I am working on a new pc board. I actually have gone out for boards
and got them working, but I've had to rethink one of the circuits.
In a nutshell the board is a result of the work published by Dallas
Lankford on his investigations into audio elliptic filters. Mr
Lankford uses these filters to reduce the distortion resulting from
fading - fading distortion. Terry had brought up the paper here a
while back and it's taken me a long while to do anything with it.
The board has a MC1350 Gain Controlled IF Amplifier followed by a
precision detector, tone control, audio amplifier, elliptic filter,
and a final amplifier to drive a speaker. There is also a dedicated
amplifier to provide some type of AGC action. I'm not quite sure of
the requirements necessary in order to provide a decent AGC. I'm just
trying to smooth out the audio fading some. My plan was to just put a
low pass filter with a cut-off frequency of a couple of hertz to
modulate the MC1350 amplifier. I intend to drive this thing with my
Red Sun RP2100 radio.
My friend pointed out that the noise would be amplified as well so
that I would need to devise a circuit that would not respond to
anything under a few uV. My answer is to have a switch and switch in
the agc when I got the station half-ass tuned in - HATI. Circuit has a
lot of hooks and empty board space so I can jam a little bit of stuff
in there to accomplish a basic agc. I've run through the rest of the
board and all of the other circuits are good to go.
So the point here is that I'm in a little bit over my head. I would
like to have some discussion with you brainiacs about AGC and maybe
some links to circuits or comments on radios that have had good agc
action. If you think I'm pissing in the wind with an audio controlled
AGC circuit then I would like to hear that as well.
regards,
Bob
N9NEO
(just say 'NEO')
Pete
"N9NEO" <powersu...@netzero.net> wrote in message
news:bf318097-e63e-4744...@e60g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
Hey Pete,
Thanks for the response. Ok on the 160ms. I'm only after talk radio
so the bass guitar thing isn't going to be a problem. I'm picking up
some of the local bc stations on the thing. I was planning on a
plastic box, but looks like I might just stick it in a cast box. The
Red sun is doing all the IF amplifing for now. It's got an IF out
which makes it easy. Had I put a little more thought into it I might
have stuck a sideband detector on the board as well. Anyway, it's the
first pass at a board, so I'll probably do a re-spin down the road.
LT has a nice sharp filter chip out that you can set the cutoff freq
with a pot. I'll get my email address of to you and you can send me
any agc stugg you might have.
regards,
Bob
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> Hey Pete,
>
> Thanks for the response. Ok on the 160ms. I'm only after talk radio
> so the bass guitar thing isn't going to be a problem.
But when they pound their fists on the table the audio can trigger the
AGC too.
I got a brand new pair of roller skates,,,, you got a brand new
keyyyyyy,,,,,
cuhulin
Pete
"N9NEO" <powersu...@netzero.net> wrote in message
news:6302dd57-899a-491b...@p73g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
My truly truly fairrrrrr,,,,, how I love me truly Fairrrrrr,,,,,,,
theres songs to bring herrrrrr,,,,, trinkets for herrrr golden
hairrrrrr,,,,,,,
www.devilfinder.com Walt Grayson Memorial Day started right here in
Mississippi
Waterloo,New York tried to claim it, but Walt Grayson proved otherwise.
cuhulin
You don't need another AGC if the Redsun AGC is controlling its IF
output, do you? Cascaded AGC's might be a problem. Maybe the Redsun
AGC is poor and you will want to replace it with an outboard one. AGC
can cause audio distortion if it is fast enough to chase the
modulation. Pete's mention of 160mS AGC must be referring to the
attack time constant or speed. A release time constant of about 10
times that is advisable to keep modulation tracking very low. If it
was symmetrical 160ms attack/release, then it would do a very good job
tracking 6Hz modulation (a rarity) but would still have a 10%
sensitivity to 60Hz and 1% at 600Hz. Then there is the concept of
'hang' AGC, where the release is delayed, maintaining constant gain
through the delay unless a greater attack is enountered that requires
a gain reduction and a new 'hang' delay. This is particularly
effective at avoiding modulation tracking if the hang time is equal or
greater than the attack time and allows a faster release without
jeopardising modulation tracking distortion.
I don't know whether there is any big advantage between audio derived
and IF derived AGC as long as there is modulation. You mention talk
radio so I assume that is DSBAM with carrier. The IF derived AGC will
output an AGC voltage affected by carrier strength and to some extent
by modulation so it will maintain an appropriate gain even during long
pauses in modulation. An audio derived AGC would increase IF gain
during silence and thus might permit peak distortion or clipping of
the next audio, especially if it begins with a plosive. Were this
suppressed carrier AM, then both would increase gain during pauses.
You would probably get more informed opinion than I can offer if you
were to post to rec.radio.amateur.homebrew.
Good luck with your project!
Tom
Definitely more complicated but possible. An example would be the RX340
with analog AGC in the front end followed by digital AGC.
> Maybe the Redsun AGC is poor and you will want to replace it with an
> outboard one. AGC can cause audio distortion if it is fast enough to
> chase the modulation. Pete's mention of 160mS AGC must be referring
> to the attack time constant or speed. A release time constant of
> about 10 times that is advisable to keep modulation tracking very
> low. If it was symmetrical 160ms attack/release, then it would do a
> very good job tracking 6Hz modulation (a rarity) but would still have
> a 10% sensitivity to 60Hz and 1% at 600Hz. Then there is the concept
> of 'hang' AGC, where the release is delayed, maintaining constant
> gain through the delay unless a greater attack is enountered that
> requires a gain reduction and a new 'hang' delay. This is
> particularly effective at avoiding modulation tracking if the hang
> time is equal or greater than the attack time and allows a faster
> release without jeopardising modulation tracking distortion.
