thanks from Tracy Leigh
digital
site around for navigating to an image. I do not want to waist my time clicking
on numbers to find out if I like an image. Give me thumbnails or can the site.
Eric
jim...@my-dejanews.com wrote:
> I just wanted to say thank you to all of those that have visited my site over
> the past few months. The repsonse has been tremendous and the offers for
> work continue to flow in. Please continue to visit the website as I will be
> updating more frequently. I know that the updates have been slow these past
> few weeks but, HEY!!, I'm a busy girl. Also, if anybody would like to
> exchange links with my page let Highland know. You can find his email address
> somewhere on my web page. Also if you would like to post some of my pics on
> your web site feel free to do it, Highland says "no problem". And lastly, if
> you are a model looking to get some exposure and some work and would like to
> have your photos posted onto my site.....yup, you got it, contact Highland.
> So come to my website if you are a rookie, if you are a former vistor come by
> to say hi!
>
> Love,
> Tracy Leigh
>
> http://members.tripod.com/~Highland67/index.html
>
> http://www.geocities.com/CollegePark/Library/6735/magazines.html
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
jim...@my-dejanews.com
Alan
digital wrote in message <36BBC90A...@mindspring.com>...
>I do not know who said this site was great, but I found it to be the most
aweful
>site around for navigating to an image. I do not want to waist my time
clicking
>on numbers to find out if I like an image. Give me thumbnails or can the
site.
>
>Eric
>
The author said it was great, actually some kind of self spammed adoration,
a setup ...... pathetic could describe it, both in context and content.
One could make a comparison to ScottMike's site and I think Scott might win
this one. Judge for yourself, we all have opinions and this is mine.
Too bad these kids fall for this stuff.....
Alan
Michael Procino
use a good rhinoplasty if she plans on pursuing a modeling career. Before I
get backlash from this, I represent 18 models at the Ford Agency, and know
from whence I speak. She's definitely an example of a naive young lady
being screwed over by less-than-trustworthy photographers.
Alan wrote in message ...
Len Cook
that works like crazy to attract a specific cyber-sex client. With good
promotion the site will generate about $800 per month within a couple of
months, then build from there with good maintenance.
It's not about "Tracy", modeling, portfolios, or anything else it sort
of talks about. C'mon, guys, a little cynicism applied to some of this
stuff helps clear the confusion.
Alan
Len Cook wrote in message <36BCAB0D...@home.net>...
>These replies seem naive. The "Tracy" stuff is spam, a formula site
>that works like crazy to attract a specific cyber-sex client. With good
>promotion the site will generate about $800 per month within a couple of
>months, then build from there with good maintenance.
>
>It's not about "Tracy", modeling, portfolios, or anything else it sort
>of talks about. C'mon, guys, a little cynicism applied to some of this
OK, OK, OK, ITS SCHLOCK! BAD SCHLOCK!
Lewisvisn
How dare you insult schlock by putting it in the same category as this schmutz?
;-)
In article <uP4v2.6569$md2....@newse2.tampabay.rr.com>, "Alan" wrote:
>Subject: Re: thanks from Tracy Leigh
>From: "Alan" <ajac...@tampabay.rr.com>
>Date: Sun, 07 Feb 1999 00:07:54 GMT
"LEWISVISION" - "Fine art and stock photography (conceptual surrealistic people
and still life photography, from the real to the surreal and beyond!)
http://members.aol.com/Lewisvisn/home.htm
Take out the "z" in the e-mail address for anti-spamming.
Jerry Hammond
sent to the cited author.]
In article <36BE6F45...@sun.science.wayne.edu>,
elu...@sun.science.wayne.edu says...
> Pretty sick and cynical comment, and you can always say "I said that". Assuming
> this is not true, photography is good, model is a peach, but Eric is right : it
> is a torture to navigate the site. Good luck Tracy!
Eugene (or whomever you are),
You honestly believe her pixs to be of good quality and flattering to
her?
Btw: when I sent a copy of one of my replie to your mail address the
owner of that adress claimed you were impersonating them? Hmmmm?
Jerry
>
> Len Cook wrote:
>
> > These replies seem naive. The "Tracy" stuff is spam, a formula site
> > that works like crazy to attract a specific cyber-sex client. With good
> > promotion the site will generate about $800 per month within a couple of
> > months, then build from there with good maintenance.
