The world could do without the Jewish industry of Filmed Prostitution (Pornography)
Love Europe, Hate the EU
(Pornography)?
Jewish Professor Says Porn Industry is a Weapon used by Jews Against
Gentiles
'Pornography': To film prostitution. Over 90% of pornographers and
porn actors are jewish.
In a respected and scholarly magazine of Jewish intellectuals, (The
Jewish Quarterly, winter 2004) Jewish professor Nathan Abrams in an
article titled, "Triple Exthnics," proudly documents the leading role
of Gentile-hating Jews in pornography.
"A story little told is that of Jews in Hollywood's seedier cousin,
the adult film industry. Perhaps we'd prefer that the 'triple
exthnics' didn't exist, but there's no getting away from the fact
that secular Jews played (and still continue to play) a
disproportionate role throughout the adult film industry in America.
Jewish involvement in pornography has a long history in the United
States, as Jews have helped transform a fringe subculture into what
has become a primary constituent of Americana. These are the 'true
blue' Jews.
Jewish activity in the porn industry divides into two (sometimes
overlapping) groups: pornographers and performers. Though Jews make
up only two per cent of the American population, they have been
prominent in pornography.
In the postwar era, America's most notorious pornographer was Reuben
Sturman, the 'Walt Disney of Porn'. According to the US Department of
Justice, throughout the 1970s Sturman controlled most of the
pornography circulating in the country. . It was said that Sturman
did not simply control the adult-entertainment industry; he was the
industry.
Many are entirely secular, Jews in name only. Sturman, however,
identified as a Jew - he was a generous donator to Jewish charities."
Abrams shows how the corruption and debasement of Gentiles and
Christian morality is a primary part of their motivation for
intentionally infecting the Gentile community with pornography.
" Is there a deeper reason, beyond the mere financial, as to why Jews
in particular have become involved in porn? Al Goldstein, the
publisher of Screw, said "The only reason that Jews are in
pornography is that we think that Christ sucks. Catholicism sucks. We
don't believe in authoritarianism." Pornography thus becomes a way of
defiling Christian culture and, as it penetrates to the very heart of
the American mainstream (and is no doubt consumed by those very same
WASPs), its subversive character becomes more charged. Extending the
subversive thesis, Jewish involvement in the X-rated industry can be
seen as a proverbial two fingers to the entire WASP establishment in
America."
Image: blond girl being thrown naked out of a battered van.
http://img18.imageshack.us/img18/4649/antiporn.jpg
Opposition to Jewish extremist subversion of Gentile, Christian or
Muslim morality is frequently defined as anti-Semitic "hatred" in the
Jewish dominated media. Abrams writing in a Jewish journal for a
presumably Jewish audience writes matter-of-factly about the
"atavistic hatred" against us by Jewish pornographers and their
motivation to "weaken the dominant culture in America by moral
subversion."
"Jewish involvement in porn, by this argument, is the result of an
atavistic hatred of Christian authority: they are trying to weaken
the dominant culture in America by moral subversion. Astyr remembers
having "to run or fight for it in grammar school because I was a Jew.
It could very well be that part of my porn career is an 'up yours' to
these people."
Obviously, there are no articles in the mainstream media exposing
Jewish "atavistic hatred" against Gentiles by the promoters of
pornographic depravity. Abrams even goes on to talk about the roots of
this revolutionary Jewish attack on European values.
" Jews were also at the vanguard of the sexual revolution of the
1960s. Wilhelm Reich, Herbert Marcuse and Paul Goodman replaced Marx,
Trotsky and Lenin as required revolutionary reading. Pacheco was one
Jewish porn star who read Reich's intellectual marriage of Freud and
Marx. In light of the relatively tolerant Jewish view of sex, why are
we ashamed of the Jewish role in the porn industry? We might not like
it, but the Jewish role in this field has been significant and it is
about time it was written about seriously."
Notice that all those mentioned: Reich, Marcuse, Goodman, Marx,
Trotsky, Lenin and Freud are Jews. From Freud to Goodman, all
represent a Jewish revolution against traditional European values and
morality.
