Re: Going To The Other Side Of The Tracks With The D3x!!
Colin.D
> Amazingly enough things like this don't happen on our side of the
> tracks. Once you take the old D3x to the other side of the tracks all
> bets are off.
>
> <http://i298.photobucket.com/albums/mm261/Ritaberk/Tracks.jpg>
>
>
OhMyGawd!!! He's done a Polson!
Colin D.
PS: far be it from me to criticize a NIKON, but isn't the focus off a
bit? The empty track this side of the loco is the point of focus. I
would have thought the loco would be.
Nicko
> Amazingly enough things like this don't happen on our side of the tracks.
> Once you take the old D3x to the other side of the tracks all bets are off.
>
> <http://i298.photobucket.com/albums/mm261/Ritaberk/Tracks.jpg>
Wow!!
You took a snapshot of a couple of toy trains!!
Excellent!!
Thank you so much for sharing this!!
!!
--
YOP..,.
!!
Photochimper
> Amazingly enough things like this don't happen on our side of the
> tracks. Once you take the old D3x to the other side of the tracks all
> bets are off.
>
> <http://i298.photobucket.com/albums/mm261/Ritaberk/Tracks.jpg>
>
>
--
http://www.photochimper.com
A place to Chimp photos
C J Campbell
> Amazingly enough things like this don't happen on our side of the
> tracks. Once you take the old D3x to the other side of the tracks all
> bets are off.
>
> <http://i298.photobucket.com/albums/mm261/Ritaberk/Tracks.jpg>
You have an "old" D3X?
Poser. What did you really take this photo with?
--
Waddling Eagle
World Famous Flight Instructor
George Kerby
On 3/14/09 7:49 AM, in article
0L2dncYTrY54NSbU...@supernews.com, "Larry Thong"
<larry...@shitstring.com> wrote:
> Photochimper wrote:
>
>>> Amazingly enough things like this don't happen on our side of the
>>> tracks. Once you take the old D3x to the other side of the tracks all
>>> bets are off.
>>>
>>> <http://i298.photobucket.com/albums/mm261/Ritaberk/Tracks.jpg>
>>>
>>>
>> I would of got lower to enhance the size of the trains
>
> Yep, the possibilities for better composition and shooting from different
> vantage points would have been endless if that damn Plexiglas barrier wasn't
> between me and this ultimate train set. I was lucky enough to be allowed to
> get the old D3x above the top of the Plexiglas. Especially for this
> breathtaking shot.
>
> <http://i298.photobucket.com/albums/mm261/Ritaberk/Valley.jpg>
>
>
Yep, that was breath-taking: I couldn't stop laughing for almost three
minutes when I saw it. Damn, almost back to normal rhythm now, there!
Was that with a Nokia or an iPhone?
C J Campbell
> C J Campbell wrote:
>
>>> Amazingly enough things like this don't happen on our side of the
>>> tracks. Once you take the old D3x to the other side of the tracks all
>>> bets are off.
>>>
>>> <http://i298.photobucket.com/albums/mm261/Ritaberk/Tracks.jpg>
>>
>> You have an "old" D3X?
>
> And an old 17-35/2.8, 28-70/2.8, 70-200, 50/1.4 (several versions), 85/1.4,
> 105/2.8 (both versions), 200/2, 500/4 Nikkor lenses. Plus, I will
> reluctantly and shamefully admit that I have two very old DX lenses, the
> 18-200 and 12-24. There are a few more that I'm sure I forgot to mention
> since they aren't part of my daily walk around kit. Let's not forget the
> old D200 and D3 for bodies. Thanks for making me take inventory first thing
> in the morning before my first coffee. You?
12-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 70-200/2.8, 80-400, 400/2.8, 105VR/2.8, 12-24 DX,
18-200 DX, 17-55/2.8 DX, 1.7x TC, Lensbaby, 60/2.8, 12/2.8 DX fish eye,
and some other lenses I am probably forgetting. D70 (busted), D200,
D300 and D3X bodies. Four SB800, 1 SB900 strobes. R1 closeup kit.
>
>> Poser. What did you really take this photo with?
>
> You tell me?
Couldn't. You continually remove the exif information from pictures
that you post and the quality is usually so low that they could have
been taken with cell phones. Of course, I only post low resolution
pics, too, so that is not meant as a criticism.
mj
"Larry Thong" <larry...@shitstring.com> wrote in message
news:0L2dncYTrY54NSbU...@supernews.com...
> Photochimper wrote:
>
>>> Amazingly enough things like this don't happen on our side of the
>>> tracks. Once you take the old D3x to the other side of the tracks all
>>> bets are off.
>>>
>>> <http://i298.photobucket.com/albums/mm261/Ritaberk/Tracks.jpg>
>>>
>>>
>> I would of got lower to enhance the size of the trains
>
> vantage points would have been endless if that damn Plexiglas barrier
> wasn't
> between me and this ultimate train set. I was lucky enough to be allowed
> to
> get the old D3x above the top of the Plexiglas. Especially for this
> breathtaking shot.
>
> <http://i298.photobucket.com/albums/mm261/Ritaberk/Valley.jpg>
>
Paul Furman
> C J Campbell wrote:
>
>>>> ...What did you really take this photo with?
>>>
>>> You tell me?
>>
>> Couldn't. You continually remove the exif information from pictures
>> that you post and the quality is usually so low that they could have
>> been taken with cell phones. Of course, I only post low resolution
>> pics, too, so that is not meant as a criticism.
>
I'm reading this in rec.photo.EQUIPMENT.35mm so unless there's something
else you want to demonstrate, yes withholding that info kills the
discussion. Or the point is that a D3x can take web snapshots?