New Portugese convertible !!!!

Focus

unread,

Apr 21, 2009, 7:24:44 PM4/21/09

to

70 MPG
http://caldasdarainha.olx.pt/magalhaes-movel-iid-16058871
;-)
--
---
Focus

Savageduck

unread,

Apr 21, 2009, 8:46:48 PM4/21/09

to

On 2009-04-21 16:24:44 -0700, "Focus" <do...@mail.me> said:

> 70 MPG
> http://caldasdarainha.olx.pt/magalhaes-movel-iid-16058871
> ;-)

I gather the driving position is recumbent.

--
Regards,
Savageduck

Paul Giverin

unread,

Apr 22, 2009, 2:02:18 PM4/22/09

to

In message <N6ednUn8YIsgyHPU...@novis.pt>, Focus
<do...@mail.me> writes

>70 MPG
>http://caldasdarainha.olx.pt/magalhaes-movel-iid-16058871
>;-)

Do you really have to cross post this shite to all these groups?

--
Paul Giverin

British Jet Engine Website:- www.britjet.co.uk

My photos:- www.pbase.com/vendee

Bruce

unread,

Apr 22, 2009, 2:28:48 PM4/22/09

to

Paul Giverin <pa...@giverin.co.uk> wrote:
>In message <N6ednUn8YIsgyHPU...@novis.pt>, Focus
><do...@mail.me> writes
>>70 MPG
>>http://caldasdarainha.olx.pt/magalhaes-movel-iid-16058871
>>;-)
>Do you really have to cross post this shite to all these groups?

Does he ever post anything else?

Frank ess

unread,

Apr 22, 2009, 3:40:15 PM4/22/09

to

I dono. I never look at them.

It's nice that you both left the URL unmolested, so others could judge
for themselves. Very considerate. Equitable, even.

--
Frank ess

John McWilliams

unread,

Apr 22, 2009, 4:51:17 PM4/22/09

to

Paul Giverin wrote:
> In message <N6ednUn8YIsgyHPU...@novis.pt>, Focus
> <do...@mail.me> writes
>> 70 MPG

>> http://caldasdarai << Snipped bits out >>

>> ;-)
> Do you really have to cross post this shite to all these groups?

He seems to have a need to x-post. Sometimes crap and sometimes not.

One thing folks can do is remove extraneous groups but the one they wish
to read:
[out]
uk.rec.photo.misc
rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
aus.photo

--
John McWilliams

Bruce

unread,

Apr 22, 2009, 6:09:16 PM4/22/09

to

My pleasure, Frank.

A minor detail: No-one forced you to click on the link. ;-)

Frank ess

unread,

Apr 22, 2009, 7:07:44 PM4/22/09

to

You got the "minor" wrong; did you read where I didn't ever look at
them? ... "never", "ever", pretty difficult to make the conversion,
eh?

Bruce

unread,

Apr 22, 2009, 7:39:22 PM4/22/09

to

"Frank ess" <fr...@fshe2fs.com> wrote:

I couldn't find "dono" in the dictionary so I gave up reading after
that. ;-)

Frank ess

unread,

Apr 22, 2009, 11:54:20 PM4/22/09

to

A freaking lie on the face of it.

Buh bye.

Bruce

unread,

Apr 23, 2009, 6:53:45 AM4/23/09

to

I couldn't find "Buh" in the dictionary so I gave up reading after
that. ;-)

John McWilliams

unread,

Apr 23, 2009, 6:13:07 PM4/23/09

to

ASAAR

unread,

Apr 23, 2009, 10:08:34 PM4/23/09

to

On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:53:45 +0100, Bruce wrote:

>>> I couldn't find "dono" in the dictionary so I gave up reading after
>>> that. ;-)
>>
>> A freaking lie on the face of it.
>>
>> Buh bye.
>
>
> I couldn't find "Buh" in the dictionary so I gave up reading
> after that. ;-)

Did you just try

For an r.p.d. lie?

The court's sympathetic.

Its verdict - a bye.

Burma Shave.

Bruce

unread,

Apr 24, 2009, 6:42:43 AM4/24/09

to

ASAAR <cau...@22.com> wrote:

Just a bye? Without a Buh?

ASAAR

unread,

Apr 24, 2009, 2:27:48 PM4/24/09

to

On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:42:43 +0100, Bruce wrote:

>>> I couldn't find "Buh" in the dictionary so I gave up reading
>>> after that. ;-)
>>
>> Did you just try
>>
>> For an r.p.d. lie?
>>
>> The court's sympathetic.
>>
>> Its verdict - a bye.
>
>
> Just a bye? Without a Buh?

Then me'd be repeating himself, bubbie.

John McWilliams

unread,

Apr 27, 2009, 5:13:30 PM4/27/09

to