Another falls victim to the horror of P&S's
RichA
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1033&message=32138366
John Navas
wrote in
<e80d5fc9-9a56-4f7d...@j12g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>:
>Heavy evident noise at 100 ISO.
>
>http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1033&message=32138366
Another lame troll.
Image is 100% crop from a poorly focused shot at reduced resolution and
quality, possibly with a dirty lens.
I could easily manufacture similar dSLR images.
Get a life and give it a rest.
--
Best regards,
John (Panasonic DMC-FZ28, and several others)
DRS
news:f6av35pmr67aagdf7...@4ax.com
> On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 04:03:04 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rande...@gmail.com>
> wrote in
> <e80d5fc9-9a56-4f7d...@j12g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>:
>
>> Heavy evident noise at 100 ISO.
>>
>> http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1033&message=32138366
>
> Another lame troll.
Not to mention cross-posted to rec.photo.digital in order to provoke the P&S
troll.
ribbit
> Heavy evident noise at 100 ISO.
>
> http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1033&message=32138366
The photo he is using for a supposed example was substantially under
exposed and had the virtual ISO lifted so something like ISO 1200 by
bring up the levels to 'look' like a correctly exposed image.
The give away is the skin colour shifting to red. Try it yourself with a
DSLR image. You'll get the same thing happen... Make sure you save as
40% JPEG before you start!
--
With age come a new ability ...multi-tasking.
I can laugh, cough, sneeze, fart and pee all at the same time!
Rich
> On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 04:03:04 -0700 (PDT), RichA <rander3...@gmail.com>
> wrote in
> <e80d5fc9-9a56-4f7d-80f4-8d0ba06df...@j12g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>:
>
> >Heavy evident noise at 100 ISO.
>
> >http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1033&message=32138366
>
> Another lame troll.
> Image is 100% crop from a poorly focused shot at reduced resolution and
> quality, possibly with a dirty lens.
> I could easily manufacture similar dSLR images.
> Get a life and give it a rest.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> John (Panasonic DMC-FZ28, and several others)
And focus effects noise...how? Not just noise, not nice, grainy film-
like noise, but ugly, blobby crappy processor noise.
Rich
> RichA wrote:
> > Heavy evident noise at 100 ISO.
>
> >http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1033&message=32138366
>
> The photo he is using for a supposed example was substantially under
> exposed and had the virtual ISO lifted so something like ISO 1200 by
> bring up the levels to 'look' like a correctly exposed image.
"Something like?" 3.5 stops? Rubbish.
Scott W
> Heavy evident noise at 100 ISO.
>
> http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1033&message=32138366
That looks like jpeg artifacts to me, not noise.
alvey
>
> And focus effects noise...how? Not just noise, not nice, grainy film-
> like noise, but ugly, blobby crappy processor noise.
That's an excellent description of your posts.
as
John Navas
wrote in
<77da16ee-fc48-4882...@q3g2000pra.googlegroups.com>:
Rich is apparently so desperate to put down compact digital cameras that
he'll stoop to anything, no matter how absurd.
John Turco
Hello, Rich:
Hmmm..."rubbish," you say? You should be an expert on that particular
subject -- as you haul so much of it around, during your "day job," as
one of Canada's finest "sanitation engineers." ;-)
Cordially,
John Turco <jt...@concentric.net>
John Turco
>
> Heavy evident noise at 100 ISO.
>
> http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1033&message=32138366
Hello, Rich:
Personally, I wonder how many of this newsgroup's newcomers will "fall victim"
to your insipid trolling?
Cordially,
John Turco <jt...@concentric.net>