cease and desit
an old friend
DeLorean wrote:
> As of today, clicking on http://www.google.com doesn't show the option
> to connect to Google groups until you click on the "more>>" link.
> That's because Google is starting to downplay its groups as the
> possibility looms that groups will be sold to another company.
>
> That also explains why Google hasn't been policing its users in recent
> months. They've been anticipating handing their Usenet problems over
> to someone else, so why should they spend their own money on them?
>
> The first thing that the new owner will do will be to shut down
> posting while a new interface is built, and I don't think it can
> happen too soon.
>
> Goodbye, Wiseman.
>
> Goodbye, Morgan.
funy I gues you have not been reading the NG closely if gogole were to
shut down then it at worst only in venances me
>
> Goodbye, K4YZ.
>
> Goodbye Google lamers in general. We won't miss any of ya.
an old friend
Lloyd wrote:
> He hates it when you put the subject back to what it was originally.
sometimes yes and sometimes
>
> In fact, Markie hates just about everything and everybody.
gee you are being awfully braod considering we have never met
>
> ------
> In message <1149094824.1...@j55g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> Mark Morgan autolamed himself when he said to Secwet Woger, "you arer
> [sic] everywhere like a cockroach"
lying again . Why?
>
Ma...@kb9rqz.com
<delo...@nim.bstrs> wrote:
>As of today, clicking on http://www.google.com doesn't show the option
>to connect to Google groups until you click on the "more>>" link.
>That's because Google is starting to downplay its groups as the
>possibility looms that groups will be sold to another company.
who wants to BUY it
>
>That also explains why Google hasn't been policing its users in recent
>months. They've been anticipating handing their Usenet problems over
>to someone else, so why should they spend their own money on them?
they would be well advised to sell or deal with there ToS problems
>
>The first thing that the new owner will do will be to shut down
>posting while a new interface is built, and I don't think it can
>happen too soon.
it certainly could but simply policing the sign up and lsitening to
complaints about posters would solve much of the problem
>
>Goodbye, Wiseman.
I would wonder what Wismen would do
>
>Goodbye, Morgan.
for example now that the backlog in adding shortwave has cleared I can
pioint that if Google stop being a psoting point then I will be at
worst mildly in convenaced
>
>Goodbye, K4YZ.
steve would not be beaten by that
>
>Goodbye Google lamers in general. We won't miss any of ya.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Leonard Willfong
>
> Goodbye, Morgan.
funy I gues you have not been reading the NG closely if gogole were to
shut down then it at worst only in venances me
.
There is no such thing as "gogole". You yet again show us why you have so
many intellectual superiors in these groups.
Mr. Hammington
DeLorean wrote:
> As of today, clicking on http://www.google.com doesn't show the option
> to connect to Google groups until you click on the "more>>" link.
> That's because Google is starting to downplay its groups as the
> possibility looms that groups will be sold to another company.
>
> months. They've been anticipating handing their Usenet problems over
> to someone else, so why should they spend their own money on them?
>
> posting while a new interface is built, and I don't think it can
> happen too soon.
>
>
> Goodbye, Morgan.
>
> Goodbye, K4YZ.
Then your life shall be so empty!
an old friend
Lloyd wrote:
> I should ask YOU that question, since Google records that you did
> make that statement.
googles ecords show as you yourself proved I said no such thing to
secert woger
> -----------------
> In message <1149094824.1...@j55g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> Mark Morgan autolamed himself when he said to Secwet Woger, "you arer
> [sic] everywhere like a cockroach"\
didnot say that as stateted
>
> -----------------
> In message <1152408561.4...@35g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
> Mark Morgan autolamed himself when he asked "why do you need yet
> another sock puppet"
I did say that but what is your point? why did wismen need yet another
sock puppet to harrass the NG?
it is a valid question
Mr. Hammington
in my opinion "an old friend" is his worst enemy.it appeas he goes
outof his way to stir things up. we all know dam well he can't sue
anyone on usenet.............just more fuel for the flames!
cuh...@webtv.net
if y'all want to use the best search engines.Why mess with that greasy
sissy kidstuff google anyway?
cuhulin
an old friend
Mr. Hammington wrote:
> an old friend wrote:
> > Lloyd wrote:
> > > I should ask YOU that question, since Google records that you did
> in my opinion "an old friend" is his worst enemy.it appeas he goes
> outof his way to stir things up. we all know dam well he can't sue
> anyone on usenet.............just more fuel for the flames!
sure I can I can even win the problem is not that finding a target that
also pay the judgement
but is it stiring the things to go around calling your foes child
molestors and rapists and such . I don't do that
indeed I am brave to sign my name to stuff you are not
U-Know-Who
"an old friend" <kb9...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1155514382....@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
No, just a moron that deserves what you get.
an old freind
U-Know-Who wrote:
> "an old friend" <kb9...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1155514382....@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > but is it stiring the things to go around calling your foes child
> > molestors and rapists and such . I don't do that
> >
> > indeed I am brave to sign my name to stuff you are not
> >
>
> No, just a moron that deserves what you get.
nobody deserves to be called a child molestor not even a real child
molestor (those sick folks deserve a long quiet rest and such peace as
their misdeeds allow them)
not even you Tom deserve being called a child molestor
Mark Morgan
"DeLorean" <delo...@nim.bstrs> wrote in message
news:23098717....@nim.bstrs...
> As of today, clicking on http://www.google.com doesn't show the option
> to connect to Google groups until you click on the "more>>" link.
> That's because Google is starting to downplay its groups as the
> possibility looms that groups will be sold to another company.
>
> That also explains why Google hasn't been policing its users in recent
> months. They've been anticipating handing their Usenet problems over
> to someone else, so why should they spend their own money on them?
>
> The first thing that the new owner will do will be to shut down
> posting while a new interface is built, and I don't think it can
> happen too soon.
>
> Goodbye, Wiseman.
>
> Goodbye, Morgan.
>
> Goodbye, K4YZ.
>
an old friend
> "DeLorean" <delo...@nim.bstrs> wrote in message
> news:23098717....@nim.bstrs...
Ma...@kb9rqz.com
<delo...@nim.bstrs> wrote:
>As of today, clicking on http://www.google.com doesn't show the option
>to connect to Google groups until you click on the "more>>" link.
>That's because Google is starting to downplay its groups as the
>possibility looms that groups will be sold to another company.
>
>That also explains why Google hasn't been policing its users in recent
>months. They've been anticipating handing their Usenet problems over
>to someone else, so why should they spend their own money on them?
>
>The first thing that the new owner will do will be to shut down
>posting while a new interface is built, and I don't think it can
>happen too soon.
>
>Goodbye, Wiseman.
>
>Goodbye, Morgan.
>
>Goodbye, K4YZ.
>
>Goodbye Google lamers in general. We won't miss any of ya.
well the progression of delection in my other newsreader brought up
this sessage just now
I note that Google is posting K4yz is still lamely struggling I am
doing fine Wismen seemed to be fine til aybe the last few days (maybe
he got shitcanned form yet anther ISP
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/
Ma...@kb9rqz.net
<delo...@nim.bstrs> wrote:
>As of today, clicking on http://www.google.com doesn't show the option
>to connect to Google groups until you click on the "more>>" link.
>That's because Google is starting to downplay its groups as the
>possibility looms that groups will be sold to another company.
>
>That also explains why Google hasn't been policing its users in recent
>months. They've been anticipating handing their Usenet problems over
>to someone else, so why should they spend their own money on them?
>
>The first thing that the new owner will do will be to shut down
>posting while a new interface is built, and I don't think it can
>happen too soon.
>
>Goodbye, Wiseman.
>
>Goodbye, Morgan.
>
>Goodbye, K4YZ.
>
>Goodbye Google lamers in general. We won't miss any of ya.
funy how nothing stops me (or the rest
cuh...@webtv.net
cuhulin
U-Know-Who
<Ma...@kb9rqz.net> wrote in message
news:khiuh2tnbkipjc8bl...@4ax.com...
Yes Mark, you are hell-bent on exposing your idiocy.
Ma...@kb9rqz.net
wrote:
>
><Ma...@kb9rqz.net> wrote in message
>news:khiuh2tnbkipjc8bl...@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 16:40:00 +0000 (UTC), "DeLorean"
>>>Goodbye Google lamers in general. We won't miss any of ya.
>> funy how nothing stops me (or the rest
>
>Yes Mark, you are hell-bent on exposing your idiocy.
no Tom exposing the hypocracy of folks like yourself
U-Know-Who
<Ma...@kb9rqz.net> wrote in message
news:eclvh2t4tsrb2ri2q...@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 13:28:08 GMT, "U-Know-Who" <no-...@nowhere.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>><Ma...@kb9rqz.net> wrote in message
>>news:khiuh2tnbkipjc8bl...@4ax.com...
>>> On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 16:40:00 +0000 (UTC), "DeLorean"
>
>>>>Goodbye Google lamers in general. We won't miss any of ya.
>>> funy how nothing stops me (or the rest
>>
>>Yes Mark, you are hell-bent on exposing your idiocy.
