Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

mast position when mounting a beam?

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Steve

unread,
Nov 11, 2009, 10:06:31 AM11/11/09
to
I'm in the process of putting up a 4 element 6 meter beam.
I'd like it to be balanced but that means I'll be attaching
it to my pole half way between the driven element and
first director. This is a 2" diameter aluminum pole and I'm
concerned that it will interfere with the pattern.

Can anyone say (with some level of confidence) if this is
a problem? Normally, beams seem to be mounted adjacent
to an element. TIA

Steve


christofire

unread,
Nov 11, 2009, 10:57:02 AM11/11/09
to

"Steve" <za...@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:4afad2fc$0$1639$742e...@news.sonic.net...


If the pole is perpendicular to the elements it shouldn't have much effect
on the pattern or the match, but if you want vertical polarisation then
you'll have a number of issues to contend with - the feeder as well as the
mounting pole.

Chris


tom

unread,
Nov 11, 2009, 11:30:22 AM11/11/09
to

Assuming that it's going up horizontally polarized and that the pole is
vertical, it won't make any difference where you put it.

tom
K0TAR

Steve

unread,
Nov 11, 2009, 2:54:34 PM11/11/09
to
Thanks guys....yes the beam will be horizontal and
perpendicular to the mast.

"tom" <news...@taring.org> wrote in message
news:4afae68f$0$42841$8046...@newsreader.iphouse.net...

MTV

unread,
Nov 11, 2009, 7:21:38 PM11/11/09
to

Steve,

One thing I found out AFTER I'd put up my HF beam is that 1) I'd mounted
the beam too close to the tower, abt 4" - just enough to clear the
tower, or 2) I should have located the top egg insulators on the guy
wires right next to the tower instead of 3-5' below. Methinks the guy
wires at the top of the tower may be resonate on 10-15 meters and raised
the SWR being so close to the HF beam. I also put VHF/UHF beams on top
of the mast about 3' above the HF beam but their SWR is a very wide band
1:1. If I had to do it over again I'd use a longer mast, which I could
have done since the lower part of the mast is secured at least 3' below
the rotator bushing.

Marv
W5MTV

tom

unread,
Nov 11, 2009, 9:24:41 PM11/11/09
to
MTV wrote:
>
> Steve,
>
> One thing I found out AFTER I'd put up my HF beam is that 1) I'd mounted
> the beam too close to the tower, abt 4" - just enough to clear the
> tower, or 2) I should have located the top egg insulators on the guy
> wires right next to the tower instead of 3-5' below. Methinks the guy
> wires at the top of the tower may be resonate on 10-15 meters and raised
> the SWR being so close to the HF beam. I also put VHF/UHF beams on top
> of the mast about 3' above the HF beam but their SWR is a very wide band
> 1:1. If I had to do it over again I'd use a longer mast, which I could
> have done since the lower part of the mast is secured at least 3' below
> the rotator bushing.
>
> Marv
> W5MTV

He makes a good point. I was responding only to the antenna elements,
boom and mast. The environment surrounding it needs to be reasonably
clear, and that includes height above ground.

tom
K0TAR

0 new messages