>Stephen Bishop <nospam...@now.com> wrote:
>> rfis...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>>>Stephen Bishop <nospam...@now.com> wrote:
>
>>>>What you haven't shown is that Israel deliberately targeted those or
>>>>any other civilians just because they were trying to kill civilians.
>>
>>>When you fire bullets, misiles, and bombs into crowds you can't use
>>>the excuse that "it was an accident".
>>
>>Nobody used that excuse,
>
>You did just above, asshole.
Sleazily clipping and dodging again, I see. Here it is again:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Nobody used that excuse, self-righteous bigot.
But in fact some of those deaths were accidental, just as many of the
Israel soldier casualties were accidental "friendly fire" deaths.
The biggest reason for the civilian casualties, which you deny, is
that Hamas places military targets in civilian areas.
If you disagree, provide the proof of where they launch their rockets
from, where they store their weapons, where they hide their
leadership, and place their tunnels for smuggling in weapons from
Egypt as being in designated military bases located far away from
civilian areas. Don't run away from this one, self-righteous bigot.
You will probably dismiss that as propaganda and refuse to answer, but
at least answer this:
If the above *is* true, would that be evidence of war crimes on the
part of Hamas for placing military targets in areas where they know
civilians will suffer for the purpose of gaining world sympathy? Yes
or no.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Answer the question and provide the proof I asked for, Ray. Why are
you so afraid of the truth?
Sleazy lying and whining again, I see.
>-------------------------------------------------------------------
>Nobody used that excuse, self-righteous bigot.
You did just above, asshole.
>But in fact some of those deaths were accidental, just as many of the
>Israel soldier casualties were accidental "friendly fire" deaths.
Where "some" means at least 600+ people.
>The biggest reason for the civilian casualties, which you deny, is
>that Hamas places military targets in civilian areas.
Sleazy Israeli propaganda.
The truth is that the Israelis herded the Palestians into a crowded
situation and then started killing people.
Tell us, bigot: How many Palestinians were allowed to leave when the
Israelis decided to start killing people?
The answer is: None.
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net
>Stephen Bishop <nospam...@now.com> wrote:
>> rfis...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>>>Stephen Bishop <nospam...@now.com> wrote:
>>>> rfis...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>>>>>Stephen Bishop <nospam...@now.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>What you haven't shown is that Israel deliberately targeted those or
>>>>>>any other civilians just because they were trying to kill civilians.
>>>>
>>>>>When you fire bullets, misiles, and bombs into crowds you can't use
>>>>>the excuse that "it was an accident".
>>>>
>>>>Nobody used that excuse,
>>>
>>>You did just above, asshole.
>>
>>Sleazily clipping and dodging again, I see.
>
>Sleazy lying and whining again, I see.
Still clipping and lying about it, I see.
>
>>-------------------------------------------------------------------
>>Nobody used that excuse, self-righteous bigot.
>
>You did just above, asshole.
>
>>But in fact some of those deaths were accidental, just as many of the
>>Israel soldier casualties were accidental "friendly fire" deaths.
>
>Where "some" means at least 600+ people.
Why is it that you think that the number of deaths somehow makes one
side more morally superior to the other?
Orders of magnitudes more German civilians were killed in WWII than
American civilians. Does that mean that the Nazis were in the right?
You might think so.
>
>>The biggest reason for the civilian casualties, which you deny, is
>>that Hamas places military targets in civilian areas.
>
>Sleazy Israeli propaganda.
Prove that it isn't true. I've asked you to show where Hamas puts
their military targets in areas well away from civilian populations.
You haven't done that. Why? Oh, that's right, it is well known that
they use civilians as shields.
>The truth is that the Israelis herded the Palestians into a crowded
>situation and then started killing people.
That's the very definition of spin.
>
>Tell us, bigot: How many Palestinians were allowed to leave when the
>Israelis decided to start killing people?
Tell us, bigot: are you still molesting young boys?
Both questions have equal validity. You are assuming your own
conclusion and then asking a question to justify your bigotry.
>
>The answer is: None.
That would be the answer to the question, "How many intelligent things
has Ray said?"
>>>But in fact some of those deaths were accidental, just as many of the
>>>Israel soldier casualties were accidental "friendly fire" deaths.
>>
>>Where "some" means at least 600+ people.
>
>Why is it that you think that the number of deaths somehow makes one
>side more morally superior to the other?
You have no morals at all, do you? You only have a hatred of Arabs.
>>>The biggest reason for the civilian casualties, which you deny, is
>>>that Hamas places military targets in civilian areas.
>>
>>Sleazy Israeli propaganda.
>
>Prove that it isn't true.
Prove that you're not an IDF propagandist.
>>The truth is that the Israelis herded the Palestians into a crowded
>>situation and then started killing people.
>
>That's the very definition of spin.
It's the facts, bigot.
>>Tell us, bigot: How many Palestinians were allowed to leave when the
>>Israelis decided to start killing people?
>
>Tell us, bigot: are you still molesting young boys?
The asshole runs away from the facts again.
>>The answer is: None.
>
>That would be the answer to the question,
Stop lying, you bigoted coward.
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net
>Stephen Bishop <nospam...@now.com> wrote:
>> rfis...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>
>>>>But in fact some of those deaths were accidental, just as many of the
>>>>Israel soldier casualties were accidental "friendly fire" deaths.
>>>
>>>Where "some" means at least 600+ people.
>>
>>Why is it that you think that the number of deaths somehow makes one
>>side more morally superior to the other?
>
>You have no morals at all, do you? You only have a hatred of Arabs.
You have no morals at all, do you? You only have a hatred of Jews.
Answer my question, bigot.
>
>>>>The biggest reason for the civilian casualties, which you deny, is
>>>>that Hamas places military targets in civilian areas.
