OT: Obama's Approval Ratings Still High
Mike
MNMikeW
"Mike" <mwbr...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1f4f0cf5-81f6-4ab3...@p20g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
> http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/03/10/obama.ratings/index.html?eref=rss_politics&iref=polticker
"The real test for Obama and the Democrats won't come until the midterm
elections in 2010," Holland added. "By then it is likely that Americans will
think Obama is responsible for the condition of the economy at that time."
Well who the fuck elses responsibilty would it be then?
dxAce
Michael W. Bryant, the grease dripping dufus who once claimed to have a PhD, wrote:
> http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/03/10/obama.ratings/index.html?eref=rss_politics&iref=polticker
Meanwhile, you're still stuck without the PhD you once claimed to have.
Perhaps Boy Barry will wave his magic johnson and confer one upon you!
dxAce
Michigan
USA
And, as always, don't let your children attend Louisville Technical Institute.
They've hired at least one dufus who once claimed to have a PhD, and who knows, there may be more
dufi there.
BIG AL
the economy if thats what your asking.
From Big AL @ The Belly Acre's Farm
Telamon
Bob Dobbs <chupa...@operamail.com> wrote:
> You want to fault Barama for an inability to correct in two years what
> it took that Texas turdwrangler eight years to create, all while the
> same obstructionist Republican apparatchiks that conspired with Bush are
> working against him at every turn?
Bush should have done something about the Dem's in congress in his
second term. Now that the Dem's have full control it will be the end of
capitalism as we know it.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
Count...@monsterchillerhorrortheater.com
<telamon_s...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
> Bush should have done something about the Dem's in congress in his
> second term.
Like what, send them to Dachau?
Now that the Dem's have full control it will be the end of
> capitalism as we know it.
Same old story that the Repugs used in '33, when in fact Roosevelt
saved Capitalism from a possible Communist revolution that was taken
very seriously at the time.
--
"What do you mean there's no movie?"
Telamon
<Count...@MonsterChillerHorrorTheater.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 00:43:50 UTC, Telamon
> <telamon_s...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
>
> > Bush should have done something about the Dem's in congress in his
> > second term.
> Like what, send them to Dachau?
That would be a good start.
> Now that the Dem's have full control it will be the end of
> > capitalism as we know it.
> Same old story that the Repugs used in '33, when in fact Roosevelt
> saved Capitalism from a possible Communist revolution that was taken
> very seriously at the time.
Yeah well this time it's for real.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
who are you?
If secretly spending almost $3T of taxpayers killing people in Iraq is
what republican't capitalism is....
I am glad to see it go!!!!!!
Let's hope it never darkens our nation again.
Telamon
I want it back. I would rather have us killing terrorists in Iraq than
have another 9/11 here. Money well spent.
Apparently instead of spending the money on defense you would rather it
be spent on congressional pork. Well I hope you are happy as the
obomination just signed the biggest pork bill in history. Of course he
ran for office on a pledge to end that sort of thing but it was just
another lie.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
cuh...@webtv.net
birth certificate
www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.ArtNum=258592
cuhulin
who are you?
Don't be stupid! A few hundred million $$$ of REPUBLICAN'T pork is much
cheaper the $2.78 *TRILLION* Bush sneakily spent looking for WMDs where
there were never any terrorist before.
O I forgot, Dat dar maTh is way too much complamamcated for us thar
republican'ts. All dem dar zeros must be soo confus-in. Ya know what I
hear da odder day? Dat Hawia might just even be one a da united states?!
Holey crips! Wasin't dat da joint dat dar Obammer was birthed-in?! OOoo
us CONserivitives!, we don't take kindly to any of da states not
connected on da big blue round ball map! Blue is commies and they'za too
smart for dar own good. Stupid is now da new smart don't-ya know....
Rush dar says dat!! Now I e-mail dat to all da neighbor who don't hav-a
picture box.
~ RHF
On Mar 11, 9:59 am, Mike <mwbry...@aol.com> wrote:
- http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/03/10/obama.ratings/index.html?eref=...
MWB - Here is another 'special' Off-Topic Thread
started by "Dave" - please do something ~ RHF
.
MWB -oops should read-
MWB - Here is another Off-Topic Thread started by
none other than "MWB" Himself
-mwb- please do something to yourself ~ RHF
.
MWB - Please note that I showed restraint and
only posted to it after 11 Replies to your original
OFF-TOPIC Political Post -subject-line-
"OT: Obama's Approval Ratings Still High"
Yeah MWB - You could say that for most US Presidents
during the First 100 Days of their First Term in Office.
-or- MWB were you expecting BHO to have tank-out
already and been feed to the Lions by Pelosi and
Reid by now ? ? ?
.
MWB - Can't Blame Dave : You Originated
this Off-Topic Thread.
MWB - Can't Blame RHF {Me} : You Originated
this Off-Topic Thread.
MWB - Can't Blame DX Ace : You Originated
this Off-Topic Thread and he simply replied.
MWB - Can't Blame Telamon : You Originated
this Off-Topic Thread and he simply replied.
.
MWB - Question - Why did Obama Ban the Press
from the Budget Signing
- - - Now That Is Real Openness -NOT-
.