> >
> > It's not about "Tracy", modeling, portfolios, or anything else it sort
> > of talks about. C'mon, guys, a little cynicism applied to some of this
Lewisvisn
How dare you insult schlock by putting it in the same category as this schmutz?
;-)
In article <uP4v2.6569$md2....@newse2.tampabay.rr.com>, "Alan" wrote:
>Subject: Re: thanks from Tracy Leigh
>From: "Alan" <ajac...@tampabay.rr.com>
>Date: Sun, 07 Feb 1999 00:07:54 GMT
>
>
>Len Cook wrote in message <36BCAB0D...@home.net>...
>>These replies seem naive. The "Tracy" stuff is spam, a formula site
>>that works like crazy to attract a specific cyber-sex client. With good
>>promotion the site will generate about $800 per month within a couple of
>>months, then build from there with good maintenance.
>>
>>It's not about "Tracy", modeling, portfolios, or anything else it sort
>>of talks about. C'mon, guys, a little cynicism applied to some of this
>
>
Lewisvisn
I have inadvertantly spammed myself (and the group) w/ these multiple postings
and will mutliply multiply report report myself myself to to my my ISP ISP ;-)
;-) Echo? Echo?
Lewis Lang
In article <19990207192133...@ngol03.aol.com>, lewi...@aol.comz
wrote:
>Subject: Re: Re: thanks from Tracy Leigh
>From: lewi...@aol.comz (Lewisvisn)
>Date: 08 Feb 1999 00:21:33 GMT
Alan
Jerry Hammond wrote in message ...
>[This followup was posted to rec.photo.technique.people and a copy was
>sent to the cited author.]
>
>In article <36BE6F45...@sun.science.wayne.edu>,
>elu...@sun.science.wayne.edu says...
>> Pretty sick and cynical comment, and you can always say "I said that".
Assuming
>> this is not true, photography is good, model is a peach, but Eric is
right : it
>> is a torture to navigate the site. Good luck Tracy!
>
>Eugene (or whomever you are),
>
>You honestly believe her pixs to be of good quality and flattering to
>her?
>
>Btw: when I sent a copy of one of my replie to your mail address the
>owner of that adress claimed you were impersonating them? Hmmmm?
>
>Jerry
Eugene
Gee.....you can't be that naive. Or are you infatuated....with Tracy. Do
you have a problem with discovery? Reality? Taste? Are you still watching
reruns of "Love story" with Ryan O Neal and Allie McGraw and think its great
pictorial art? Are Edsels beautiful? Or could this be the first signs of
ScottMike Syndrome.........
Hmmmm
jim...@my-dejanews.com
newsgroups. I, Tracy, do not make money from this site. I don't sell photos,
I don't sell videos of myself and I don't sell dates. I advertise myself to
a few hundred people each day. Some of them write to me to say hello, some
ask me out on dates and many ask me to send 'better' photos of myself for
possible portfolio work.
I don't have a problem if you like to visit, look at the pictures, etc. I
won't trick any of you into buying pictures of me at a later date. The only
stuff on my site is there for me to make a few extra dollars to affset the
cost of school and my monthly fee to Earthlink.
Just enjoy the site and the future FREE pictures soon to come.
Love, Tracy Leigh
In article <uP4v2.6569$md2....@newse2.tampabay.rr.com>,
"Alan" <ajac...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>
> Len Cook wrote in message <36BCAB0D...@home.net>...
> >These replies seem naive. The "Tracy" stuff is spam, a formula site
> >that works like crazy to attract a specific cyber-sex client. With good
> >promotion the site will generate about $800 per month within a couple of
> >months, then build from there with good maintenance.
> >
> >It's not about "Tracy", modeling, portfolios, or anything else it sort
> >of talks about. C'mon, guys, a little cynicism applied to some of this
>
> OK, OK, OK, ITS SCHLOCK! BAD SCHLOCK!
>
>
http://www.geocities.com/CollegePark/Library/6735/magazines.html
Alan
eugene a lutsenko wrote in message
<36BE6F45...@sun.science.wayne.edu>...
>Pretty sick and cynical comment, and you can always say "I said that".
Assuming
>this is not true, photography is good, model is a peach, but Eric is right
: it
>is a torture to navigate the site. Good luck Tracy!
