Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Barack Hussein Obama - one of freedom's enemies

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Mark

unread,
Jun 15, 2008, 5:12:15 PM6/15/08
to
On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 15:14:46 +0000 (UTC), Concerned <anon...@anon.anon> wrote:
> Instead of posting a long explanation here, I direct you instead to the
> URI
>
> http://www.freedomsenemies.com/_Obama/ObamaLies.htm
>
> where Obama's lies are exposed irrefutably. Neither Snopes' pages nor any
> amount of spinning by his protagonists can refute the evidence presented
> there.
oh hum. more lies.

RHF

unread,
Jun 15, 2008, 5:37:15 PM6/15/08
to
On Jun 15, 2:12 pm, Mark <M...@chicken.poop> wrote:

> On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 15:14:46 +0000 (UTC), Concerned <anonym...@anon.anon> wrote:
> > Instead of posting a long explanation here, I direct you instead to the
> > URI
>
> >http://www.freedomsenemies.com/_Obama/ObamaLies.htm
>
> > where Obama's lies are exposed irrefutably.  Neither Snopes' pages nor any
> > amount of spinning by his protagonists can refute the evidence presented
> > there.
>
> oh hum. more lies.

Barack Hussein Obama Jr. (BHO)
- You Got To Like the Guy
- But Would You Vote For Him ?
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/79cf93af5d5ce198
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/d96d73609e6893e6
.

Mark

unread,
Jun 15, 2008, 8:08:23 PM6/15/08
to
On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 14:37:15 -0700 (PDT), RHF wrote:
>
rhf flushed.

RHF

unread,
Jun 15, 2008, 9:51:12 PM6/15/08
to
On Jun 15, 5:08 pm, Mark <M...@chicken.poop> wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 14:37:15 -0700 (PDT), RHF wrote:

- rhf flushed.

Mark - The "Chicken Poop" You Say ~ RHF

Mark

unread,
Jun 15, 2008, 10:07:21 PM6/15/08
to
On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 18:51:12 -0700 (PDT), RHF <rhf-new...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> On Jun 15, 5:08 pm, Mark <M...@chicken.poop> wrote:
>> On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 14:37:15 -0700 (PDT), RHF wrote:
>
> - rhf flushed.

rhf flushed more but dont forget
http://www.freedomsenemies.com/_Obama/ObamaLies.htm becuase you wilthank
me.

http://www.freedomsenemies.com/_Obama/ObamaLies.htm

an old friend

unread,
Jun 18, 2008, 8:11:48 PM6/18/08
to
On Jun 15, 10:07 pm, Mark <M...@chicken.poop> wrote:
>
fake

Mark

unread,
Jun 19, 2008, 8:23:15 AM6/19/08
to
On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 18:51:12 -0700 (PDT), RHF <rhf-new...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> On Jun 15, 5:08 pm, Mark <M...@chicken.poop> wrote:
>> On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 14:37:15 -0700 (PDT), RHF wrote:
>
> - rhf flushed.

rhf flushed more but dont forget

an old friend

unread,
Jun 19, 2008, 9:41:31 AM6/19/08
to
On Jun 19, 8:23 am, Mark <M...@chicken.poop> wrote:
>
fake

RHF

unread,
Jun 19, 2008, 10:05:26 PM6/19/08
to
On Jun 19, 5:23 am, Mark <M...@chicken.poop> wrote:

> On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 18:51:12 -0700 (PDT), RHF <rhf-newsgro...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> > On Jun 15, 5:08 pm, Mark <M...@chicken.poop> wrote:
> >> On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 14:37:15 -0700 (PDT), RHF wrote:
>
> > - rhf flushed.
>
- rhf flushed more but dont forget
- http://www.freedomsenemies.com/_Obama/ObamaLies.htm
- becuase you will thank me.