MWB - Let's give Obama Credit where Credit is due :
Today the US StocK Market held-on-to yesterday's
Gain and that is some Obama Good News -but-
Again 'possibly' only because BHO stayed in the
White House and Said and Did Nothing ;;-}
--- hey maybe the 'prez' is learning ---
praise be the obama,
Praise Be The Obama.
PRAISE BE THE OBAMA !
The US Stock Market When Up Today 10 March 2009
Due To His Great Leadership : Cause He stayed in the
White House and Said and Did Nothing ;;-}
.
~ RHF
.
~ RHF
> MNMikeW wrote:
>
> >"Mike" <mwbry...@aol.com> wrote in message
> >news:1f4f0cf5-81f6-4ab3...@p20g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
> >>http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/03/10/obama.ratings/index.html?eref=...
>
> >"The real test for Obama and the Democrats won't come until the midterm
> >elections in 2010," Holland added. "By then it is likely that Americans will
> >think Obama is responsible for the condition of the economy at that time."
>
> >Well who the fuck elses responsibilty would it be then?
>
- You want to fault Barama for
Yeah Sure Do !
He "Barack 'Hussein' Obama" Is The US President
and Barack 'Hussein' Obama is the Commander-in-Chief
- - - so we can all chant :
hey, Hey. HEY ! O-Bomb-My-A
How Many American Boys and Girls Did You Kill Today
along with Innocent Iraqi and Afghan Women and Children ?
.
-subject-line-was-
"Obama's Approval Ratings Still High"
.
>an inability to correct in two years what
> it took that Texas turdwrangler eight years to create, all while the
> same obstructionist Republican apparatchiks that conspired with Bush are
> working against him at every turn?
>
> --
>
> Operator Bob
> Echo Charlie 42
~ RHF
<telamon_spamshi...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
> In article <49b83bdd.3246890@chupacabra>,
> > >news:1f4f0cf5-81f6-4ab3...@p20g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
> > >>http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/03/10/obama.ratings/index.html?eref=...
> > >> litics&iref=polticker
>
> > >"The real test for Obama and the Democrats won't come until the midterm
> > >elections in 2010," Holland added. "By then it is likely that Americans will
> > >think Obama is responsible for the condition of the economy at that time."
>
> > >Well who the fuck elses responsibilty would it be then?
>
> > You want to fault Barama for an inability to correct in two years what
> > it took that Texas turdwrangler eight years to create, all while the
> > same obstructionist Republican apparatchiks that conspired with Bush are
> > working against him at every turn?
- Bush should have done something about the Dem's in congress in his
- second term. Now that the Dem's have full control it will be the end
of
- capitalism as we know it.
-
- --
- Telamon
- Ventura, California
Telamon - What Makes You 'Think' That BHO Will
Be Able To Control the Democrat Leadership of the
US House and the US Senate : So Far He Has Only
Proven That He Is Going-Along-For-The-Ride By
Signing Everything That Pelosi & Reid Send Him.
.
Why Even Today He Signed the Pork Inflated Budget
and Banned {Did Not Permit} the Press to Witness and
Record the Event - Now That Is Openness - NOT !
.
REPLACE - US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner
- - - BHO DO IT NOW !
He Is Too Weak For the Job {Strong Leadership is Required}
RESIGN - US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner
- - - Save the President the Embarrassment and DO IT NOW !
The Job Is Over-Your-Head {Smarter Leadership is Required}
REMOVE - US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner
- - - President Obama Do IT NOW !
He is Too Inept For the Job {Wiser Leadership is Required}
US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner
1 - The Wrong Man - The Bankers Say So . . .
2 - The Wrong Place - Wall Street Says So . . .
3 - The Wrong Time - The American People Say So . . .
.
timothy geithner if he only had a brain ~ RHF
.
.
Mike
> The US Stock Market When Up Today 10 March 2009
> Due To His Great Leadership : Cause He stayed in the
> White House and Said and Did Nothing ;;-}
> .
> ~ RHF
> .
Obama actually had a very busy day. You need to learn how to read the
news.
dxAce
Nobody is better at reading the news than a dufus who lied about having a PhD,
right, fat boy?
dave
>
> Bush should have done something about the Dem's in congress in his
> second term. Now that the Dem's have full control it will be the end of
> capitalism as we know it.
>
That already happened.
dave
> Apparently instead of spending the money on defense you would rather it
> be spent on congressional pork. Well I hope you are happy as the
> obomination just signed the biggest pork bill in history. Of course he
> ran for office on a pledge to end that sort of thing but it was just
> another lie.
Defense spending isn't pork?
dave
> ~ RHF
> .
Roy Fisk;
You undoubtedly post more characters than the other people mentioned
above COMBINED. You use the tilde more than the rest of usenet combined.
dave
the market go up, not politicians.
Billy Burpelson
> I would rather have us killing terrorists in Iraq than
> have another 9/11 here.
Please explain your logic.
How could "us killing terrorists in Iraq" having anything whatsoever to
do with "another 9/11 here"?
Terrorists operate throughout the entire world and do not need Iraq at
all if they wanted another 9/11. No connection whatsoever.
And didn't you read a day or two ago when someone posted here what
REPUBLICAN Ron Paul said? The people in Iraq are not even "terrorists"
per se, half of them are just defending their country against FOREIGN
OCCUPIERS (us), just like we would do if foreign soldiers were occupying
our country. The other half of the Iraqi "terrorists" are just
continuing the centuries long fight of Shiites vs. Sunnis vs. Kurds.