> no Tom exposing the hypocracy of folks like yourself
Who is Tom? And what hypocrisy?
kb9r...@hotmail.com
> > no Tom exposing the hypocracy of folks like yourself
>
> Who is Tom?
you are Tom
>And what hypocrisy?
your claim you want to discuss radio for one thing
you don't you just want to trash the NGS
cuh...@webtv.net
cuhulin
Ma...@kb9rqz.net
>As of today, clicking on http://www.google.com doesn't show the option
>to connect to Google groups until you click on the "more>>" link.
>That's because Google is starting to downplay its groups as the
>possibility looms that groups will be sold to another company.
>
>That also explains why Google hasn't been policing its users in recent
>months. They've been anticipating handing their Usenet problems over
>to someone else, so why should they spend their own money on them?
>
>The first thing that the new owner will do will be to shut down
>posting while a new interface is built, and I don't think it can
>happen too soon.
>
>Goodbye, Wiseman.
>
>Goodbye, Morgan.
>
>Goodbye, K4YZ.
>
>Goodbye Google lamers in general. We won't miss any of ya.
funny delorean it more than 3 months later and I am here althouh
wismen and robeson seem mostly gone
Ma...@kb9rqz.aprs
<delo...@nim.bstrs> wrote:
>As of today, clicking on http://www.google.com doesn't show the option
>to connect to Google groups until you click on the "more>>" link.
>That's because Google is starting to downplay its groups as the
>possibility looms that groups will be sold to another company.
>
>That also explains why Google hasn't been policing its users in recent
>months. They've been anticipating handing their Usenet problems over
>to someone else, so why should they spend their own money on them?
>
>The first thing that the new owner will do will be to shut down
>posting while a new interface is built, and I don't think it can
>happen too soon.
>
>Goodbye, Wiseman.
>
>Goodbye, Morgan.
>
>Goodbye, K4YZ.
>
>Goodbye Google lamers in general. We won't miss any of ya.
again Delorean note the dates and who is still here Me not even
yourself delorans but google is STILL up and ruuning
Ma...@kb9rqz.aprs
<delo...@nim.bstrs> wrote:
>As of today, clicking on http://www.google.com doesn't show the option
>to connect to Google groups until you click on the "more>>" link.
>That's because Google is starting to downplay its groups as the
>possibility looms that groups will be sold to another company.
>
>That also explains why Google hasn't been policing its users in recent
>months. They've been anticipating handing their Usenet problems over
>to someone else, so why should they spend their own money on them?
>
>The first thing that the new owner will do will be to shut down
>posting while a new interface is built, and I don't think it can
>happen too soon.
>
>Goodbye, Wiseman.
>
>Goodbye, Morgan.
>
>Goodbye, K4YZ.
>
>Goodbye Google lamers in general. We won't miss any of ya.
well 4 months later google still operates it usenet posting and code
testing died
only person we may have lost is K4YZ NoCode may have been too much for
him, maybe he has just busy but your acurately leave something to
desired but then you take your nick fail carmarker and cocaine dealer
Ma...@kb9rqz.aprs
<delo...@nim.bstrs> wrote:
>As of today, clicking on http://www.google.com doesn't show the option
>to connect to Google groups until you click on the "more>>" link.
>That's because Google is starting to downplay its groups as the
>possibility looms that groups will be sold to another company.
>
>That also explains why Google hasn't been policing its users in recent
>months. They've been anticipating handing their Usenet problems over
>to someone else, so why should they spend their own money on them?
>
>The first thing that the new owner will do will be to shut down
>posting while a new interface is built, and I don't think it can
>happen too soon.
>
>Goodbye, Wiseman.
>
>Goodbye, Morgan.
>
>Goodbye, K4YZ.
>
>Goodbye Google lamers in general. We won't miss any of ya.
13 aug and this is han?
U-Know-Who
<Ma...@kb9rqz.aprs> wrote in message
news:or88q2ddoqpldgt2l...@4ax.com...
Boy Markie, you're struggling for a fight today, eh?
Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
Ma...@kb9rqz.aprs
wrote:
>
><Ma...@kb9rqz.aprs> wrote in message
>news:or88q2ddoqpldgt2l...@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 16:40:00 +0000 (UTC), "DeLorean"
>> <delo...@nim.bstrs> wrote:
>>
>>>As of today, clicking on http://www.google.com doesn't show the option
>>>to connect to Google groups until you click on the "more>>" link.
>>>That's because Google is starting to downplay its groups as the
>>>possibility looms that groups will be sold to another company.
>>>
>>>That also explains why Google hasn't been policing its users in recent
>>>months. They've been anticipating handing their Usenet problems over
>>>to someone else, so why should they spend their own money on them?
>>>
>>>The first thing that the new owner will do will be to shut down
>>>posting while a new interface is built, and I don't think it can
>>>happen too soon.
>>>
>>>Goodbye, Wiseman.
>>>
>>>Goodbye, Morgan.
>>>
>>>Goodbye, K4YZ.
>>>
>>>Goodbye Google lamers in general. We won't miss any of ya.
>> 13 aug and this is han?
>
>Boy Markie, you're struggling for a fight today, eh?
no Tom I am just pointing to "deloran" who has been bothering me today
claiming he knows better what hapenes in the world soe I pointed one
of his bonehead plays
Head2Mo...@yahoo.com
Ma...@kb9rqz.aprs
>http://www.geocities.com/iam_ironman2002/
more spaming of pic woger?
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
<delo...@nim.bstrs> wrote:
>As of today, clicking on http://www.google.com doesn't show the option
>to connect to Google groups until you click on the "more>>" link.
>That's because Google is starting to downplay its groups as the
>possibility looms that groups will be sold to another company.
>
>That also explains why Google hasn't been policing its users in recent
>months. They've been anticipating handing their Usenet problems over
>to someone else, so why should they spend their own money on them?
>
>The first thing that the new owner will do will be to shut down
>posting while a new interface is built, and I don't think it can
>happen too soon.
>
>Goodbye, Wiseman.
>
>Goodbye, Morgan.
BTW I am still here dispite a bit of possible sabotage
>
>Goodbye, K4YZ.
>
>Goodbye Google lamers in general. We won't miss any of ya.
"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress"
adams
woger you are a Congress all in your own head
http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/
G
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
<delo...@nim.bstrs> wrote:
>As of today, clicking on http://www.google.com doesn't show the option
>to connect to Google groups until you click on the "more>>" link.
>That's because Google is starting to downplay its groups as the
>possibility looms that groups will be sold to another company.
>
>That also explains why Google hasn't been policing its users in recent
>months. They've been anticipating handing their Usenet problems over
>to someone else, so why should they spend their own money on them?
>
>The first thing that the new owner will do will be to shut down
>posting while a new interface is built, and I don't think it can
>happen too soon.
>
>Goodbye, Wiseman.
>
>Goodbye, Morgan.
still here Chris
I just re-respsond to this post every now and then to remind you of
your prediction that I was soon to off line
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
<delo...@nim.bstrs> wrote:
>As of today, clicking on http://www.google.com doesn't show the option
>to connect to Google groups until you click on the "more>>" link.
>That's because Google is starting to downplay its groups as the
>possibility looms that groups will be sold to another company.
>
>That also explains why Google hasn't been policing its users in recent
>months. They've been anticipating handing their Usenet problems over
>to someone else, so why should they spend their own money on them?
>
>The first thing that the new owner will do will be to shut down
>posting while a new interface is built, and I don't think it can
>happen too soon.
>
>Goodbye, Wiseman.
>
>Goodbye, Morgan.
>
>Goodbye, K4YZ.
>
>Goodbye Google lamers in general. We won't miss any of ya.
sure you made the post "chris" all annymice are the same I don't care
what distintions you try to draw between you
and as long as you want to keep thread jacking I can deal with with it
funny though I can deal with being thread jacked and you can not
but still here what 10 months after this pronoucement of doom
if you want to be treated other than a annymouse then start sign a
name or call to your posts and make one that is your coward
Dloyd Lavies
> On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 16:40:00 +0000 (UTC), "DeLorean"
>
> what distintions you try to draw between you
>
> and as long as you want to keep thread jacking I can deal with with it
> funny though I can deal with being thread jacked and you can not
>
> but still here what 10 months after this pronoucement of doom
>
how much Markie whines, a KooK is a KooK is a KooK.
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
wrote:
>On May 26, 8:27 pm, M...@kb9rqz.gimmiebackmyblogorIwillcry.org wrote:
>> On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 16:40:00 +0000 (UTC), "DeLorean"
>>
>> sure you made the post "chris" all annymice are the same I don't care
>> what distintions you try to draw between you
>>
>> and as long as you want to keep thread jacking I can deal with with it
>> funny though I can deal with being thread jacked and you can not
>>
>> but still here what 10 months after this pronoucement of doom
>>
>Still whining, trashing the NG's, and unable to spell.
yea you are still whining Dloyd and you lack even as good a ham
station as myself if your words can be beleived
>Doesn't matter
>how much Markie whines, a KooK is a KooK is a KooK.
indeed nothing I can do, in practical terms, to stop you from being a
Kook dloyd.
indeed you are a kook and will likely die a kook
cuh...@webtv.net
cuhulin
Dloyd Lavies
>
> >> sure you made the post "chris" all annymice are the same I don't care
> >> what distintions you try to draw between you
>
> >> and as long as you want to keep thread jacking I can deal with with it
> >> funny though I can deal with being thread jacked and you can not
>
> >> but still here what 10 months after this pronoucement of doom
>
> >Still whining, trashing the NG's, and unable to spell.