Barack Hussein Obama II (BHO) could Win Popular Vote
and Lose the Electoral College Election -says- Al Gore
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/11182.html
.

an old friend

unread,
Jun 20, 2008, 12:55:31 PM6/20/08
to
On Jun 19, 10:05 pm, RHF <rhf-newsgro...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> On Jun 19, 5:23 am, Mark <M...@chicken.poop> wrote:> On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 18:51:12 -0700 (PDT), RHF <rhf-newsgro...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> > > On Jun 15, 5:08 pm, Mark <M...@chicken.poop> wrote:
> > >> On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 14:37:15 -0700 (PDT), RHF wrote:
>
> > > - rhf flushed.
>
> - rhf flushed more but dont forget
> -http://www.freedomsenemies.com/_Obama/ObamaLies.htm

> - becuase you will thank me.
>
> Barack Hussein Obama II (BHO) could Win Popular Vote
> and Lose the Electoral College Election -says- Al Gorehttp://www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/11182.html
>  .

sowhat that is how the system works indeed I think the result is
likely

RHF

unread,
Jun 20, 2008, 3:06:38 PM6/20/08
to
On Jun 20, 9:55 am, an old friend <kb9...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 19, 10:05 pm, RHF <rhf-newsgro...@pacbell.net> wrote:

-snip-

- - Barack Hussein Obama II (BHO) could Win Popular Vote
- - and Lose the Electoral College Election -says- Al Gore
- - http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/11182.html

- so what that is how the system works
- indeed I think the result is likely

An Old Friend,

What this 'potential' Outcome Means is :

Both Barack Hussein Obama II (BHO) and John "Smiley"
McCain have to Play the "Electoral College" Game to Win the Election
and not Chase After the Popular Vote.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Electoral_College
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by_population

There are in Fact Four Tiers to the "Electoral College" Game
an a Candidate has to Focus on Each of the Tiers in their
Order-of-Importance and have a Winning Strategy to Win
Each Tier.

TIER # 1 - There are 3 States with more than 30 Electoral
College Votes :
California (55)
Texas (34)
New York (31)
* Total 120 Votes
The Winner should Win 2-out-of-3.

TIER # 2 - There are 4 States with 20~29 Electoral College Votes
Florida (27)
Illinois (21)
Pennsylvania (21)
Ohio (20)
* Total 89 Votes {R/T 209}
The Winner should Win 3-out-of-4.

TIER # 3 - There are 13 States with 11~19 Electoral College Votes
Michigan (17)
New Jersey (15)
North Carolina (15)
Georga (15)
Virginia (13)
Massachusetts (12)
Indiana (11)
Tennessee (11)
Missouri (11)
Washington (11)
Arizona (10)
Minnesota (10)
Maryland (10)
* Total 161 Votes {R/T 370}
The Winner should Win 8-out-of-13.

These Twenty (20) States can "Control" the Electoral College
and Winning the Vast Majority can Tip the Election in favor
of one Candidate or the other.

TIER # 4 - The remaining 30 States only account for 168
of the Electoral College Votes and the Winner would only
need 58 Votes from these States to Win the Election.

What Is Need To Win the "Electoral College" Game
John "smiley" McCain needs Carl Rowe to help him
Win the Electoral College Election in 2008. Plus a
Stratigic Political Mistake by Barack Hussein Obama II
(BHO).

At present the reality is that Barack Hussein Obama II
(BHO) should Win the Electoral College by about 64
Votes : 301 to 237 of the Total of 538 Electors
=PROVIDED= BHO selects a Woman as his Vice
Presidential running mate. -imho- Not Selecting a
Women as his VP Running Mate would be a Stratigic
Political Mistake by BHO.

NOTE - That Is Any Women Except Hillary "Rotten" Clinton.

The Secret to a Democrat Party Winning Ticket in 2008 :
Overcoming the Black -versus- Feminist Dilemma
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/ca6c96fca3ce14d1
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/56128aeed6bccc0b

-DANGER- Should Barack Hussein Obama II (BHO) select
any Male as as his Vice Presidential running mate.
-AND- John "Smiley" McCain selects a Woman as his
Vice Presidential running mate.
-THEN- There is a distinct 'possibility' that Barack Hussein
Obama II (BHO) could Win the Popular Vote by a small
percentage of 1%~3% -and- Lose the All Important Electoral
College Vote by fewer than 14 Votes to John "Smiley" McCain.
.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
CopyRight © RHF {Radio High Frequency} All Rights Reserved.
.
Fair Use Notice : This Entire Message in Part or Entirety
may be Copied and Reposted on/in All Media : Provided
the Source the "Rec.Radio.Shortwave" Newsgroup and
the Author RHF {Radio High Frequency} are both identified.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
.

an old friend

unread,
Jun 20, 2008, 5:06:27 PM6/20/08
to
On Jun 20, 3:06 pm, RHF <rhf-newsgro...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> On Jun 20, 9:55 am, an old friend <kb9...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jun 19, 10:05 pm, RHF <rhf-newsgro...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
> -snip-
>
> - - Barack Hussein Obama II (BHO) could Win Popular Vote
> - - and Lose the Electoral College Election -says- Al Gore
> - -http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/11182.html

>
> - so what that is how the system works
> - indeed I think the result is likely
>
> An Old Friend,
>
> What this 'potential' Outcome Means is :
>

agfain so what

you want to change the constitution or what

Brenda Ann

unread,
Jun 20, 2008, 5:49:04 PM6/20/08
to

"an old friend" <kb9...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:012fd471-6806-4a5a...@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...

agfain so what

Changing the Constitution seems to be everyone's answer for everything these
days..


