burr


Bushcraftgregg

unread,
Mar 3, 2009, 10:26:16 PM3/3/09
to
On Mar 2, 7:20 am, Mike <mwbry...@aol.com> wrote:
> On Mar 2, 3:47 am, BCBlazysusan <gk...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> > I can't say I am surprised. Every senator and congressman should be
> > labeled "traitor" and anyone in cahoots should be brought before the
> > people of the USA and judged IMO.
> > I wonder how Hillary felt as the person from China signed this.
>
> >http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=0f8_1235673139&comment_order=newest_first
>
> > If this is genuine and on the up and up, I feel this country has
> > reached the point of no return. Why have I not heard about this on my
> > local news or any other news outlet? "Yes We Can" - - I guess this was
> > the "Change" we were all told about.
>
> The fact that you re-post Hal Turner gossip is all anyone needs to
> know about your brand of Christianity.

What the heck does Christianity have to do with anything? See Mike,
that is why I don't think much of you, you take words from someone and
turn it around. You talk to people in "confidence" and then break that
confidence and spew it into the newsgroup. You are the worst type of
person on usenet IMO. Mike, just leave me alone, OK? Just don't
respond to me anymore because when I post something in here or
respond, (other than now) I am not talking to you and it has nothing
to do with you.

Just go away please, I am trying to be somewhat nice about it.

Bushcraftgregg

unread,
Mar 3, 2009, 10:34:13 PM3/3/09
to
On Mar 2, 7:35 am, dxAce <dx...@milestones.com> wrote:

> Michael W. Bryant, the dufus who once claimed to have a PhD, wrote:
>
> > On Mar 2, 3:47 am, BCBlazysusan <gk...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> > > I can't say I am surprised. Every senator and congressman should be
> > > labeled "traitor" and anyone in cahoots should be brought before the
> > > people of the USA and judged IMO.
> > > I wonder how Hillary felt as the person from China signed this.
>
> > >http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=0f8_1235673139&comment_order=newest_first
>
> > > If this is genuine and on the up and up, I feel this country has
> > > reached the point of no return. Why have I not heard about this on my
> > > local news or any other news outlet? "Yes We Can" - - I guess this was
> > > the "Change" we were all told about.
>
> > The fact that you re-post Hal Turner gossip is all anyone needs to
> > know about your brand of Christianity.
>
> Please, inform us of the PhDufus brand of Christianity.

Don't reply to him Steve, it is just a waste of your time. He
literally "gets off" from yanking people and starting trouble on
usenet. I may have to speak to you back channel if he keeps harassing
me by continuing to respond to my posts, I'm trying to play nice but I
have a feeling he is just going to continue.

Bushcraftgregg

unread,
Mar 3, 2009, 10:47:41 PM3/3/09
to
On Mar 2, 8:46 pm, Telamon <telamon_spamshi...@pacbell.net.is.invalid>
wrote:
> In article
> <4d6b61c1-0594-41b9-b5f5-b56bd151d...@x38g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>,

I feel Telamon that the truth lies somewhere in the middle. I know she
was over there, it was all over the news. I know we have actually
"sold out" to China so too speak and if I day ever comes that they
"call in their markers".....it isn't going to be pretty.

IMO every person in Congress and Senate have played a part in
basically handing either a part of our country to....or putting the US
in an extremely precarious situation. Actually I wouldn't be surprised
(like I said earlier) if it didn't actually happen or something
somewhat similar happened and it could be cloaked by using a different
phrase.

Bushcraftgregg

unread,
Mar 3, 2009, 11:01:27 PM3/3/09
to

As far as I remember he was the first president to actually physically
go to China. It opened the floodgates. I really feel that was the
first major blunder that our president/government allowed to happen,
at least in my lifetime. Again, it all comes back to greed, if they
didn't have people in China working at slave wages to profit the CEO's
etc. over in this coutry it never would have happened. I think it says
something in the bible about greed and money. ;-)

BDK

unread,
Mar 4, 2009, 3:27:02 AM3/4/09
to
In article <telamon_spamshield-B5B904.17300203032009


That's a really good one coming from you, Telemundo? So what other
kooktardery have you swallowed lately?

dave

unread,
Mar 4, 2009, 8:33:40 AM3/4/09
to
That is your preconceived notion. The only thing I like about Obama
(the president) is that he is leaning in the direction of prosecuting
the Bush Crime Family for criminal acts committed during the years
2001-2009. I think these bailouts and stimuli are not nearly radical
enough.

dave

unread,
Mar 4, 2009, 8:35:30 AM3/4/09
to

Blood in the streets by summer.

dave

unread,
Mar 4, 2009, 8:37:19 AM3/4/09
to

I voted for Barack Obama in the California Primary, as Ron Paul was not
available to Independents. I voted for Cynthia McKinney (Green) in the
November 4 General.

