Re: Why are queers called "Gay"?
Tynk
wrote:
> "Diogenes" <dioge...@its.invalid> wrote in message
>
> news:h37luj$bak$2...@news.eternal-september.org...
>
> > RamRodew.
>
> >>> There's quite a difference between a few primitive savages and a
> >>> modern army.
> >>> Homosexuals are effeminate by nature and not equipped mentally and
> >>> physically
> >>> to take on modern warriors such as Spetsnaz or Chinese Airborne
> >>> Special Forces.
>
> >> Well one estimate says that there are 65,000 Gay people in the US
> >> military, maybe you had better tell them.
> > ---
> > Instead of telling them, give them a discharge and send them to California
> > or Massachusetts where they will be appreciated.
>
> And the US military can afford to lose 65,000 trained personnel?
Trained in the art of take down (makes a hard dick soft) and the
lesbians probably have bigger gonads than the Big Bosses anyhow .
Imagine getting mouth to mouth from Joe the Medic knowing full well
you seen and heard about him sucking off guys behind the barracks.
Would that make you a dick sucker by proxy or not? Would really
makes you wonder is that or is it not lip gloss on the Colonels lips,
or did he just not clean himself up like he should have done before
the rules changed.
Tynk
wrote:
> "Diogenes" <dioge...@its.invalid> wrote in message
>
> news:h37luj$bak$2...@news.eternal-september.org...
>
> > RamRodew.
>
> >>> There's quite a difference between a few primitive savages and a
> >>> modern army.
> >>> Homosexuals are effeminate by nature and not equipped mentally and
> >>> physically
Yea, they wood always be stopping to smell the flowers or straighten a
picture on the wall after a house got shelled.
> >>> to take on modern warriors such as Spetsnaz or Chinese Airborne
> >>> Special Forces.
First the chinese would have to get suyfficieint aircraft that could
take part in a airlift / airdrop operation. They don;t have a fraction
of what is needed in that aspect......nor do they have bombers to
amount to anything.
>
> >> Well one estimate says that there are 65,000 Gay people in the US
> >> military, maybe you had better tell them.
Hell he probably is the one that counted / sucked each onne off just
to verify the number
> > ---
> > Instead of telling them, give them a discharge and send them to California
> > or Massachusetts where they will be appreciated.
yep send em to the last remaining Kennedys or to Nancy Pelosi the
closed female
>
> And the US military can afford to lose 65,000 trained personnel?
Consider them expendable along with everyone else. No one is
irreplaceable.