Carl Zeiss photo contest winner (what took it, a camera phone?)

[RichA]

What is with the weird textured pattern? It almost looks like it was
printed on canvas and rephotographed.

http://www.zeiss.de/c12567a8003b58b9/Contents-Frame/ff8a7b7a369c1549c12570fb0048e952

The photo:

http://www.zeiss.de/C125679B0029303C/EmbedTitelIntern/PI_0051-2009/$File/PI_0051-2009.jpg

[Bigguy]

Could just be high ISO noise?

Guy

[Nomen Nescio]

Since you asked, Re: Carl Zeiss photo contest winner (what took it, a camera
phone?)

Exif IFD0

* Camera Make = Canon
* Camera Model = Canon PowerShot A700
* Picture Orientation = normal (1)
* X-Resolution = 180/1 = 180
* Y-Resolution = 180/1 = 180
* X/Y-Resolution Unit = inch (2)
* Last Modified Date/Time = 2006:03:14 11:05:15
* Y/Cb/Cr Positioning (Subsampling) = centered / center of pixel array
(1)

Exif Sub IFD

* Exposure Time (1 / Shutter Speed) = 1/60 second = 0.01667 second
* Lens F-Number/F-Stop = 35/10 = F3.5
* Exif Version = 0220
* Original Date/Time = 2006:03:14 11:05:15
* Digitization Date/Time = 2006:03:14 11:05:15
* Components Configuration = 0x01,0x02,0x03,0x00 / YCbCr
* Compressed Bits per Pixel = 5/1 = 5
* Shutter Speed Value (APEX) = 189/32
Shutter Speed (Exposure Time) = 1/59.97 second
* Aperture Value (APEX) = 116/32
Aperture = F3.51
* Exposure Bias (EV) = 0/3 = 0
* Max Aperture Value (APEX) = 116/32 = 3.63
Max Aperture = F3.51
* Metering Mode = pattern / multi-segment (5)
* Flash = Flash fired, auto mode, red-eye reduction mode
* Focal Length = 13159/1000 mm = 13.16 mm
* Maker Note =

"RichA" <rande...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:d0f9809f-ce28-4120...@e15g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...

[Paul Furman]

RichA wrote:
> What is with the weird textured pattern? It almost looks like it was
> printed on canvas and rephotographed.
>
> http://www.zeiss.de/c12567a8003b58b9/Contents-Frame/ff8a7b7a369c1549c12570fb0048e952

Try this link:
http://www.zeiss.com/c12567a8003b58b9/Contents-Frame/c9027d13d4f33842c12575600048b4b1
"Picture taken with: Analogue rangefinder camera with
Planar T* 2/50 ZM"

> The photo:
>
> http://www.zeiss.de/C125679B0029303C/EmbedTitelIntern/PI_0051-2009/$File/PI_0051-2009.jpg

--
Paul Furman
www.edgehill.net
www.baynatives.com

all google groups messages filtered due to spam

[Rich]

"Nomen Nescio" <nob...@dizum.com> wrote in
news:gorata$ctr$1...@news.motzarella.org:

> Since you asked, Re: Carl Zeiss photo contest winner (what took it, a
> camera phone?)
>
> Exif IFD0
>
> * Camera Make = Canon
> * Camera Model = Canon PowerShot A700

God, that explains it! It looked horrible.

[Paul Furman]

John A. wrote:

> On Fri, 06 Mar 2009 10:34:22 -0800, Paul Furman <paul-@-edgehill.net>
> wrote:
>
>> RichA wrote:
>>> What is with the weird textured pattern? It almost looks like it was
>>> printed on canvas and rephotographed.
>>>
>>> http://www.zeiss.de/c12567a8003b58b9/Contents-Frame/ff8a7b7a369c1549c12570fb0048e952
>> Try this link:
>> http://www.zeiss.com/c12567a8003b58b9/Contents-Frame/c9027d13d4f33842c12575600048b4b1
>> "Picture taken with: Analogue rangefinder camera with
>> Planar T* 2/50 ZM"
>

> So, given that claim, and the differing information in the EXIF, is
> the jpeg posted on the site actually a noisy picture OF the entry? Was
> the entry even a digital shot?

Analog rangefinder means film.

[DRS]

"Paul Furman" <paul-@-edgehill.net> wrote in message
news:IUlsl.19453$c45....@nlpi065.nbdc.sbc.com
> John A. wrote:

[...]

>> So, given that claim, and the differing information in the EXIF, is
>> the jpeg posted on the site actually a noisy picture OF the entry?
>> Was the entry even a digital shot?
>
> Analog rangefinder means film.

Moreover, I couldn't find the EXIF data given earlier in the image itself.

[Chris Malcolm]

It doesn't explain it. The "noise" being discussed, if that's what it
is, doesn't look at all like digital camera noise.

--
Chris Malcolm

[Rich]

Chris Malcolm <c...@holyrood.ed.ac.uk> wrote in news:71f06eFkm2hbU1
@mid.individual.net:

It looks like some P&S noise or "effect" I've seen before.