When sick Jewish pornographers are part of the brutality of Jewish
organized crime, the results can obviously be horrifically tragic for
our people. In 2000, a Jewish "Russian" organized crime ring was
uncovered that specialized in kidnapping Russian children, some as
young as two years old, from parks and orphanages and then subjecting
them to rape, torture and murder, all on video tape. These tapes were
sold to thousands of Jewish and Gentile perverts all over the world.
When police in Italy were frustrated by lack of action by the
authorities they released some of the video footage to an Italian
network which then showed some of the graphic images hoping to cause
public outrage. Instead of outrage against the Jewish murderers the
TV producers suffered outrage for showing the disturbing images.
In spite of the horror and obvious newsworthiness of this
international Jewish child porn/murder operation, it received little
coverage in the media in the United States. When Seth Bekenstein, the
ring's American distributor was arrested, there was little publicity,
and in spite of being a part of one of the most horrific criminal
activities imaginable, he was sentenced to only 18 months on guilty
plea.
Porn is no longer 1950s pictures of voluptuous nude women on a
deserted beach. It has become permeated with sadism, masochism,
scatology, even sexual molestation, rape and murder of young
children. I am no prude. I love the beauty of the human body. But, I
do think that this kind of sick criminal activity, in which there is
so much exploitation, so much degradation, so much catering to the
depths of human depravity, should be fought with constitutional law.
Ironically, with Jewish influence over media, societal mores, and
government today, it is legal, even chic to make and sell the sickest
pornography showing the sick defilement of women. But, if you have
unacceptable political opinions about Jewish supremacism, you may
find yourself a political and social pariah, or at worst in prison.
We live in a Zionist world where often the sickest porn is legal
while political incorrect opinions will land you in prison.
Some protagonists of the sex ‘industry’
The first ever porno mag - Playboy
Hugh Heffner (Jewish)
Famous pornographer who was honored by the ADL with its ridiculous
"Torch of Freedom" award. Sexcetera is made by Playboy TV.
The second ever porno mag – Hustler
Larry Flint (Jew). Paralyzed by a white nationalists riflr bullet in
protest at puting together negros and white women in porn scenes.
‘Page Three’3
Breasts were introduced under the front flap of British newspapers
(turning us all into scuttling perverts like them) in 1970 in half-Jew
Rupert Murdoch's The Sun newspaper, the idea of Murdoch's Jewish
editor Larry Lamb. The first page 3 girl was Jewish "German" model
Stephenie Rahn.
Ann Summers
Owned by the jewish Gold brothers, Ralph and David. They also own 50%
of Jew David Sullivan's Sunday/Daily Sport Newspapers. The managing
director of Ann Summers is David Gold's daughter, Jacqueline. She is
"the astute businesswoman who created the Ann Summers parties based on
the Tupperware parties."
The Joy of Sex book
written by jewish author Alex Comfort
http://www.jewishachievement.com/domains/word.html
Telephone Sex Lines
These are those late night adverts where women are paraded like sex
slaves and beckon you to talk to them via a premium rate phone number.
The inventor of telephone sex lines is Gloria Leonard. Miss Leonard
often refers to herself as "A nice Jewish girl from the Bronx."
Lap dancing
Peter Stringfellow (Jew) Introduced lap dancing to Britain.
Spearmint Rhino
The Starbucks of brothels, Owned by convicted jewish frauster john
gray. The chain's flagship London club was the first in the UK to
offer fully nude dancing, prompting a "dirty war" with its main rival
Stringfellow's, which at the time was topless-only.
The ubiquitous Hollywood ‘Sex Scene’
You know the feeling, you are watching a film, it could be a drama, an
action movie, a thriller, a comedy, a horror or anything, you are with
your friends, parents, girlfriend, boyfriend, boyfriend’s parents etc
when an uneasy silence falls over the room as the writhing and gasping
of a soft porn scene suddenly and inexplicably appears in the middle
of the film. Jews control Hollywood as they control porn and that is
something you should Google. Check out the name list at the bottom of
this post and then see the credits of any movie.
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-stein19-2008dec19,0,4676183.column
Arther Miller
Author of depraved novels
"Dr" Ruth. so-called sex-therapist (Jew).
They Live: Who are the Jews?
While this list may never be complete, it will cover most of the
Jewish names one is likely to encounter in everyday Western life.
Unlike many gentile names, there is such a thing as a 'Jewish name.'