>
> yea you are still whining Dloyd
No, your the one whining, and still so desperate for attention that
you have to dredge old threads from four months ago. So much for who
is feeding the flames, huh Mark?
>you lack even as good a ham
>station as myself if your words can be beleived
I don't lack anything, yes my station is currently down by my own
choice for renovations. Nevertheless, do you have a point or is it
just more of your dribble.
> >Doesn't matter
> >how much Markie whines, a KooK is a KooK is a KooK.
>
> indeed nothing I can do, in practical terms, to stop you from being a
> Kook dloyd.
Nor can I stop your continued attack on the NG, but then again It was
you who earned the honor of KooK of the month.
>
> indeed you are a kook and will likely die a kook
Not likely, but you will certainly die before I.
>
> "one useless Mark is expected"
>
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/
>
Dloyd Lavies
Let me correct my prior post before Mark goes on a rant.
Nor can I stop your continued attack on the NG, but then again It was
you who earned a nomination as KooK of the month.
Dloyd
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
wrote:
>On May 26, 10:43?pm, M...@kb9rqz.gimmiebackmyblogorIwillcry.org wrote:
>>
>> >> sure you made the post "chris" all annymice are the same I don't care
>> >> what distintions you try to draw between you
>>
>> >> and as long as you want to keep thread jacking I can deal with with it
>> >> funny though I can deal with being thread jacked and you can not
>>
>> >> but still here what 10 months after this pronoucement of doom
>>
>> >Still whining, trashing the NG's, and unable to spell.
>>
>> yea you are still whining Dloyd
>
>No, your the one whining,
nope
> and still so desperate for attention that
>you have to dredge old threads from four months ago.
more like 10 months your point you go out looking for stuff YEARS old
> So much for who
>is feeding the flames, huh Mark?
how is pointing out that you are enaging in a futile effort to attack
and harm someone that has never harmed you in the slightest
>
>>you lack even as good a ham
>>station as myself if your words can be beleived
>
>I don't lack anything, yes my station is currently down by my own
>choice for renovations.
you comfirm you lack a working station
> Nevertheless, do you have a point or is it
>just more of your dribble.
you can't see it you claim to be a ham and yet you are withoout even a
workable station
>
>> >Doesn't matter
>> >how much Markie whines, a KooK is a KooK is a KooK.
>>
>> indeed nothing I can do, in practical terms, to stop you from being a
>> Kook dloyd.
>
>Nor can I stop your continued attack on the NG,.......
what attack?
>...... but then again It was
>you who earned the honor of KooK of the month.
did I realy?
>>
>> indeed you are a kook and will likely die a kook
>
>Not likely, but you will certainly die before I.
you are a kook one that can't stand anyoe standing up to your vicous
years of Homophobic attack, but you are likely older than I (since I
am younger than most hams etc ) and therefore your death is likely
long before mine esp if any of your no doubt large legion of victums
ever finds out who you are
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
wrote:
>On May 27, 6:10?pm, Dloyd Lavies <DloydLav...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
talking to your self now Dloyd that is not a good siogn but you are a
an_old_friend
> On Sun, 27 May 2007 20:34:54 -0400, M...@kb9rqz.org wrote:
>
> [nothing]
nothing you can face anyway
the fact of the matter you have been shhoting your mouth off for
months to years on how certain folks were gpoing to be driven off
USENET the only sucess is MINE in driving K4YZ off
one day perhap you will grow up and learn your efforts are futile
Not Roger
>
>>you lack even as good a ham
>>station as myself if your words can be beleived
>
>I don't lack anything, yes my station is currently down by my own
>choice for renovations.
you comfirm you lack a working station
> Nevertheless, do you have a point or is it
>just more of your dribble.
you can't see it you claim to be a ham and yet you are withoout even a
workable station
Where is YOUR "working" station, Mark? All we have is your word that you
have worked EME, but even that is in question.
We have yet to hear you on HF.
>...... but then again It was
>you who earned the honor of KooK of the month.
did I realy?
>>
>> indeed you are a kook and will likely die a kook
>
>Not likely, but you will certainly die before I.
you are a kook one that can't stand anyoe standing up to your vicous
years of Homophobic <snip>
Here goes Mark yet again, flaunting his sexual orientation.
Dloyd Lavies
> On 27 May 2007 15:10:27 -0700, Dloyd Lavies <DloydLav...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >On May 26, 10:43?pm, M...@kb9rqz.gimmiebackmyblogorIwillcry.org wrote:
>
> >> >> sure you made the post "chris" all annymice are the same I don't care
> >> >> what distintions you try to draw between you
>
> >> >> and as long as you want to keep thread jacking I can deal with with it
> >> >> funny though I can deal with being thread jacked and you can not
>
> >> >> but still here what 10 months after this pronoucement of doom
>
> >> >Still whining, trashing the NG's, and unable to spell.
>
> >> yea you are still whining Dloyd
>
> >No, your the one whining,
>
> nope
>
> > and still so desperate for attention that
> >you have to dredge old threads from four months ago.
>
> more like 10 months your point you go out looking for stuff YEARS old
>
already, you cry like a little bitch.
> > So much for who
> >is feeding the flames, huh Mark?
>
> how is pointing out that you are enaging in a futile effort to attack
> and harm someone that has never harmed you in the slightest
>
You harm everyone with you assinie posting behavior, a behavior, that
because you are such a Kook, you can't even see that it is so
inappropriate.
>
>
> >>you lack even as good a ham
> >>station as myself if your words can be beleived
>
> >I don't lack anything, yes my station is currently down by my own
> >choice for renovations.
>
> you comfirm you lack a working station
>
Yes, but just the one in my main residence. The ones in my mobile and
other residences are working fine, as matter of fact worked a little
DX on six yesterday.
> > Nevertheless, do you have a point or is it
> >just more of your dribble.
>
> you can't see it you claim to be a ham and yet you are withoout even a
> workable station
No I don't see it, just another one of you "Markie" assumptions.
Unlike you, I have multiple residences and the means to have multiple
stations.
>
>
> >> >Doesn't matter
> >> >how much Markie whines, a KooK is a KooK is a KooK.
>
> >> indeed nothing I can do, in practical terms, to stop you from being a
> >> Kook dloyd.
>
> >Nor can I stop your continued attack on the NG,.......
>
> what attack?
Using your words, "You can't see it, you claim to be under attack, yet
it is you who is dredging up old posts to keep the flames going, to
keep yourself "under attack".
>
> >...... but then again It was
> >you who earned the honor of KooK of the month.
>
> did I realy?
>
Yes you did. Kook!
>
>
> >> indeed you are a kook and will likely die a kook
>
> >Not likely, but you will certainly die before I.
>
> you are a kook one that can't stand anyoe standing up to your vicous
> years of Homophobic attack, but you are likely older than I (since I
> am younger than most hams etc ) and therefore your death is likely
> long before mine esp if any of your no doubt large legion of victums
> ever finds out who you are
>
I don't know how old you are, but since you father is in poor health,
you probably will be too at that age and before me. My parents are
both alive and have no health problems whatsoever. Furthermore, I
don't have a large legion of "victums" as you say. There are no
"victurms", only Kooks who think they can shit on everyone's posts
without getting a response from the group, and when the response
comes, they cry "I am a VICTUM, the eternal VICTUM". Nevertheless,
there you go again bringing up that you are a HOMO. No one gives a
shit about you abnormal lifestyle, why don't you shut the hell up
already about the subject. You always whine that some dislike you
because of your sexuality. Well Mark, it is all bullshit, I don't
like you because of your constant shit stirring on RRAM and RRAP, and
the fact that you LIE so much.
Dloyd
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
wrote:
>On May 27, 8:34?pm, M...@kb9rqz.givemebackmyblogorIwillcry.org wrote:
>> On 27 May 2007 15:10:27 -0700, Dloyd Lavies <DloydLav...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On May 26, 10:43?pm, M...@kb9rqz.gimmiebackmyblogorIwillcry.org wrote:
>>
>> >> >> sure you made the post "chris" all annymice are the same I don't care
>> >> >> what distintions you try to draw between you
>>
>> >> >> and as long as you want to keep thread jacking I can deal with with it
>> >> >> funny though I can deal with being thread jacked and you can not
>>
>> >> >> but still here what 10 months after this pronoucement of doom
>>
>> >> >Still whining, trashing the NG's, and unable to spell.
>>
>> >> yea you are still whining Dloyd
>>
>> >No, your the one whining,
>>
>> nope
>>
>Yes
where?
>> > and still so desperate for attention that
>> >you have to dredge old threads from four months ago.
>>
>> more like 10 months your point you go out looking for stuff YEARS old
>>
>What stuff? Are you speaking of your wedding registry. Get over it
>already, you cry like a little bitch.
ah yes HYPOCRITE you are ok doing anything like calling my wife a
lesbian and stealing blog credit cards digging up urnrelated stuff but
I am doing something wrong in reminding you and your freinds that you
lack the power to carryout your crude threats
the rest flushed
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
>Where is YOUR "working" station, Mark? All we have is your word that you
>have worked EME, but even that is in question.