Mike

unread,
Mar 4, 2009, 9:14:46 AM3/4/09
to
On Mar 3, 8:06 pm, "Burr" <pitz...@iwvisp.com> wrote:

>
>     In my post to or about Telamon I said I think or I asked a question, I
> was playing with words. I don't care what he says or thinks, if he runs his
> mouth at me then I do the same. Same with Mike and I went out of my way to
> be friends with him for years after all the mess and he still came back her
> and started runing his mouth about me and my wife.
>

Burr,

1. Please produce the post where I came back and started "runing" my
mouth about you.

2. You attacked first, dude. I think you got ramped up defending your
"cuzz" from Michigan. You started attacking me out of nowhere, and
pretty viciously.

3. I have never said anything about your wife. The closest I may have
come was suggesting that you must be bored in the Philippines to play
all the stupid games you do with Telamon.

Burr, you live in a fog. You're not really a bad guy, but sometimes
you seem to come across with far less credibility and common sense
than even Cuhulin. Simple deal: Leave me alone, I'll be happy to leave
you alone.

Good luck w/ your health,

Mike

Mike

unread,
Mar 4, 2009, 9:24:20 AM3/4/09
to
On Mar 3, 10:34 pm, Bushcraftgregg <gk...@earthlink.net> wrote:

>
> Don't reply to him Steve, it is just a waste of your time. He
> literally "gets off" from yanking people and starting trouble on
> usenet. I may have to speak to you back channel if he keeps harassing
> me by continuing to respond to my posts, I'm trying to play nice but I
> have a feeling he is just going to continue

Right, I'm a big troublemaker, but Steve Lare is a really nice guy
being viciously attacked by liberals, right? Hell, you probably
believe in green leprechauns, also...

Mike

unread,
Mar 4, 2009, 9:25:16 AM3/4/09
to
On Mar 3, 10:26 pm, Bushcraftgregg <gk...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> > The fact that you re-post Hal Turner gossip is all anyone needs to
> > know about your brand of Christianity.
>
> What the heck does Christianity have to do with anything? See Mike,
> that is why I don't think much of you, you take words from someone and
> turn it around. You talk to people in "confidence" and then break that
> confidence and spew it into the newsgroup. You are the worst type of
> person on usenet IMO. Mike, just leave me alone, OK? Just don't
> respond to me anymore because when I post something in here or
> respond, (other than now) I am not talking to you and it has nothing
> to do with you.
>
> Just go away please, I am trying to be somewhat nice about it

You've spoke about your religious beliefs in open posts in the
newsgroup. There has been no private communication between you and I,
so there has been no breaking of any confidence. And since you are
making posts in a public newsgroup, you don't get to prohibit people
from responding to you.

Why are you spreading the words of a devout racist? Is that what
Christians of your ilk do? Are you saying that you never heard of Hal
Turner?

You have never been very nice about anything. And I think you give us
all an excellent sign of your inner stability when you use multiple
screennames to post in the same thread.

Please stop making your ridiculous off-topic posts. Do you still
listen to shortwave?

Mike

Mike

unread,
Mar 4, 2009, 9:27:33 AM3/4/09
to
On Mar 3, 11:01 pm, Bushcraftgregg <gk...@earthlink.net> wrote:

>
> As far as I remember he was the first president to actually physically
> go to China. It opened the floodgates. I really feel that was the
> first major blunder that our president/government allowed to happen,
> at least in my lifetime. Again, it all comes back to greed, if they
> didn't have people in China working at slave wages to profit the CEO's
> etc. over in this coutry it never would have happened. I think it says
> something in the bible about greed and money. ;-)

It also says something in the Bible about false prophets. Opening up
China to the West was Nixon's greatest accomplishment. Even most
conservatives believe that.

~ RHF

unread,
Mar 4, 2009, 10:09:29 AM3/4/09
to
On Mar 4, 6:24 am, Mike <mwbry...@aol.com> wrote:
> On Mar 3, 10:34 pm, Bushcraftgregg <gk...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Don't reply to him Steve, it is just a waste of your time. He
> > literally "gets off" from yanking people and starting trouble on
> > usenet. I may have to speak to you back channel if he keeps harassing
> > me by continuing to respond to my posts, I'm trying to play nice but I
> > have a feeling he is just going to continue
>
- Right, I'm a big troublemaker,

MWB - Only if'n You Want To !

- but Steve Lare is a really nice guy
- being viciously attacked by liberals, right?

