On 3/14/09 7:50 AM, in article
0L2dncETrY54NSbU...@supernews.com, "Larry Thong"
<larry...@shitstring.com> wrote:
> It's hard to image that "The Beast", Nikon's old 28-70/2.8 can perform so
> well on the old D3x.
>
> <http://i298.photobucket.com/albums/mm261/Ritaberk/Valley.jpg>
>
>
It's hard to imagine that was not a pinhole camera image...
True, but it was a pinhead camera image. Love to see someone (they claim)
wasting that hardware on model train sets.
On 3/14/09 10:22 AM, in article
49bbcb97$0$8382$ec3e...@news.usenetmonster.com, "bowser" <w...@tisgoing.on>
wrote:
>
> "George Kerby" <ghost_...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:C5E1315E.24A0A%ghost_...@hotmail.com...
>>
>>
>>
>> On 3/14/09 7:50 AM, in article
>> 0L2dncETrY54NSbU...@supernews.com, "Larry Thong"
>> <larry...@shitstring.com> wrote:
>>
>>> It's hard to image that "The Beast", Nikon's old 28-70/2.8 can perform so
>>> well on the old D3x.
>>>
>>> <http://i298.photobucket.com/albums/mm261/Ritaberk/Valley.jpg>
>>>
>>>
>> It's hard to imagine that was not a pinhole camera image...
>
> True, but it was a pinhead camera image.
<BFG!>
A waste, hunh? But a close-up shot of a model train would be a
perfectly legitimate entry in your new Shoot-In mandate. I may use
it.
--
Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida
Capital idea. I have no idea what I'm going to submit for the next mandate,
but it can't be of a model train since I don't have any. But I do have a
friend who builds some killer model jets. Yeah, that's it. Model jet on the
tarmac, ultra wide angle, low angle shot...?
Hand reaching down to pick it up...
--
Waddling Eagle
World Famous Flight Instructor
Yeah, too bad the picture sucked. Damn shame.
Take it however you like, Rita, you haven't changed. Still the same low-rent
troll.