Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Feedback of these images would appreciated

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Joe wilson

unread,
Dec 18, 2001, 11:59:06 PM12/18/01
to
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=482710 - portrait of wife in
mirror

and

http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=482688 - baby portrait

I'm relatively new to photography and would love to get valuable feedback.

Oh yeah, this is for Annika...

Taken with the almost fabulous Elan 7E. :)

Thanks in advance!


Annika1980

unread,
Dec 19, 2001, 12:18:42 AM12/19/01
to
>From: "Joe wilson" thene...@hotmail.com

>Oh yeah, this is for Annika...
>
>Taken with the almost fabulous Elan 7E. :)

At least you used the incredible 28-135 f/3.5/5.6 IS USM.

Btw, your wife is hot. But you knew that already....


Joe wilson

unread,
Dec 19, 2001, 12:54:00 AM12/19/01
to
Thanks dude...I'll trade her to you for an EOS 1D.

"Annika1980" <annik...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20011219001842...@mb-cu.aol.com...

Annika1980

unread,
Dec 19, 2001, 1:09:18 AM12/19/01
to
>From: "Joe wilson" thene...@hotmail.com


>> Btw, your wife is hot. But you knew that already....
>>

>Thanks dude...I'll trade her to you for an EOS 1D.

If I had a EOS-1D, I could get 10 of her.
EOS-1D = Babe Magnet !!!


Joe wilson

unread,
Dec 19, 2001, 1:03:47 AM12/19/01
to
Okay, how about a G2 and your peach jacket?

"Annika1980" <annik...@aol.com> wrote in message

news:20011219010918...@mb-cu.aol.com...

Joerg Daehn

unread,
Dec 19, 2001, 4:42:57 AM12/19/01
to
Hey,

I thought you wanted feedback? Instead, you are trying to sell your wife to
Annika for some crappy digital equipment that will loose value by the
minute? Shame on you! ;-)) And Annika, are you a Mormon or Muslim to be
capable and willing to have and support two wifes??

Anyway, the pictures are very nice and that's all I can say for I am not a
composition or exposition expert by now. (But, . . . maybe the baby would
be placed better in the "goldene Schnitt", meaning that . . .

When you take the picture and divide it into 1/8 section, it is most
appealing to the human eye when you put your subject into the position
marked by the 3/8 section in both x- axis and y-axis. (That's what I
learned back in school when we were shooting black and white in 11th grade.
I am sorry, I have problems with my English when it gets this technical.
Hope you get the point.) The baby is -in my view- actually to close to the
border. Shouldn't be in the center either but . . . in the "goldene
Schnitt".)

I like your pictures better than Annika's, btw.

Joerg

Joe wilson wrote:

--
--
"To those of you who received honors, awards and
distinctions, I say, well done. And to the C students, I
say, you too can be president of the United States."

- PRESIDENT BUSH, to Yale's graduates

Joerg Daehn Tele-/Mobilfon: +49 511/178 80 77 866
Jordanstr. 17 Email: joerg...@web.de
30173 Hannover Unified Messaging: +491212 5 124 25 241
Deutschland

McEowen

unread,
Dec 19, 2001, 7:53:21 AM12/19/01
to
My only comments are about cropping. I would like to see just a tad more space
around the mirror so that I can instantly recognize the shape and know what I'm
looking at -- though the wiper helps. Otherwise, pretty nice picture. I haven't
seen the face in the car mirror shot done a whole lot better. I'm not sure
exactly what her expression says but it's somewhat interesting. It makes you
wonder anyway. It might be better if her head were looking the same way but her
eyes were directed at the mirror. I'm not saying ask her to do it but rather
just wait until it happens.

On the other hand, I would have cropped the baby photo much tighter. I don't
see any reason to include so much couch. I'm thinking at least a square and
perhaps a vertical.

McEowen

unread,
Dec 19, 2001, 7:55:04 AM12/19/01
to
<< Thanks dude...I'll trade her to you for an EOS 1D. >>


Oh jeez, now I'm sorry I responded to this post. I wish I could take back my
critique.

Joe wilson

unread,
Dec 19, 2001, 10:49:30 AM12/19/01
to
Thanks for the comments.

I actually have another shot of the mirror picture where I pulled back a bit
and you can see much more of the windshield and can tell what it is much
better. When I posted that one I guess I was in an abstract mood. :)

I think her thought was "Put that damn camera away while we are in the car
before I wrap it around your head." :)

"McEowen" <mce...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20011219075321...@mb-ce.aol.com...

Annika1980

unread,
Dec 19, 2001, 7:17:22 PM12/19/01
to
>From: "Joe wilson" thene...@hotmail.com

>Okay, how about a G2 and your peach jacket?
>

I'll give ya the peach jacket, a Kodak DC290 and one 5-iron (slightly soiled)
for her. Final offer.

AnnikaHurls

unread,
Dec 22, 2001, 4:42:40 AM12/22/01
to
> I thought you wanted feedback? Instead, you are trying to sell your wife to
> Annika for some crappy digital equipment that will loose value by the
> minute? Shame on you! ;-)) And Annika, are you a Mormon or Muslim to be
> capable and willing to have and support two wifes??

Knowing how Annika1980's wife looks, it's understandable
that he's trading her in for hardware. Of course, he'd
want that younger and skinnier woman. I don't condone it;
but nevertheless understand it. As far as camera being
a babe magnet, is that how it is in Tennesee ?

Joe: the pictures are cute. Glad to see you trying
out new things.

my 2 cents
Annie

Denis Boisclair

unread,
Dec 22, 2001, 9:22:16 AM12/22/01
to
Your wife is a very attractive young lady - but then this is
digressing!

To be honest, this portrait does very little for me - the sitter's
head seems to be disembodied in a sort of mist and it is not clear
that one is looking at a reflection in a mirror.

The most 'effective mirror portraits'that I have seen show the sitter
looking at their reflection in the mirror - in profile for example
with a full face reflection:probably tricky to do and I have never
tried it - but perhaps I will now - or when I can swap my wife for a
younger model!

Another problem for me is that the colours look washed out and the
picture is lacking in contrast.

The baby is cute - but as another poster has indicated - looks lost on
that settee - zooming in close would be more effective.Here too there
is a lack of contrast, which I have found is typical of photo's taken
with the extremely diffused light resulting from flash bounced on the
ceiling.

What sort of processing lab did you use by the way?

I hope that all this doesn't sound too destructive...!

Regards -

Denis Boisclair
Cheshire, England)

"Joe wilson" <thene...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<3c20...@news.microsoft.com>...

McEowen

unread,
Dec 22, 2001, 11:32:51 AM12/22/01
to
<< I hope that all this doesn't sound too destructive...!
>>


You know what they say: Careful what you wish for, you just might get it . . .

0 new messages