Many Jewish persons can be recognized as being Jewish by their surname
[last name], although not always--some Jews are adopted, or their
forebears changed the family surname, or their surname simply does not
appear Jewish.
Here are the most common Jewish names likely to be encountered:
-Names ending in "-berg" (Goldberg, Weinberg, etc.)
-Names ending in "-man" (Goldman, Lightman, etc.)
-Names ending in "-stein" (Einstein, Perlstein, etc.)
-Names that sound "precious" (Gold, Silver, Diamond, Ruby (Rubenstein)
etc.)
-Names ending in "-ler" (Adler, Midler, etc.)
-Names ending in "-ner" (Asner, Lardner, etc.)
-Names ending in "-lin" (Gitlin, Sheindlin, etc.)
-Names ending in "-band" (Miliband, Goldband, etc.)
-Names ending in "-witz" (Horowitz, Rabinowitz, etc.) or "-
itz" (Kravitz, etc.)
-Names ending in "-baum" (Teitelbaum, Metzenbaum, etc.)
-Names ending in "-off" (Chartoff, Berkhoff, etc.)
-Names ending in "-nik" (Resnik, Mitnik, etc.)
-Names ending in "-thal" (Blumenthal, Rosenthal, etc.)
-Names ending in "-ling" (Spelling, Sperling, etc.)
-Names ending in "-sky" (Barshefsky, Linsky, etc.)
-Names ending in "-farb" (Himmelfarb, Goldfarb, etc.)
-Names ending in "-feld" (Seinfeld, Rosenfeld, etc.)
-Names ending in "-stone" (Wellstone, Firestone, etc.)
-Some, but certainly not all, names ending in "-son" (Abelson,
Josephson, etc.)
-Surnames that sound "Biblical," e.g., David, Joseph, Abram or
Abraham, Moses, Benjamin, Isaac, etc.
Some other common Jewish names:
-Miller -Davis -Ross -Lewis -Roth -Morris -Davidson -Green -Wolf -
Newman -Gross -Harris -Sherman -Myers -Mayer -Jacobs -Aaron -Michael -
Hirsch -Raphael -Tobias -Levy -Brand -Cohen -Kaplan -Weiss -Nathan -
Leo -Levine -Simon -Levin -Samuel -Falk -Wise -Gottfried -Gottlieb -
Mann -Mathis -May -Mars -Marx -Marks -Saul -Gould -Fink -Loeb -Loew -
Rubin -Stern -Shapiro -Klein -Cohn -Singer -Frank -Schwartz -Rich -
Kahn -Kramer
Ray Fischer
>Could the nation do without the Jewish industry of Filmed Prostitution
More neonazi anti-semitism.
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net
Twibil
wrote:
>
>
> Could the nation do without the Jewish industry of Filmed Prostitution
> (Pornography)?
That's odd: I'm reasonably certain that Carrie Prejean isn't Jewish,
and that before her home-made masturbation video surfaced she was in
fact acting as a far-right-wing propagandist much like yourself.
Always remember folks: you can't spell "propagandist" without "pagan".
The Correction Police
spewed their ignorance thusly:
>
>Always remember folks: you can't spell "propagandist" without "pagan".
Except that "Pagan" in the strictest sense only means non-christian,
non-jewish, non-muslim today. All other belief systems in the world are
Pagan. Even Atheists in the strictest sense are Pagan. That leaves all
non-Pagans in the minority, if it is numbers you seek as proof to which
imaginary one-true-god to choose for your psychotic worship.
(OED = Oxford English Dictionary. The highly acclaimed reference source to
the English Language)
Pagan Definition - OED v2: [ad. L. pagan-us, orig. 'villager, rustic;
civilian, non-militant', opposed to m_les 'soldier, one of the army', in
christian L. (Tertullian, Augustine) 'heathen' as opposed to christian or
jewish. The christians called themselves m_lites 'enrolled soldiers' of
christ, members of his militant church, and applied to non-christians the
term applied by soldiers to all who were 'not enrolled in the army'.
1. One of a nation or community which does not hold to the non-nature-based
(unnatural) christian religion, or does not worship a christian god; a
heathen (i.e. 'dweller on the heath'). In earlier use practically =
non-christian, and so including muslims and, sometimes, jews.