O M G - Beware the Attack of the Vicious Liberals
from inner-socialist-space filled with the spirit of
once great euro-land.

- Hell, you probably believe in green leprechauns, also...

Yeah dem dar Green Leprechauns is from the
Planet Shamrock -ps- It's an All Green HELL.

just for the fun of it ~ RHF
.
NASA JPL - Asteroid DD45's Passing Earth
Was A Cosmic Near-Miss of just 48.8K Miles
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iMRlXoAOKgOWrgy2Iux54E-dmD8QD96N7ASO0

Mike

unread,
Mar 4, 2009, 12:25:41 PM3/4/09
to
> Was A Cosmic Near-Miss of just 48.8K Mileshttp://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iMRlXoAOKgOWrgy2Iux...

RHF,

It's getting harder and harder to believe that you don't get drunk
before posting. Your posts probably make a lot more sense to you than
they do to anyone else.

Mike

dxAce

unread,
Mar 4, 2009, 2:05:28 PM3/4/09
to

Michael W. Bryant, the dufus who once claimed to have a PhD, wrote:

Heck, you believed (or tried to make US believe) that you had a PhD.

LMFAO

dxAce
Michigan
USA

And, as always, don't let your children attend Louisville Technical Institute.
They've hired at least one dufus who once claimed to have a PhD, and who knows,
there may be more.

Burr

unread,
Mar 4, 2009, 6:15:26 PM3/4/09
to

"dave" <da...@dave.dave> wrote in message
news:OMqdnbGTWoSSGTPU...@earthlink.com...

You Voted,
Please say anything you want, you paid your dues.
Just think, we that voted help keep American free so that those who
don't vote can run there fat mouth.

Burr


Burr

unread,
Mar 4, 2009, 6:17:20 PM3/4/09
to

"Mike"

Burr, you live in a fog. You're not really a bad guy, but sometimes
you seem to come across with far less credibility and common sense
than even Cuhulin. Simple deal: Leave me alone, I'll be happy to leave
you alone.

Good luck w/ your health,

Mike

Thank You,

Burr


Hangman

unread,
Mar 4, 2009, 6:33:20 PM3/4/09
to

"Mike" <mwbr...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:4249f47b-0a63-4369...@o11g2000yql.googlegroups.com...


> On Mar 3, 8:06 pm, "Burr" <pitz...@iwvisp.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> In my post to or about Telamon I said I think or I asked a question,
>> I
>> was playing with words. I don't care what he says or thinks, if he runs
>> his
>> mouth at me then I do the same. Same with Mike and I went out of my way
>> to
>> be friends with him for years after all the mess and he still came back
>> her
>> and started runing his mouth about me and my wife.
>>
>
> Burr,
>

> 1. Please produce the post where I came back and started "running" my


> mouth about you.
>
> 2. You attacked first, dude. I think you got ramped up defending your
> "cuzz" from Michigan. You started attacking me out of nowhere, and
> pretty viciously.
>
> 3. I have never said anything about your wife. The closest I may have
> come was suggesting that you must be bored in the Philippines to play
> all the stupid games you do with Telamon.
>
> Burr, you live in a fog. You're not really a bad guy, but sometimes
> you seem to come across with far less credibility and common sense
> than even Cuhulin. Simple deal: Leave me alone, I'll be happy to leave
> you alone.
>
> Good luck w/ your health,
>
> Mike


Shutup Bryant --you dickhead! Why don't you leave this newsgroup alone?
Dumbass!

Telamon

unread,
Mar 4, 2009, 8:10:36 PM3/4/09
to
In article <MPG.241805624...@news.buckeye-express.com>,
BDK <TopS...@sanity.com> wrote:

Just you. I limit myself to one kookaburra.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Telamon

unread,
Mar 4, 2009, 8:23:41 PM3/4/09
to
In article
<d8091a95-d223-4a26...@v19g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>,
Mike <mwbr...@aol.com> wrote:

Political and cultural ties sure but I don't know any conservatives that
think the economic treaties between the USA and China are a good thing.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

John Barnard

unread,
Mar 4, 2009, 8:51:15 PM3/4/09
to
Anything that you post in a PUBLIC forum could be fair game for someone
else to put in their 2 cents worth. If you think that's harassment then
you may need to get a thicker skin.