(It's almost too bad Saddam is dead -- for all his faults, he at least
kept tight control on the warring factions, something we have not been
able to accomplish yet).
cuh...@webtv.net
could buy a soda pop or some candy.If I had a dime I could buy a comic
book.Little town I used to live in back in the 1940s, about once a year,
a Hobo would be by the Railroad Track.He would give us kids a nickel and
tell us stories about his travels, we called him the Nickel Man.Back in
those days a Nickel or a Dime was big money to us.Compared to what a
Dollar was worth in 1900, a Dollar today is worth less than four and one
half cents.
cuhulin
........................................
Don't take no Wooden Nickels
........................................
MNMikeW
"Bob Dobbs" <chupa...@operamail.com> wrote in message
news:49b83bdd.3246890@chupacabra...
> it took that Texas turdwrangler eight years to create, all while the
> same obstructionist Republican apparatchiks that conspired with Bush are
> working against him at every turn?
>
their mouths.
MNMikeW
"BIG AL" <alt...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:26437-49B...@storefull-3272.bay.webtv.net...
> The Republican party are the ones that are responsible for messing up
> the economy if thats what your asking.
>
>
>
> From Big AL @ The Belly Acre's Farm
>
MNMikeW
"Telamon" <telamon_s...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote in message
news:telamon_spamshield-0...@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net...
Yeah, those 8,000 earmarks don't count. Change and hope, BWHAHAHAHAHHA.
MNMikeW
"dave" <da...@dave.dave> wrote in message
news:tO6dnWyjS7-CYiXU...@earthlink.com...
Yeah, wait till Geithner opens his mouth again. Buh bye 200 points.
obamao.sux....@gmail.com
"The stock market is sort of like a tracking poll in politics. It bobs
up and down day to day, and if you spend all your time worrying about
that, then you're probably going to get the long-term strategy wrong,"
Obama recently explained.
You know, Mr. President, not everything is like politics.
The market is a forward-looking entity, indeed, but it is driven by
the decentralized actions of millions of investors every second. It's
the opposite of politics. And this setup surely offends the
sensibilities of the statist planners occupying Washington. Unlike
politicians, markets don't lie. And this market has been in freefall
for a year.
So, what to do? Obama, who promised not to raise taxes during a
recession, now plans to raise nearly $1 trillion in new taxes directly
from the investor class. He plans to raise capital gains taxes (a
disincentive to investment), corporate taxes (for you, the consumer,
ultimately to pay) and on the "rich" (which the nonpartisan Tax
Foundation estimates will affect 1.3 million small-business owners).
This recession already has passed the 15-month threshold, the
historical average for downturns. Most presidents helped ease us out
of those tough spots by easing the burden on Americans. Obama has
engaged in the opposite. That's his gamble.
And most polls show the president's approval rating at about 60
percent, which is similar to other modern presidents' ratings at this
point in their presidencies. But now that Obama has used his political
capital to further ideology rather than economic growth, one thing is
clear: He owns this mess.
Mike
>
> Nobody is better at reading the news than a dufus who lied about having a PhD,
> right, fat boy?
>
Well, you probably have more time to read the news, given that you
don't have a job or a family...
dxAce
You had time to lie about having a PhD...
LMFAO at the crying Fat Boy !
~ RHF
> old boy kickbacks and no-bid contracts were used to create the most
> effective recruiting tool Al Qaeda could have ever dreamed of, then send
> a surge of targets into the gallery so they don't have to do a trans
> Atlantic and come here again.
- Looks like Barama is just the latest sucker
- to think there's a 'western' solution to the
- middle east issue.
- Afghanistan is shaping up to be his Viet Nam,
- wonder how long before he realizes it?
The US President "Barack 'Hussein' Obama" is
the Commander-in-Chief - so we can all chant :
hey, Hey. HEY ! O-Bomb-My-A
How Many American Boys and Girls Did You Kill Today
along with Innocent Iraqi and Afghan Women and Children ?
.
> Shame is that the limpballed dittoheads will see it as a rallying
> opportunity to install another colossal mistake like that mistress of
> moral contradiction, Palin.
dxAce
dxAce wrote:
> Michael W. Bryant, Marxist dufus who once claimed to have a PhD, wrote:
>
> > On Mar 12, 7:41 am, dxAce <dx...@milestones.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Nobody is better at reading the news than a dufus who lied about having a PhD,
> > > right, fat boy?
> > >
> >
> > Well, you probably have more time to read the news, given that you
> > don't have a job or a family...
>
> You had time to lie about having a PhD...
And, you had time to get busted smoking pot with your students...
ROTFLMFAO at the crying Fat Boy !
~ RHF
> ~ RHF wrote:
> > -was- OT: Obama's Approval Ratings Still High
> > On Mar 11, 9:59 am, Mike <mwbry...@aol.com> wrote:
- Roy Fisk;
-
- You undoubtedly post more characters than
- the other people mentioned above COMBINED.
Dave - Yeah I Am Mega-Super-Colossal 'Character'
and you are welcome ~ RHF
- You use the tilde more than the rest of usenet combined.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tilde
Dave - Right Again ! - As a matter-of-fact
. . . I am the 'Tilde' Holder ;;-} ~ RHF
.