Ok that explains it.
We voted, consensus is:
Six distinguished writers and site critics thought this site lacked anything
other than self adoration.
Eugene thinks the photography is good and the model is a peach.......
Using the algebraic formula for this equation: The sum of the site is equal
to the mass of the mess divided by the dis-incidental comments of the
knowing nothings about quantitative analysis of the purist acclaimed
statement.
Thus: Several conclusions are achieved:
1) The site and the photography still sucks.
2) Eugene's taste is in question and perhaps he is the photographers
brother
3) Eugene would like to date Tracy who probably is going steady with the
photographer
4) We see vestiges of Scott Mike syndrome....no taste, the adoration, see
the pattern
5) Possibility of an alias being used here by a returned email.
And since Eugene has posted also about street photography with strange
Cambridge Camera remarks,
Hmmmmmmm could be a ?????????
Beginner?
Have a great day!
Alan
Steve1chsn
**** steve ****
eugene a lutsenko
this is not true, photography is good, model is a peach, but Eric is right : it
is a torture to navigate the site. Good luck Tracy!
Len Cook wrote:
> These replies seem naive. The "Tracy" stuff is spam, a formula site
> that works like crazy to attract a specific cyber-sex client. With good
> promotion the site will generate about $800 per month within a couple of
> months, then build from there with good maintenance.
>
> It's not about "Tracy", modeling, portfolios, or anything else it sort
> of talks about. C'mon, guys, a little cynicism applied to some of this
digital
jim...@my-dejanews.com wrote:
> I'd like to take a moment to clarify my reason for posting to these
> newsgroups. I, Tracy, do not make money from this site. I don't sell photos,
> I don't sell videos of myself and I don't sell dates. I advertise myself to
> a few hundred people each day. Some of them write to me to say hello, some
> ask me out on dates and many ask me to send 'better' photos of myself for
> possible portfolio work.
>
> I don't have a problem if you like to visit, look at the pictures, etc. I
> won't trick any of you into buying pictures of me at a later date. The only
> stuff on my site is there for me to make a few extra dollars to affset the
> cost of school and my monthly fee to Earthlink.
>
> Just enjoy the site and the future FREE pictures soon to come.
>
> Love, Tracy Leigh
>
> In article <uP4v2.6569$md2....@newse2.tampabay.rr.com>,
> "Alan" <ajac...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
> >
> > Len Cook wrote in message <36BCAB0D...@home.net>...
> > >These replies seem naive. The "Tracy" stuff is spam, a formula site
> > >that works like crazy to attract a specific cyber-sex client. With good
> > >promotion the site will generate about $800 per month within a couple of
> > >months, then build from there with good maintenance.
> > >
> > >It's not about "Tracy", modeling, portfolios, or anything else it sort
> > >of talks about. C'mon, guys, a little cynicism applied to some of this
> >
Steve1chsn
**** steve ****
William Reid
Jerry Hammond
sent to the cited author.]
In article <79nh6e$i46$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>, jim...@my-dejanews.com
says...
Oh Lordy Lordy, what we have here is a failure to communicate...
> I'd like to take a moment to clarify my reason for posting to these
> newsgroups. I, Tracy, do not make money from this site. I don't sell photos,
> I don't sell videos of myself and I don't sell dates. I advertise myself to
> a few hundred people each day. Some of them write to me to say hello, some
> ask me out on dates and many ask me to send 'better' photos of myself for
> possible portfolio work.
Your point?
>
> I don't have a problem if you like to visit, look at the pictures, etc. I
> won't trick any of you into buying pictures of me at a later date. The only
> stuff on my site is there for me to make a few extra dollars to affset the
> cost of school and my monthly fee to Earthlink.
Wait a cracker-croakin moment! Didn't ya'll jus' tell us you're not
makin' saw-bucks off'n this here site? May be that I'm a bit slow here,
Lil' Miss, but this ol' cowpoke sees it differently. You all is promisin'
to show us somptin' worth lookin' at but you jus' ain't deliver'n'...
I recollect critiquin' you alls site 3 months past and I don't see one
image since worthy a repeat ride. Maybe it's the filly, but just as
likely it's the laddy whose taken them there pixs whose riden the net
poorly...
Best,
Sunset Jerry