Yes, even muslims and jews can be considered "Pagan".
The definition in OED v3 has since been edited to just say, "Anyone who
does not worship the One True God." Or something almost exactly the same as
that, I can't quote it verbatim since I deleted v3 from all my computers.
Even biased christian hypocrites have their hand in editing authoritative
reference books today to leave out important information and twist the
remaining information to what they wish it might mean or say. We know
they've reinterpreted their bible from its fictional beginnings many times,
but now they are even editing classic reference books on the english
language itself to present their misguided and biased ignorance -- pure
propagandists in the strictest sense. Oxymoronic in that they are the very
ones who invented the term Pagan to try to belittle anyone not like them.
Much like "hick" and "hillbilly" is used today by the insecure and
frightened wealthy who are afraid of anyone that reminds them of being
poor.
OED v3 having since been deleted from my HDDs, I'll still refer to v2 that
has some facts and truth still left in it, until ignorant and insecure
christian bigot editors got hold of it and destroyed any of its credibility
whatsoever in v3.
John McWilliams
> On Sun, 8 Nov 2009 12:28:47 -0800 (PST), Twibil <noway...@gmail.com>
> spewed their ignorance thusly:
That'd be "his".......
>
>> Always remember folks: you can't spell "propagandist" without "pagan".
>
> Except that "Pagan" in the strictest sense only means non-christian,
> non-jewish, non-muslim today.
Huh. It's customary to capitalize major religions, but I'd expect you to
not conform to that.
For many, 'pagan' means anything they don't embrace.
--
john mcwilliams
The Correction Police
wrote:
When you display the common-courtesy, consideration, and respect that all
Pagans deserve by capitalizing their title, then I might start to
capitalize the titles of the belittling and insecure religions that show
nothing but disrespect to all others. You are nothing but a contemptible
and reprehensible humans until then. Not deserving of having your beliefs
capitalized in print nor even recognized as a valid belief system. You get
back exactly what you give to all others. It's only fair.
The Correction Police
wrote:
>The Correction Police wrote:
>> On Sun, 8 Nov 2009 12:28:47 -0800 (PST), Twibil <noway...@gmail.com>
>> spewed their ignorance thusly:
>
>That'd be "his".......
>>
That'd be "his" if you were sure of their gender. There is no indication
nor guarantee of "Twibil"'s gender in their written words, nor anyone
else's online, therefore you cannot use "his" nor "her" with certainty. The
plural possessive pronoun "their" has been adopted in contemporary English
as the neuter form which never existed in English before but was always
needed. One of the few languages which has always been lacking in this
regard compared to most all other languages.
The Correction Police
wrote:
>The Correction Police wrote:
When you display the common-courtesy, consideration, and respect that all
Pagans deserve by capitalizing their title, then I might start to
capitalize the titles of the belittling and insecure religions that show
nothing but disrespect to all others. You are nothing but a contemptible
and reprehensible human until then. Not deserving of having your beliefs
John McWilliams
> On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 16:04:42 -0800, John McWilliams <jp...@comcast.net>
> wrote:
>
>> The Correction Police wrote:
>>> On Sun, 8 Nov 2009 12:28:47 -0800 (PST), Twibil <noway...@gmail.com>
>>> spewed their ignorance thusly:
>> That'd be "his".......
>
> That'd be "his" if you were sure of their gender.
That'd be "his" regardless of gender.
> There is no indication
> nor guarantee of "Twibil"'s gender in their written words, nor anyone
> else's online, therefore you cannot use "his" nor "her" with certainty. The
> plural possessive pronoun "their" has been adopted in contemporary English
> as the neuter form which never existed in English before but was always
> needed. One of the few languages which has always been lacking in this
> regard compared to most all other languages.
Neuters aside, "his" has long been recognized as both the singular
masuline and the non-gender singular possessive.
"Their" is more common on usenet today, and I wouldn't have noted it but
for your show of erudition.
--
lsmft
The Correction Police
wrote:
The use of "his" when the person being referenced is female, shows nothing
but disrespect to the female, if that is the case. This is why "their" is
commonly adopted today, rather than the more archaic, more disrespectful,
more error-prone, and wholly chauvinistic "his" when you are uncertain of
their gender.