Billy Burpelson
>>> "Mike" <mwbr...@aol.com> wrote in message
>>> news:1f4f0cf5-81f6-4ab3...@p20g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
>>>> http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/03/10/obama.ratings/index.html?eref=rss_politics&iref=polticker
>>> "The real test for Obama and the Democrats won't come until the midterm
>>> elections in 2010," Holland added. "By then it is likely that Americans
>>> will
>>> think Obama is responsible for the condition of the economy at that time."
MNMikeW wrote:
>>> Well who the fuck elses responsibilty would it be then?
"Bob Dobbs" <chupa...@operamail.com> wrote
>> You want to fault Barama for an inability to correct in two years what
>> it took that Texas turdwrangler eight years to create, all while the
>> same obstructionist Republican apparatchiks that conspired with Bush are
>> working against him at every turn?
MNMikeW wrote:
> Yeah, Bush caused this LOL!
Well, as a matter of fact, you're right! There's good evidence Bush
-did- cause it. According to many sources, including the Republican,
strongly pro-Bush Wall Street Journal, they say this economic mess has
been going on for 14 to 15 months. My calendar drops that right into
Bush's lap.
> The DOW drops everytime Obama Or Geithner open
> their mouths.
Yeah, that no doubt explains why the market went up almost 400 points
the other day, positive territory the next day and is up 202 points so
far today (as of 1845 UTC).
~ RHF
> On Mar 12, 2:51 am, "~ RHF" <rhf-newsgro...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
- - Due To His Great Leadership : Cause He stayed in the
- - White House and Said and Did Nothing ;;-}
- - .
- - ~ RHF
- - .
- Obama actually had a very busy day.
- You need to learn how to read the news.
Yeah Saying and Doing Nothing ~ RHF
.
dxAce
Carter, why is a known Marxist such as yourself cheering market upswings?
MNMikeW
"Billy Burpelson" <bi...@burpelsonafb.net> wrote in message
news:ANcul.26036$ZP4....@nlpi067.nbdc.sbc.com...
Of course, neither of them spoke recently now did they.
Mike
>
> The US President "Barack 'Hussein' Obama" is
> the Commander-in-Chief - so we can all chant :
> hey, Hey. HEY ! O-Bomb-My-A
> How Many American Boys and Girls Did You Kill Today
> along with Innocent Iraqi and Afghan Women and Children ?
> .
I think most of us feel pretty confident that fewer innocents will be
tortured and killed in the battle against terrorism during the Obama
presidency than suffered under the Bush-Cheney fiasco. Or are you
suggesting, RHF, that the risk of killing innocents negates the
necessity of battling terrorism?
Or do you have any idea about what you're saying? Consistency is
something you seem pretty averse to...
MNMikeW
On Mar 12, 2:32 pm, "~ RHF" <rhf-newsgro...@pacbell.net> wrote:
I think most of us feel pretty confident that fewer innocents will be
tortured and killed in the battle against terrorism during the Obama
presidency than suffered under the Bush-Cheney fiasco.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
How many of these fine folks releases from Gitmo have returned to terrorism?
Take you time.
Mike
> How many of these fine folks releases from Gitmo have returned to terrorism?
> Take you time.
Well, I don't think exact numbers exist. Some have returned to
terrorism. Many of the
Gitmo detainees turned out to be totally innocent, so I'll venture
that more turned out
innocent than returned to terrorism.
But American jurisprudence has long been based off the principle that
it's better to let
ten guilty people go free as opposed to incarcerating one innocent
individual.
dave
hardened terrorists because of their treatment at Camp X-ray.
Telamon
who are you? <Bar...@one.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:54:08 -0700, Telamon wrote:
>
> > In article <gp9sft$9g3$1...@news.albasani.net>,
> > who are you? <Bar...@one.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:43:50 -0700, Telamon wrote:
> >>
> >> > In article <49b83bdd.3246890@chupacabra>,
> >> > Bob Dobbs <chupa...@operamail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Bush should have done something about the Dem's in congress in his
> >> > second term. Now that the Dem's have full control it will be the end
> >> > of capitalism as we know it.
> >>
> >> If secretly spending almost $3T of taxpayers killing people in Iraq is
> >> what republican't capitalism is....
> >> I am glad to see it go!!!!!!
> >>
> >> Let's hope it never darkens our nation again.
> >
> > I want it back. I would rather have us killing terrorists in Iraq than
> > have another 9/11 here. Money well spent.
> >
> > Apparently instead of spending the money on defense you would rather it
> > be spent on congressional pork. Well I hope you are happy as the
> > obomination just signed the biggest pork bill in history. Of course he
> > ran for office on a pledge to end that sort of thing but it was just
> > another lie.
>
> Don't be stupid! A few hundred million $$$ of REPUBLICAN'T pork is much
> cheaper the $2.78 *TRILLION* Bush sneakily spent looking for WMDs where
> there were never any terrorist before.
>
> O I forgot, Dat dar maTh is way too much complamamcated for us thar
> republican'ts. All dem dar zeros must be soo confus-in. Ya know what I
> hear da odder day? Dat Hawia might just even be one a da united states?!
