Landscape Photo Gallery
Roberto Herrett
photos of the U.K. at:-
http://members.tripod.com/~rherrett/photo.htm
Comments welcome.
(My apologies to anyone who has visited this site already, as they won't
find any new pictures there!)
Regards,
Rob Herrett
Paul Saunders
news:81hj54$esq$1...@gxsn.com...
> For anyone who missed my previous post, I have a selection of
landscape
> photos of the U.K. at:-
>
> http://members.tripod.com/~rherrett/photo.htm
>
> Comments welcome.
Great shots, very artistic and moody. I'm very impressed. My only
complaint is that the images are a little on the small side. It would
be nice if they were a bit bigger, say 750x500.
I recommend that anyone who hasn't seen this site should take a look.
Paul
--
Wilderness Wales
http://website.lineone.net/~wilderness
Keith Clark
No photographer trying to sell their work would put it in those sizes.
Keith
Paul Saunders
news:384D8A02...@spiritone.com...
> If he had them in the size you mention it would be a license to
steal.
>
> No photographer trying to sell their work would put it in those
sizes.
Well I am and I do. 750x500 is nowhere near large enough for any
professional application.
HeyyyJude
of them had a stronger center of interest. My fave was the Derwater(?) shot -
2nd row, 1st shot. Very nice
Keith Clark
No offense meant!
It all depends how you define "professional" use.
The size you mentioned is more than ample for multimedia use.
I make a sizable portion of my income solely from multimedia sales. And
we're talking 640x480 (copy protected) images here.
People forget that there are many ways to make money from photos. If you
mean for "print" use, then well, maybe. I've had smaller images taken
from my web site, resampled, and used in ads (I'll send you a copy of
the ad if you want). In the end I was paid standard ad rates for the
use, but only because I caught them.
My point here isn't intended to belittle anyone for the size of the
images they choose to post on the web. Think of it more as a friendly
warning from a comrade in arms. Never give away for free what you can
sell. It devalues us all...
Just a thought.
Keith
Rick Ellis
Keith Clark <ClarkPho...@spiritone.com> wrote:
>If he had them in the size you mention it would be a license to steal.
>No photographer trying to sell their work would put it in those sizes.
I do but there are ways to track stolen images.
Gloria D. Hopkins
You're right, these are very "moody" and I only wish I can shoot like this
someday ...
Gloria
Paul Saunders wrote:
> Roberto Herrett <robhe...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:81hj54$esq$1...@gxsn.com...
> > For anyone who missed my previous post, I have a selection of
> landscape
> > photos of the U.K. at:-
> >
> > http://members.tripod.com/~rherrett/photo.htm
> >
> > Comments welcome.
>
> Great shots, very artistic and moody. I'm very impressed. My only
> complaint is that the images are a little on the small side. It would
> be nice if they were a bit bigger, say 750x500.
>
> I recommend that anyone who hasn't seen this site should take a look.
>
> Paul
> --
> Wilderness Wales
> http://website.lineone.net/~wilderness
--
TO EMAIL ME CHANGE "GDHOPKINS" TO "GHEIM"
Apologies for the inconvenience ...
Keith Clark
Not with Digimarc's overpriced and ineffective spider, I hope.
I haven't yet found an effective way of doing it, so I hope you can
enlighten us all.
Keith
Nev
>
> OOPS!
>
> No offense meant!
>
> It all depends how you define "professional" use.
>
> The size you mentioned is more than ample for multimedia use.
>
> I make a sizable portion of my income solely from multimedia sales. And
> we're talking 640x480 (copy protected) images here.
>
> People forget that there are many ways to make money from photos. If you
> mean for "print" use, then well, maybe. I've had smaller images taken
> from my web site, resampled, and used in ads (I'll send you a copy of
> the ad if you want). In the end I was paid standard ad rates for the
> use, but only because I caught them.
>
> My point here isn't intended to belittle anyone for the size of the
> images they choose to post on the web. Think of it more as a friendly
> warning from a comrade in arms. Never give away for free what you can
> sell. It devalues us all...
>
> Just a thought.
>
> Keith
>
> Paul Saunders wrote:
>
> > Keith Clark <ClarkPho...@spiritone.com> wrote in message
> > news:384D8A02...@spiritone.com...
> > steal.
> > >
> > > No photographer trying to sell their work would put it in those
> > sizes.
> >
> > professional application.
> >
So Pauls is bigger than yours? ;-)
--
Nev