>We have yet to hear you on HF.
>
right here On air right now
of course yDloyd admits he lacks a station you have no proof of a
working either
cuh...@webtv.net
Lookin for an old Army buddy,Harold Pack.
cuhulin
cuh...@webtv.net
last more than two minutes.I don't want to ''work'' with them lesbian
wimmins next door to me either.They are ugly and nasty.I am fixin to
click off of that Battle of Britain movie on tv.I don't like that Stupid
background ''music'' on there at all.It SUCKS!
cuhulin
Dloyd Lavies
> ah yes HYPOCRITE you are ok doing anything like calling my wife a
> lesbian
According to you and by your own admission she is a lesbian/bi-sexual.
So where is the problem?
>and stealing blog credit cards digging up urnrelated stuff but
>I am doing something wrong in reminding you and your freinds that >you lack the power to carryout your crude threats
Ah yes, MORE of Markie's Lies, First I didn't steal anything. You are
a buffoon and lost control of your blog, you admitted doing such.
Second, no credit cards were stolen, more of your bullshit, didn't
happen.
> the rest flushed
Because you can't stand to read the truth that there is no large
legion of "victums", but only one Kook, yourself, who keeps crapping
on everyone's posts, and that you keep bringing up the fact that your
are a HOMO to stir the pot.
Again, no one gives a shit about you abnormal lifestyle.
Dloyd
an_old_friend
> On May 27, 8:34?pm, M...@kb9rqz.givemebackmyblogorIwillcry.org wrote:
>
> > ah yes HYPOCRITE you are ok doing anything like calling my wife a
> > lesbian
>
> According to you and by your own admission she is a lesbian/bi-sexual.
> So where is the problem?
no such statement from me dloyd
>
> Again, no one gives a shit about you abnormal lifestyle.
then why do you make off topic coments about it?
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
>As of today, clicking on http://www.google.com doesn't show the option
>to connect to Google groups until you click on the "more>>" link.
>That's because Google is starting to downplay its groups as the
>possibility looms that groups will be sold to another company.
>
>That also explains why Google hasn't been policing its users in recent
>months. They've been anticipating handing their Usenet problems over
>to someone else, so why should they spend their own money on them?
>
>The first thing that the new owner will do will be to shut down
>posting while a new interface is built, and I don't think it can
>happen too soon.
>
>Goodbye, Wiseman.
>
>Goodbye, Morgan.
>
>Goodbye, K4YZ.
>
>Goodbye Google lamers in general. We won't miss any of ya.
well I will take monment to repaet what dlyd and chris (the cabal of
one perhaps) just can't face
they are not able to silence me
nobody has selinced woger either
only Robeson has been seilenced
Dloyd Lavies
> On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 16:40:00 +0000 (UTC), "DeLorean"
>
>
>
>
>
> >As of today, clicking onhttp://www.google.comdoesn't show the option
> >to connect to Google groups until you click on the "more>>" link.
> >That's because Google is starting to downplay its groups as the
> >possibility looms that groups will be sold to another company.
>
> >That also explains why Google hasn't been policing its users in recent
> >months. They've been anticipating handing their Usenet problems over
> >to someone else, so why should they spend their own money on them?
>
> >The first thing that the new owner will do will be to shut down
> >posting while a new interface is built, and I don't think it can
> >happen too soon.
>
> >Goodbye, Wiseman.
>
> >Goodbye, Morgan.
>
> >Goodbye, K4YZ.
>
> >Goodbye Google lamers in general. We won't miss any of ya.
>
> well I will take monment to repaet what dlyd and chris (the cabal of
> one perhaps) just can't face
>
> they are not able to silence me
>
> nobody has selinced woger either
>
> only Robeson has been seilenced
>
> "one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress"
> adams
>
> woger you are a Congress all in your own head
>
> http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/
>
> G
>
> --
>
> - Show quoted text -
Obviously, no one can teach you how to spell either.
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
wrote:
>On May 28, 7:32?pm, M...@kb9rqz.org wrote:
>> On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 16:40:00 +0000 (UTC), "DeLorean"
>>
>>
>> --
>> Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>Obviously, no one can teach you how to spell either.
that is generaly the case with real dyslexics Dloyd
and I refuse to blackmailed in wasting more time on crap like yours
too
but I am here and you can't stand being reminded of that
Dloyd Lavies
> On 28 May 2007 16:43:52 -0700, Dloyd Lavies <DloydLav...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >On May 28, 7:32?pm, M...@kb9rqz.org wrote:
> >> On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 16:40:00 +0000 (UTC), "DeLorean"
>
> >> --
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> >Obviously, no one can teach you how to spell either.
>
> that is generaly the case with real dyslexics Dloyd
>
Most dyslexics overcome, your are the exception, not the rule. But
since you have "other issues", they may be more of a contributing
factor than just being dyslexic.
> and I refuse to blackmailed in wasting more time on crap like yours
> too
If it is such a waste, then stop responding to my posts, but you can't
you are too much of a KooK.
>
> but I am here and you can't stand being reminded of that
>
I don't care that you are here. You are cheap entertainment, similar
to a dancing monkey. So dance, BTW don't forget your top hat and
banana?
Dloyd
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
wrote:
>On May 28, 7:49?pm, M...@kb9rqz.org wrote:
>> On 28 May 2007 16:43:52 -0700, Dloyd Lavies <DloydLav...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On May 28, 7:32?pm, M...@kb9rqz.org wrote:
>> >> On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 16:40:00 +0000 (UTC), "DeLorean"
>>
>> >> --
>> >> Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com-Hide quoted text -
>>
>> >> - Show quoted text -
>>
>> >Obviously, no one can teach you how to spell either.
>>
>> that is generaly the case with real dyslexics Dloyd
>>
>No, only for those who are too lazy to overcome this minor disability.
ah yes I am so lazy
get a life
>Most dyslexics overcome, your are the exception, not the rule. But
>since you have "other issues", they may be more of a contributing
>factor than just being dyslexic.
right other issues
get a life and stop whing Dloyd
>
>> and I refuse to blackmailed in wasting more time on crap like yours
>> too
>
>If it is such a waste, then stop responding to my posts, but you can't
>you are too much of a KooK.
you realy need to learn to read
I did not say repsonding was a waste I said spending much time on
rsponding was a waste
>>
>> but I am here and you can't stand being reminded of that
>>
>I don't care that you are here.
yes you certainl y as you admit to in your next sentence
try to keep your story straight from one sentence to the next
> You are cheap entertainment, similar
>to a dancing monkey. So dance, BTW don't forget your top hat and
>banana?
nice of you to admit you seek to disrupt the NG dloyd you did just
admit to that you know
after all you claimed you posted to provoke that reaction you get and
tyou have claimed I am disruptive when I post so you are claiming
responiblity for disrupting the NG
hi steve
"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress"
adams
woger you are a Congress all in your own head
http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/
G
--
Dloyd Lavies
>
> right other issues
>
Glad you admit that also.
>
> you realy need to learn to read
I can read just fine, you need to learn how to clearly articulate
yourself.
>
> I did not say repsonding was a waste I said spending much time on
> rsponding was a waste
>
No difference.
>
>
> >> but I am here and you can't stand being reminded of that
>
> >I don't care that you are here.
>
> yes you certainl y as you admit to in your next sentence
No, if you weren't here some other Kook would be here instead. All
Kooks are the same, no difference between your or the others Kooks on
Usenet.
>
> try to keep your story straight from one sentence to the next
>
I don't have to, this is not a moderated group and you are not a
moderator, if you don't like it, too bad, now stop crying.
> > You are cheap entertainment, similar
> >to a dancing monkey. So dance, BTW don't forget your top hat and
> >banana?
>
> nice of you to admit you seek to disrupt the NG dloyd you did just
> admit to that you know
>
No, just to see you dance, and it is working as long as you keep
responding. Dance little monkey dance.
> after all you claimed you posted to provoke that reaction you get and
> tyou have claimed I am disruptive when I post so you are claiming
> responiblity for disrupting the NG
> hi steve
Why don't you keep yourself straight, you said "only Robeson has been
seilenced" yet If Robeson has been silenced, who is Steve.
Kook.
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
>As of today, clicking on http://www.google.com doesn't show the option
>to connect to Google groups until you click on the "more>>" link.
>That's because Google is starting to downplay its groups as the
>possibility looms that groups will be sold to another company.
>
>That also explains why Google hasn't been policing its users in recent
>months. They've been anticipating handing their Usenet problems over
>to someone else, so why should they spend their own money on them?
>
>The first thing that the new owner will do will be to shut down
>posting while a new interface is built, and I don't think it can
>happen too soon.
>
>Goodbye, Wiseman.
>
>Goodbye, Morgan.
>
>Goodbye, K4YZ.
