Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Review: Nikon D3s
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Chronicle
Jan 6, 2010, 3:29:42 PM1/6/10
to
(End User) - I'd say I know the ins-and-outs of the Nikon D3 pretty well -- after all, I've taken more than 200,000 photos with one. And I knew that Nikon had a big problem: The camera is so darned good, how do you make it better, especially with an incremental upgrade? The D3 isn't perfection -- the AF sensors are too closely grouped, the default white balance is a little too cool, the AF sensors are too closely grouped -- but, as you can see from my struggling, it's generally close enough. If you can't do most jobs really well with a D3, it's probably your fault, not the camera's. So how do you convince people to buy something more expensive?...
Continued: http://xrl.us/NikonD3s
Ray Fischer
Jan 6, 2010, 10:42:01 PM1/6/10
to
Chronicle <Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
>(End User) - I'd say I know the ins-and-outs of the Nikon D3 pretty well -- after all, I've taken more than
>200,000 photos with one. And I knew that Nikon had a big problem: The camera is so darned good, how do you make
>(End User) - I'd say I know the ins-and-outs of the Nikon D3 pretty well -- after all, I've taken more than
>200,000 photos with one. And I knew that Nikon had a big problem: The camera is so darned good, how do you make
Another paid ad.
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net
Dur
Jan 6, 2010, 11:55:42 PM1/6/10
to
(End User) - I'd say I know the ins-and-outs of the Nikon
D3 pretty well -- after all, I've taken more than 200,000
photos with one. And I knew that Nikon had a big problem:
D3 pretty well -- after all, I've taken more than 200,000
photos with one. And I knew that Nikon had a big problem:
0 new messages