Dave

unread,
Jun 20, 2008, 5:59:30 PM6/20/08
to
On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 06:49:04 +0900, Brenda Ann wrote:

> you want to change the constitution or what
>
> Changing the Constitution seems to be everyone's answer for everything
> these days..

The Constitution is no longer applicable.

"...just a goddam piece of paper"
--George Walker Bush

cheley_b...@live.com

unread,
Jun 20, 2008, 6:19:41 PM6/20/08
to

In a heart beat

RHF

unread,
Jun 20, 2008, 7:13:04 PM6/20/08
to
On Jun 20, 3:19 pm, cheley_bonstel...@live.com wrote:
> On Jun 15, 5:37 pm, RHF <rhf-newsgro...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jun 15, 2:12 pm, Mark <M...@chicken.poop> wrote:
>
> > > On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 15:14:46 +0000 (UTC), Concerned <anonym...@anon.anon> wrote:
> > > > Instead of posting a long explanation here, I direct you instead to the
> > > > URI
>
> > > >http://www.freedomsenemies.com/_Obama/ObamaLies.htm
>
> > > > where Obama's lies are exposed irrefutably.  Neither Snopes' pages nor any
> > > > amount of spinning by his protagonists can refute the evidence presented
> > > > there.
>
> > > oh hum. more lies.

- - Barack Hussein Obama Jr. (BHO)
- - - You Got To Like the Guy
- - - But Would You Vote For Him ?
- - http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/79cf93af5d5ce198
- - http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/d96d73609e6893e6

- In a heart beat

CB - Right or Wrong - At Least You Are A Man Who Knows
His Own Mind -and- Is Ready and Willing To Vote.
--- good for you ~ RHF
.

RHF

unread,
Jun 20, 2008, 7:15:45 PM6/20/08
to
On Jun 20, 2:49 pm, "Brenda Ann" <bren...@shinbiro.com> wrote:
> "an old friend" <kb9...@hotmail.com> wrote in messagenews:012fd471-6806-4a5a...@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...

> On Jun 20, 3:06 pm, RHF <rhf-newsgro...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jun 20, 9:55 am, an old friend <kb9...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 19, 10:05 pm, RHF <rhf-newsgro...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
> > -snip-
>
> > - - Barack Hussein Obama II (BHO) could Win Popular Vote
> > - - and Lose the Electoral College Election -says- Al Gore
> > - -http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/11182.html
>
> > - so what that is how the system works
> > - indeed I think the result is likely
>
> > An Old Friend,
>
> > What this 'potential' Outcome Means is :
>
> agfain so what
>
> you want to change the constitution or what
>
- Changing the Constitution seems to be everyone's
- answer for everything these days..

I myself am simply interested in upholding the
US Constitution as the Law of the Land. ~ RHF
.

RHF

unread,
Jun 20, 2008, 7:29:52 PM6/20/08
to
On Jun 20, 2:59 pm, Dave <j...@somewhere.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 06:49:04 +0900, Brenda Ann wrote:
> > you want to change the constitution or what
>
> > Changing the Constitution seems to be everyone's answer for everything
> > these days..
>
> The Constitution is no longer applicable.

Dave you have every right to say that
-unless- you give-up the right to say that . . .

-  "...just a goddam piece of paper"
- --George Walker Bush

Dave there you go again repeating another Liberal Lie
-aka- Political Propaganda & Disinformation.
http://message.snopes.com/showthread.php?t=2348
.


an old friend

unread,
Jun 20, 2008, 7:31:24 PM6/20/08
to
On Jun 20, 5:49 pm, "Brenda Ann" <bren...@shinbiro.com> wrote:
> "an old friend" <kb9...@hotmail.com> wrote in messagenews:012fd471-6806-4a5a...@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...