JB

~ RHF

unread,
Mar 4, 2009, 9:57:15 PM3/4/09
to
On Mar 4, 5:10 pm, Telamon <telamon_spamshi...@pacbell.net.is.invalid>
wrote:
> In article <MPG.2418056248c325e598a...@news.buckeye-express.com>,

>
>
>
>  BDK <TopSh...@sanity.com> wrote:
> > In article <telamon_spamshield-B5B904.17300203032009
> > @newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com>,
> > telamon_spamshi...@pacbell.net.is.invalid says...
> > > In article <MPG.2416bacc9096434d98a...@news.buckeye-express.com>,

> > >  BDK <TopSh...@sanity.com> wrote:
>
> > > > In article <telamon_spamshield-81D0F8.18411902032009
> > > > @newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com>,
> > > > telamon_spamshi...@pacbell.net.is.invalid says...
> > > > > In article <MPG.2416613c93b72ad598a...@news.buckeye-express.com>,
> > > > >  BDK <TopSh...@sanity.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > In article <49ac53f2$0$31170$bd467...@news.dslextreme.com>,
> > > > > > d...@dave.dave says...

> > > > > > > BDK wrote:
> > > > > > > > In article <c85da9fd-d811-473f-aca2-
> > > > > > > > 9c0b476e5...@d36g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, mwbry...@aol.com

- - That's a really good one coming from you, Telemundo? So what other
- - kooktardery have you swallowed lately?

- Just you. I limit myself to one kookaburra.
-
- --
- Telamon
- Ventura, California

Juan KookaBurra . . .
He's A Juan KookaBurra ! ! !
Juan Kook-A-Bur-Ra-Ra-Ra . . .
For He's A Juan KookaBurra ! ! !
.

Burr

unread,
Mar 4, 2009, 11:08:37 PM3/4/09
to

"Telamon"

>>
>> That's a really good one coming from you, Telemundo? So what other
>> kooktardery have you swallowed lately?
>
> Just you. I limit myself to one kookaburra.
>
> --
> Telamon
> Ventura, California

That's OK Telamon, just don't swallow!


cuh...@webtv.net

unread,
Mar 5, 2009, 12:37:30 AM3/5/09
to
Senator: Eligibility is up to the voters inplies Constitution demands
for pres can be bypassed

www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=257908

What a load of horse puckky THAT IS!!!
cuhulin

BDK

unread,
Mar 5, 2009, 12:55:59 AM3/5/09
to
In article <f-Wdnc5WU43VzTLU...@iwvisp.com>,
pit...@iwvisp.com says...

Dsmnit,I was trying to eat dinner!!

Bushcraftgregg

unread,
Mar 5, 2009, 6:40:55 AM3/5/09
to
> JB- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

No JB- no thicker skin needed, I know what you're saying, I'm just
trying/asking him to stop before he gets out of hand. I HAVE seen him
out of hand years back, so my statement is valid. He DID email me
years back and tried to chum up to me but I'm hip to his type and
never responded. Of course, he is going to say he didn't and it's my
word against his and that's fine but I would hope the majority or at
least the ones I care about in here would believe me over him. IMO him/
his type are the most dangerous types of people to encounter on
usenet, he cloaks himself in a veil as "one that would do you no
wrong" but I do not buy it because I have seen the opposite of that. I
really don't want to speak about it anymore, really I don't. But I
know he is just going to keep on - he can't help it. I appreciate you
taking up for him, though you will say you weren't etc. etc. but lets
just stop it at this. Thanks.

Bushcraftgregg

unread,
Mar 5, 2009, 6:43:14 AM3/5/09
to
On Mar 5, 12:55 am, BDK <TopSh...@sanity.com> wrote:
> In article <f-Wdnc5WU43VzTLUnZ2dnUVZ_juWn...@iwvisp.com>,
> pitz...@iwvisp.com says...

>
>
>
> > "Telamon"
>
> > >> That's a really good one coming from you, Telemundo? So what other
> > >> kooktardery have you swallowed lately?
>
> > > Just you. I limit myself to one kookaburra.
>
> > > --
> > > Telamon
> > > Ventura, California
>
> > That's OK Telamon, just don't swallow!
>
> Dsmnit,I was trying to eat dinner!!
> --
> BDK
>
> BDK Klan leader?
> kOOk Magnet!
> NJJ CLUB #1
> Shillmaster

That was funny exchange.:-)

John Barnard

unread,
Mar 5, 2009, 8:17:44 PM3/5/09
to
Unfortunately, as you've probably noticed in this group, lots of
people get out of hand on here (myself included). It's all part of the
game on here.

JB

~ RHF

unread,
Mar 6, 2009, 1:50:29 AM3/6/09
to

- Unfortunately, as you've probably noticed in this group,
- lots of people get out of hand on here (myself included).
- It's all part of the game on here.
-
- JB

Dang JB - I am agreeing with you for once. ~ RHF
- - - and i did not see it coming . . .
.