> Holey crips! Wasin't dat da joint dat dar Obammer was birthed-in?! OOoo
> us CONserivitives!, we don't take kindly to any of da states not
> connected on da big blue round ball map! Blue is commies and they'za too
> smart for dar own good. Stupid is now da new smart don't-ya know....
>
> Rush dar says dat!! Now I e-mail dat to all da neighbor who don't hav-a
> picture box.
I forgot how dumb liberals are. You are worried about $2.78 trillion
spent over 8 years protecting the country, which is constitutional, and
the size of the bailout 1 and 2 in 0.5 years time for unconstitutional
spending does not worry you? And hey, bailout 3 is coming right up.
You are one bright boy.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
Telamon
dave <da...@dave.dave> wrote:
Yes, it is a constitutional use of Federal funds as opposed to what is
going on now.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
Telamon
<856100a4-e9fa-4a65...@e38g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
Mike <mwbr...@aol.com> wrote:
I'm feeling pretty confident that another attack on our nation is in the
works aided by the obomination's policies.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
Telamon
dave <da...@dave.dave> wrote:
I'd say zero.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
Telamon
Billy Burpelson <bi...@burpelsonafb.net> wrote:
> Telamon wrote:
>
> > I would rather have us killing terrorists in Iraq than
> > have another 9/11 here.
>
> Please explain your logic.
>
> How could "us killing terrorists in Iraq" having anything whatsoever to
> do with "another 9/11 here"?
< SNIP >
It is the difference between taking an offensive as opposed to defensive
posture. It's sort of along the same lines as the ice melting seasonal
thread.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
Telamon
"MNMikeW" <MNMi...@aol.com> wrote:
> Yeah, those 8,000 earmarks don't count. Change and hope, BWHAHAHAHAHHA.
It's the new obomination math.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
Telamon
Bob Dobbs <chupa...@operamail.com> wrote:
> Telamon wrote:
> >Now that the Dem's have full control it will be the end of
> >capitalism as we know it.
>
> I'm sure looking forward to the end of capitalism
> as we've come to know it under the Bush cabal.
I'll bet you will change your mind over the next 4 years.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
Telamon
dave <da...@dave.dave> wrote:
> Telamon wrote:
>
> >
> > Bush should have done something about the Dem's in congress in his
> > second term. Now that the Dem's have full control it will be the end of
> > capitalism as we know it.
> >
> That already happened.
It hasn't yet. I'm still working, buying stuff with the money I make. I
don't think things have changed for you yet either.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
Telamon
"MNMikeW" <MNMi...@aol.com> wrote:
> "Bob Dobbs" <chupa...@operamail.com> wrote in message
> news:49b83bdd.3246890@chupacabra...
> > MNMikeW wrote:
> >>
> >>"Mike" <mwbr...@aol.com> wrote in message
> >>news:1f4f0cf5-81f6-4ab3...@p20g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
> >>> http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/03/10/obama.ratings/index.html?eref=rss_p
> >>> olitics&iref=polticker
> >>
> >>"The real test for Obama and the Democrats won't come until the midterm
> >>elections in 2010," Holland added. "By then it is likely that Americans
> >>will
> >>think Obama is responsible for the condition of the economy at that time."
> >>
> >>Well who the fuck elses responsibilty would it be then?
> >>
> >
> > You want to fault Barama for an inability to correct in two years what
> > it took that Texas turdwrangler eight years to create, all while the
> > same obstructionist Republican apparatchiks that conspired with Bush are
> > working against him at every turn?
> >
> Yeah, Bush caused this LOL! The DOW drops everytime Obama Or Geithner open
> their mouths.
Bush is making them say bad things about the market, investors, car
makers, and people in banking.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
Telamon
Billy Burpelson <bi...@burpelsonafb.net> wrote:
>
> >>> "Mike" <mwbr...@aol.com> wrote in message
> >>> news:1f4f0cf5-81f6-4ab3...@p20g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
> >>>> http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/03/10/obama.ratings/index.html?eref=rss_
> >>>> politics&iref=polticker
> >>> "The real test for Obama and the Democrats won't come until the midterm
> >>> elections in 2010," Holland added. "By then it is likely that Americans
> >>> will
> >>> think Obama is responsible for the condition of the economy at that
> >>> time."
>
> MNMikeW wrote:
>
> >>> Well who the fuck elses responsibilty would it be then?
>
> "Bob Dobbs" <chupa...@operamail.com> wrote
>
> >> You want to fault Barama for an inability to correct in two years what
> >> it took that Texas turdwrangler eight years to create, all while the
> >> same obstructionist Republican apparatchiks that conspired with Bush are
> >> working against him at every turn?
>
> MNMikeW wrote:
>
> > Yeah, Bush caused this LOL!
>
> Well, as a matter of fact, you're right! There's good evidence Bush
> -did- cause it. According to many sources, including the Republican,
> strongly pro-Bush Wall Street Journal, they say this economic mess has
> been going on for 14 to 15 months. My calendar drops that right into
> Bush's lap.
< SNIP >
I hold Bush responsible for not reining in the Dem's on the banking and
finance committee creating the toxic debt crisis, which is the major
cause of the current economic problems. This started 4 years ago and
Barney when completely out of control the last 2 years.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
Telamon
<420139d7-74ce-45f1...@v15g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>,
Mike <mwbr...@aol.com> wrote:
> On Mar 12, 2:51 am, "~ RHF" <rhf-newsgro...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
> > The US Stock Market When Up Today 10 March 2009
> > Due To His Great Leadership : Cause He stayed in the
> > White House and Said and Did Nothing ;;-}
> > .