> On Jun 20, 3:06 pm, RHF <rhf-newsgro...@pacbell.net> wrote:


>> you want to change the constitution or what
>
> Changing the Constitution seems to be everyone's answer for everything these

> days..-
where was that advocated?

Channel Cop

unread,
Jun 20, 2008, 9:05:11 PM6/20/08
to

"an old friend" <kb9...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:012fd471-6806-4a5a...@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...

agfain so what

OT


Channel Cop

unread,
Jun 20, 2008, 9:05:30 PM6/20/08
to

"an old friend" <kb9...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:86dd03ee-7b5d-4c7b...@59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...

OT - SPAM


Brenda Ann

unread,
Jun 20, 2008, 9:23:20 PM6/20/08
to

"an old friend" <kb9...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:86dd03ee-7b5d-4c7b...@59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...

Where? Don't you watch the news? Read the papers? Constitutional changes
have been suggested and/or attempted for such things as:

109th Congress (2005-2006)

a.. To ensure reproductive rights of women
b.. To force the Congress and President to agree to a balanced budget,
with overspending allowed only in the case of a three-fifths vote of
Congress
c.. To ensure that all children who are citizens have a right to a "free
and adequate education"
d.. To specifically permit prayer at school meetings and ceremonies
e.. To allow non-natural born citizens to become President if they have
been a citizen for 20 years
f.. To specifically allow Congress to regulate the amount of personal
funds a candidate to public office can expend in a campaign
g.. To ensure that apportionment of Representatives be set by counting
only citizens
h.. To make the filibuster in the Senate a part of the Constitution
i.. To provide for continuity of government in case of a catastrophic
event
j.. The "Every Vote Counts" Amendment - providing for direct election of
the President and Vice President, abolishing the Electoral College
k.. To clarify eminent domain, specifically that no takings can be
transferred to a private person except for transportation projects
l.. Providing a right to work, for equal pay for equal work, the right to
organize, and the right to favorable work conditions
m.. To allow the President to reduce any Congressional appropriation, or
to disapprove of same (akin to a line-item veto)
108th Congress (2003-2004)

a.. To lower the age restriction on Representatives and Senators from 30
and 25 respectively to 21
b.. To ensure that citizens of U.S. territories and commonwealths can vote
in presidential elections
c.. To guarantee the right to use the word "God" in the Pledge of
Allegiance and the national motto
d.. To restrict marriage in all states to be between a man and a woman
e.. To remove any protection any court may find for child pornography
f.. To allow Congress to pass laws for emergency replenishment of its
membership should more than a quarter of either house be killed
g.. To place Presidential nominees immediately into position, providing
the Senate with 120 days to reject the nominee before the appointment is
automatically permanent
107th Congress (2001-2002)

a.. Calling for the repeal of the 8th Amendment and its replacement with
wording prohibiting incarceration for minor traffic offenses
b.. To specify that progressive income taxes must be used
c.. To specify a right to "equal high quality" health care
d.. To limit pardons granted between October 1 and January 21 of any
presidential election year
e.. To require a balanced budget without use of Social Security Trust Fund
monies
f.. To allow for any person who has been a citizen of the United States
for twenty years or more to be eligible for the Presidency
g.. To force the members of Congress and the President to forfeit their
salary, on a per diem basis, for every day past the end of the fiscal year
that a budget for that year remains unpassed
Courtesy of: http://www.usconstitution.net/constamprop.html


RHF

unread,
Jun 20, 2008, 9:56:12 PM6/20/08
to
On Jun 20, 6:23 pm, "Brenda Ann" <bren...@shinbiro.com> wrote:
> "an old friend" <kb9...@hotmail.com> wrote in messagenews:86dd03ee-7b5d-4c7b...@59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...

Dang The US Congress Didn't Do All That . . .

i did not know that they had
accomplished so much ~ RHF
.

dave

unread,
Jun 20, 2008, 11:30:28 PM6/20/08
to
RHF wrote:
>
> - "...just a goddam piece of paper"
> - --George Walker Bush
>
> Dave there you go again repeating another Liberal Lie
> -aka- Political Propaganda & Disinformation.
> http://message.snopes.com/showthread.php?t=2348