>
>Goodbye Google lamers in general. We won't miss any of ya.
when will dloyd et all face the fact they can disrupt the NG all they
like but they can get rid of me
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
wrote:
>On May 28, 8:16?pm, M...@kb9rqz.org wrote:
>> ah yes I am so lazy
>>
>Glad you admit it fatboy.
no amdission made
>>
>> right other issues
>>
>Glad you admit that also.
no admission made at least not in context steve
>>
>> you realy need to learn to read
>
>I can read just fine, you need to learn how to clearly articulate
>yourself.
you prove otherwise with almost every post
>>
>> I did not say repsonding was a waste I said spending much time on
>> rsponding was a waste
>>
>No difference.
is reading skill or just plain mental comprhension you lack?
>>
>>
>> >> but I am here and you can't stand being reminded of that
>>
>> >I don't care that you are here.
>>
>> yes you certainl y as you admit to in your next sentence
>
>No, if you weren't here some other Kook would be here instead. All
>Kooks are the same, no difference between your or the others Kooks on
>Usenet.
>>
>> try to keep your story straight from one sentence to the next
>>
>I don't have to, this is not a moderated group and you are not a
>moderator, if you don't like it, too bad, now stop crying.
no you don' t have to but it might make morre effective
>
>> > You are cheap entertainment, similar
>> >to a dancing monkey. So dance, BTW don't forget your top hat and
>> >banana?
>>
>> nice of you to admit you seek to disrupt the NG dloyd you did just
>> admit to that you know
>>
>No, just to see you dance, and it is working as long as you keep
>responding. Dance little monkey dance.
>
>> after all you claimed you posted to provoke that reaction you get and
>> tyou have claimed I am disruptive when I post so you are claiming
>> responiblity for disrupting the NG
>> hi 3teve
>
>Why don't you keep yourself straight, you said "only Robeson has been
>seilenced" yet If Robeson has been silenced, who is Steve.
who indeed? many people are neamed steve
>
>Kook.
>
>http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
<delo...@nim.bstrs> wrote:
>As of today, clicking on http://www.google.com doesn't show the option
>to connect to Google groups until you click on the "more>>" link.
>That's because Google is starting to downplay its groups as the
>possibility looms that groups will be sold to another company.
>
>That also explains why Google hasn't been policing its users in recent
>months. They've been anticipating handing their Usenet problems over
>to someone else, so why should they spend their own money on them?
>
>The first thing that the new owner will do will be to shut down
>posting while a new interface is built, and I don't think it can
>happen too soon.
>
>Goodbye, Wiseman.
>
>Goodbye, Morgan.
>
>Goodbye, K4YZ.
>
>Goodbye Google lamers in general. We won't miss any of ya.
again I am still here you don't like your nose rubbed in your mistakes
dloyd
Dloyd Lavies
>
> when will dloyd et all face the fact they can disrupt the NG all they
> like but they can get rid of me
>
Dloyd
Dloyd Lavies
> again I am still here you don't like your nose rubbed in your mistakes
> dloyd
No mistakes at all. You are still responding to my every post, I took
your blog, I outed your wife as you say, I proved that your are a liar
which you have admitted, and most of all, I have made you dance for
months like a little chimp, making you go off on tangents spamming
this NG. Like you did tonight, posting the same thing with different
subject titles on 5 seperate posts.
Ma ma monkey Markie, would you like a banana now?
Dloyd
Not Mark's Blog
Anon
There you go again, Mork. Your Obsessive/Compulsive Disorder is showing.
And once again you are posting off topic.
Anon
unspoken Markie Morgan no-no! Mark will, in his twisted mind,
predictably view this as a reference to a phallic symbol and will yet
again accuse you of being a homophobe.
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
wrote:
>On May 28, 8:47?pm, M...@kb9rqz.org wrote:
well you and your friends have been trying for years and I am still
here
>
>Dloyd
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
wrote:
>On May 28, 8:50?pm, M...@kb9rqz.org wrote:
>> again I am still here you don't like your nose rubbed in your mistakes
>> dloyd
>
>No mistakes at all.
plenty of mistake dloyd
> You are still responding to my every post,......
so?
>...... I took
>your blog,.........
amditing to theft at Last
>..... I outed your wife as you say,
you have made that unsupported accusation yes
> I proved that your are a liar
where?
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
>
literly nothing just a threadjacking
"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress"
adams
woger you are a Congress all in your own head
http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/
G
--
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
>As of today, clicking on http://www.google.com doesn't show the option
>to connect to Google groups until you click on the "more>>" link.
>That's because Google is starting to downplay its groups as the
>possibility looms that groups will be sold to another company.
>
>That also explains why Google hasn't been policing its users in recent
>months. They've been anticipating handing their Usenet problems over
>to someone else, so why should they spend their own money on them?
>
>The first thing that the new owner will do will be to shut down
>posting while a new interface is built, and I don't think it can
>happen too soon.
>
>Goodbye, Wiseman.
>
>Goodbye, Morgan.
>
>Goodbye, K4YZ.
>
>Goodbye Google lamers in general. We won't miss any of ya.
still here Dloyd
kb9_...@yahoo.com
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to
this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the
Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
an old friend View profileDeLorean wrote: > As of today, clicking
on http://www.google.com doesn't show the option > to connect to
Google groups until you click on the "more>>" link. > That's because
Google is starting to downplay its groups as the > possibility looms
that groups will be sold to another company. > That also explains why
Google hasn't been policing its users in recent > months. They've
been anticipating handing their Usenet problems over > to someone
else, so why should they spend their own money on them? > The first
thing that the new owner will do will be to shut down > posting while
a new interface is built, and I don't think it can > happen too soon.
> Goodbye, Wiseman. > Goodbye, Morgan. funy I gues you have not been
reading the NG closely if gogole were to shut down then it at worst
only in venances me > Goodbye, K4YZ. > Goodbye Google lamers in
general. We won't miss any of ya. - Hide quoted text -- Show quoted
text -- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text -
More options Aug 13 2006, 11:44 am
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.shortwave
From: "an old friend" <kb9...@hotmail.com>
Date: 13 Aug 2006 09:44:57 -0700
Local: Sun, Aug 13 2006 11:44 am
Subject: cease and desit
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original
| Report this message | Find messages by this author
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
DeLorean wrote:
> As of today, clicking on http://www.google.com doesn't show the option
> to connect to Google groups until you click on the "more>>" link.
> That's because Google is starting to downplay its groups as the
> possibility looms that groups will be sold to another company.
> That also explains why Google hasn't been policing its users in recent
> months. They've been anticipating handing their Usenet problems over
> to someone else, so why should they spend their own money on them?
> The first thing that the new owner will do will be to shut down
> posting while a new interface is built, and I don't think it can
> happen too soon.
> Goodbye, Wiseman.
> Goodbye, Morgan.
funy I gues you have not been reading the NG closely if gogole were
to
shut down then it at worst only in venances me
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
> Goodbye, K4YZ.
> Goodbye Google lamers in general. We won't miss any of ya.
Reply Reply to author Forward Rate this post: Text for clearing
space
Cancel
Send Discard
From: kb9_...@yahoo.com
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Send Discard
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy
From: dxAce <d...@milestones.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 12:49:34 -0400
Local: Sun, Aug 13 2006 11:49 am
Subject: Re: cease and desit
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original
| Report this message | Find messages by this author
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
an old friend wrote:
> DeLorean wrote:
> > As of today, clicking on http://www.google.com doesn't show the option
> > to connect to Google groups until you click on the "more>>" link.
> > That's because Google is starting to downplay its groups as the
> > possibility looms that groups will be sold to another company.
> > That also explains why Google hasn't been policing its users in recent
> > months. They've been anticipating handing their Usenet problems over
> > to someone else, so why should they spend their own money on them?
> > The first thing that the new owner will do will be to shut down
> > posting while a new interface is built, and I don't think it can
> > happen too soon.
> > Goodbye, Wiseman.
> > Goodbye, Morgan.
> funy I gues you have not been reading the NG closely if gogole were to
> shut down then it at worst only in venances me
Being in venanced is a royal pain!
dxAce
Michigan
USA
Reply Reply to author Forward Rate this post: Text for clearing
space
an old friend View profile
More options Aug 13 2006, 11:52 am
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy
From: "an old friend" <kb9...@hotmail.com>
Date: 13 Aug 2006 09:52:32 -0700
Local: Sun, Aug 13 2006 11:52 am
Subject: Re: cease and desit
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original
| Report this message | Find messages by this author
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
dxAce wrote:
> an old friend wrote:
> > DeLorean wrote:
> > > As of today, clicking on http://www.google.com doesn't show the option
> > > to connect to Google groups until you click on the "more>>" link.
> > > That's because Google is starting to downplay its groups as the
> > > possibility looms that groups will be sold to another company.
> > > Goodbye, Wiseman.
> > > Goodbye, Morgan.
> > funy I gues you have not been reading the NG closely if gogole were to
> > shut down then it at worst only in venances me
> Being in venanced is a royal pain!
hardly
> dxAce
> Michigan
> USA
Reply Reply to author Forward Rate this post: Text for clearing
space
Discussion subject changed to "cease and desist" by an old friend
an old friend View profile
More options Aug 13 2006, 12:22 pm
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.shortwave
From: "an old friend" <kb9...@hotmail.com>
Date: 13 Aug 2006 10:22:25 -0700
Local: Sun, Aug 13 2006 12:22 pm
Subject: cease and desist
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original
| Report this message | Find messages by this author
Lloyd wrote:
> He hates it when you put the subject back to what it was originally.
sometimes yes and sometimes
> In fact, Markie hates just about everything and everybody.
gee you are being awfully braod considering we have never met
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
> ------
> In message <1149094824.180528.105...@j55g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> Mark Morgan autolamed himself when he said to Secwet Woger, "you arer
> [sic] everywhere like a cockroach"
lying again . Why?