Not unlike those who think their "god" is always masculine. Showing total
disrespect to all those that favor a female God.
You're not too "with it", are you.
Twibil
>
>
> >Always remember folks: you can't spell "propagandist" without "pagan".
>
> Except that "Pagan" in the strictest sense only means non-christian,
> non-jewish, non-muslim today.
Can you self-correct for your own "whoose"?
(Rhetorical question.)
Twibil
>
>
> You're not too "with it", are you.
Well, so far he's got *you* beat.
The Correction Police
wrote:
Not true, because he's the one who started to nitpick troll about my having
used "their" as the proper singular non-gender possessive pronoun in common
and more correct use today. I was only correcting his nitpick trolls'
stupidity. As I am now doing for you, for both of you useless trolls.
John McWilliams
> The use of "his" when the person being referenced is female, shows nothing
> but disrespect to the female, if that is the case.
Some females will take offense, yes, but usually those with limited
education. Similarly, men I know who care about proper language are not
in the least disrespectful towards women when they use proper grammar.
> This is why "their" is
> commonly adopted today, rather than the more archaic, more disrespectful,
> more error-prone, and wholly chauvinistic "his" when you are uncertain of
> their gender.
You really are soooo PC! Such a gentleman for defending the female sex
from chauvinism!
> Not unlike those who think their "god" is always masculine. Showing total
> disrespect to all those that favor a female God.
To many, God is neither sex.
--
lsmft
The Correction Police
wrote:
>The Correction Police wrote:
>
>> The use of "his" when the person being referenced is female, shows nothing
>> but disrespect to the female, if that is the case.
>
>Some females will take offense, yes, but usually those with limited
>education.
LOL!
Holy fuck, are you EVER a chauvinistic and disrespectful PIG.
I feel filthy just trying to educate you to the aspects of respect and
disrespect.
LOL!!!!!
"Never wrastle with a pig. You only end up covered in pig's filth and the
PIG has all the fun."
LOL!!!!!!!!
John McWilliams
> On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 21:05:58 -0800, John McWilliams <jp...@comcast.net>
> wrote:
>
>> The Correction Police wrote:
>>
>>> The use of "his" when the person being referenced is female, shows nothing
>>> but disrespect to the female, if that is the case.
>> Some females will take offense, yes, but usually those with limited
>> education.
>
> LOL!
>
> Holy fuck, are you EVER a chauvinistic and disrespectful PIG.
I knew you were an unhappy gal , so do go and fly a kite!
--
lsmft
The Correction Police
wrote:
>The Correction Police wrote:
>> On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 21:05:58 -0800, John McWilliams <jp...@comcast.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The Correction Police wrote:
>>>
>>>> The use of "his" when the person being referenced is female, shows nothing
>>>> but disrespect to the female, if that is the case.
>>> Some females will take offense, yes, but usually those with limited
>>> education.
>>
>> LOL!
>>
>> Holy fuck, are you EVER a chauvinistic and disrespectful PIG.
>
>I knew you were an unhappy gal , so do go and fly a kite!
Wrongo Piggo Bukco! I'm one of the more masculine and secure men on this
planet. Regularly making venison roasts for dinner. In fact there's a
venison roast in the oven as I type. Freshly dressed just a day ago.
LOL
You fuckingly useless and insecure male PIG. You're a disgrace to anything
that's male.
ROFLMAO!!!!!
John McWilliams
> On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 21:38:08 -0800, John McWilliams <jp...@comcast.net>
> wrote:
>
>> The Correction Police wrote:
>>> On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 21:05:58 -0800, John McWilliams <jp...@comcast.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The Correction Police wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The use of "his" when the person being referenced is female, shows nothing
>>>>> but disrespect to the female, if that is the case.
>>>> Some females will take offense, yes, but usually those with limited
>>>> education.
>>> LOL!
>>>
>>> Holy fuck, are you EVER a chauvinistic and disrespectful PIG.
>> I knew you were an unhappy gal , so do go and fly a kite!
>
> Wrongo Pi
Sorry, but you're a pompous and cowardly nym-shifting twit.
--
lsmft
The Correction Police
wrote:
That's going to be your only excuse for being an insecure PIG?
LOL
Go for it!
LOL!!!!!!!!!
