I did these photos of this species in these two moments:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4123706152/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4123331062/
Thanks for your technical comments about photography.
--
MMYV
http://www.mmyv.com
>Hello:
>
>I did these photos of this species in these two moments:
>
>http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4123706152/
>
>http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4123331062/
>
>Thanks for your technical comments about photography.
I like these. The first one shows nicely how the fish blends into its
surroundings. I like the effect of the second one, making it look
like the fish is part of the surrounding scenery.
>On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:19:01 -0500, mmyvusenet wrote:
>
>> Hello:
>>
>> I did these photos of this species in these two moments:
>>
>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4123706152/
>
>Great illustration of it camoflage ability
Poor focus, poor exposure, poor white balance, poor composition.
>
>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4123331062/
>
>Would be nice to come back after the mall is closed
>and the background is dark.
Out of focus, poorly composed. Human bodies sticking out of the lion-fish's
head and fins. Corner of the tank makes the fish look like it is an
artificial-mount stuck on a display rod. About as attractive as a candle on
a wall sticking out of someone's head. Typical snapshooter's mistakes made
by any 6 year old with a camera in their hands. Do you people know nothing
about paying attention to details?
Due to the two vastly different light sources the lion-fish in the tank
would have had to been shot independently of the mall scene, then blended.
Or use advanced masking techniques in an attempt to repair both from one
shot.
What are you people? Rejects from Fickr's every-photo-is-fantastic
brain-dead-fan clubs?
On 11/21/09 9:19 PM, in article 7mrp10F...@mid.individual.net,
"mmyvusenet" <mmyvu...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I did these photos of this species in these two moments:
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4123706152/
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4123331062/
>
> Thanks for your technical comments about photography.
It looks cyanotic.
Hello rwalker, each moment is like you say, thanks for answer.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4104629706/
I expect to take photos about Tropical Fishes in a very soon travel to
Iquitos, Per�, where begins the Amazon River.
--
MMYV
http://www.mmyv.com
Hello, thanks for your comments, yes, It is a marine specie
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4104629706/
Also I expect to take about tropical fishes when I will be going to the
Amazon River, in Iquitos, Per�.
--
MMYV
http://www.mmyv.com
Hello, thanks for your comments, It is marine species:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4104629706/
When I will travel to Amazon River, I expect to take photos of several
species, like for example Rays when are eating.
--
MMYV
http://www.mmyv.com
On 11/23/09 2:00 PM, in article 7n088cF...@mid.individual.net,
"mmyvusenet" <mmyvu...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> "Toxic" <staring@my_hd.tv> escribi� en el mensaje
> news:pan.2009.11...@cdc.gov...
>> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:19:01 -0500, mmyvusenet wrote:
>>
>>> Hello:
>>>
>>> I did these photos of this species in these two moments:
>>>
>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4123706152/
>>
>> Great illustration of it camoflage ability
>>
>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4123331062/
>>
>> Would be nice to come back after the mall is closed
>> and the background is dark.
>
>
> Hello, thanks for your comments, yes, It is a marine specie
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4104629706/
>
You ever see what one of those does with a goldfish?
Goldfish don't usually survive long enough in salt-water for a lion-fish or
scorpion-fish to be attracted to them as food. Lion-fish and scorpion-fish
don't eat dead foods nor carrion.
Go educate yourself, you fucked-up and amazingly ignorant troll.
>
>
><http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NDBgsIs3fMI>
What do you know? The P&S troll knows about as much about fish as he
does about photography.
What do you know? Read the comments on that video. He knows more than you
can even hope to know one day.
On 11/24/09 2:52 PM, in article llhog5ti1ic38dom8...@4ax.com,
You stupid pissant piece of pussyfied stentching fantasy, I was talking
about in my aquarium, asshole!
Do us all a favor and check yourself into a resting spot on a train track
and stop producing CO2 for Al Gore's sake, OK?
On 11/24/09 4:31 PM, in article qinog5t6p5ql27fc1...@4ax.com,
You illiterate sack-o-shit, that commenter was just as full of crap as you
are about photography and ichthyology.
FYI: My "Mister Tee" has been doing well on goldfish for over four and a
half years now.
Moron.
...your nuts are so numb it's good for humanity you can't reproduce.
cg
Or electronics...
--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------
>rwalker wrote:
>> On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:44:40 -0800 (PST), -hh
>> <recscub...@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NDBgsIs3fMI>
>>
>> What do you know? The P&S troll knows about as much about fish as he
>> does about photography.
>
>Or electronics...
Bob Larter's legal name: Lionel Lauer
Home news-group, an actual group in the "troll-tracker" hierarchy:
alt.kook.lionel-lauer (established on, or before, 2004)
Registered Description: "the 'owner of several troll domains' needs a group where he'll stay on topic."
<http://groups.google.com/groups/search?hl=en&num=10&as_ugroup=alt.kook.lionel-lauer>
"Results 1 - 10 of about 2,170 for group:alt.kook.lionel-lauer."