Reply Reply to author Forward Rate this post: Text for clearing
space
Discussion subject changed to "cease and desit" by M...@kb9rqz.com
M...@kb9rqz.com View profile
More options Aug 13 2006, 1:15 pm
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.shortwave
From: M...@kb9rqz.com
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 14:15:17 -0400
Local: Sun, Aug 13 2006 1:15 pm
Subject: cease and desit
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original
| Report this message | Find messages by this author
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 16:40:00 +0000 (UTC), "DeLorean"
<delor...@nim.bstrs> wrote:
>As of today, clicking on http://www.google.com doesn't show the option
>to connect to Google groups until you click on the "more>>" link.
>That's because Google is starting to downplay its groups as the
>possibility looms that groups will be sold to another company.
who wants to BUY it
>That also explains why Google hasn't been policing its users in recent
>months. They've been anticipating handing their Usenet problems over
>to someone else, so why should they spend their own money on them?
they would be well advised to sell or deal with there ToS problems
>The first thing that the new owner will do will be to shut down
>posting while a new interface is built, and I don't think it can
>happen too soon.
it certainly could but simply policing the sign up and lsitening to
complaints about posters would solve much of the problem
>Goodbye, Wiseman.
I would wonder what Wismen would do
>Goodbye, Morgan.
for example now that the backlog in adding shortwave has cleared I
can
pioint that if Google stop being a psoting point then I will be at
worst mildly in convenaced
>Goodbye, K4YZ.
steve would not be beaten by that
>Goodbye Google lamers in general. We won't miss any of ya.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Reply Reply to author Forward Rate this post: Text for clearing
space
Newsgroups: alt.cocksucker.roger-wiseman, alt.morons,
rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.shortwave
From: "Leonard Willfong" <noemail@y>
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 14:40:45 -0500
Local: Sun, Aug 13 2006 2:40 pm
Subject: Re: cease and desit
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original
| Report this message | Find messages by this author
> Goodbye, Morgan.
funy I gues you have not been reading the NG closely if gogole were
to
shut down then it at worst only in venances me
.
There is no such thing as "gogole". You yet again show us why you have
so
many intellectual superiors in these groups.
Reply Reply to author Forward Rate this post: Text for clearing
space
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy
From: "Leonard Willfong" <noemail@y>
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 15:01:48 -0500
Local: Sun, Aug 13 2006 3:01 pm
Subject: Re: cease and desit
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original
| Report this message | Find messages by this author
> > Goodbye, Wiseman.
> > Goodbye, Morgan.
> funy I gues you have not been reading the NG closely if gogole were to
> shut down then it at worst only in venances me
Being in venanced is a royal pain!
dxAce
Michigan
USA
..
Now, ya gotta admit. That is funny.
And we're not laughing with you, Mark.
We are laughing AT you.
Reply Reply to author Forward Rate this post: Text for clearing
space
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy
From: "an old friend" <kb9...@hotmail.com>
Date: 13 Aug 2006 13:38:14 -0700
Local: Sun, Aug 13 2006 3:38 pm
Subject: Re: cease and desit
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original
| Report this message | Find messages by this author
Leonard Willfong wrote:
> > > Goodbye, Wiseman.
> > > Goodbye, Morgan.
> > funy I gues you have not been reading the NG closely if gogole were to
> > shut down then it at worst only in venances me
> Being in venanced is a royal pain!
> dxAce
> Michigan
> USA
> ..
> Now, ya gotta admit. That is funny.
no I don't gatta that is whtat you bozzoo don't seem to understand
Reply Reply to author Forward Rate this post: Text for clearing
space
Discussion subject changed to "Google spewers enter their final days"
by Mr. Hammington
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.shortwave,
alt.usenet.kooks
From: "Mr. Hammington" <mr_hamming...@yahoo.com>
Date: 13 Aug 2006 14:05:50 -0700
Local: Sun, Aug 13 2006 4:05 pm
Subject: Re: Google spewers enter their final days
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original
| Report this message | Find messages by this author
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
DeLorean wrote:
> As of today, clicking on http://www.google.com doesn't show the option
> to connect to Google groups until you click on the "more>>" link.
> That's because Google is starting to downplay its groups as the
> possibility looms that groups will be sold to another company.
> That also explains why Google hasn't been policing its users in recent
> months. They've been anticipating handing their Usenet problems over
> to someone else, so why should they spend their own money on them?
> The first thing that the new owner will do will be to shut down
> posting while a new interface is built, and I don't think it can
> happen too soon.
> Goodbye, Wiseman.
> Goodbye, Morgan.
> Goodbye, K4YZ.
Then your life shall be so empty!
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
> Goodbye Google lamers in general. We won't miss any of ya.
Reply Reply to author Forward Rate this post: Text for clearing
space
Discussion subject changed to "cease and desist" by an old friend
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.shortwave
From: "an old friend" <kb9...@hotmail.com>
Date: 13 Aug 2006 14:19:16 -0700
Local: Sun, Aug 13 2006 4:19 pm
Subject: cease and desist
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original
| Report this message | Find messages by this author
Lloyd wrote:
> I should ask YOU that question, since Google records that you did
> make that statement.
googles ecords show as you yourself proved I said no such thing to
secert woger
> -----------------
> In message <1149094824.180528.105...@j55g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> Mark Morgan autolamed himself when he said to Secwet Woger, "you arer
> [sic] everywhere like a cockroach"\
didnot say that as stateted
> -----------------
> In message <1152408561.426921.160...@35g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
> Mark Morgan autolamed himself when he asked "why do you need yet
> another sock puppet"
I did say that but what is your point? why did wismen need yet
another
sock puppet to harrass the NG?
it is a valid question
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.shortwave,
alt.usenet.kooks, rec.radio.cb
From: "Mr. Hammington" <mr_hamming...@yahoo.com>
Date: 13 Aug 2006 14:44:21 -0700
Local: Sun, Aug 13 2006 4:44 pm
Subject: Re: cease and desist
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original
| Report this message | Find messages by this author
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
an old friend wrote:
> Lloyd wrote:
> > I should ask YOU that question, since Google records that you did
> > make that statement.
> googles ecords show as you yourself proved I said no such thing to
> secert woger
> > -----------------
> > In message <1149094824.180528.105...@j55g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> > Mark Morgan autolamed himself when he said to Secwet Woger, "you arer
> > [sic] everywhere like a cockroach"\
> didnot say that as stateted
> > -----------------
> >
> > Mark Morgan autolamed himself when he asked "why do you need yet
> > another sock puppet"
> I did say that but what is your point? why did wismen need yet another
> sock puppet to harrass the NG?
> it is a valid question
in my opinion "an old friend" is his worst enemy.it appeas he goes
outof his way to stir things up. we all know dam well he can't sue
anyone on usenet.............just more fuel for the flames!
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.shortwave,
alt.usenet.kooks, rec.radio.cb
From: "an old friend" <kb9...@hotmail.com>
Date: 13 Aug 2006 17:13:02 -0700
Local: Sun, Aug 13 2006 7:13 pm
Subject: Re: cease and desist
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original
| Report this message | Find messages by this author
Mr. Hammington wrote:
> an old friend wrote:
> > Lloyd wrote:
> > > I should ask YOU that question, since Google records that you did
> in my opinion "an old friend" is his worst enemy.it appeas he goes
> outof his way to stir things up. we all know dam well he can't sue
> anyone on usenet.............just more fuel for the flames!
sure I can I can even win the problem is not that finding a target
that
also pay the judgement
but is it stiring the things to go around calling your foes child
molestors and rapists and such . I don't do that
indeed I am brave to sign my name to stuff you are not
Reply Reply to author Forward Rate this post: Text for clearing
space
U-Know-Who View profile
More options Aug 13 2006, 7:24 pm
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.shortwave,
alt.usenet.kooks, rec.radio.cb
From: "U-Know-Who" <no-...@nowhere.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 00:24:17 GMT
Local: Sun, Aug 13 2006 7:24 pm
Subject: Re: cease and desist
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original
| Report this message | Find messages by this author
"an old friend" <kb9...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1155514382....@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
> Mr. Hammington wrote:
>> an old friend wrote:
>> > Lloyd wrote:
>> > > I should ask YOU that question, since Google records that you did
>> in my opinion "an old friend" is his worst enemy.it appeas he goes
>> outof his way to stir things up. we all know dam well he can't sue
>> anyone on usenet.............just more fuel for the flames!
> sure I can I can even win the problem is not that finding a target that
> also pay the judgement
> but is it stiring the things to go around calling your foes child
> molestors and rapists and such . I don't do that
> indeed I am brave to sign my name to stuff you are not
No, just a moron that deserves what you get.