Mike

unread,
Mar 6, 2009, 6:22:35 AM3/6/09
to
On Mar 5, 6:40�am, Bushcraftgregg <gk...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> No JB- no thicker skin needed, I know what you're saying, I'm just
> trying/asking him to stop before he gets out of hand. I HAVE seen him
> out of hand years back, so my statement is valid. He DID email me
> years back and tried to chum up to me but I'm hip to his type and
> never responded. Of course, he is going to say he didn't and it's my
> word against his and that's fine but I would hope the majority or at
> least the ones I care about in here would believe me over him. IMO him/
> his type are the most dangerous types of people to encounter on
> usenet, he cloaks himself in a veil as "one that would do you no
> wrong" but I do not buy it because I have seen the opposite of that. I
> really don't want to speak about it anymore, really I don't. But I
> know he is just going to keep on - he can't help it. I appreciate you
> taking up for him, though you will say you weren't etc. etc. but lets
> just stop it at this. Thanks.-


Dear BCBLazySusan,

You're a basketcase. And a liar. If you feel so threatened, why do you
feel the need to make OT political posts in a shortwave newsgroup? You
just like stirring up trouble and spreading malicious garbage. You're
obviously one of those "special Christians" who refuses to practice
what he preaches.

Dude, you're such a jerk! Earlier in the thread you wrote that I had
diclosed confidences from backchannels with you, now you say I wrote
you, but you never responded. Gee whiz, that a contradiction! Can you
put your little mind in gear and explain how those two posts can be
consistent?

Is it OK to lie when your target is someone you don't like? If so, I
can understand why you are so chummy with Stave Lare.

dxAce

unread,
Mar 6, 2009, 6:34:37 AM3/6/09
to

Michael W. Bryant, the dufus who once claimed to have a PhD, wrote:

> On Mar 5, 6:40�am, Bushcraftgregg <gk...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> >
> > No JB- no thicker skin needed, I know what you're saying, I'm just
> > trying/asking him to stop before he gets out of hand. I HAVE seen him
> > out of hand years back, so my statement is valid. He DID email me
> > years back and tried to chum up to me but I'm hip to his type and
> > never responded. Of course, he is going to say he didn't and it's my
> > word against his and that's fine but I would hope the majority or at
> > least the ones I care about in here would believe me over him. IMO him/
> > his type are the most dangerous types of people to encounter on
> > usenet, he cloaks himself in a veil as "one that would do you no
> > wrong" but I do not buy it because I have seen the opposite of that. I
> > really don't want to speak about it anymore, really I don't. But I
> > know he is just going to keep on - he can't help it. I appreciate you
> > taking up for him, though you will say you weren't etc. etc. but lets
> > just stop it at this. Thanks.-
>
> Dear BCBLazySusan,
>
> You're a basketcase. And a liar.

Yes, Bryant, you are indeed a basketcase! And, a liar as well, PhDufus!

> If you feel so threatened, why do you
> feel the need to make OT political posts in a shortwave newsgroup? You
> just like stirring up trouble and spreading malicious garbage. You're
> obviously one of those "special Christians" who refuses to practice
> what he preaches.

You must be one of those "special Christians" who feels compelled to lie their
fat ass off.

> Dude, you're such a jerk!

Dude, you're such a lying dufus!

> Earlier in the thread you wrote that I had
> diclosed confidences from backchannels with you, now you say I wrote
> you, but you never responded. Gee whiz, that a contradiction! Can you
> put your little mind in gear and explain how those two posts can be
> consistent?
>
> Is it OK to lie when your target is someone you don't like? If so, I
> can understand why you are so chummy with Stave Lare.

Stave?

Keep rolling, dufus!

Mike

unread,
Mar 6, 2009, 8:24:46 AM3/6/09
to
On Mar 4, 8:23 pm, Telamon <telamon_spamshi...@pacbell.net.is.invalid>
wrote:

>
> Political and cultural ties sure but I don't know any conservatives that
> think the economic treaties between the USA and China are a good thing.
>

I remember Ronald Reagan suggesting that trade pacts with China would
eventually make sense. You should also remember that it was Reagan who
got the ball rolling on NAFTA and it was King George, the First, that
pretty much was responsible for finishing the negotiations on NAFTA.
Clinton just signed it shortly after being elected.

Telamon

unread,
Mar 6, 2009, 3:20:37 PM3/6/09
to
In article
<fc1a1544-8abd-49f8...@v15g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>,
Mike <mwbr...@aol.com> wrote:

The limited trade packs the Reagan administration were in our favor but
the follow on expanded trade deals from Bush, Clintoon, Bush were not.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

~ RHF

unread,
Mar 6, 2009, 3:37:04 PM3/6/09
to

- Clinton just signed it shortly after being elected.

MWB 'just' More Liberal Re-Writing of History Again.

