Graham
<JRIC...@satx.rr.com> wrote in message
news:vHW_b.410$19....@fe2.texas.rr.com...
<JRIC...@satx.rr.com> wrote in message
news:vHW_b.410$19....@fe2.texas.rr.com...
So set the camera at ISO 1000 and get the lens with the fastest lens I can?
I don't think a 180mm lens is long enough though for the shots I am used to
getting.
BTW, I understand with film that each rated film can take pictures with a
set range of light and shutter speeds. How can a digital camera with one
light detection device (whatever it's called) be set to multiple ISO
ratings? And why does the lowest ISO rating for the D100 stop at 200, I
believe? Does it need that much more light then a simple throw away camera
that uses ISO 100 film? Thanks again for the response!!
"gsum" <gs...@baesyst.com> wrote in message
news:403c52bb$1...@baen1673807.greenlnk.net...
<JRIC...@satx.rr.com> wrote in
news:5u1%b.2138$l86....@fe1.texas.rr.com:
dSLRs are able to achieve variable ISO settings as the signals from
the CCD elements can be amplified to varying degrees. High amplification
of a weak signal causes noise to become more apparent. Noise is
not a problem with the D100 below ISO 1000 and is acceptable
at ISO 1600.
The minimum ISO of 200 was a real oversight and is the only significant
fault in the D100. It is difficult to select a very slow speed on a bright
day, if you want to blur action, due to the high minimum ISO setting.
I'm not sure what the aperture of a throw-away camera is but I doubt
that it would be more than f5.6 or f8.
Graham
<JRIC...@satx.rr.com> wrote in message
news:5u1%b.2138$l86....@fe1.texas.rr.com...
The hockey rinks have bad lighting and I also need fast shutter speeds.
I have had good luck with ISO 1000 - 1600 between 1/125s and 1/250s with an
f3.5-4.5 lens. I just got a 70-200 mm f2.8 VR lens and can now get
excellent results at ISO 640 at 1/125s. No matter what camera you choose,
you really should check out Neat Image www.neatimage.com for a software tool
that does an amazing job of cleaning up and eliminating the noise from ISO
settings without losing picture detail.
Steve
<JRIC...@satx.rr.com> wrote in message
news:5u1%b.2138$l86....@fe1.texas.rr.com...
Dave
"Dave Bouvier" <da...@dabstudios.com> wrote in message
news:bif%b.407768$xy6.2326827@attbi_s02...
terry
--
http://www.pbase.com/tvacha/skiing
"Dave Bouvier" <da...@dabstudios.com> wrote in message
news:bif%b.407768$xy6.2326827@attbi_s02...
Of course you can. It all depends on the lens you're using.
For best results, you will definitely need top-quality glass
(i.e. expensive...)
Dave
<JRIC...@satx.rr.com> wrote in message
news:dvf%b.1698$as....@fe2.texas.rr.com...
The shots you see on the school website don't include individual shots for
security reasons. They are only a portion of what was shot that evening.
Dave
"Terry" <tva...@remove.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:dq2dnSxFBuS...@adelphia.com...
Terry
--
http://www.pbase.com/tvacha/skiing
"Dave Bouvier" <da...@dabstudios.com> wrote in message
news:Isn%b.63983$4o.86667@attbi_s52...