> > ~ RHF
> > .
>
> Obama actually had a very busy day. You need to learn how to read the
> news.
Yeah, he destroyed a lot of wealth today.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
Billy Burpelson
> In article <zt7ul.8622$jZ1....@flpi144.ffdc.sbc.com>,
> Billy Burpelson <bi...@burpelsonafb.net> wrote:
>
>> Telamon wrote:
>>
>>> I would rather have us killing terrorists in Iraq than
>>> have another 9/11 here.
>> Please explain your logic.
>>
>> How could "us killing terrorists in Iraq" having anything whatsoever to
>> do with "another 9/11 here"?
>
> < SNIP >
Telamon wrote:
> It is the difference between taking an offensive as opposed to defensive
> posture.
Humph! That is really a non-answer.
An "offensive posture" against what?
The "terrorists" in Iraq aren't really terrorists. They are either
a) Fighting against foreign occupiers (us), just like we would do with
occupiers here in our country.
or
b) Participants in the local tribal civil war.
As I stated previously (and snipped by you), -real- terrorists wanting
to pull another 9/11 don't need to be in Iraq and indeed, they would be
rather stupid to stay in Iraq where we could kill them.
As I stated previously (and snipped by you), -real- terrorists will/can
operate anywhere in the whole world.
So again, a non-answer dodge on your part -- but thanks for playing.
Telamon
Billy Burpelson <bi...@burpelsonafb.net> wrote:
> > In article <zt7ul.8622$jZ1....@flpi144.ffdc.sbc.com>,
> > Billy Burpelson <bi...@burpelsonafb.net> wrote:
> >
> >> Telamon wrote:
> >>
> >>> I would rather have us killing terrorists in Iraq than
> >>> have another 9/11 here.
> >> Please explain your logic.
> >>
> >> How could "us killing terrorists in Iraq" having anything whatsoever to
> >> do with "another 9/11 here"?
> >
> > < SNIP >
>
> Telamon wrote:
>
> > It is the difference between taking an offensive as opposed to defensive
> > posture.
>
> Humph! That is really a non-answer.
It is the right answer.
> An "offensive posture" against what?
Your ignorance is pretty offensive.
> The "terrorists" in Iraq aren't really terrorists. They are either
>
> a) Fighting against foreign occupiers (us), just like we would do with
> occupiers here in our country.
>
> or
>
> b) Participants in the local tribal civil war.
>
> As I stated previously (and snipped by you), -real- terrorists wanting
> to pull another 9/11 don't need to be in Iraq and indeed, they would be
> rather stupid to stay in Iraq where we could kill them.
>
> As I stated previously (and snipped by you), -real- terrorists will/can
> operate anywhere in the whole world.
>
> So again, a non-answer dodge on your part -- but thanks for playing.
It not a dodge, it just just that you are incapable of comprehending.
And that's a personal problem of yours Billy.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
who are you?
No drought there is... it's rush limpbowowow and his lemmings out to
destroy the united states because they are still crying like little
school girls that they lost the election.
dxAce
Bob Dobbs wrote:
> Sure, my mindset will change from the current hopeful optimism
> to the satisfaction in knowing he's done a good job.
He has apparently done a good job of increasing the number of listeners to
Rush's program (which, by the way, is excellent).
dave
>
> I forgot how dumb liberals are. You are worried about $2.78 trillion
> spent over 8 years protecting the country, which is constitutional, and
> the size of the bailout 1 and 2 in 0.5 years time for unconstitutional
> spending does not worry you? And hey, bailout 3 is coming right up.
>
How does the Iraq War "protect the country"? Was Saddam going to shoot
us with his giant cannon?
dave
It is pure pork. The system is to foment chaos and then plunder under
the cloud of confusion. You are being played like a cheap violin.
http://coursesa.matrix.msu.edu/~hst306/documents/indust.html
dave
It has been fundamentally alterred for the forseeable future. (Reminds
me of Lurch) Paulson's first bailout was the beginning of socializing
the losses of speculating banks. We are screwed.
dave
>
> He has apparently done a good job of increasing the number of listeners to
> Rush's program (which, by the way, is excellent).
>
If you like pre-fontal lobotomy via radio.
MNMikeW
"dave" <da...@dave.dave> wrote in message
news:49b9a25a$0$31149$bd46...@news.dslextreme.com...
I'm guessing........none.
Count...@monsterchillerhorrortheater.com
<telamon_s...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
> In article <H4nF2fc6WnjP-pn2-qhQN1Mqpu1zF@localhost>,
> <Count...@MonsterChillerHorrorTheater.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 00:43:50 UTC, Telamon
> > <telamon_s...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > > Bush should have done something about the Dem's in congress in his
> > > second term.
> > Like what, send them to Dachau?
>
> That would be a good start.
And you, of course, would be Reinhardt Heydrich head of the
Einsatsgruppen in charge of putting them on their knees, shooting them
in the back of the head and kicking them into lime filled ditches.
Seig Heil!