President Bill Clinton Signed the NAFTA Treaty
INTO LAW [.]
-ps- He could have Vetoed It
-but- He 'Choose' to Sign the NAFTA Treaty Into Law.

Yes History Will Show Clinton Was At The Very End
Responsible for the NAFTA Treaty Becoming LAW [. ]

mwb - the facts are the facts ~ RHF
.

Mike

unread,
Mar 6, 2009, 4:08:32 PM3/6/09
to

RHF,

As usual, you're just choosing to be difficult. Though Clinton signed
NAFTA (and, yes,
he took grief from the labor unions for doing so), but it was the
Reagan and Bush
administrations that were responsible for the negotiations during the
1980's.

The responsibility for NAFTA was clearly shared by both Democrats and
Republicans.
Reagan was famous for his prediction that countries that trade with
each other have seldom
fought wars. Yes, even the great Conservative supported Free Trade
Pacts. The Republican
Party has always been bigger supporters of such pacts.

What, RHF, no URLs to support your insanity this time? That clearly
says something..
Come on, RHF, where are the URLs?

Mike

dxAce

unread,
Mar 6, 2009, 4:23:40 PM3/6/09
to

Michael W. Bryant, the totally discredited dufus who once claimed to have a PhD,
wrote:

> On Mar 6, 3:37�pm, "~ RHF" <rhf-newsgro...@pacbell.net> wrote:

What about your insanity, PhDufus?

After all, any 'tard boy who'd lie about having a PhD certainly must have a screw
or two loose.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

And, as always, don't let your children attend Louisville Technical Institute.
They've hired at least one dufus who once claimed to have a PhD, and who knows,

there may be more dufi there.

Telamon

unread,
Mar 6, 2009, 4:34:25 PM3/6/09
to
In article <49B1945B...@milestones.com>,
dxAce <dx...@milestones.com> wrote:

You want insanity, this is insanity.

Obama's Radicalism Is Killing the Dow

By MICHAEL J. BOSKIN

"It's hard not to see the continued sell-off on Wall Street and the
growing fear on Main Street as a product, at least in part, of the
realization that our new president's policies are designed to radically
re-engineer the market-based U.S. economy, not just mitigate the
recession and financial crisis.

The illusion that Barack Obama will lead from the economic center has
quickly come to an end. Instead of combining the best policies of past
Democratic presidents -- John Kennedy on taxes, Bill Clinton on welfare
reform and a balanced budget, for instance -- President Obama is
returning to Jimmy Carter's higher taxes and Mr. Clinton's draconian
defense drawdown."

Go read the rest of it here:
<http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123629969453946717.html>

The obomination is looking more like Carter II everyday.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Telamon

unread,
Mar 6, 2009, 4:45:37 PM3/6/09
to
In article
<telamon_spamshield-F...@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com>,
Telamon <telamon_s...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:

Well, that would be Carter II with a tele-prompter.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

~ RHF

unread,
Mar 6, 2009, 5:00:38 PM3/6/09
to

MWB - Your 'logic' is typical of the Liberals
who blame the Gun Manufactures for the
Killing of by Guns and at the same time;
excusing the Criminal for coming from a
poor or abusive home.

MWB 'again' More Liberal Re-Writing of History Again.

~ RHF

unread,
Mar 6, 2009, 5:37:55 PM3/6/09
to
On Mar 6, 1:34 pm, Telamon <telamon_spamshi...@pacbell.net.is.invalid>
wrote:
> In article <49B1945B.22C63...@milestones.com>,

Starting to seam like every time Obama Speaks
or someone from the Obama Regime speaks . . .

Wall Street, the Banks, the Automakers and
the average American's Net Worth collectively
take a nose dive.

Rumors are that even some of the Democrats are
starting to suggest that for a few weeks President
Obama practice 'restaint' and let the Markets have
time to adjust and recover before another onslaught
of ObamaNomics©.

PLUS the Obama Regime's National Health Care
Program does nothing to Eliminate Law Suits
and Trail Lawyers Fees : Which could trim some
Health Care Costs by 33%~50%.
1 - A Nation-Wide Health Care Program -means-
No Need to Sue for Medial Cost cause we have
a Nation-Wide Health Care Program and that is
already cover and provided for For Life.
2 - A Nation-Wide Health Care Program -means-
Malpractice is covered by Disability Insurance
so there is No Need to Sue for Loss of Income
cause we have a Nation-Wide {State} Disability
Insurance Program and that is already cover
and provided for For Life.
3 - Make the Pain and Suffering Claims limited
to a Monthly Premium on on the Disability
Payment.
4 - Arbitration with a National Cap -not- Lawsuits.

~ RHF
.