You fuckingly useless waste of flesh.
ROFLMAO!!
Twibil
>
>
> Not true, because he's the one who started to nitpick troll about my having
> used "their" as the proper singular non-gender possessive pronoun in common
> and more correct use today. I was only correcting his nitpick trolls'
> stupidity. As I am now doing for you, for both of you useless trolls.
Bullshit, pussylips.
You're simply another sad little anti-semite who's trying to distract
attention from the fact that (A) Jews don't run the porn industry,
that (B) the Nazi-wanna-be OP (probably you) made a fool of himself by
claiming that they do, and that (C) I helped him along in that
direction by pointing out that "good Christian girls" are just as
likely to be found in porn as anyone else.
Now go have a nice Zyklon B shower and try to pretend that you fooled
someone and that your life is somehow worthwhile.
The Correction Police
wrote:
>The Correction Police wrote:
>> On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 21:05:58 -0800, John McWilliams <jp...@comcast.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The Correction Police wrote:
>>>
>>>> The use of "his" when the person being referenced is female, shows nothing
>>>> but disrespect to the female, if that is the case.
>>> Some females will take offense, yes, but usually those with limited
>>> education.
>>
>> LOL!
>>
>> Holy fuck, are you EVER a chauvinistic and disrespectful PIG.
>
>I knew you were an unhappy gal , so do go and fly a kite!
Wrongo Piggo Bucko! I'm one of the more masculine and secure men on this
Twibil
>
>
> Sorry, but you're a pompous and cowardly nym-shifting twit.
Why be sorry? You called it quite accurately.
The Correction Police
wrote:
>On Nov 8, 7:41�pm, The Correction Police <t...@facts.org> wrote:
Wow, are you ever demented. Lost on your conspiracy theories. Better check
the seams in you aluminum cap. Apparently some aren't sealed too tightly.
Try the "Alcoa" brand of aluminum. I hear (reported by other psychotics
like you) that it works the best.
Damn, I guess this is what happens after you've disproved all their other
DLSLR-Trolls' nonsense.
The Correction Police
wrote:
>On Nov 8, 9:53�pm, John McWilliams <jp...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Sorry, but you're a pompous and cowardly nym-shifting twit.
>
>Why be sorry? You called it quite accurately.
Twibil
>
>
> Wow, are you ever demented. Lost on your conspiracy theories. Better check
> the seams in you aluminum cap. Apparently some aren't sealed too tightly.
> Try the "Alcoa" brand of aluminum. I hear (reported by other psychotics
> like you) that it works the best.
Heh! So you just randomly jumped into a rabidly anti-semitic thread to
start a flame war over nothing......and then claim that it's the other
posters who are unbalanced.
Good one!
Back under your bridge now, little troll, or we release the
billygoats.
(This gives you the perfect opportunity to post that one more reply
which will convince you -and alas, *only* you- that you've "won"
something, while still allowing you to ignore the fact that people are
refusing to play your game. Of course you could prove me wrong by
simply not posting another reply.... Heh.)
The Correction Police
wrote:
> while still allowing you to ignore the fact that people are
>refusing to play your game. Of course you could prove me wrong by
>simply not posting another reply.... Heh.)
What a load of crap. A typical TROLL's gambit.
Thanks for proving to all the world EXACTLY what you are.
The Correction Police
wrote:
> while still allowing you to ignore the fact that people are
>refusing to play your game. Of course you could prove me wrong by
>simply not posting another reply.... Heh.)
What a load of crap. A typical TROLL's gambit.
Thanks for proving to all the world EXACTLY what you are.
Now ... how about those DSLRs that I'll trash because you don't even know
how to use them. To get back on topic.
rwalker
One more asshole for the kill file. I don't care what your religion
is, you are just a jerk.
The Correction Police
Stick your fingers in your ears and hum a tune. Your methods and motives
for self-induced ignorance are already well known by those courageous
enough to approach reality with a bold spirit. Enjoy poking your own eyes
out. The quickest and least invested path to bliss -- self-induced
ignorance. The mainstay of every last fucked-up religion on earth invented
by the weakest-spirited mindless moronic masses. Consider yourself their
leader.
John McWilliams
Heh. Foam on, game over.
--
john mcwilliams