I've been using a TZ3 (an earlier version of the TZ5) as a backup to a
DSLR and found it reliable and capable of good image quality (considering
the size). For best results, I keep it on ISO 100 or perhaps 200. Good
for short movie clips as well. The Leica lenses on the Panasonics are
good lenses.
Cheers,
David
Ricoh. That name triggers memories :-) Was my first SLR, too. Nice
camera, sure did it's job. If I remember correctly it even had a light
meter build in. You pushed a button and a little needle would center in
a circle in the viewfinder if the exposure was right. Highly innovative
and soooooo cool.
>One thing that I'm a bit perturbed about are that these digitals have
>so many functions and features. Why perturbed? I'd rather spend
>money on image quality than on functions I don't need.
In modern times where most of functions are controlled by software
additional functions really don't cost that much extra money. Besides,
auto-focus, auto-exposure, matrix metering, adjustable ISO, ... are sure
nice things to have. Even if you decide to go all manual occasionally
for that one perfect shot, usually the automatic settings aren't all
that bad.
>What cameras have the best image quality in that price range($319.00
>in Canada).
That's a highly subjective questions where you won't get a single truth.
Check out dpreview.com, their review are quite good and the site allows
you to filter cameras by many criteria.
jue
Clair