Reply Reply to author Forward Rate this post: Text for clearing
space
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.shortwave,
alt.usenet.kooks, rec.radio.cb
From: "an old freind" <kb9...@hotmail.com>
Date: 13 Aug 2006 17:40:36 -0700
Local: Sun, Aug 13 2006 7:40 pm
Subject: Re: cease and desist
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original
| Report this message | Find messages by this author
U-Know-Who wrote:
> "an old friend" <kb9...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1155514382....@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> > but is it stiring the things to go around calling your foes child
> > molestors and rapists and such . I don't do that
> > indeed I am brave to sign my name to stuff you are not
> No, just a moron that deserves what you get.
nobody deserves to be called a child molestor not even a real child
molestor (those sick folks deserve a long quiet rest and such peace
as
their misdeeds allow them)
not even you Tom deserve being called a child molestor
Reply Reply to author Forward Rate this post: Text for clearing
space
Discussion subject changed to "Google spewers enter their final days"
by Mark Morgan
Mark Morgan View profile
More options Aug 14 2006, 10:33 am
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.shortwave
From: "Mark Morgan" <konst...@homomale.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 11:33:48 -0400
Local: Mon, Aug 14 2006 10:33 am
Subject: Re: Google spewers enter their final days
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original
| Report this message | Find messages by this author
"DeLorean" <delor...@nim.bstrs> wrote in message
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
> As of today, clicking on http://www.google.com doesn't show the option
> to connect to Google groups until you click on the "more>>" link.
> That's because Google is starting to downplay its groups as the
> possibility looms that groups will be sold to another company.
> That also explains why Google hasn't been policing its users in recent
> months. They've been anticipating handing their Usenet problems over
> to someone else, so why should they spend their own money on them?
> The first thing that the new owner will do will be to shut down
> posting while a new interface is built, and I don't think it can
> happen too soon.
> Goodbye, Wiseman.
> Goodbye, Morgan.
> Goodbye, K4YZ.
> Goodbye Google lamers in general. We won't miss any of ya.
sees an deezit
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Reply Reply to author Forward Rate this post: Text for clearing
space
Discussion subject changed to "cease and desit" by an old friend
an old friend View profile
More options Aug 14 2006, 10:41 am
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.shortwave
From: "an old friend" <kb9...@yahoo.com>
Date: 14 Aug 2006 08:41:24 -0700
Local: Mon, Aug 14 2006 10:41 am
Subject: cease and desit
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original
| Report this message | Find messages by this author
Mark Morgan wrote:
> "DeLorean" <delor...@nim.bstrs> wrote in message
> news:23098717....@nim.bstrs...
id theft is crime although the cops are not likely to bust you for it
Reply Reply to author Forward Rate this post: Text for clearing
space
Discussion subject changed to "Google spewers enter their final days"
by M...@kb9rqz.com
M...@kb9rqz.com View profile
More options Sep 12 2006, 8:53 pm
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.shortwave
From: M...@kb9rqz.com
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 21:53:18 -0400
Local: Tues, Sep 12 2006 8:53 pm
Subject: Re: Google spewers enter their final days
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original
| Report this message | Find messages by this author
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 16:40:00 +0000 (UTC), "DeLorean"
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
<delor...@nim.bstrs> wrote:
>As of today, clicking on http://www.google.com doesn't show the option
>to connect to Google groups until you click on the "more>>" link.
>That's because Google is starting to downplay its groups as the
>possibility looms that groups will be sold to another company.
>That also explains why Google hasn't been policing its users in recent
>months. They've been anticipating handing their Usenet problems over
>to someone else, so why should they spend their own money on them?
>The first thing that the new owner will do will be to shut down
>posting while a new interface is built, and I don't think it can
>happen too soon.
>Goodbye, Wiseman.
>Goodbye, Morgan.
>Goodbye, K4YZ.
>Goodbye Google lamers in general. We won't miss any of ya.
well the progression of delection in my other newsreader brought up
this sessage just now
I note that Google is posting K4yz is still lamely struggling I am
doing fine Wismen seemed to be fine til aybe the last few days (maybe
he got shitcanned form yet anther ISP
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Reply Reply to author Forward Rate this post: Text for clearing
space
M...@kb9rqz.net View profile
More options Sep 30 2006, 11:55 pm
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.shortwave
From: M...@kb9rqz.net
Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 00:55:32 -0400
Local: Sat, Sep 30 2006 11:55 pm
Subject: Re: Google spewers enter their final days
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original
| Report this message | Find messages by this author
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 16:40:00 +0000 (UTC), "DeLorean"
<delor...@nim.bstrs> wrote:
>As of today, clicking on http://www.google.com doesn't show the option
>to connect to Google groups until you click on the "more>>" link.
>That's because Google is starting to downplay its groups as the
>possibility looms that groups will be sold to another company.
>That also explains why Google hasn't been policing its users in recent
>months. They've been anticipating handing their Usenet problems over
>to someone else, so why should they spend their own money on them?
>The first thing that the new owner will do will be to shut down
>posting while a new interface is built, and I don't think it can
>happen too soon.
>Goodbye, Wiseman.
>Goodbye, Morgan.
>Goodbye, K4YZ.
>Goodbye Google lamers in general. We won't miss any of ya.
funy how nothing stops me (or the rest
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Reply Reply to author Forward Rate this post: Text for clearing
space
U-Know-Who View profile
More options Oct 1 2006, 8:28 am
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.shortwave
From: "U-Know-Who" <no-...@nowhere.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 13:28:08 GMT
Local: Sun, Oct 1 2006 8:28 am
Subject: Re: Google spewers enter their final days
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original
| Report this message | Find messages by this author
<M...@kb9rqz.net> wrote in message
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
> On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 16:40:00 +0000 (UTC), "DeLorean"
> <delor...@nim.bstrs> wrote:
>>As of today, clicking on http://www.google.com doesn't show the option
>>to connect to Google groups until you click on the "more>>" link.
>>That's because Google is starting to downplay its groups as the
>>possibility looms that groups will be sold to another company.
>>That also explains why Google hasn't been policing its users in recent
>>months. They've been anticipating handing their Usenet problems over
>>to someone else, so why should they spend their own money on them?
>>The first thing that the new owner will do will be to shut down
>>posting while a new interface is built, and I don't think it can
>>happen too soon.
>>Goodbye, Wiseman.
>>Goodbye, Morgan.
>>Goodbye, K4YZ.
>>Goodbye Google lamers in general. We won't miss any of ya.
> funy how nothing stops me (or the rest
Yes Mark, you are hell-bent on exposing your idiocy.
Reply Reply to author Forward Rate this post: Text for clearing
space
M...@kb9rqz.net View profile
More options Oct 1 2006, 9:50 am
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.shortwave
From: M...@kb9rqz.net
Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 10:50:19 -0400
Local: Sun, Oct 1 2006 9:50 am
Subject: Re: Google spewers enter their final days
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original
| Report this message | Find messages by this author
On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 13:28:08 GMT, "U-Know-Who" <no-...@nowhere.com>
wrote:
><M...@kb9rqz.net> wrote in message
>news:khiuh2tnbkipjc8bl...@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 16:40:00 +0000 (UTC), "DeLorean"
>>>Goodbye Google lamers in general. We won't miss any of ya.
>> funy how nothing stops me (or the rest
>Yes Mark, you are hell-bent on exposing your idiocy.
no Tom exposing the hypocracy of folks like yourself
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Reply Reply to author Forward Rate this post: Text for clearing
space
U-Know-Who View profile
More options Oct 1 2006, 9:54 am
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.shortwave
From: "U-Know-Who" <no-...@nowhere.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 14:54:03 GMT
Local: Sun, Oct 1 2006 9:54 am
Subject: Re: Google spewers enter their final days
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original
| Report this message | Find messages by this author
<M...@kb9rqz.net> wrote in message
news:eclvh2t4tsrb2ri2q...@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 13:28:08 GMT, "U-Know-Who" <no-...@nowhere.com>
> wrote:
>><M...@kb9rqz.net> wrote in message
>>news:khiuh2tnbkipjc8bl...@4ax.com...
>>> On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 16:40:00 +0000 (UTC), "DeLorean"
>>>>Goodbye Google lamers in general. We won't miss any of ya.
>>> funy how nothing stops me (or the rest
>>Yes Mark, you are hell-bent on exposing your idiocy.
> no Tom exposing the hypocracy of folks like yourself
Who is Tom? And what hypocrisy?
Reply Reply to author Forward Rate this post: Text for clearing
space
kb9r...@hotmail.com View profile
More options Oct 1 2006, 10:05 am
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.shortwave
From: "kb9rq...@hotmail.com" <kb9rq...@hotmail.com>
Date: 1 Oct 2006 08:05:10 -0700
Local: Sun, Oct 1 2006 10:05 am
Subject: Re: Google spewers enter their final days
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original
| Report this message | Find messages by this author
U-Know-Who wrote:
> <M...@kb9rqz.net> wrote in message
> > no Tom exposing the hypocracy of folks like yourself
> Who is Tom?
you are Tom
>And what hypocrisy?
your claim you want to discuss radio for one thing
you don't you just want to trash the NGS
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
>Discussion subject changed to "cease and desist" by an old friend
>
>The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to
>this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the
>Internet.