>>>
>>>Sleazy Israeli propaganda.
>>
>>Prove that it isn't true.
>
>Prove that you're not an IDF propagandist.
Prove that you're not a Hamas, FATAH, PLO or Iranian propagandist.
>>>The truth is that the Israelis herded the Palestians into a crowded
>>>situation and then started killing people.
>>
>>That's the very definition of spin.
>
>It's the facts, bigot.
It's your spin, bigot.
>
>>>Tell us, bigot: How many Palestinians were allowed to leave when the
>>>Israelis decided to start killing people?
>>
>>Tell us, bigot: are you still molesting young boys?
>
>The asshole runs away from the facts again.
The anally-obsessed bigot continues to selectively clip text and avoid
questions.
>
>>>The answer is: None.
>>
>>That would be the answer to the question,
>
>Stop lying, you bigoted coward.
I'm not, you cowardly self-righteous bigot.
All you have are insults. That's why I throw them right back at you,
it seems to be the only thing you understand. Run away, coward, and
come back when you have something of substance to say.
>>>>>But in fact some of those deaths were accidental, just as many of the
>>>>>Israel soldier casualties were accidental "friendly fire" deaths.
>>>>
>>>>Where "some" means at least 600+ people.
>>>
>>>Why is it that you think that the number of deaths somehow makes one
>>>side more morally superior to the other?
>>
>>You have no morals at all, do you? You only have a hatred of Arabs.
>
>You have no morals at all, do you? You only have a hatred of Jews.
Since I have written nothing critical of Jews it's obvious that you're
just a lying asshole.
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net
>Stephen Bishop <nospam...@now.com> wrote:
>> rfis...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>>>Stephen Bishop <nospam...@now.com> wrote:
>>>> rfis...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>
>>>>>>But in fact some of those deaths were accidental, just as many of the
>>>>>>Israel soldier casualties were accidental "friendly fire" deaths.
>>>>>
>>>>>Where "some" means at least 600+ people.
>>>>
>>>>Why is it that you think that the number of deaths somehow makes one
>>>>side more morally superior to the other?
Let me quote you directly again, Ray. Regarding the above question I
asked: "That isn't an answer. In fact you don't even try to answer
the question. Why is that?"
>>>
>>>You have no morals at all, do you? You only have a hatred of Arabs.
>>
>>You have no morals at all, do you? You only have a hatred of Jews.
>
>Since I have written nothing critical of Jews it's obvious that you're
>just a lying asshole.
Right back at you, Ray. Since you have falsely claimed that I said
all Palestinians are terrorists, it's obvious that you are a lying
lunatic.
By the way, does your constant use of abusive language and false
accusations fit with sonic.net's acceptable use policy? A quick scan
of your posts all over usenet shows this to be quite a pattern with
you. I'm quite surprised you haven't been reported by now.
>>>>You have no morals at all, do you? You only have a hatred of Arabs.
>>>
>>>You have no morals at all, do you? You only have a hatred of Jews.
>>
>>Since I have written nothing critical of Jews it's obvious that you're
>>just a lying asshole.
>
>Right back at you, Ray.
Except that you have, repeatedly, written evil lies about Arabs.
Once again you're shown to be a lying asshole.
> Since you have falsely claimed that I said
>all Palestinians are terrorists,
You're trying to change the subject, sleazebag.
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net
>Stephen Bishop <nospam...@now.com> wrote:
>> rfis...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>
>>>>>You have no morals at all, do you? You only have a hatred of Arabs.
>>>>
>>>>You have no morals at all, do you? You only have a hatred of Jews.
>>>
>>>Since I have written nothing critical of Jews it's obvious that you're
>>>just a lying asshole.
>>
>>Right back at you, Ray.
>
>Except that you have, repeatedly, written evil lies about Arabs.
\
And you have yet to name one, other than some things you've distorted
from what I may have said.
>
>Once again you're shown to be a lying asshole.
But Ray, you are continuously showing yourself to be a
rectally-obsessed fool with those false accusations and middle school
insults.
>
>> Since you have falsely claimed that I said
>>all Palestinians are terrorists,
>
>You're trying to change the subject, sleazebag.
What subject? You clip so much text from any posts that there's no
way to tell what the subect is other than you are an insult machine
who has no clue about the real world.
Run away!
Your lie that All arabs hate Israel.
>>> Since you have falsely claimed that I said
>>>all Palestinians are terrorists,
>>
>>You're trying to change the subject, sleazebag.
>
>What subject?
You're a lying assole.
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net
>Stephen Bishop <nospam...@now.com> wrote:
>>On 04 Feb 2009 04:57:56 GMT, rfis...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>>
>>>Stephen Bishop <nospam...@now.com> wrote:
>>>> rfis...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>You have no morals at all, do you? You only have a hatred of Arabs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You have no morals at all, do you? You only have a hatred of Jews.
>>>>>
>>>>>Since I have written nothing critical of Jews it's obvious that you're
>>>>>just a lying asshole.
>>>>
>>>>Right back at you, Ray.
>>>
>>>Except that you have, repeatedly, written evil lies about Arabs.
>>
>>And you have yet to name one,
>
>Run away!
>
>Your lie that All arabs hate Israel.
You repeat that blatant lie yet again.
Be careful when you distort other people's words by inserting the word
"all" wherever you think it is convenient to prove your point. It
doesn't prove anything other than you are dishonest bigot.
>>>> Since you have falsely claimed that I said
>>>>all Palestinians are terrorists,
>>>
>>>You're trying to change the subject, sleazebag.
>>
>>What subject?
>
>You're a lying assole.
Says the rectally-obsessed little manchild who thinks being on usenet
makes him a real man.