~ RHF

unread,
Mar 6, 2009, 5:45:11 PM3/6/09
to
On Mar 6, 1:45 pm, Telamon <telamon_spamshi...@pacbell.net.is.invalid>
wrote:
> In article
> <telamon_spamshield-F5568D.13342506032...@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com>,
>
>
>
>  Telamon <telamon_spamshi...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
> > In article <49B1945B.22C63...@milestones.com>,

- - The obomination is looking more like Carter II everyday.

- Well, that would be Carter II with a tele-prompter.


-
- --
- Telamon
- Ventura, California

President Obama Turn-Off That Tela-Promter ! ©

and start telling americans the truth
cause your script ain't working ~ RHF
.

cuh...@webtv.net

unread,
Mar 6, 2009, 7:04:44 PM3/6/09
to

Telamon

unread,
Mar 6, 2009, 7:59:35 PM3/6/09
to
In article
<telamon_spamshield-0...@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com>,
Telamon <telamon_s...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:

Ah! A new moniker "Obama bin Biden"

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

cuh...@webtv.net

unread,
Mar 6, 2009, 8:37:36 PM3/6/09
to
www.jtf.org/news.php
Obama,,, T-Q-F-U
cuhulin

cuh...@webtv.net

unread,
Mar 6, 2009, 10:18:48 PM3/6/09
to

John Barnard

unread,
Mar 6, 2009, 10:43:50 PM3/6/09
to

That's the Law of Averages in action ;-)

JB

~ RHF

unread,
Mar 6, 2009, 10:44:45 PM3/6/09
to
On Mar 6, 4:59 pm, Telamon <telamon_spamshi...@pacbell.net.is.invalid>
wrote:
> In article
> <telamon_spamshield-04DC7B.13453706032...@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com>,

>
>
>
>  Telamon <telamon_spamshi...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
> > In article
> > <telamon_spamshield-F5568D.13342506032...@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com>,
> >  Telamon <telamon_spamshi...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
>
> > > In article <49B1945B.22C63...@milestones.com>,
- Ah! A new moniker "Obama bin Biden"

-
- --
- Telamon
- Ventura, California

Better Obama be Bye Bye !
Impeach Obama Now He's Bad For America and The World Economy
.

~ RHF

unread,
Mar 6, 2009, 10:49:05 PM3/6/09
to

Read : Obama Is In Trouble = O-B-A-M-A Spells Trouble
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=258101

After reading that it is time for Obama to be Bye Bye !
"Impeach Obama Now - He's Bad For America

John Barnard

unread,
Mar 6, 2009, 10:51:06 PM3/6/09
to
Top ten, Mike!

The House of Reps approved it 234 to 200 with 132 of those 234 being
Republicans and 102 being Democrats.

I can't believe RHF's revisionist history and pseudoscience approach to
things.

JB

John Barnard

unread,
Mar 6, 2009, 10:53:40 PM3/6/09
to

Failed capitalism and its supporters did Wall Street in NOT Barack
Obama. He has the unfortunate job of picking up the pieces.

JB

John Barnard

unread,
Mar 6, 2009, 10:54:31 PM3/6/09
to

You know nothing of the facts you twisted, little thug.

JB

Telamon

unread,
Mar 7, 2009, 12:57:21 AM3/7/09
to
In article <9dmsl.91236$2h5....@newsfe11.iad>,
John Barnard <jf...@shaw.ca> wrote:

The stock market disagrees with you in strongest possible terms. It
didn't like Jimmy's policies and it doesn't think the obomination's
policies are any better.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Mike

unread,
Mar 7, 2009, 8:26:59 AM3/7/09
to
On Mar 6, 5:00�pm, "~ RHF" <rhf-newsgro...@pacbell.net> wrote:

>
> Yes History Will Show Clinton Was At The Very End
> Responsible for the NAFTA Treaty Becoming LAW [. ]
>
> mwb - the facts are the facts ~ RHF

While Clinton signed it into law, NAFTA was Reagan's dream. Please
note that the following URL is from the ultra-conservative Heritage
Foundation:

http://www.heritage.org/Research/tradeandeconomicfreedom/EM371.cfm

Proof of RHF's revisionist tendencies....

dxAce

unread,
Mar 7, 2009, 8:29:53 AM3/7/09
to

So what's your excuse, PhDufus?

cuh...@webtv.net

unread,
Mar 7, 2009, 12:18:36 PM3/7/09
to
Hitler HO Obama's girlfriend, Vera Baker.When Michelle Party Party Party
Obama found out Hitler HO Obama (T-Q-F-U) and Vera Baker were screwing
(Literally) around, Michelle Party Party Party Obama had Vera Baker sent
completely out of America, to Martinique.