"Facts have a liberal bias"
--Stephen Colbert

http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7779.shtml

RHF

unread,
Jun 21, 2008, 3:37:22 AM6/21/08
to
On Jun 20, 8:30 pm, dave <noth...@nowhere.com> wrote:
> RHF wrote:
>
> > -  "...just a goddam piece of paper"
> > - --George Walker Bush
>
> > Dave there you go again repeating another Liberal Lie
> > -aka- Political Propaganda & Disinformation.
> >http://message.snopes.com/showthread.php?t=2348

- "Facts have a liberal bias"
- --Stephen Colbert
-
- http://www.capitolhillblue.moc/artman/publish/article_7779.shtml

Dave,

Repeating a Manufactured Washington Media
"Liberal" Lie - Long Enough and Loud Enough

don't make it true ~ RHF
.

an old friend

unread,
Jun 21, 2008, 9:02:33 AM6/21/08
to
fake

an old friend

unread,
Jun 21, 2008, 9:02:32 AM6/21/08
to
fake

an old friend

unread,
Jun 21, 2008, 9:02:33 AM6/21/08
to
fake

dave

unread,
Jun 21, 2008, 9:17:34 AM6/21/08
to
Can you find an official denial anywhere?

Channel Cop

unread,
Jun 21, 2008, 9:35:03 AM6/21/08
to

"an old friend" <Ma...@chicken.poop> wrote in message
news:494a-b8b6-e...@chicken.poop...
> fake

OT - SPAM


an old friend

unread,
Jun 21, 2008, 9:54:48 AM6/21/08
to
On Jun 21, 9:35 am, "Channel Cop" <ned...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
fake

an old friend

unread,
Jun 21, 2008, 9:54:48 AM6/21/08
to

an old friend

unread,
Jun 21, 2008, 10:27:33 AM6/21/08
to
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 16:13:04 -0700 (PDT), RHF <rhf-new...@pacbell.net> wrote:
lies

RHF

unread,
Jun 21, 2008, 12:32:17 PM6/21/08
to
On Jun 21, 6:17 am, dave <noth...@nowhere.com> wrote:
> RHF wrote:
> > On Jun 20, 8:30 pm, dave <noth...@nowhere.com> wrote:
> >> RHF wrote:
>
> >>> -  "...just a goddam piece of paper"
> >>> - --George Walker Bush

- - - - Dave there you go again repeating another Liberal Lie
- - - - -aka- Political Propaganda & Disinformation.
- - - - http://message.snopes.com/showthread.php?t=2348

- - - "Facts have a liberal bias"
- - - --Stephen Colbert
- - -
- - -http://www.capitolhillblue.moc/artman/publish/article_7779.shtml

- - Dave,
- -
- - Repeating a Manufactured Washington Media
- - "Liberal" Lie - Long Enough and Loud Enough
- -
- - don't make it true ~ RHF
- -  .

- Can you find an official denial anywhere?

Dave - Never Dignify a Bold Face Lie with a Reply. ~ RHF
.

Dave

unread,
Jun 21, 2008, 12:55:08 PM6/21/08
to
RHF wrote:
>
> - - - "Facts have a liberal bias"
> - - - --Stephen Colbert

> - Can you find an official denial anywhere?


>
> Dave - Never Dignify a Bold Face Lie with a Reply. ~ RHF
> .

Do you think it's possible to be excessively rational?

RHF

unread,
Jun 22, 2008, 2:14:36 AM6/22/08
to
On Jun 21, 9:55 am, Dave <d...@dave.dave> wrote:
> RHF wrote:
>
> > - - - "Facts have a liberal bias"
> > - - - --Stephen Colbert
> > - Can you find an official denial anywhere?

- - Dave - Never Dignify a Bold Face Lie with a Reply. ~ RHF

- Do you think it's possible to be excessively rational?

Dave - One Could Rationalize Anything

and that in and of itself is a rationalization ~ RHF
.

Jasper Towing Co; Lmtd.

unread,
Jun 22, 2008, 10:31:58 AM6/22/08
to

"Channel Cop" <ned...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ifydnfmk1_LqnsDV...@comcast.com...

piss off, net-nanny


Channel Cop

unread,
Jun 24, 2008, 12:50:45 PM6/24/08
to

"Jasper Towing Co; Lmtd." <jaspto...@everychance.com> wrote in message
news:ynt7k.195$t2.163@trndny06...
I see that you are a member of the jasper towing co in Alabama


an Old friend

unread,
Jun 25, 2008, 11:41:49 AM6/25/08
to
On Jun 24, 12:50 pm, "Channel Cop" <ned...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "
an the spam
0 new messages