"What do you mean there's no movie?"
dave
cuh...@webtv.net
Telamon
dave <da...@dave.dave> wrote:
Looks like you have been reading news on the Internet again. You know
better.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
Telamon
dave <da...@dave.dave> wrote:
I'll make this simple for you. We as a country do not have a large
enough population to counter what was the USSR and China. We have had
to rely on technology and advanced weapons as an equalizer. We don't
have any choice but to have technology that is superior. Money must be
spent to maintain this edge.
The big battle now is with China and the pacific. The Chinese tests us
all the time in the air, on the ocean surface, and under water.
Soon the contest will be in orbit around the earth.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
Telamon
Bob Dobbs <chupa...@operamail.com> wrote:
> Telamon wrote:
> >In article <49b8b029.2260046@chupacabra>,
> > Bob Dobbs <chupa...@operamail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Telamon wrote:
> >> >Now that the Dem's have full control it will be the end of
> >> >capitalism as we know it.
> >>
> >> I'm sure looking forward to the end of capitalism
> >> as we've come to know it under the Bush cabal.
> >
> >I'll bet you will change your mind over the next 4 years.
>
> Sure, my mindset will change from the current hopeful optimism
> to the satisfaction in knowing he's done a good job.
I expect you to be among the most disappointed.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
Telamon
dave <da...@dave.dave> wrote:
We can at least agree on that much.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
Telamon
<Count...@MonsterChillerHorrorTheater.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 01:16:13 UTC, Telamon
> <telamon_s...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
>
> > In article <H4nF2fc6WnjP-pn2-qhQN1Mqpu1zF@localhost>,
> > <Count...@MonsterChillerHorrorTheater.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 00:43:50 UTC, Telamon
> > > <telamon_s...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Bush should have done something about the Dem's in congress in
> > > > his second term.
> > > Like what, send them to Dachau?
> >
> > That would be a good start.
> And you, of course, would be Reinhardt Heydrich head of the
> Einsatsgruppen in charge of putting them on their knees, shooting
> them in the back of the head and kicking them into lime filled
> ditches. Seig Heil!
>
> "What do you mean there's no movie?"
You are describing the current administration. The liberal fascists have
taken over.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
Telamon
who are you? <Bar...@one.com> wrote:
Could you come over here and cry California a river? We need the water.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
~ RHF
<telamon_spamshi...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
> In article <4cGdneVU6_A--CfUnZ2dnUVZ_jeWn...@earthlink.com>,
>
>
>
> dave <d...@dave.dave> wrote:
> > Telamon wrote:
> > > dave <d...@dave.dave> wrote:
>
> > >> Telamon wrote:
>
> > >>> Apparently instead of spending the money on defense you would rather it
> > >>> be spent on congressional pork. Well I hope you are happy as the
> > >>> obomination just signed the biggest pork bill in history. Of course he
> > >>> ran for office on a pledge to end that sort of thing but it was just
> > >>> another lie.
> > >> Defense spending isn't pork?
>
> > > Yes, it is a constitutional use of Federal funds as opposed to what is
> > > going on now.
>
> > It is pure pork. The system is to foment chaos and then plunder under
> > the cloud of confusion. You are being played like a cheap violin.
>
> >http://coursesa.matrix.msu.edu/~hst306/documents/indust.html
>
> I'll make this simple for you. We as a country do not have a large
> enough population to counter what was the USSR and China. We have had
> to rely on technology and advanced weapons as an equalizer. We don't
> have any choice but to have technology that is superior. Money must be
> spent to maintain this edge.
>
> The big battle now is with China and the pacific. The Chinese tests us
> all the time in the air, on the ocean surface, and under water.
>
> Soon the contest will be in orbit around the earth.
>
> --
> Telamon
> Ventura, California
The Chinese are shoring-up sources of Oil around
the World to Fuel their Economy after the Collapse
of the US Economy : So that they can rely on the
World as a Market without the USA being a major
Buyer in that market. Plus the Chinese will be
able to Import US Food at a discount.
.
Within 5 Years half of the Oil Tankers carrying
Oil around the World will be carrying Oil to China.
Some of the Oil will be from the USA cause we
won't be able to afford our own Oil and will need
the Chinese "Hard Currency" to Pay our Foreign
Creditors.
Super-High US Gas Prices --- The ObamaTax©
US Gas Rationing --- The ObamaTax©
US Hyper-Inflation --- The ObamaTax©
Exorbitant US Interest-Rates --- The ObamaTax©
A Dollar That's Worth Only A Nickel --- The ObamaTax©
.
Until the pending Economic Collapse of the US
Treasury due to the Foreign Capital Pull-out :
Buy and Hold bankers boxes of 100CNY Chinese
Notes or open-up a Chinese Bank Account in
China Yuan {Renminbi} not US Dollars; along
with buying and holding Gold and Silver.
.
Within a year maybe three at most the US Dollar
will be worth 5 to 10 Cents and the Yuan will be
on Parity {equal} with the Dollar meaning a 600%
to 700% Gain in the Yuan Bank Account Holdings.
The Gold and Silver will show roughly an Equal
Gain against the US Dollar too.
.
The Euro will be BUST as well as the EU.
.
On the good side Foreign Goods and Services
will be too costly for Americans to buy with a
100 {old} US Dollar Chinese made Celphone
costing 500 {new} US Dollars at Wal*Mart.