>
> I don't know whether there is any big advantage between audio derived
> and IF derived AGC as long as there is modulation. You mention talk
> radio so I assume that is DSBAM with carrier. The IF derived AGC will
> output an AGC voltage affected by carrier strength and to some extent
> by modulation so it will maintain an appropriate gain even during long
> pauses in modulation. An audio derived AGC would increase IF gain
> during silence and thus might permit peak distortion or clipping of
> the next audio, especially if it begins with a plosive. Were this
> suppressed carrier AM, then both would increase gain during pauses.
The design goal for the radio AGC is to set an optimum level in the IF
chain for the following mixer input or detector depending on the radio
architecture. This is complicated by having to overcome path fading so
the AGC has to react properly to conditions. Sometimes the fading is
rapid and other times much slower. An additional complication is the
radio has AM or SSB detection modes. One set of AGC constants is not
going to do the job. Generally, the Drake AGC scheme with a slow, fast,
and off would be a minimum workable arrangement for a radio with various
detectors.
For a AGC slow you would want 1 to 3 seconds and for fast something in
the hundreds of milliseconds. You definitely, as you wrote above, must
avoid a response that could follow the audio modulation so you would
need to filter the response to less than 5 Hz. Actually the fastest
response you would most likely want is 250 ms.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
Pete
I agree with Telamon about the two release speeds for speech
programming: the long release for fairly stable signals and the
shorter for rapid fading. The longer one gives lower distortion due to
modulation tracking. Under really stable conditions (local
groundwave), lowest distortion would be obtained by turning AGC off
and setting the RF Gain manually.
Pete, given that the Redsun already has AGC, why couldn't the 1350 be
manually set to an appropriate gain to match the controlled level
coming out of the tuner?
I have done a fair bit of investigation and modification of AGC
circuits in the Radio Shack DX-394 and the Yaesu FT-817 and been
surprised by the experience. Did a lot of research on published specs
or test reports for high-end radios and other articles. There seemed
to be a rough consensus about release speeds corresponding roughly to
what Telamon cites for speech/music; for interrupted CW and for data
modes, below 25ms seemed to be the desired speed. What was more
confusing or contentious is the attack - some radios citing sub 1ms!
Moreover, good audio compressor/limiters also have very fast attack to
prevent peak clipping and broadcast Peak Program Meters integrate over
10ms, effectively ignoring peaks very much shorter in duration as
these are psychoacoustically inaudible. I modified the AGC for the
DX-394 with sub 10ms attack for all release speeds and then was
dismayed with the effect of impulse noise - long holes in audible
modulation or even continuous suppression if the repetition rate was
high enough. Unless there is an IF noise blanker ahead of the AGC
detector, an attack that is proportional to the release is necessary,
something on the order of 5-10%.
With the FT-817, I found that the effective AGC speed is inversely
related to the RG Gain control setting and is very much faster than
the RC time constant would suggest. Pete, you mention a 'knee' with
the 1350 around 5V - I think the FT-817 has a knee around 1V and
follows a square law characteristic such that most gain variation
occurs over maybe a 100mV slice out of the 3V range over which the AGC
and RF Gain control swing. Hence, I have been unable to eliminate what
I think is quite objectionable distortion due to modulation tracking,
even with a release RC time constant on the order of 2.5s and an
attack RC time constant pushed up from a few ms to over 100ms.
Modulation wiggling the AGC by a millivolt distorts the IF envelope
delivered to the AM detector. Listening to DSBAM in ECSS mode (SSB)
significantly reduces distortion because the filter skirt suppresses
bass energy.
Tom
http://www.answers.com/topic/hamburger
http://www.forbisthemighty.com/acidlogic/im_davethomas.htm
<cuh...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:414-47DD...@storefull-3253.bay.webtv.net...
<snip>
> arse
<snip>
Is 'arse' commonly used in the South? In my occasional
terms of residence in GA, and TX, I never heard it used.
Michael
Another example would SSB where if the station transmitting pauses in
speech the background noise pops up. This also happens when one ham ends
his transmission and the another ham starts transmitting. Here you would
want the long response time. Most of the time on AM broadcast I use the
short response time. A polar path with rapid flutter would be an
exception for AM broadcast where I would then use the long response time.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
Britney Spears is a good example of positive feedback in a AGC circuit.
Now does that make any sense to you? There is a meaning there. Give it a
shot.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
Pete
"Tom" <holden...@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:b807e938-e8f1-4d2f...@p73g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
www.devilfinder.com Alabama State Song
cuhulin
I'd love to see those myself.
--
Iran tells us what the mainstream media won't:
"A new opinion poll suggests that over 54 percent of Americans do not trust
mainstream media and consider news websites more reliable."
<http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=46837§ionid=3510203>
> SSB has always Sucked.Can't understand anything they say on SSB.Besides,
> who cares anything about how to fry eggs in a cook stove pan anyway.I
> called those Alanama Dumbasses then, I still call them Alabama Dumbasses
> now.(but not really though)
>
OK nice try. Any time you have a feed back loop it is negative so you
have control. Positive feedback would cause the amplifier to the maximum
output at all times or in other words would be out of control like Ms.
Spears.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
I would make their familys pay Ten Thousand dollars for the Bullet.
cuhulin
Dont feel sorry for me, California boy.
cuhulin