Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Photos of Scripta

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Miguel

unread,
May 12, 2009, 10:21:11 PM5/12/09
to
Hello, recently I did these photos:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/3527043780/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/3527043786/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/3527043790/

Your comments about photography always are interesting.

--
Miguel M. Yal�n
http://mmyv.com

Tzortzakakis Dimitrios

unread,
May 13, 2009, 12:37:52 PM5/13/09
to

? "Miguel" <responde...@invalid.invalid> ?????? ??? ??????
news:76up5tF...@mid.individual.net...

> Hello, recently I did these photos:
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/3527043780/
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/3527043786/
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/3527043790/
>
> Your comments about photography always are interesting.
>
> --
I liked very much your closeups, are you sure its Scripta? I think they have
two orange dots at their "cheeks" (aka side of the head). I had a pair of
them in a miniature pool in my room, I called them Pipis and Lili, they even
laid eggs (so probably had sex, too). Very cute.

--
Tzortzakakis Dimitrios
major in electrical engineering
mechanized infantry reservist
hordad AT otenet DOT gr


Miguel

unread,
May 13, 2009, 4:38:56 PM5/13/09
to
"Tzortzakakis Dimitrios" <no...@nospam.com> escribi� en el mensaje
news:guet13$jma$1...@mouse.otenet.gr...

>
> ? "Miguel" <responde...@invalid.invalid> ?????? ??? ??????
> news:76up5tF...@mid.individual.net...
>> Hello, recently I did these photos:
>>
>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/3527043780/
>>
>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/3527043786/
>>
>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/3527043790/
>>
>> Your comments about photography always are interesting.
>>
>> --
> I liked very much your closeups, are you sure its Scripta? I think they
> have two orange dots at their "cheeks" (aka side of the head). I had a
> pair of them in a miniature pool in my room, I called them Pipis and Lili,
> they even laid eggs (so probably had sex, too). Very cute.


Yes, It is one of its variants, after I'll post another photos with other
characteristics.

--
Miguel M. Yal�n
http://mmyv.com

Miguel

unread,
May 13, 2009, 6:30:12 PM5/13/09
to
"Miguel" <responde...@invalid.invalid> escribi� en el mensaje
news:770pfsF...@mid.individual.net...


I was checking better to the Turtle and It is a Phrynops nasuta, the Scripta
is the species that I will be doing a photo soon.

Bob Larter

unread,
May 18, 2009, 5:41:13 AM5/18/09
to
Miguel wrote:
> Hello, recently I did these photos:
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/3527043780/

Potentially interesting, but the motion blurring does nothing for it.

> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/3527043786/

Not as soft, but still a bit too soft, & the background's obtrusive.

> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/3527043790/

Much better for sharpness, but I still hate the fake marble background.

> Your comments about photography always are interesting.

Well, my comments haven't been very nice, but hopefully you'll find them
useful anyway.

Put your turtle in a pond or something & try again. ;^)

--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------

tony cooper

unread,
May 18, 2009, 10:05:32 AM5/18/09
to
On Mon, 18 May 2009 19:41:13 +1000, Bob Larter <bobby...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>Miguel wrote:
>> Hello, recently I did these photos:
>>
>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/3527043780/
>
>Potentially interesting, but the motion blurring does nothing for it.
>
>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/3527043786/
>
>Not as soft, but still a bit too soft, & the background's obtrusive.
>
>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/3527043790/
>
>Much better for sharpness, but I still hate the fake marble background.
>
>> Your comments about photography always are interesting.
>
>Well, my comments haven't been very nice, but hopefully you'll find them
>useful anyway.
>
>Put your turtle in a pond or something & try again. ;^)

You want to critique my shots of a Florida Softshell turtle?

http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f244/cooper213/softshell1.jpg
http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f244/cooper213/softshell2.jpg
--
Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

Paul Furman

unread,
May 18, 2009, 11:32:32 PM5/18/09
to
Miguel wrote:
> "Miguel" <responde...@invalid.invalid> escribi� en el mensaje
> news:770pfsF...@mid.individual.net...
>> "Tzortzakakis Dimitrios" <no...@nospam.com> escribi� en el mensaje
>> news:guet13$jma$1...@mouse.otenet.gr...
>>>
>>> ? "Miguel" <responde...@invalid.invalid> ?????? ??? ??????
>>> news:76up5tF...@mid.individual.net...
>>>> Hello, recently I did these photos:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/3527043780/
>>>>
>>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/3527043786/
>>>>
>>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/3527043790/
>>>>
>>>> Your comments about photography always are interesting.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>> I liked very much your closeups,

You did?


>>> are you sure its Scripta? I think they
>>> have two orange dots at their "cheeks" (aka side of the head). I had a
>>> pair of them in a miniature pool in my room, I called them Pipis and
>>> Lili, they even laid eggs (so probably had sex, too). Very cute.
>>
>>
>> Yes, It is one of its variants, after I'll post another photos with other
>> characteristics.
>

> I was checking better to the Turtle and It is a Phrynops nasuta, the
> Scripta is the species that I will be doing a photo soon.

Why?

Why do a photo?

Paul Furman

unread,
May 18, 2009, 11:36:35 PM5/18/09
to

Much much much better.

Sorry to say but Miguel: your photos are completely uninteresting. Why
do you post them to a photography group? Post to a turtle group, a
parrot group, a Catholic ceremony group... do you have any interest at
all in photography? I rarely make mean comments like that but seriously
man, why do you post to a photography group?

I just checked your posts for the last few months and there is no
growth, no interest in photographic comments, just a very very few
extremely bland replies about the subject and a bunch of boring links.

What do you want us to critique?
What do you want to show?

Miguel

unread,
May 19, 2009, 5:30:01 PM5/19/09
to
"Bob Larter" <bobby...@gmail.com> escribi� en el mensaje
news:4a112d39$1...@dnews.tpgi.com.au...

> Miguel wrote:
>> Hello, recently I did these photos:
>>
>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/3527043780/
>
> Potentially interesting, but the motion blurring does nothing for it.
>
>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/3527043786/
>
> Not as soft, but still a bit too soft, & the background's obtrusive.
>
>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/3527043790/
>
> Much better for sharpness, but I still hate the fake marble background.
>
>> Your comments about photography always are interesting.
>
> Well, my comments haven't been very nice, but hopefully you'll find them
> useful anyway.
>
> Put your turtle in a pond or something & try again. ;^)


I will, thanks for your comments.

Bob Larter

unread,
May 31, 2009, 2:24:18 PM5/31/09
to

Yow! The creature looks creepy as hell, but your photos are pretty good.
Hopefully the OP will take a look at them & learn something.

0 new messages