Junk Yard Dog

[Dudley Hanks]

http://www.blind-apertures.ca/gallery/main.php?g2_itemId=126

Comments welcome.

--
Take Care,
Dudley

[Dudley Hanks]

"Dudley Hanks" <dha...@blind-apertures.ca> wrote in message news:...
> http://www.blind-apertures.ca/gallery/main.php?g2_itemId=126
>
> Comments welcome.
>

This is my best zoom pic to date. 50mm (80mm 35mm equiv) P&S. Not great,
but getting there.

Take Care,
Dudley

[Caesar Romano]

On Sun, 10 May 2009 06:35:20 GMT, "Dudley Hanks"
<dha...@blind-apertures.ca> wrote Re Junk Yard Dog:

>Comments welcome.

I notice that most of your shots are exposure biased +0.67EV. For most
of the front-lit shots, that looks too bright for my taste. I would
drop it to +0.33EV or even 0.0EV.

[Dudley Hanks]

"Caesar Romano" <Sp...@uce.gov> wrote in message
news:1fed051jemkqu4n7a...@4ax.com...

Thanks, Caesar, I bumped up the EC because some folks were saying my shots
lacked detail in the shadows. But, 2/3 sounds like it is a bit too much.
I'll drop it down a third for a while and see how much difference it makes.

Thanks for the comment.

Take Care,
Dudley

[whisky-dave]

"Dudley Hanks" <dha...@blind-apertures.ca> wrote in message

news:yeBNl.26358$Db2.9669@edtnps83...

I agree, in fact I'd tend to under exposure a little in your shots as shadow
detail
in a dog shot I don;t see as important his fur and body are more important.
Most seem a little over exposed to me if anything.

[Dudley Hanks]

"whisky-dave" <whisk...@final.front.ear> wrote in message
news:gu94uj$11a$1@qmul...

Thanks, Dave. Over the next week or so, I'll try a variety of EC settings
from +1/3 to -1/3 to determine just where the majority of shots come out the
best.

Take Care,
Dudley

[Bob Larter]

Dudley, it'd be nice if you could put all your links in a single post,
rather than making a new post for each one.

--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------