Over the next Decade Jobs will becoming back
to America in Factories Owned and Operated
by Foreign Investors and Made-in-American
will be the good 'cheaper' Products on the Shelf
.
Many most Illegal Mexican Invaders will be
going back to Mexico as living there 'poor'
will be easier than living in the USA 'poor'.
.
it's a 'vision' thingee ~ RHF
.
.
cuh...@webtv.net
long yesterday and allmost all night long last night.It was a steady
hard rain too Bouque Moor, Sep.
cuhulin
cuh...@webtv.net
Agent and I will review them''
www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=258839
cuhulin
John Barnard
> In article
> <856100a4-e9fa-4a65...@e38g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
> Mike <mwbr...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mar 12, 2:32 pm, "~ RHF" <rhf-newsgro...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>>
>>> the Commander-in-Chief - so we can all chant :
>>> hey, Hey. HEY ! O-Bomb-My-A
>>> How Many American Boys and Girls Did You Kill Today
>>> along with Innocent Iraqi and Afghan Women and Children ?
>>> .
>> I think most of us feel pretty confident that fewer innocents will be
>> tortured and killed in the battle against terrorism during the Obama
>> suggesting, RHF, that the risk of killing innocents negates the
>> necessity of battling terrorism?
>>
>> Or do you have any idea about what you're saying? Consistency is
>> something you seem pretty averse to...
>
> I'm feeling pretty confident that another attack on our nation is in the
> works aided by the obomination's policies.
>
And, just to prove your prediction you would, no doubt, help the
terrorists. Way to go RHF Jr.!
JB
John Barnard
> "Bob Dobbs" <chupa...@operamail.com> wrote in message
> news:49b83bdd.3246890@chupacabra...>>> news:1f4f0cf5-81f6-4ab3...@p20g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
>>>> http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/03/10/obama.ratings/index.html?eref=rss_politics&iref=polticker
>>> "The real test for Obama and the Democrats won't come until the midterm
>>> elections in 2010," Holland added. "By then it is likely that Americans
>>> will
>>> think Obama is responsible for the condition of the economy at that time."
>>>
>>>
>> it took that Texas turdwrangler eight years to create, all while the
>> same obstructionist Republican apparatchiks that conspired with Bush are
>> working against him at every turn?
>>
> their mouths.
>
>
>
It dropped more under Bush.
JB
John Barnard
>
> Michael W. Bryant, the dufus who once claimed to have a PhD, wrote:
>
>> On Mar 12, 2:51 am, "~ RHF" <rhf-newsgro...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>>
>>> The US Stock Market When Up Today 10 March 2009
>>> Due To His Great Leadership : Cause He stayed in the
>>> White House and Said and Did Nothing ;;-}
>>> .
>>> ~ RHF
>>> .
>> Obama actually had a very busy day. You need to learn how to read the
>> news.
>
> right, fat boy?
>
> dxAce
> Michigan
> USA
>
> And, as always, don't let your children attend Louisville Technical Institute.
> They've hired at least one dufus who once claimed to have a PhD, and who knows,
> there may be more dufi there.
>
>
And you received a business degree from which matchbook institute?
JB
dxAce
John Barnard wrote:
No matchbooks involved, dumbass Canuck!
Now you just shut your mouth and crawl back into your third-world hole, boy!
dxAce
Michigan
USA
Telamon
John Barnard <jf...@shaw.ca> wrote:
You just post whatever random thought you have Kookaburra junior. Are
the voices bothering you again?
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
MNMikeW
cuh...@webtv.net
John Barnard
Repeat after me: "there is no problem with Obama's BC. There is no
problem with Obama's BC."
You may get the point sooner or later!
JB
John Barnard
from Sept. 2008 to Oct. 2008 and it keeps relatively constant until Jan.
2009. Grand Kahuna - Bush
From about 8000 to 6500 from Jan. 2009 - March 2009 and that ignores
the recent mild upswing. Grand Kahuna - Obama
Greater percent loss under Bush that Obama.
JB
John Barnard
credentials?
JB
dxAce
John Barnard wrote:
> What's the matter, dumbass? Afraid that someone would check up on your
> credentials?
Not at all, dumbass Canuck. After all, I've never lied about having a PhD!
Telamon
John Barnard <jf...@shaw.ca> wrote:
Keep repeating I am not a twit.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
John Barnard
JB
John Barnard
JB
Telamon
John Barnard <jf...@shaw.ca> wrote:
Right. You just keep on repeating that you are an asshole. Eventually it
will sink in.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
Telamon
John Barnard <jf...@shaw.ca> wrote:
Like you? I think not.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
dxAce
John Barnard wrote:
I've given the details several times, even gone so far as to post a pic of my diploma,
but you being a dumbass Canuck, it flew right on past you, boy!
LMFAO at the dufus Canuck.
John Barnard
aren't you?
JB
dxAce
John Barnard wrote:
Yes, I am capable of doing that, boy! However, that might be considered as 'repetitive and
BORING', so I guess you missed it.
Better luck next time, CanaDuh!
dxAce
Michigan
USA
John Barnard
your "stupid is as stupid does routine", I'll fill the blanks as you
don't seem capable of it.
Grand Valley State U, Degree in Business, Major in Investments and
Securities, 1985 claimed to have the degree conferred. Degree claimed
but not proven.
JB