Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Pentax mirrorless K-01 announced

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Bruce

unread,
Feb 2, 2012, 9:56:48 AM2/2/12
to
The new Pentax mirrorless offering is the K-01. It has a 16 MP sensor
and a body shaped by Australian designer Mark Newson.

Alone among mirrorless cameras it adopts, unchanged, the mount of the
company's DSLR system. So there won't be any need for adapters - you
just mount your existing Pentax K mount lenses and off you go!

Image quality should be very good as the sensor is the same Sony-made
CMOS device as in the excellent K-5 DSLR and also the Sony NEX-5N.

<http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/news/pentax_launches_iconic_16mp_k01_uk_price_news_311302.html>
<http://www.dpreview.com/news/2012/02/02/Pentax_K-01_announcement>

Apparently the Pentax Q mirrorless system will continue to be
available. However, I wonder if any of those are still being
manufactured given their very slow sales.

Mike

unread,
Feb 2, 2012, 10:59:05 AM2/2/12
to
On 02/02/2012 9:56 AM, Bruce wrote:
> The new Pentax mirrorless offering is the K-01. It has a 16 MP sensor
> and a body shaped by Australian designer Mark Newson.
>
> Alone among mirrorless cameras it adopts, unchanged, the mount of the
> company's DSLR system. So there won't be any need for adapters - you
> just mount your existing Pentax K mount lenses and off you go!
>
I am not sure if a M42 screwmount will mount, Pentax did a pretty good
job with that in the past.


--
Mike

Just Me

unread,
Feb 2, 2012, 12:54:28 PM2/2/12
to
K01 = DOA

Apteryx

unread,
Feb 2, 2012, 4:09:26 PM2/2/12
to
On 3/02/2012 6:54 a.m., Just Me wrote:
> K01 = DOA

I was going with Pentax - KO'd

Apteryx

Apteryx

unread,
Feb 2, 2012, 4:27:59 PM2/2/12
to
On 3/02/2012 3:56 a.m., Bruce wrote:
> The new Pentax mirrorless offering is the K-01. It has a 16 MP sensor
> and a body shaped by Australian designer Mark Newson.
>
> Alone among mirrorless cameras it adopts, unchanged, the mount of the
> company's DSLR system. So there won't be any need for adapters - you
> just mount your existing Pentax K mount lenses and off you go!

I'd say rather that it has its adapter built in and not removable or
replaceable with other adapters. They have taken out the mirror, but
left the mirror box!

> Image quality should be very good as the sensor is the same Sony-made
> CMOS device as in the excellent K-5 DSLR and also the Sony NEX-5N.

Indeed it should. This is in effect a defective K5 stuck permanently in
Live View. It is about $400 cheaper than a K5, but I think I would want
a bigger discount than that for a K5 with that defect. In fact I can't
imagine paying anything for a K5 with that defect.

Apteryx
Message has been deleted

Rich

unread,
Feb 2, 2012, 9:19:48 PM2/2/12
to
Bruce <docne...@gmail.com> wrote in
news:3g8li75lqak7bjsmi...@4ax.com:
It's pointless. A mirrorless system with a registration distance the
same as their DSLR!!!!

Bruce

unread,
Feb 3, 2012, 5:20:20 AM2/3/12
to
I agree that, technically, it seems pointless. It's a Pentax DSLR
with the mirror box but no mirror. Must have been cheap to develop.

The question is, will it sell? It won't sell many lenses!

RichA

unread,
Feb 3, 2012, 8:22:16 AM2/3/12
to
On Feb 3, 5:20 am, Bruce <docnews2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Rich <n...@nowhere.com> wrote:
> >Bruce <docnews2...@gmail.com> wrote in
Plus, the whole idea of mirrorless, that by nature (and adapters)
allows the mounting of all kinds of lenses does serve to attract
buyers who already own other systems than the one being offered. With
Pentax, that is not going to be the case. They are "preaching to the
choir" and it's a small choir.

Bob G

unread,
Feb 3, 2012, 1:14:04 PM2/3/12
to
Those idiots who buy it will regret throwing their money away as soon
as the KO2 shows up with a viewfinder. I give it two months.

Peter Chant

unread,
Feb 9, 2012, 7:33:32 PM2/9/12
to
Rich wrote:

>
> It's pointless. A mirrorless system with a registration distance the
> same as their DSLR!!!!

I don't think it would be pointless if they could make one the size of an
ME-Super etc. One would have hoped that DSLRs (or mirrorless) would shrink
down to that size over time.

Pete

--
http://www.petezilla.co.uk
0 new messages