FUBO
cuhulin

dave

unread,
Mar 7, 2009, 1:46:57 PM3/7/09
to

You are not what we call a "critical thinker". An analogy would be an
animal that eats anything.

dxAce

unread,
Mar 7, 2009, 1:52:31 PM3/7/09
to

dave wrote:

> cuh...@webtv.net wrote:
> > Hitler HO Obama's girlfriend, Vera Baker.When Michelle Party Party Party
> > Obama found out Hitler HO Obama (T-Q-F-U) and Vera Baker were screwing
> > (Literally) around, Michelle Party Party Party Obama had Vera Baker sent
> > completely out of America, to Martinique.
> >
> > FUBO
> > cuhulin
> >
>
> You are not what we call a "critical thinker".

You are what we call a "drug addled tard boy".

dxAce
Michigan
USA


cuh...@webtv.net

unread,
Mar 7, 2009, 2:26:39 PM3/7/09
to
A few minutes ago, the History channel said The Irish in America tv
program will be on the History channel in a few days.

I am not a critical thinker,,, you think?
cuhulin

dxAce

unread,
Mar 7, 2009, 2:46:35 PM3/7/09
to

cuh...@webtv.net wrote:

A tip for you, Larry: Buy rolling tobacco now. Taxes on it are going up
astronomically on April 1.

dxAce
Michigan
USA


dave

unread,
Mar 7, 2009, 2:55:13 PM3/7/09
to
Tobacco? Ick.

Telamon

unread,
Mar 7, 2009, 4:02:52 PM3/7/09
to
In article
<e92508b3-9148-4875...@p11g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>,
Mike <mwbr...@aol.com> wrote:

Please note that NAFTA today is not what Reagan wanted.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

~ RHF

unread,
Mar 7, 2009, 4:09:43 PM3/7/09
to
On Mar 6, 7:53 pm, John Barnard <j...@shaw.ca> wrote:
> Telamon wrote:
> > In article <49B1945B.22C63...@milestones.com>,

- - The obomination is looking more like Carter II everyday.

- Failed capitalism and its supporters did Wall Street
- in NOT Barack Obama. He has the unfortunate job
- of picking up the pieces.
-
- JB

(OT) : The Obama Regime's ObamaNomics©
US Unemployment Rate Jumps to 8.1% Worst Since 1983
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=a2sWlnEIj58U&refer=news
* US Job Losses topped 600,000 for a Third Straight Month,
the first time that's happened in government record-keeping
dating to 1939. - - - It's ObamaNomics©
http://www.newsday.com/services/newspaper/printedition/saturday/news/ny-bzjobs076060508mar07,0,5660062.story
* ObamaNomics© 13.4% Unemployment Far Worse for Blacks
- - - It's ObamaNomics©
http://www.suntimes.com/business/1465536,CST-NWS-unemploy07.article
* U.S. Unemployment Reaches 26-year High
- - - It's ObamaNomics©
http://www.bizjournals.com/stlouis/stories/2009/03/02/daily79.html
.
FWIW the 'Blame Bush' Game has become
the 'Blame Obama' Game -cause- Bush Ain't
the President Anymore and Obama "IS"
.
It's Happening On Obama's Presidential Watch So . . .
It's His Problem [.]
It's His Responsibility [.]
It's His Fame or Blame [.]
.

~ RHF

unread,
Mar 7, 2009, 4:17:14 PM3/7/09
to
On Mar 7, 5:26 am, Mike <mwbry...@aol.com> wrote:
> On Mar 6, 5:00 pm, "~ RHF" <rhf-newsgro...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Yes History Will Show Clinton Was At The Very End
> > Responsible for the NAFTA Treaty Becoming LAW [. ]
>
> > mwb - the facts are the facts ~ RHF
>
- While Clinton signed it into law,
- NAFTA was Reagan's dream.
- Please note that the following URL is from
- the ultra-conservative Heritage Foundation:
-
- http://www.heritage.org/Research/tradeandeconomicfreedom/EM371.cfm
-
- Proof of RHF's revisionist tendencies....

MWB ?while? - More Liberal Re-Writing of History Again.

The simple Historical Fact Is :


President Bill Clinton Signed the NAFTA Treaty INTO LAW [.]

-ps- He could have Vetoed It

{ Did He ? - NO ! }

-but- He 'Choose' to Sign the NAFTA Treaty Into Law.

{ Instead He Got Behind It and Made It Law }

Yes History Will Show Clinton Was At The Very End
Responsible for the NAFTA Treaty Becoming LAW [. ]

mwb - the facts are the facts ~ RHF

.

It is loading more messages.
0 new messages