>Your reply message has not been sent.
>Your post was successful
you do insist on spamming woger
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
<delo...@nim.bstrs> wrote:
>As of today, clicking on http://www.google.com doesn't show the option
>to connect to Google groups until you click on the "more>>" link.
>That's because Google is starting to downplay its groups as the
>possibility looms that groups will be sold to another company.
>
>That also explains why Google hasn't been policing its users in recent
>months. They've been anticipating handing their Usenet problems over
>to someone else, so why should they spend their own money on them?
>
>The first thing that the new owner will do will be to shut down
>posting while a new interface is built, and I don't think it can
>happen too soon.
>
>Goodbye, Wiseman.
>
>Goodbye, Morgan.
>
>Goodbye, K4YZ.
>
>Goodbye Google lamers in general. We won't miss any of ya.
still here Dloyd dispite your years of efforts
Dloyd Lavies
to make you dance, like a little monkey on a leash, and you dance so
well, following my every command.
Keep on dancing Ma Ma Monkey.
Dloyd
cuh...@webtv.net
cuhulin
Davey Vile K8MN SUX
> On 28 May 2007 23:21:58 -0700, kb9_id...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> >Discussion subject changed to "cease and desist" by an old friend
>
> >The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to
> >this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the
> >Internet.
> >Your reply message has not been sent.
> >Your post was successful
>
> you do insist on spamming woger
You do insist on showing the world your idiocy, Marqueer.
Get that satellite dish for your isp fixed yet? Muhahahahahaha!
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
wrote:
>On May 29, 2:30?am, M...@kb9rqz.org wrote:
>>
>> still here Dloyd dispite your years of efforts
>>
>Not years, only months.
'
more lies dloyd
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
<davey_vil...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
get a lfie of your own
Kadaitcha Man
knave. Ye exhausted:
> get a lfie of your own
Post your home address. I'll come and take yours.
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
AUK psychos and felons Lits
#2 Cog in the Usenet Hate Machine Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
Mentula.
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
<delo...@nim.bstrs> wrote:
>As of today, clicking on http://www.google.com doesn't show the option
>to connect to Google groups until you click on the "more>>" link.
>That's because Google is starting to downplay its groups as the
>possibility looms that groups will be sold to another company.
>
>That also explains why Google hasn't been policing its users in recent
>months. They've been anticipating handing their Usenet problems over
>to someone else, so why should they spend their own money on them?
>
>The first thing that the new owner will do will be to shut down
>posting while a new interface is built, and I don't think it can
>happen too soon.
>
>Goodbye, Wiseman.
>
>Goodbye, Morgan.
>
>Goodbye, K4YZ.
>
>Goodbye Google lamers in general. We won't miss any of ya.
again i point out I am still here as is wsement robeson seesm gone
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
<nntp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Ma...@kb9rqz.org Thou sow of lead. Thou mammering, fawning scurvy railing
>knave. Ye exhausted:
>
>> get a lfie of your own
>
>Post your home address. I'll come and take yours.
it is easy to find if you want it
cuh...@webtv.net
still have her email reply to me) She said,,,, What a dump!
Mostly,all she saw on the little short,short street I live on are Trees.
I love Trees.
Sayyyyy,,,, diddy y did y'all see that thar article ats
www.drudgereport.com tahday (today) about that new ''improved''
google Earth thangy.
y'all wants to espy (espy) on my little doggy takin a dump in my front
yard tomorrow at a sartin (certain) time in the daylight hours? I know
y'all do.
cuhulin
toerag
cuh...@webtv.net
2 + 2 = 22
A woman in a chatroom in Baton Rouge said her toofs are hurtin.I told
her,Well,at least you have some toofs.
cuhulin
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
>111,111,111 multiplied by 111,111,111 equals 12,345,678,987,654,321
assuming you are right so what?
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
<delo...@nim.bstrs> wrote:
>As of today, clicking on http://www.google.com doesn't show the option
>to connect to Google groups until you click on the "more>>" link.
>That's because Google is starting to downplay its groups as the
>possibility looms that groups will be sold to another company.
>
>That also explains why Google hasn't been policing its users in recent
>months. They've been anticipating handing their Usenet problems over
>to someone else, so why should they spend their own money on them?
>
>The first thing that the new owner will do will be to shut down
>posting while a new interface is built, and I don't think it can
>happen too soon.
>
>Goodbye, Wiseman.
>
>Goodbye, Morgan.
>
>Goodbye, K4YZ.
>
>Goodbye Google lamers in general. We won't miss any of ya.
stil heredleorean
cuh...@webtv.net
soooooo smart because they Think they know how to work on Shit!!!!! They
don't know their Asses from a hole in the Ground!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Damn Bunch of Cowrads!!!!!!!!!!!!
cuhulin
cuh...@webtv.net
yard,about an hour ago.y'all missed it.
cuhulin
toerag
> On Thu, 31 May 2007 07:02:51 -0700, toerag <uk...@limey.cum> wrote:
>
>
>>111,111,111 multiplied by 111,111,111 equals 12,345,678,987,654,321
>
> assuming you are right so what?
>
Just trying to enlighten this dark corner of the world.
Not Woger
"toerag" <uk...@limey.cum> wrote in message
news:6kF7i.12082$rO7....@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
Let's all hope Mark doesn't multiply.
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
then try posting something iluminating
radfine
repair than you'll ever know.
Whatever you do, just forget those "PUNKS", as you call them, even exist.
They surely will thank you for it.
<cuh...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:19976-465...@storefull-3256.bay.webtv.net...
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
<delo...@nim.bstrs> wrote:
>As of today, clicking on http://www.google.com doesn't show the option
>to connect to Google groups until you click on the "more>>" link.
>That's because Google is starting to downplay its groups as the
>possibility looms that groups will be sold to another company.
>
>That also explains why Google hasn't been policing its users in recent
>months. They've been anticipating handing their Usenet problems over
>to someone else, so why should they spend their own money on them?
>
>The first thing that the new owner will do will be to shut down
>posting while a new interface is built, and I don't think it can
>happen too soon.
>
>Goodbye, Wiseman.
>
>Goodbye, Morgan.
>
>Goodbye, K4YZ.
>
>Goodbye Google lamers in general. We won't miss any of ya.
hmm just notice dloren after all YOU are google user and thus by your
own words a lamer
get a life
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
<delo...@nim.bstrs> wrote:
>As of today, clicking on http://www.google.com doesn't show the option
>to connect to Google groups until you click on the "more>>" link.
>That's because Google is starting to downplay its groups as the
>possibility looms that groups will be sold to another company.
>
>That also explains why Google hasn't been policing its users in recent
>months. They've been anticipating handing their Usenet problems over
>to someone else, so why should they spend their own money on them?
>
>The first thing that the new owner will do will be to shut down
>posting while a new interface is built, and I don't think it can
>happen too soon.
>
>Goodbye, Wiseman.
>
>Goodbye, Morgan.
>
>Goodbye, K4YZ.
>
>Goodbye Google lamers in general. We won't miss any of ya.
still here I note dispite your efforts woger or dloyd or christ or
what ever else you are cllaing yourself tonight
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
<delo...@nim.bstrs> wrote:
>As of today, clicking on http://www.google.com doesn't show the option
>to connect to Google groups until you click on the "more>>" link.
>That's because Google is starting to downplay its groups as the
>possibility looms that groups will be sold to another company.
>
>That also explains why Google hasn't been policing its users in recent
>months. They've been anticipating handing their Usenet problems over
>to someone else, so why should they spend their own money on them?
>
>The first thing that the new owner will do will be to shut down
>posting while a new interface is built, and I don't think it can
>happen too soon.
>
>Goodbye, Wiseman.
>
>Goodbye, Morgan.
>
>Goodbye, K4YZ.
>
>Goodbye Google lamers in general. We won't miss any of ya.
still here
"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress"
cuh...@webtv.net
dinky parlez vous links to) says google and microsoft and yahoo censor
people.
I like www.devilfinder.com and www.dogpile.com and
www.vivisimo.com and any search engines that aren't google.
(especially google,I Don't like! Mama didn't raise no fool) Hey,on the
webtv home page right up there at the top is a search window for msn
search engine.Why do some people use msn search engine? Every once in a
while in some webtv newsgroups, there are some people complaing that msn
search thingy (Yes, Karl, Thingys are high technology) isn't working for
them.You would think they would know better.
cuhulin
Ma...@kb9rqz.org
<delo...@nim.bstrs> wrote:
>As of today, clicking on http://www.google.com doesn't show the option
>to connect to Google groups until you click on the "more>>" link.
>That's because Google is starting to downplay its groups as the
>possibility looms that groups will be sold to another company.
>
>That also explains why Google hasn't been policing its users in recent
>months. They've been anticipating handing their Usenet problems over
>to someone else, so why should they spend their own money on them?
>
>The first thing that the new owner will do will be to shut down
>posting while a new interface is built, and I don't think it can
>happen too soon.
>
>Goodbye, Wiseman.
>
>Goodbye, Morgan.
>
>Goodbye, K4YZ.
>
>Goodbye Google lamers in general. We won't miss any of ya.
I note Dloyd is one the google spewers I cguess this is why he can't
face this thread